RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line? -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist http://www.struts-atlanta.org 678.910.8017 AIM:jmitchtx > -Original Message- > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: > Addition of two new actions) > > > I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. > > [ ] ParameterDispatchAction > [ ] MappingDispatchAction > [ ] ConfigDispatchAction > > Steve > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM > > To: Struts Developers List > > Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions > > > > > > In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become > > ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. > > > > Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? > > > > I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping > > or Config. > > > > Steve > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper > > > Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions > > > > > > I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think > ParameterDispatchAction is > > > definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People > are *far* more > > > likely to think of the "Parameter" in the name as meaning > a request > > > parameter than they are to think of the "parameter" action mapping > > > attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? > > > > > > I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. > > > > > > -- > > > Martin Cooper > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º >Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could >you tell me ? Thanks~~ > > >-- >James Mitchell >Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist >http://www.struts-atlanta.org >678.910.8017 >AIM:jmitchtx > > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM >> To: Struts Developers List >> Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: >> Addition of two new actions) >> >> >> I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. >> >> [ ] ParameterDispatchAction >> [ ] MappingDispatchAction >> [ ] ConfigDispatchAction >> >> Steve >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM >> > To: Struts Developers List >> > Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions >> > >> > >> > In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become >> > ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. >> > >> > Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? >> > >> > I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping >> > or Config. >> > >> > Steve >> > >> > > -Original Message- >> > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper >> > > Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions >> > > >> > > I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think >> ParameterDispatchAction is >> > > definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People >> are *far* more >> > > likely to think of the "Parameter" in the name as meaning >> a request >> > > parameter than they are to think of the "parameter" action mapping >> > > attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? >> > > >> > > I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Martin Cooper >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `--> http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º >Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could >you tell me ? Thanks~~ > > >-- >James Mitchell >Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist >http://www.struts-atlanta.org >678.910.8017 >AIM:jmitchtx > > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM >> To: Struts Developers List >> Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: >> Addition of two new actions) >> >> >> I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. >> >> [ ] ParameterDispatchAction >> [ ] MappingDispatchAction >> [ ] ConfigDispatchAction >> >> Steve >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM >> > To: Struts Developers List >> > Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions >> > >> > >> > In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become >> > ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. >> > >> > Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? >> > >> > I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping >> > or Config. >> > >> > Steve >> > >> > > -Original Message- >> > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper >> > > Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions >> > > >> > > I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think >> ParameterDispatchAction is >> > > definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People >> are *far* more >> > > likely to think of the "Parameter" in the name as meaning >> a request >> > > parameter than they are to think of the "parameter" action mapping >> > > attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? >> > > >> > > I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Martin Cooper >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `--> http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
Yup. What Ted said. :-) I'm still feeling my way here, but does this kind of change *need* a formal vote? Steve > -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: August 9, 2003 6:03 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of > two new actions) > > > I'd say it was more like a poll to get an early consensus on the best > name for the class. Any product change would still be subject to a veto > before the next release. > > James Mitchell wrote: > > Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line? > >> > >>I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. > >> > >>[ ] ParameterDispatchAction > >>[ ] MappingDispatchAction > >>[ ] ConfigDispatchAction > >> > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º >Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could >you tell me ? Thanks~~ > > >-- >James Mitchell >Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist >http://www.struts-atlanta.org >678.910.8017 >AIM:jmitchtx > > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM >> To: Struts Developers List >> Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: >> Addition of two new actions) >> >> >> I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. >> >> [ ] ParameterDispatchAction >> [ ] MappingDispatchAction >> [ ] ConfigDispatchAction >> >> Steve >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM >> > To: Struts Developers List >> > Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions >> > >> > >> > In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become >> > ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. >> > >> > Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? >> > >> > I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping >> > or Config. >> > >> > Steve >> > >> > > -Original Message- >> > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper >> > > Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions >> > > >> > > I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think >> ParameterDispatchAction is >> > > definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People >> are *far* more >> > > likely to think of the "Parameter" in the name as meaning >> a request >> > > parameter than they are to think of the "parameter" action mapping >> > > attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? >> > > >> > > I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Martin Cooper >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `--> http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º >Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could >you tell me ? Thanks~~ > > >-- >James Mitchell >Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist >http://www.struts-atlanta.org >678.910.8017 >AIM:jmitchtx > > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM >> To: Struts Developers List >> Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: >> Addition of two new actions) >> >> >> I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. >> >> [ ] ParameterDispatchAction >> [ ] MappingDispatchAction >> [ ] ConfigDispatchAction >> >> Steve >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM >> > To: Struts Developers List >> > Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions >> > >> > >> > In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become >> > ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. >> > >> > Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? >> > >> > I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping >> > or Config. >> > >> > Steve >> > >> > > -Original Message- >> > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper >> > > Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions >> > > >> > > I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think >> ParameterDispatchAction is >> > > definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People >> are *far* more >> > > likely to think of the "Parameter" in the name as meaning >> a request >> > > parameter than they are to think of the "parameter" action mapping >> > > attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? >> > > >> > > I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Martin Cooper >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `--> http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
Internationalisation doesn't/can't apply to the naming of classes. We'd have to rewrite the whole framework for each language. Ted raised the issue in regard to naming of the action forward, but also addressed that point himself. Steve > -Original Message- > From: Peter A. Pilgrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: August 9, 2003 3:13 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of > two new actions) > > > Steve Raeburn wrote: > > I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. > > > > [ ] ParameterDispatchAction > > [ ] MappingDispatchAction > > [ ] ConfigDispatchAction > > > > Steve > > > > What happens if English is not your mother language. > Are you suggesting we have? > > ErfolgreichAction -- German > > ExitosAction -- Spanish > > If we have Global.SUCCESS_FORWARD and Global.FAILURE_FORWARD > to represent common ActionForward names it might help. > Ted Husted suggests such naming in his book, but if program > your variables with name that are non-english then you > may not agree this. > > -- > Peter Pilgrim > __ _ _ _ >/ //__ // ___// ___/ + Serverside Java > / /___/ // /__ / /__ + Struts > / // ___// ___// ___/ + Expresso Committer > __/ // /__ / /__ / /__ + Independent Contractor > /___/////// + Intrinsic Motivation > On Line Resume > || > \\===> `` http://www.xenonsoft.demon.co.uk/no-it-striker.html '' > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º >Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could >you tell me ? Thanks~~ > > >-- >James Mitchell >Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist >http://www.struts-atlanta.org >678.910.8017 >AIM:jmitchtx > > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM >> To: Struts Developers List >> Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: >> Addition of two new actions) >> >> >> I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. >> >> [ ] ParameterDispatchAction >> [ ] MappingDispatchAction >> [ ] ConfigDispatchAction >> >> Steve >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM >> > To: Struts Developers List >> > Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions >> > >> > >> > In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become >> > ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. >> > >> > Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? >> > >> > I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping >> > or Config. >> > >> > Steve >> > >> > > -Original Message- >> > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper >> > > Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions >> > > >> > > I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think >> ParameterDispatchAction is >> > > definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People >> are *far* more >> > > likely to think of the "Parameter" in the name as meaning >> a request >> > > parameter than they are to think of the "parameter" action mapping >> > > attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? >> > > >> > > I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Martin Cooper >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `--> http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º >Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could >you tell me ? Thanks~~ > > >-- >James Mitchell >Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist >http://www.struts-atlanta.org >678.910.8017 >AIM:jmitchtx > > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM >> To: Struts Developers List >> Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: >> Addition of two new actions) >> >> >> I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. >> >> [ ] ParameterDispatchAction >> [ ] MappingDispatchAction >> [ ] ConfigDispatchAction >> >> Steve >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM >> > To: Struts Developers List >> > Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions >> > >> > >> > In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become >> > ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. >> > >> > Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? >> > >> > I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping >> > or Config. >> > >> > Steve >> > >> > > -Original Message- >> > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper >> > > Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions >> > > >> > > I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think >> ParameterDispatchAction is >> > > definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People >> are *far* more >> > > likely to think of the "Parameter" in the name as meaning >> a request >> > > parameter than they are to think of the "parameter" action mapping >> > > attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? >> > > >> > > I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Martin Cooper >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `--> http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º >Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could >you tell me ? Thanks~~ > > >-- >James Mitchell >Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist >http://www.struts-atlanta.org >678.910.8017 >AIM:jmitchtx > > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM >> To: Struts Developers List >> Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: >> Addition of two new actions) >> >> >> I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. >> >> [ ] ParameterDispatchAction >> [ ] MappingDispatchAction >> [ ] ConfigDispatchAction >> >> Steve >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM >> > To: Struts Developers List >> > Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions >> > >> > >> > In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become >> > ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. >> > >> > Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? >> > >> > I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping >> > or Config. >> > >> > Steve >> > >> > > -Original Message- >> > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper >> > > Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions >> > > >> > > I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think >> ParameterDispatchAction is >> > > definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People >> are *far* more >> > > likely to think of the "Parameter" in the name as meaning >> a request >> > > parameter than they are to think of the "parameter" action mapping >> > > attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? >> > > >> > > I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Martin Cooper >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `--> http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º >Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could >you tell me ? Thanks~~ > > >-- >James Mitchell >Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist >http://www.struts-atlanta.org >678.910.8017 >AIM:jmitchtx > > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM >> To: Struts Developers List >> Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: >> Addition of two new actions) >> >> >> I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. >> >> [ ] ParameterDispatchAction >> [ ] MappingDispatchAction >> [ ] ConfigDispatchAction >> >> Steve >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM >> > To: Struts Developers List >> > Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions >> > >> > >> > In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become >> > ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. >> > >> > Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? >> > >> > I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping >> > or Config. >> > >> > Steve >> > >> > > -Original Message- >> > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper >> > > Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions >> > > >> > > I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think >> ParameterDispatchAction is >> > > definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People >> are *far* more >> > > likely to think of the "Parameter" in the name as meaning >> a request >> > > parameter than they are to think of the "parameter" action mapping >> > > attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? >> > > >> > > I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Martin Cooper >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `--> http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
--- Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. > > [ ] ParameterDispatchAction > [X] MappingDispatchAction > [ ] ConfigDispatchAction I agree with Martin that Parameter implies request parameter and I think Config is overly general so I chose Mapping. David > > Steve > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM > > To: Struts Developers List > > Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions > > > > > > In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become > > ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. > > > > Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? > > > > I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping > > or Config. > > > > Steve > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper > > > Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions > > > > > > I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think > ParameterDispatchAction is > > > definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People are *far* > more > > > likely to think of the "Parameter" in the name as meaning a request > > > parameter than they are to think of the "parameter" action mapping > > > attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? > > > > > > I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. > > > > > > -- > > > Martin Cooper > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
