Re: problems setting form attributes that are nested attributes

2001-01-12 Thread Steven D. Wilkinson

Craig,

That worked Yea!!! Thanks soo much.
I'll convert to the HTML tags from my form tags.  I just wanted to make sure my
logic was right in the Action before I made the switch.

Steve

"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> 
> "Steven D. Wilkinson" wrote:
> 
> > I'm having trouble using nested form attributes with the FORM tags (I know the
> > HTML tags are replacements, I just wanted to finish my last few pages before
> > using them.  Unless it fixes this bug, then I'll switch immediately.)
> >
> > I have traced the code down to the PropertyUtils file.
> > In the PropertyUtils.setNestedProperty(Object bean, String name, Object value,
> > boolean convert) method I have the name the value and the bean of the attribute
> > just fine.  Then the getSimpleProperty(bean,next) returns null for the bean.
> >
> 
> Could you try this with a more recent nightly build (like the one from last
> night)?  I've done some major surgery on this logic, and it works in a completely
> different manner now -- among other things, this method no longer exists -- and
> passes all the tests I've been able to come up with.  I'd appreciate it if you
> could try this in your environment and report back.
> 
> Craig McClanahan



Re: problems setting form attributes that are nested attributes

2001-01-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan

"Steven D. Wilkinson" wrote:

> I'm having trouble using nested form attributes with the FORM tags (I know the
> HTML tags are replacements, I just wanted to finish my last few pages before
> using them.  Unless it fixes this bug, then I'll switch immediately.)
>
> I have traced the code down to the PropertyUtils file.
> In the PropertyUtils.setNestedProperty(Object bean, String name, Object value,
> boolean convert) method I have the name the value and the bean of the attribute
> just fine.  Then the getSimpleProperty(bean,next) returns null for the bean.
>

Could you try this with a more recent nightly build (like the one from last
night)?  I've done some major surgery on this logic, and it works in a completely
different manner now -- among other things, this method no longer exists -- and
passes all the tests I've been able to come up with.  I'd appreciate it if you
could try this in your environment and report back.

Craig McClanahan