I don't understand your question. This functionality doesn't exist, at
least, when I tried and asked questions, I was told that it worked at
some point but then code was lost, and now it doesn't exist. Do you want
me to send you various email threads on this?
-Original Message-
From: Abu Obeida Bakhach [mailto:abu.obe...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 2:20 PM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Stonehenge
What is the problem with the current metro demo?
-Original Message-
From: Akopov, Sergei (GE Intelligent Platforms)
[mailto:sergei.ako...@ge.com]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 8:46 AM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Stonehenge
I have to say that it is disappointing that this interoperability
project could not provide a sample of interoperability between JAVA
METRO stack and the WCF. This is one of the most important use cases
that the industry really needs.
Sergei Akopov.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 9:36 PM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Retire Stonehenge
There has not been a commit to Stonehenge in about 10 months now. The
mailing list is pretty much empty except for board report reminders for
4
months. Thus, as mentor, I feel this project is not a sustainable
project
and should be retired.
Are there any objections? Does anyone feel that the above doesn't
accurately reflect the situation?
Thanks!
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com
