Re: Bugzilla status for bugs with patches

2003-04-05 Thread David Graham
I've never found working with bugzilla to be sufficiently difficult enough 
to warrant an instruction manual.  Just query for open bugs, pick one that 
sounds interesting and investigate it.  If you come up with a patch, attach 
it to the bug and add the PatchAvailable keyword.

David



From: Mohan Kishore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bugzilla status for bugs with patches
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 09:50:58 -0800 (PST)
I am sorry - i guess i was not very clear. i am just concerned about how to
query Bugzilla in order to only get bugs with no available patches. If we 
had a
standard (say, keyword 'PATCH' or 'HAS_PATCH') for bugs with an available
patch, then we can do more focussed queries.
Would be especially nice if there were a small document which establishes 
the
steps in picking up bugs from Bugzilla, [assigning to oneself], uploading
patch, updating status etc. (with focus on Bugzilla status at every point).
Would allow easier participation from part-time/new participants...

regards,
Mohan.
--- David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patches are listed in each bug report as links to the attachments.  
I
> personally don't use the [PATCH] marker in the name because you can just 
add
> that to the keywords field.
>
> David
>
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Is it a standard (at least within jakarta) to prefix the bugs with 
patches
> >available with a [PATCH]? Any ideas w.r.t creating a status called "Has
> >Patch"?
> >
> >I ask because there are quite a few bugs in the commons which have no
> >indication about available patches. I guess the commiters can finish up 
(or
> >reject) the ones with patches, while the rest of us can try our hands 
at
> >the
> >ones which do not have any fix yet...
> >
> >regards,
> >Mohan.
> >
> >
> >__
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
> >http://tax.yahoo.com
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _
> STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bugzilla status for bugs with patches

2003-04-05 Thread Martin Cooper
There is a standard Bugzilla way of marking bugs so that those with (or
without) patches can be easily identified. That is the use of PatchAvailable
in the Keywords field. Ted has started using this field, and I think this is
great.

Unfortunately, I suspect there are plenty of unresolved bug reports that
have patches but do not have this keyword set. A very useful exercise,
therefore, would be to query for unresolved bug reports that do not have
PatchAvailable set, and then go through the results and add the keyword for
those that do have patches.

Personally, I find the use of [PATCH] in the subject of a bug report
annoying, and I'd rather see that removed and replaced with the use of the
PatchAvailable keyword.

--
Martin Cooper


"Mohan Kishore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I am sorry - i guess i was not very clear. i am just concerned about how
to
> query Bugzilla in order to only get bugs with no available patches. If we
had a
> standard (say, keyword 'PATCH' or 'HAS_PATCH') for bugs with an available
> patch, then we can do more focussed queries.
> Would be especially nice if there were a small document which establishes
the
> steps in picking up bugs from Bugzilla, [assigning to oneself], uploading
> patch, updating status etc. (with focus on Bugzilla status at every
point).
> Would allow easier participation from part-time/new participants...
>
> regards,
> Mohan.
>
> --- David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The patches are listed in each bug report as links to the attachments.
I
> > personally don't use the [PATCH] marker in the name because you can just
add
> > that to the keywords field.
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >Is it a standard (at least within jakarta) to prefix the bugs with
patches
> > >available with a [PATCH]? Any ideas w.r.t creating a status called "Has
> > >Patch"?
> > >
> > >I ask because there are quite a few bugs in the commons which have no
> > >indication about available patches. I guess the commiters can finish up
(or
> > >reject) the ones with patches, while the rest of us can try our hands
at
> > >the
> > >ones which do not have any fix yet...
> > >
> > >regards,
> > >Mohan.
> > >
> > >
> > >__
> > >Do you Yahoo!?
> > >Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
> > >http://tax.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >-
> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > _
> > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
> http://tax.yahoo.com




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bugzilla status for bugs with patches

2003-04-05 Thread Mohan Kishore
I am sorry - i guess i was not very clear. i am just concerned about how to
query Bugzilla in order to only get bugs with no available patches. If we had a
standard (say, keyword 'PATCH' or 'HAS_PATCH') for bugs with an available
patch, then we can do more focussed queries.
Would be especially nice if there were a small document which establishes the
steps in picking up bugs from Bugzilla, [assigning to oneself], uploading
patch, updating status etc. (with focus on Bugzilla status at every point).
Would allow easier participation from part-time/new participants...

regards,
Mohan.

--- David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patches are listed in each bug report as links to the attachments.  I 
> personally don't use the [PATCH] marker in the name because you can just add 
> that to the keywords field.
> 
> David
> 
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >Is it a standard (at least within jakarta) to prefix the bugs with patches
> >available with a [PATCH]? Any ideas w.r.t creating a status called "Has 
> >Patch"?
> >
> >I ask because there are quite a few bugs in the commons which have no
> >indication about available patches. I guess the commiters can finish up (or
> >reject) the ones with patches, while the rest of us can try our hands at 
> >the
> >ones which do not have any fix yet...
> >
> >regards,
> >Mohan.
> >
> >
> >__
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
> >http://tax.yahoo.com
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> 
> _
> STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bugzilla status for bugs with patches

2003-04-05 Thread David Graham
The patches are listed in each bug report as links to the attachments.  I 
personally don't use the [PATCH] marker in the name because you can just add 
that to the keywords field.

David


Hi,

Is it a standard (at least within jakarta) to prefix the bugs with patches
available with a [PATCH]? Any ideas w.r.t creating a status called "Has 
Patch"?

I ask because there are quite a few bugs in the commons which have no
indication about available patches. I guess the commiters can finish up (or
reject) the ones with patches, while the rest of us can try our hands at 
the
ones which do not have any fix yet...

regards,
Mohan.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bugzilla status for bugs with patches

2003-04-04 Thread Mohan Kishore
Hi,

Is it a standard (at least within jakarta) to prefix the bugs with patches
available with a [PATCH]? Any ideas w.r.t creating a status called "Has Patch"?

I ask because there are quite a few bugs in the commons which have no
indication about available patches. I guess the commiters can finish up (or
reject) the ones with patches, while the rest of us can try our hands at the
ones which do not have any fix yet...

regards,
Mohan.


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]