DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24517] - Extending JavascriptValidatorTag
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24517. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24517 Extending JavascriptValidatorTag [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-07 17:35 --- The constants are now protected. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24517] - Extending JavascriptValidatorTag
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24517. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24517 Extending JavascriptValidatorTag --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-02 17:38 --- Using protected attributes would work. I only brought up getters as a way of hiding the attributes... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24517] - Extending JavascriptValidatorTag
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24517. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24517 Extending JavascriptValidatorTag --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-02 05:10 --- getStartElement is now called renderStartElement and is protected instead of private. getNextVar() no longer exists. What is the use case for using getter methods for the HTML comments? Could we make the constants protected instead? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24517] - Extending JavascriptValidatorTag
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24517. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24517 Extending JavascriptValidatorTag --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-08 18:49 --- isXhtml() is simply a wrapper around TagUtils.getInstance().isXhtml(this.pageContext) that you can call just as easily. It's a private helper method that we shouldn't expose to subclasses and it's debatable whether we even need it at all. I'll take a look at the other methods... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
