cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/validator/dist ApplicationResources.properties.sample

2002-02-16 Thread dwinterfeldt

dwinterfeldt02/02/16 23:13:59

  Added:   contrib/validator/dist
ApplicationResources.properties.sample
  Log:
  Default error messages associted with pluggable validators defined in 
validation-rules.xml.
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.1  
jakarta-struts/contrib/validator/dist/ApplicationResources.properties.sample
  
  Index: ApplicationResources.properties.sample
  ===
  ###
  # #
  # These are the default error messages associated with#
  # each validator in the validator-rules.xml file in this  #
  # directory.  They should be added to your projects   #
  # ApplicationResources.properties file or you can #
  # associate new ones by modifying the pluggable validators#
  # in validator-rules.xml. #
  # #
  ###
  
  # Errors
  errors.required={0} is required.
  errors.minlength={0} can not be less than {1} characters.
  errors.maxlength={0} can not be greater than {1} characters.
  errors.invalid={0} is invalid.
  
  errors.byte={0} must be an byte.
  errors.short={0} must be an short.
  errors.integer={0} must be an integer.
  errors.long={0} must be an long.
  errors.float={0} must be an float.
  errors.double={0} must be an double.
  
  errors.date={0} is not a date.
  errors.range={0} is not in the range {1} through {2}.
  errors.creditcard={0} is not a valid credit card number.
  errors.email={0} is an invalid e-mail address.
  
  
  
  

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: Workflow/Pageflow proposal

2002-02-16 Thread Martin Cooper

The workflow proposal originally made here is currently being developed in
Jakarta Commons. The goal is to make the workflow framework as generic as
possible, and therefore independent of specific projects such as Struts,
while making it simple to integrate with them.

It would be great if you could take a look at what's going on in Commons and
perhaps contribute your work there in such a way that Struts users (amongst
others) could make use of the end result.

Thanks!

--
Martin Cooper


- Original Message -
From: "Paul Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:24 PM
Subject: Workflow/Pageflow proposal


Ted,

I have a design put together for a pretty significant upgrade to the struts
framework which would meet the needs of the workflow requirements. I have
set up the struts framework and have started a build structure in the
contrib folder on my local machine. However, this is a major change, and I
was wondering if I should run it past the group first. I thought it up a
year or two ago and just recently decided to graft it onto the struts
framework instead of starting my own. I have read the workflow proposal on
the web and believe that my design would meet and exceed it in a number of
ways. So what do you think? Should I attempt to layout the design on paper
for the group (probably take me a while), or build it and then show
everybody?

Thanks,
Paul


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: Broken link on the site...

2002-02-16 Thread Martin Cooper

This is looking very good, Ted. I like the new structure.

A couple of things:

1) I can't figure out how to get to the taglib documentation for Struts
1.0.2. For the nightly build, these links are part of the menu in the User
Guide, but they're not there for Struts 1.0.2.

2) In the nightly build User Guide, the Developer Guides link for Nested
Tags is broken. This may just be an artifact of the way you updated the
site, though, since it looks like there is a package summary file in CVS.

3) The Wish List (which I assume used to be the ToDo list) seems to have
lost much of its formatting. The headings are gone, as are the table
structure and the indications of who has volunteered to help with what.

These points aside, I'm seeing big improvements!

--
Martin Cooper


- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: Broken link on the site...


> Done.
>
> Martin Cooper wrote:
> >
> > Stable Release (1.0.2)
> > Welcome  <--- This is what I'm suggesting we add
> > User Guide
> > Javadoc
> > Release Notes
> > Installation
> >
> > I found one *very* minor typo on the News page - there's a period
missing
> > after the second "here" link in the item about the Struts 1.0.2 release.
> >
> > Also, since I happened to have just built up a list of doc bugs to fix
(but
> > hadn't started on them), I notice that there are also 6318 and 5991. It
> > looks like you may have fixed 6318, but I didn't see Bugzilla updates
for
> > either, so I just wanted to mention them, while you're in there.
> >
> > --
> > Martin Cooper
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:

> For additional commands, e-mail:

>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: Broken link on the site...

2002-02-16 Thread Ted Husted

Done.

Martin Cooper wrote:
> 
> Stable Release (1.0.2)
> Welcome  <--- This is what I'm suggesting we add
> User Guide
> Javadoc
> Release Notes
> Installation
> 
> I found one *very* minor typo on the News page - there's a period missing
> after the second "here" link in the item about the Struts 1.0.2 release.
> 
> Also, since I happened to have just built up a list of doc bugs to fix (but
> hadn't started on them), I notice that there are also 6318 and 5991. It
> looks like you may have fixed 6318, but I didn't see Bugzilla updates for
> either, so I just wanted to mention them, while you're in there.
> 
> --
> Martin Cooper

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5991] - Additional Item for JRun Install Notes

2002-02-16 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5991

Additional Item for JRun Install Notes

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6318] - documentation enhancement request

2002-02-16 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6318

documentation enhancement request

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
Summary|documentation enhancement   |documentation enhancement
   |request |request
Version|0.5 Final   |1.0 Beta 1

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: Broken link on the site...

2002-02-16 Thread Martin Cooper

Looks good.

The only thing that confused me a little was that, when I clicked on the
User Guide link for Struts 1.0.2, it took me to the 1.0.2 Welcome page,
where I had to click on another User Guide page to get to the user guide
itself.

Could we perhaps have the User Guide link on the main page go directly to
the Struts 1.0.2 User Guide proper, and maybe add a "Welcome" link as the
first link in the Stable Release (1.0.2) section of the menu that goes to
the 1.0.2 Welcome page? In other words, the Stable Release section of the
menu would look like:

Stable Release (1.0.2)
Welcome  <--- This is what I'm suggesting we add
User Guide
Javadoc
Release Notes
Installation

I found one *very* minor typo on the News page - there's a period missing
after the second "here" link in the item about the Struts 1.0.2 release.

Also, since I happened to have just built up a list of doc bugs to fix (but
hadn't started on them), I notice that there are also 6318 and 5991. It
looks like you may have fixed 6318, but I didn't see Bugzilla updates for
either, so I just wanted to mention them, while you're in there.

--
Martin Cooper


- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: Broken link on the site...


> OK. I haven't checked the changes into the CVS, but I have updated the
> Website along the lines that we've been discussing. I didn't actually
> break it into two apps, since it seems to be OK as it is.
>
> Things to do:
>
> + Finish linking the installation pages on the UserGuide TOC.
> + Put in a referring page for /release-notes.html to
> userGuide/release-notes.html
> + Flesh out the new Newbie FAQ
> + Bring the release notes current
>
> The overall tree is
>
>
> /
> index.xml
> news_2002.xml
> news_2001.xml
> kickstart.xml
> newbie.xml
> resources.xml
> volunteers.xml
>
>
> /proposals/
> ./todo-1.1.xml
> ./workflow.xml
> ...
>
> with everything else being under userGuide, including the tag XMLs.
>
> If this looks good to everyone, I'll finish up and check in the CVS
> changes.
>
> -Ted.
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I'm a bit puzzled as to what happened as well. Somewhere along the line,
> > the Javadoc link reverted to the nightly builds too.
> >
> > In any case, I'm +1 on your proposed changes.
> >
> > --
> > Martin Cooper
> >
> > At 04:14 AM 2/15/02, Ted Husted wrote:
> > >I'm not exactly sure what happened there, but if there are no
> > >objections, I'll proceed along the lines outlined here:
> > >
> > >http://www.mail-archive.com/struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg04760.html
> > >
> > >-Ted.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:

> For additional commands, e-mail:

>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: Broken link on the site...

2002-02-16 Thread Ted Husted

OK. I haven't checked the changes into the CVS, but I have updated the
Website along the lines that we've been discussing. I didn't actually
break it into two apps, since it seems to be OK as it is. 

Things to do:

+ Finish linking the installation pages on the UserGuide TOC.
+ Put in a referring page for /release-notes.html to
userGuide/release-notes.html
+ Flesh out the new Newbie FAQ
+ Bring the release notes current

The overall tree is 


/
index.xml
news_2002.xml
news_2001.xml
kickstart.xml
newbie.xml
resources.xml
volunteers.xml


/proposals/
./todo-1.1.xml
./workflow.xml
...

with everything else being under userGuide, including the tag XMLs.

If this looks good to everyone, I'll finish up and check in the CVS
changes. 

-Ted.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> I'm a bit puzzled as to what happened as well. Somewhere along the line,
> the Javadoc link reverted to the nightly builds too.
> 
> In any case, I'm +1 on your proposed changes.
> 
> --
> Martin Cooper
> 
> At 04:14 AM 2/15/02, Ted Husted wrote:
> >I'm not exactly sure what happened there, but if there are no
> >objections, I'll proceed along the lines outlined here:
> >
> >http://www.mail-archive.com/struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg04760.html
> >
> >-Ted.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6117] - Document Enhancement Request for Consultants section of Struts Resources page

2002-02-16 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6117

Document Enhancement Request for Consultants section of Struts Resources page

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6384] - Add website to "Powered by Struts" page

2002-02-16 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6384

Add website to "Powered by Struts" page

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc struts-nested.xml

2002-02-16 Thread Ted Husted

I can merge what you did easily enough. Just moving some things around,
and didn't want to get confused. 

I'll post the updates to the site as soon as I finish updating the
Resources, and we think they look good, I can update the CVS. 

Arron Bates wrote:
> 
> Sorry 'bout that, but that's all of it.
> Only a change to the struts.xsl and the nested docco.
> 
> If you're hacking the stylesheet, then I can roll it back until your
> go-ahead. Yes/No?
> 
> Arron.
> 
> Ted Husted wrote:
> 
> >Arron,
> >
> >Could you hold off any more Commits. I'm in the middle of heavy surgery
> >on the documentation.
> >
> >-Ted.
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> >For additional commands, e-mail: 
> >
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 

-- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
-- Java Web Development with Struts.
-- Tel +1 585 737-3463.
-- Web http://www.husted.com/struts/

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6440] - Request to be listed as a consultant on the resources page.

2002-02-16 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6440

Request to be listed as a consultant on the resources page.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc struts-nested.xml

2002-02-16 Thread Arron Bates

Sorry 'bout that, but that's all of it.
Only a change to the struts.xsl and the nested docco.

If you're hacking the stylesheet, then I can roll it back until your 
go-ahead. Yes/No?


Arron.


Ted Husted wrote:

>Arron, 
>
>Could you hold off any more Commits. I'm in the middle of heavy surgery
>on the documentation. 
>
>-Ted.
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>For additional commands, e-mail: 
>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc struts-nested.xml

2002-02-16 Thread Ted Husted

Arron, 

Could you hold off any more Commits. I'm in the middle of heavy surgery
on the documentation. 

-Ted.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/stylesheets struts.xsl userGuide.xsl

2002-02-16 Thread arron

arron   02/02/16 08:12:56

  Modified:doc/stylesheets struts.xsl userGuide.xsl
  Log:
  Added the ability for a tag to specify whether the table of attribute
  documenation is to be generated or not.
  Defaults to creating the documentation if attribute is not present for backward
  compatibility.
  This is so the nested tags can refer to the original tags without the burden
  of duplicated documentation.
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.6   +39 -29jakarta-struts/doc/stylesheets/struts.xsl
  
  Index: struts.xsl
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/doc/stylesheets/struts.xsl,v
  retrieving revision 1.5
  retrieving revision 1.6
  diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
  --- struts.xsl12 Jan 2002 21:30:37 -  1.5
  +++ struts.xsl16 Feb 2002 16:12:56 -  1.6
  @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
   
   
  -
  +
   
   http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
 version="1.0">
  @@ -228,36 +228,46 @@
 
   
 
  -  
  -
  -  
  +  
  +
  +  
  +  
  +
  +  
  +
  +  
  +
  +  
  +  
  +
  +  
  +
  +  
  +Attribute Name
  +Description
  +  
  +  
   
  -  Attribute Name
  -  Description
  +  
  +
  +  
  +  
  +
  +
  +  
  +
  +
  +  [Required]
  +
  +
  +  [RT Expr]
  +
  +  
   
  -
  -  
  -
  -  
  -
  -
  -  
  -  
  -
  -  
  -  
  -[Required]
  -  
  -  
  -[RT Expr]
  -  
  -
  -  
  -
  -  
  -
  -  
  -
  +  
  +
  +  
  +
 
   
   
  
  
  
  1.5   +40 -29jakarta-struts/doc/stylesheets/userGuide.xsl
  
  Index: userGuide.xsl
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/doc/stylesheets/userGuide.xsl,v
  retrieving revision 1.4
  retrieving revision 1.5
  diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
  --- userGuide.xsl 12 Jan 2002 21:30:37 -  1.4
  +++ userGuide.xsl 16 Feb 2002 16:12:56 -  1.5
  @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
   
   
  -
  +
   
   http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
 version="1.0">
  @@ -221,36 +221,47 @@
 
   
 
  -  
  -
  -  
  +  
  +
  +  
  +  
  +
  +  
  +
  +  
  +
  +
  +  
  +  
  +
  +  
  +
  +  
  +Attribute Name
  +Description
  +  
  +  
   
  -  Attribute Name
  -  Description
  +  
  +
  +  
  +  
  +
  +
  +  
  +
  +
  +  [Required]
  +
  +
  +  [RT Expr]
  +
  +  
   
  -
  -  
  -
  -  
  -
  -
  -  
  -  
  -
  -  
  -  
  -[Required]
  -  
  -  
  -[RT Expr]
  -  
  -
  -  
  -
  -  
  -
  -  
  -
  +  
  +
  +  
  +
 
   
   
  
  
  

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6035] - Ressources enhancement

2002-02-16 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6035

Ressources enhancement

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6505] - Enhancement to logic tags

2002-02-16 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6505

Enhancement to logic tags

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-02-16 16:01 ---
If you cannot do these sorts of comparisons on the Action before passing the 
bean to the page, then you might need to resort to a scriptlet to expose the 
property of the second bean. But, it is far better to process the beans in the 
Action and store the result as a simple property in one of the beans.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6505] New: - Enhancement to logic tags

2002-02-16 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6505

Enhancement to logic tags

   Summary: Enhancement to logic tags
   Product: Struts
   Version: 1.0.1 Final
  Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: Enhancement
  Priority: Other
 Component: Custom Tags
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I need an extension to the logic tags like equal, notEqual, match, a.o. to 
compare not only with constants but with other attributes.
For example:



Ids from myBean1 and myBean2 are equal.


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: