Re: changing from *.do to /do/* screws up everything? -> Jerry Springer sums up...

[Eddie Bush]

I would tend to agree Mark - but it seems we may be in the minority.

Eddie

- Original Message -
From: "Galbreath, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:02 PM
Subject: RE: changing from *.do to /do/* screws up everything? -> Jerry Sp
ringer sums up...


> They're only as exposed as you make them!  A JSP is a presentation layer
> object and belongs in the web-app directory.  Burying them in the same
space
> as the controller invites sloppy designs and lazy coding.
>
> (Perhaps I should wait until Friday for this?)
>
> Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Breeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:54 PM
>
> It seems that migrating from a *.do to /do/* is not as straightforward as
> I'd hoped. Especially if putting JSPs under WEB-INF (which is better than
> leaving them exposed).
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:

> For additional commands, e-mail:

>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: changing from *.do to /do/* screws up everything? -> Jerry Springer sums up...

[Galbreath, Mark]

They're only as exposed as you make them!  A JSP is a presentation layer
object and belongs in the web-app directory.  Burying them in the same space
as the controller invites sloppy designs and lazy coding.

(Perhaps I should wait until Friday for this?)

Mark

-Original Message-
From: Rob Breeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:54 PM

It seems that migrating from a *.do to /do/* is not as straightforward as
I'd hoped. Especially if putting JSPs under WEB-INF (which is better than
leaving them exposed).

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: