- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 12:19 PM
Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net
I think I was better off not sending that last email,
especially on a Friday. :)
Thanks for education.
- Malcolm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: EJB = bad = MS.net
TGIF
- Original Message -
From: Cakalic, James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:02 PM
Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net
== Rolling on the floor laughing my ass off
-Original Message-
From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:57 PM
To: 'Wes Bramhall '; ''Struts Users Mailing List' '
Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net
ROTFLMAO!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Wes Bramhall
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Sent: 2/22/02 2:52 PM
Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net
But it's Friday now, so SSS is allowed, right?
(SSS = Small Scale Spamming)
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:45 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: EJB = bad = MS.net
I thought we had abandoned this thread in
favor of Struts related
questions
=)
- Original Message -
From: David Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: EJB = bad = MS.net
I'm staying out of this discussion, but
to answer your question --
IMNSHO = In My Not So Humble Opinion
--David
On Friday 22 February 2002 01:03 pm, you wrote:
IMNSHO? What the hell is that? Man,
the colloquial shortcuts are
getting
hairy these days :)
-Original Message-
From: Edward Q. Bridges
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 4:15 AM
To: dIon Gillard; Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: EJB = bad = MS.net
location independence means
independent of location,
that is all.
if you're implementing two interfaces
to do (more or
less) the exact
same
thing, and one is called local and
one is called
remote that is
absolutely *not*, by any stretch of
the imagination, location
independent. _end of story_.
with EJBs the method call does not
appear to be remote,
because it
is
*explicitly* remote. the method is in
a RemoteInterface and
throws a
RemoteException for crying out loud!
furthermore, it's not about box1 vs
box12. to be more
precise, it's
about
vm1 vs. vm12. and, if you are writing
a client, your client has
business
logic to take care of. it's the
servers responsibility
to determine
whether it should call a method at vm1
or at vm12.
IMNSHO, this is the achilles heel of EJB.
--e--
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 05:24:22 +1100,
dIon Gillard wrote:
The method call can take place
anywhere, but always appears to be
remote. That could be many remote
machines though. Location
independence
is not about local vs remote, it's
more about box1 vs box12.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
