Re: Submit included in GET parameters
I did not give the submit button a name parameter. This is my code.
Go!
Marc
- Original Message -
From: "McShane, Matthew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 5:22 PM
Subject: RE: Submit included in GET parameters
> do not give the submit button a name parameter.
>
> --matt.
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Marc S. Penner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 3:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Submit included in GET parameters
>
>
> Is there any way to avoid having the submit text show up as a GET
parameter
> when submitting a form? I want the other form elements to show up as GET
> parameters so that the page can be bookmarked, but I would prefer that the
> submit text not show up. Is there a way to do this? Thanks.
>
> Marc
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Nanduri, Amarnath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:45 PM
> Subject: RE: bean:write Tag and polymorphic behavior
>
>
> > David,
> >
> > Thanks for the info. I do have the setters. Too lazy to include
them
> in
> > my actual mail.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Amar..
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Winterfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:18 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: bean:write Tag and polymorphic behavior
> >
> >
> > Struts uses reflection. So if the method is there, it
> > will find it. You will need a setter though for the
> > key method or it will generate errors.
> >
> > Here is an excerpt from the PropertyUtils
> > documentation.
> >
> > Utility methods for using Java Reflection APIs to
> > facilitate generic property getter and setter
> > operations on Java objects. Much of this code was
> > originally included in BeanUtils, but has been
> > separated because of the volume of code involved.
> >
> > In general, the objects that are examined and modified
> > using these methods are expected to conform to the
> > property getter and setter method naming conventions
> > described in the JavaBeans Specification (Version
> > 1.0.1). No data type conversions are performed, and
> > there are no usage of any PropertyEditor classes that
> > have been registered, although a convenient way to
> > access the registered classes themselves is included.
> >
> > David
> > --- "Nanduri, Amarnath"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi my fellow Strutters,
> > >
> > >
> > > got an interesting question for you all to
> > > ponder. I am using the tag
> > >
> > > > > property="superclassObject.key" /> in my jsp
> > > pages.
> > >
> > >
> > > WILL THIS WORK ? Is struts smart enough to know that
> > > i am returning a
> > > subclass and so can call its private variable using
> > > the getter method ? I
> > > know that introspection is being performed inside.
> > > Some expert advise is
> > > helpful...
> > >
> > > I am enclosing the code for this..
> > >
> > > public class ABCForm extends ActionForm
> > > {
> > >
> > > public SuperClass getSuperClassObject()
> > > {
> > > // basically it returns a Subclass upcasted to
> > > the superclass.
> > > return superclassObject ;
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > public SuperClass
> > > {
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > public SubClass extends SuperClass
> > > {
> > >private String key ;
> > >
> > >public String getKey()
> > >{
> > > return key ;
> > >}
> > > }
> >
> >
> > __
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
> > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
>
> _
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Submit included in GET parameters
Is there any way to avoid having the submit text show up as a GET parameter
when submitting a form? I want the other form elements to show up as GET
parameters so that the page can be bookmarked, but I would prefer that the
submit text not show up. Is there a way to do this? Thanks.
Marc
- Original Message -
From: "Nanduri, Amarnath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:45 PM
Subject: RE: bean:write Tag and polymorphic behavior
> David,
>
> Thanks for the info. I do have the setters. Too lazy to include them
in
> my actual mail.
>
> cheers,
> Amar..
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Winterfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: bean:write Tag and polymorphic behavior
>
>
> Struts uses reflection. So if the method is there, it
> will find it. You will need a setter though for the
> key method or it will generate errors.
>
> Here is an excerpt from the PropertyUtils
> documentation.
>
> Utility methods for using Java Reflection APIs to
> facilitate generic property getter and setter
> operations on Java objects. Much of this code was
> originally included in BeanUtils, but has been
> separated because of the volume of code involved.
>
> In general, the objects that are examined and modified
> using these methods are expected to conform to the
> property getter and setter method naming conventions
> described in the JavaBeans Specification (Version
> 1.0.1). No data type conversions are performed, and
> there are no usage of any PropertyEditor classes that
> have been registered, although a convenient way to
> access the registered classes themselves is included.
>
> David
> --- "Nanduri, Amarnath"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi my fellow Strutters,
> >
> >
> > got an interesting question for you all to
> > ponder. I am using the tag
> >
> > > property="superclassObject.key" /> in my jsp
> > pages.
> >
> >
> > WILL THIS WORK ? Is struts smart enough to know that
> > i am returning a
> > subclass and so can call its private variable using
> > the getter method ? I
> > know that introspection is being performed inside.
> > Some expert advise is
> > helpful...
> >
> > I am enclosing the code for this..
> >
> > public class ABCForm extends ActionForm
> > {
> >
> > public SuperClass getSuperClassObject()
> > {
> > // basically it returns a Subclass upcasted to
> > the superclass.
> > return superclassObject ;
> > }
> >
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> > public SuperClass
> > {
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> > public SubClass extends SuperClass
> > {
> >private String key ;
> >
> >public String getKey()
> >{
> > return key ;
> >}
> > }
>
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
> a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Nested logic:iterate tags
Apparently, it is. I tried it and it worked quite easily. Answered my own question. Marc - Original Message - From: "Marc S. Penner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:32 AM Subject: Nested logic:iterate tags > Is it possible to nest logic:iterate tags? I would prefer not to try to > spend too much time trying to do something that isn't possible. > > Marc > > > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Nested logic:iterate tags
Is it possible to nest logic:iterate tags? I would prefer not to try to spend too much time trying to do something that isn't possible. Marc _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Precompiling JSP Pages?
This is the rule that I have used in the build.xml file for pre-compiling JSPs using WebLogic 6.0 jspc via an Ant build. Obviously the properties (e.g. CLASSPATH) and paths need to be set up properly for this to work. Marc _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
