RE: Refactoring RequestUtils

2003-07-31 Thread Shai.Berger
Ask in the user list. Struts users may be relying on these methods, even
if Struts itself doesn't.

-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 03:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Refactoring RequestUtils


The movement of JSP specific methods to TagUtils is nearly completed
except for moving the externalized messages.  I'd like to refactor
RequestUtils even more to reduce its hefty size.  There are 2 distinct
groups of methods: URL related and Module related.

1.  I suggest we move the module methods into a new ModuleUtils class.

2.  I would suggest that there also be a UrlUtils class except that 4 of
the URL methods aren't used in Struts and 2 of them should be moved into
TagUtils.  serverURL(), absoluteURL(), actionURL(), and printableURL()
are
not used.  encodeURL() and pageURL() should go to TagUtils.  What do we
do
with the 4 unused methods?

Thoughts?

David



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Refactoring RequestUtils

2003-07-31 Thread Rob Leland
David Graham wrote:

The movement of JSP specific methods to TagUtils is nearly completed
except for moving the externalized messages.  I'd like to refactor
RequestUtils even more to reduce its hefty size.  There are 2 distinct
groups of methods: URL related and Module related.
1.  I suggest we move the module methods into a new ModuleUtils class.

2.  I would suggest that there also be a UrlUtils class except that 4 of
the URL methods aren't used in Struts and 2 of them should be moved into
TagUtils.  serverURL(), absoluteURL(), actionURL(), and printableURL() are
not used.  

absoluteURL() is the original method in RequestUtils January 05 2001, 
and was originally used by
the Include, Link, and Redirect tags in struts Beta 1. It was removed 
from these tags
in May 2001, and replaced by inline stringBuffer appends.

actionURL() was contributed by Chris Smith Jan 25 2001, as part of the 
FormTag but was migrated
later to the ReuqestUtils.

Two options come to mind, deprecation or place it in a 'user space' set 
of utilities. These would
be convience methods not used by struts but available for a user. I am 
+1 on either route

encodeURL() and pageURL() should go to TagUtils.  What do we do
with the 4 unused methods?
Thoughts?

David



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 



--
-
Rob Leland (703-525-3580)
Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day of your life.
 
-Confucius.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Refactoring RequestUtils

2003-07-30 Thread David Graham
The movement of JSP specific methods to TagUtils is nearly completed
except for moving the externalized messages.  I'd like to refactor
RequestUtils even more to reduce its hefty size.  There are 2 distinct
groups of methods: URL related and Module related.

1.  I suggest we move the module methods into a new ModuleUtils class.

2.  I would suggest that there also be a UrlUtils class except that 4 of
the URL methods aren't used in Struts and 2 of them should be moved into
TagUtils.  serverURL(), absoluteURL(), actionURL(), and printableURL() are
not used.  encodeURL() and pageURL() should go to TagUtils.  What do we do
with the 4 unused methods?

Thoughts?

David



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]