Re: [Validator] FieldChecks Serializable?

2003-09-30 Thread David Graham
I don't believe there is any reason it needs to be serializable because
objects of that class are never created and saved in other objects.  We're
just in the habit of making things Serializable in case they go into the
session.

David

--- Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I asked this question on the user list yesterday and received no reply.
> So I figured this is the more appropriate place to ask.
> 
> Why does org.apache.struts.validator.FieldChecks implement Serializable
> when it has nothing but static methods and static final instance
> variables?
> 
> Just curious.
> 
> Brandon
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Validator] FieldChecks Serializable?

2003-09-30 Thread Brandon Goodin
I asked this question on the user list yesterday and received no reply.
So I figured this is the more appropriate place to ask.

Why does org.apache.struts.validator.FieldChecks implement Serializable
when it has nothing but static methods and static final instance
variables?

Just curious.

Brandon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]