WrapDynaBean does not support contains()
DynaBean interface declares contains(). Is there any plan for implementing contains() for WrapDynaBean implementation? Supposing that it would check the property via instanceof X and recurse if it is a List, Map, Collection, DynaBean, etc. ? (I love beanutils, btw) -Rand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WrapDynaBean does not support contains()
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, WILLIAMS,RAND (HP-USA,ex1) wrote: Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:16:02 -0500 From: WILLIAMS,RAND (HP-USA,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WrapDynaBean does not support contains() DynaBean interface declares contains(). Is there any plan for implementing contains() for WrapDynaBean implementation? Supposing that it would check the property via instanceof X and recurse if it is a List, Map, Collection, DynaBean, etc. ? Best way to deal with that would be an enhancement requests against commons-beanutils: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ and/or discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED], since it's now a Commons package. (I love beanutils, btw) Me too :-). -Rand Craig McClanahan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WrapDynaBean does not support contains()
Craig, I hear what you're saying. At times, I feel like we're dealing with a two-edge sword. I wish our teams could do more work with nightly builds. One of the battles I constantly face with our management is their reluctancy to even allow us to work with beta releases (or lesser) in our development environment. Their fear is, not knowing when an official release will occur, that beta open-source software will end up in production. But my argument is, hey if we've successfully completed all levels of testing (unit, integration, q/a, etc.), have the corresponding source code, know what the open bugs/issues/limitatoins are, what's the worse that can happen? We discover a bug that we have to fix (and possibly relay back to the open-source development team). How is this any different that with the code we develop in-house? I guarantee you we have in-house software running in production that should be labeled beta (or less), but isn't because of a schedule that had to be met. It's too bad the label beta has to be used, it has such a negative connotation. I did read on the mailing lists a while back that Lands End was using a beta 1 version of Struts 1.1 in production. I think that says something in it's own right. I'm sure there are others doing the same. There is an open-source mindset that I'm trying to slowly change in our company. I've tried to convince our management that beta open-source is different than beta commercial. Open-source projects don't have schedule deadlines that will affect the quarterly financial results. Hence, they move a slower and strive for 100% perfection. If we do a thorough job of testing, with a high-level of confidence, it shouldn't matter whether something is beta or not. One issue we do have with Struts, however, is the many other Jakarta Commons libraries that it depends upon. Since we're using other software that also uses the Jakarta-Commons libraries, we do have compatability concerns. Hence, it's a little trickier trying to use a unofficially released version of Struts vs. some project that has very little, or no dependency on other libraries. Additional thoughts on this are greatly appreciated, Thanks, JOHN -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 2/28/2003 9:52 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Cc: Subject: Re: WrapDynaBean does not support contains() On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, WILLIAMS,RAND (HP-USA,ex1) wrote: Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:16:02 -0500 From: WILLIAMS,RAND (HP-USA,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WrapDynaBean does not support contains() DynaBean interface declares contains(). Is there any plan for implementing contains() for WrapDynaBean implementation? Supposing that it would check the property via instanceof X and recurse if it is a List, Map, Collection, DynaBean, etc. ? Best way to deal with that would be an enhancement requests against commons-beanutils: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ and/or discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED], since it's now a Commons package. (I love beanutils, btw) Me too :-). -Rand Craig McClanahan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WrapDynaBean does not support contains()
Please disregard this last message from me. I replied to the wrong message. Dooohh!! JOHN -Original Message- From: Hohlen, John Sent: Fri 2/28/2003 10:33 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Cc: Subject: RE: WrapDynaBean does not support contains() Craig, I hear what you're saying. At times, I feel like we're dealing with a two-edge sword. I wish our teams could do more work with nightly builds. One of the battles I constantly face with our management is their reluctancy to even allow us to work with beta releases (or lesser) in our development environment. Their fear is, not knowing when an official release will occur, that beta open-source software will end up in production. But my argument is, hey if we've successfully completed all levels of testing (unit, integration, q/a, etc.), have the corresponding source code, know what the open bugs/issues/limitatoins are, what's the worse that can happen? We discover a bug that we have to fix (and possibly relay back to the open-source development team). How is this any different that with the code we develop in-house? I guarantee you we have in-house software running in production that should be labeled beta (or less), but isn't because of a schedule that had to be met. It's too bad the label beta has to be used, it has such a negative connotation. I did read on the mailing lists a while back that Lands End was using a beta 1 version of Struts 1.1 in production. I think that says something in it's own right. I'm sure there are others doing the same. There is an open-source mindset that I'm trying to slowly change in our company. I've tried to convince our management that beta open-source is different than beta commercial. Open-source projects don't have schedule deadlines that will affect the quarterly financial results. Hence, they move a slower and strive for 100% perfection. If we do a thorough job of testing, with a high-level of confidence, it shouldn't matter whether something is beta or not. One issue we do have with Struts, however, is the many other Jakarta Commons libraries that it depends upon. Since we're using other software that also uses the Jakarta-Commons libraries, we do have compatability concerns. Hence, it's a little trickier trying to use a unofficially released version of Struts vs. some project that has very little, or no dependency on other libraries. Additional thoughts on this are greatly appreciated, Thanks, JOHN -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 2/28/2003 9:52 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Cc: Subject: Re: WrapDynaBean does not support contains() On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, WILLIAMS,RAND (HP-USA,ex1) wrote: Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:16:02 -0500 From: WILLIAMS,RAND (HP-USA,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WrapDynaBean does not support contains() DynaBean interface declares contains(). Is there any plan for implementing contains() for WrapDynaBean implementation? Supposing that it would check the property via instanceof X and recurse if it is a List, Map, Collection, DynaBean, etc. ? Best way to deal with that would be an enhancement requests against commons-beanutils: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ and/or discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED], since it's now a Commons package. (I love beanutils, btw) Me too :-). -Rand Craig McClanahan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
