Re: New Request Processor System [was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor]
David Graham wrote: As one of those contributors to the whole "Composable Request Processor" a while ago, is there chance that we will get hint to what the Request Processor system look likes? I haven't seen it yet but I hear it's based on the GoF Chain of Responsibility pattern and will be a commons component, not Struts specific. This seemed to be an appropriate middle ground between the Filters vs. Struts only RequestProcessor debate to me. Chain of Responsibility is appropriate. My guess is there may be probably multiple CoR here just by casual inspection of the current request processor. Anyway, the bug bear would be the configuration details of the new request processor. This is what the previous bun-fight debate detoriated to? Should it be with XML and/or programmatically? I wait with baited breathe. I finished of Struts 1.1 FCS integration Expresso Framework today, time to catch some well deserved sun and sea. -- Peter Pilgrim __ _ _ _ / //__ // ___// ___/ + Serverside Java / /___/ // /__ / /__ + Struts / // ___// ___// ___/ + Expresso Committer __/ // /__ / /__ / /__ + Independent Contractor /___/////// + Intrinsic Motivation On Line Resume || \\===> `` http://www.xenonsoft.demon.co.uk/no-it-striker.html '' - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Request Processor System [was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor]
> As one of those contributors to the whole "Composable Request Processor" > a while ago, is there chance that we will get hint to what the > Request Processor system look likes? I haven't seen it yet but I hear it's based on the GoF Chain of Responsibility pattern and will be a commons component, not Struts specific. This seemed to be an appropriate middle ground between the Filters vs. Struts only RequestProcessor debate to me. David > > > -- > Peter Pilgrim > __ _ _ _ >/ //__ // ___// ___/ + Serverside Java > / /___/ // /__ / /__ + Struts > / // ___// ___// ___/ + Expresso Committer > __/ // /__ / /__ / /__ + Independent Contractor > /___/////// + Intrinsic Motivation > On Line Resume > || > \\===> `` http://www.xenonsoft.demon.co.uk/no-it-striker.html '' > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Request Processor System [was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor]
David Graham wrote: There is some movement towards separating Struts from the Servlet API so that it may be used in by the upcoming Portlets API. Craig is implementing a new RequestProcessor system that accomodates that and I would hate to move things in the opposite direction by tying ActionForms even more to HttpServletRequest objects. David --- Kurt Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As one of those contributors to the whole "Composable Request Processor" a while ago, is there chance that we will get hint to what the Request Processor system look likes? -- Peter Pilgrim __ _ _ _ / //__ // ___// ___/ + Serverside Java / /___/ // /__ / /__ + Struts / // ___// ___// ___/ + Expresso Committer __/ // /__ / /__ / /__ + Independent Contractor /___/////// + Intrinsic Motivation On Line Resume || \\===> `` http://www.xenonsoft.demon.co.uk/no-it-striker.html '' - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]