Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~ -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist http://www.struts-atlanta.org 678.910.8017 AIM:jmitchtx -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions) I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. [ ] ParameterDispatchAction [ ] MappingDispatchAction [ ] ConfigDispatchAction Steve -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping or Config. Steve -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think ParameterDispatchAction is definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People are *far* more likely to think of the Parameter in the name as meaning a request parameter than they are to think of the parameter action mapping attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `-- http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~ -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist http://www.struts-atlanta.org 678.910.8017 AIM:jmitchtx -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions) I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. [ ] ParameterDispatchAction [ ] MappingDispatchAction [ ] ConfigDispatchAction Steve -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping or Config. Steve -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think ParameterDispatchAction is definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People are *far* more likely to think of the Parameter in the name as meaning a request parameter than they are to think of the parameter action mapping attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `-- http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~ -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist http://www.struts-atlanta.org 678.910.8017 AIM:jmitchtx -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions) I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. [ ] ParameterDispatchAction [ ] MappingDispatchAction [ ] ConfigDispatchAction Steve -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping or Config. Steve -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think ParameterDispatchAction is definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People are *far* more likely to think of the Parameter in the name as meaning a request parameter than they are to think of the parameter action mapping attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `-- http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~ -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist http://www.struts-atlanta.org 678.910.8017 AIM:jmitchtx -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions) I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. [ ] ParameterDispatchAction [ ] MappingDispatchAction [ ] ConfigDispatchAction Steve -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping or Config. Steve -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think ParameterDispatchAction is definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People are *far* more likely to think of the Parameter in the name as meaning a request parameter than they are to think of the parameter action mapping attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `-- http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~ -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist http://www.struts-atlanta.org 678.910.8017 AIM:jmitchtx -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions) I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. [ ] ParameterDispatchAction [ ] MappingDispatchAction [ ] ConfigDispatchAction Steve -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping or Config. Steve -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think ParameterDispatchAction is definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People are *far* more likely to think of the Parameter in the name as meaning a request parameter than they are to think of the parameter action mapping attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `-- http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~ -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist http://www.struts-atlanta.org 678.910.8017 AIM:jmitchtx -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions) I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. [ ] ParameterDispatchAction [ ] MappingDispatchAction [ ] ConfigDispatchAction Steve -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping or Config. Steve -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think ParameterDispatchAction is definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People are *far* more likely to think of the Parameter in the name as meaning a request parameter than they are to think of the parameter action mapping attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `-- http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~ -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist http://www.struts-atlanta.org 678.910.8017 AIM:jmitchtx -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions) I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. [ ] ParameterDispatchAction [ ] MappingDispatchAction [ ] ConfigDispatchAction Steve -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping or Config. Steve -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think ParameterDispatchAction is definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People are *far* more likely to think of the Parameter in the name as meaning a request parameter than they are to think of the parameter action mapping attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `-- http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~ -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist http://www.struts-atlanta.org 678.910.8017 AIM:jmitchtx -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:38 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions) I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. [ ] ParameterDispatchAction [ ] MappingDispatchAction [ ] ConfigDispatchAction Steve -Original Message- From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: Addition of two new actions In an ideal world, DispatchAction should probably become ParameterDispatchAction and this could be plain old DispatchAction. Is Anthony's original suggestion of ConfigDispatchAction any better? I can't think of a name that I *really* like so I'm +0 on Mapping or Config. Steve -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper Sent: August 4, 2003 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Addition of two new actions I'm +1 on this, other than on naming. I think ParameterDispatchAction is definitely the wrong name for the last of these. People are *far* more likely to think of the Parameter in the name as meaning a request parameter than they are to think of the parameter action mapping attribute. Perhaps MappingDispatchAction instead? I am -0 on combining all of this into one action. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mqg - SOUVENIR --- . | Souvenir of China | | A Good Place for You | `-- http://www.souvenirchina.com -' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
