action mapping 'input' question

2003-07-18 Thread Erez Efrati
I guess it's simple, but why can't I put an action /MyAction.do in the
'input' field in a action-mapping in the struts-config.xml?

Erez



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: action mapping 'input' question

2003-07-18 Thread Amit Kirdatt
You can but have to account for the state the form associated with
/MyAction.do.
Before I try to suggest a solution can you please tell us specifically what
problem you are experiencing?



-Original Message-
From: Erez Efrati [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:46 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: action mapping 'input' question


I guess it's simple, but why can't I put an action /MyAction.do in the
'input' field in a action-mapping in the struts-config.xml?

Erez



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to
which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If
you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying
to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: action mapping 'input' question

2003-07-18 Thread Erez Efrati
I am using struts/tiles/validator in my application.

Using the following configuration works fine, still I see that on the
first invocation the form gets validated and I get validation errors. My
ForgotPasswordAction action is used both for the INIT and the SUBMIT
operations. The only solution I read about is putting 'validate'=false
and control the invocation of the super.validate() in my code. Is this
true?

action name=ForgotPasswordForm 
type=web.ForgotPasswordAction  
validate=true 
input=.forgotPassword 
scope=request 
path=/ForgotPassword 

forward name=show path=.forgotPassword redirect=false /
/action

If I use the following:
action name=ForgotPasswordForm 
type=web.ForgotPasswordAction  
validate=true 
input=/ForgotPassword.do 
scope=request 
path=/ForgotPassword 

forward name=show path=.forgotPassword redirect=false /
/action

Then I get the following error: (now it's endless... really so sorry :)

javax.servlet.ServletException: Servlet execution threw an exception
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Applica
tionFilterChain.java:269)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilt
erChain.java:193)
at
org.securityfilter.filter.SecurityFilter.doFilter(SecurityFilter.java:19
9)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Applica
tionFilterChain.java:213)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilt
erChain.java:193)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValv
e.java:256)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:643)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:4
80)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValv
e.java:191)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:643)
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.CertificatesValve.invoke(CertificatesValve.ja
va:246)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:641)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:4
80)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.invoke(StandardContext.java:241
5)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java
:180)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:643)
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorDispatcherValve.invoke(ErrorDispatcherVa
lve.java:171)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:641)
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java
:172)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:641)
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:509
)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:641)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:4
80)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.
java:174)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:643)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:4
80)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at
org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:223)
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:59
4)
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processC
onnection(Http11Protocol.java:392)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:56
5)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool
.java:619)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536)


root cause 

java.lang.StackOverflowError
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationHttpRequest.setAttribute(Application
HttpRequest.java:247)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationHttpRequest.setAttribute(Application
HttpRequest.java:250)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationHttpRequest.setAttribute(Application
HttpRequest.java:250)
at

RE: action mapping 'input' question

2003-07-18 Thread Michael Ruppin
Unless validation suceeds, this looks like an infinite
loop to me:

input=/ForgotPassword.do
path=/ForgotPassword 

m

--- Erez Efrati [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am using struts/tiles/validator in my application.
 
 Using the following configuration works fine, still
 I see that on the
 first invocation the form gets validated and I get
 validation errors. My
 ForgotPasswordAction action is used both for the
 INIT and the SUBMIT
 operations. The only solution I read about is
 putting 'validate'=false
 and control the invocation of the super.validate()
 in my code. Is this
 true?
 
 action name=ForgotPasswordForm 
   type=web.ForgotPasswordAction  
   validate=true 
   input=.forgotPassword 
   scope=request 
   path=/ForgotPassword 
 
   forward name=show path=.forgotPassword
 redirect=false /
 /action
 
 If I use the following:
 action name=ForgotPasswordForm 
   type=web.ForgotPasswordAction  
   validate=true 
   input=/ForgotPassword.do 
   scope=request 
   path=/ForgotPassword 
 
   forward name=show path=.forgotPassword
 redirect=false /
 /action
 
 Then I get the following error: (now it's endless...
 really so sorry :)
 
 javax.servlet.ServletException: Servlet execution
 threw an exception
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Applica
 tionFilterChain.java:269)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilt
 erChain.java:193)
   at

org.securityfilter.filter.SecurityFilter.doFilter(SecurityFilter.java:19
 9)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Applica
 tionFilterChain.java:213)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilt
 erChain.java:193)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValv
 e.java:256)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
 nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:643)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:4
 80)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValv
 e.java:191)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
 nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:643)
   at

org.apache.catalina.valves.CertificatesValve.invoke(CertificatesValve.ja
 va:246)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
 nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:641)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:4
 80)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.invoke(StandardContext.java:241
 5)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java
 :180)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
 nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:643)
   at

org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorDispatcherValve.invoke(ErrorDispatcherVa
 lve.java:171)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
 nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:641)
   at

org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java
 :172)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
 nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:641)
   at

org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:509
 )
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
 nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:641)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:4
 80)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.
 java:174)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.i
 nvokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:643)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:4
 80)
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
   at

org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:223)
   at

org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:59
 4)
   at

org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processC
 onnection(Http11Protocol.java:392)
   at

org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:56
 5)
   at

org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool
 .java:619)
   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536)
 
 
 root cause 
 
 java.lang.StackOverflowError
   at

org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationHttpRequest.setAttribute(Application
 HttpRequest.java:247)
   at


RE: action mapping input

2002-10-28 Thread Chen, Gin
Okay, I misunderstood what John was saying and this is what I have:
1) forward failure is NOT the same as input which is required if
validate=true
2) input CAN forward to a tiles definition.
I looked at the original post and realized that it was pretty ambiguous.
what i wanted to do (and it was successful)
was:

  action path=/siteSelect type=SiteSelectAction
name=siteSelectForm validate=true scope=request
input=site.select.page
 forward name=success path=site.select.global/
  /action

where site.select.page was a tiles definition.

Thanks,
-Tim

-Original Message-
From: Chen, Gin [mailto:Gin_Chen;tvratings.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 3:19 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: action mapping input


Okay, just to get this straight.
So I define a failure forward and it will behave the same as validation
error following the input tag?
No additional coding required?
Also, the reason that I wanted to use the input tag instead of another
forward is that I want to use the 1.1b2 method getInputForward(). It would
almost make sense that with the inclusion of this new method, the intent was
for it to behave as if it were looking up a forward or global.
No?

-Tim

-Original Message-
From: John Nicholas [mailto:jakarta;mobosplash.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: action mapping input


Chen, Gin wrote:
 Hi all,
   I'm still new to struts and I cant find this in the documentation
 but, lets say that you have one of the struts-config from the docs.
 
   global-forwards type=org.apache.struts.action.ActionForward/
 forward name=logon path=/logon.jsp redirect=false /
   /global-forwards
   action-mappings
 action path=/logon type=org.apache.struts.example.LogonAction
 name=logonForm scope=request input=/logon.jsp unknown=false
 validate=true /
   /action-mappings
 
Rather than have input=/logon.jsp as in the snip can you have
 input=logon and have it use the path from the global-forwards?
It just seems like it would make more sense since that means that you
 only have to change one location in case the location of the file ever has
 to change.
 


The input attribute is used when validation of the form bean fails. if 
the validation in the form bean (or the validator) fails the action is 
never run so it couldn't use the forward. The controller is returning 
you to the input page.

If a validation in the action fails (like a business logic failure)then 
you can use a failure forward.

John Nicholas



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:struts-user-help;jakarta.apache.org

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:struts-user-help;jakarta.apache.org

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:struts-user-help;jakarta.apache.org




action mapping input

2002-10-18 Thread Chen, Gin
Hi all,
I'm still new to struts and I cant find this in the documentation
but, lets say that you have one of the struts-config from the docs.

  global-forwards type=org.apache.struts.action.ActionForward/
forward name=logon path=/logon.jsp redirect=false /
  /global-forwards
  action-mappings
action path=/logon type=org.apache.struts.example.LogonAction
name=logonForm scope=request input=/logon.jsp unknown=false
validate=true /
  /action-mappings

   Rather than have input=/logon.jsp as in the snip can you have
input=logon and have it use the path from the global-forwards?
   It just seems like it would make more sense since that means that you
only have to change one location in case the location of the file ever has
to change.

Thanks,
-Tim

-Original Message-
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:ekbush;swbell.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:25 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Avoid Heavy Use of Logic Tags ???


... and now that we have the JSTL you can have your tags optimized into 
actual code.  It's my understanding, for example, that a forEach tag 
would be translated into an actual while (or was it for ...  anyway, you 
get the point).  So, you're bypassing the tag-usage overhead some.

Hopefully Martin will see this and elaborate (and correct me if I'm 
wrong).  I believe that's fairly close though ...

Of course - not all of us are on containers that even support the JSTL 
... but some of us are :-)

Robert wrote:

I think that statement Using custom tags for logic provides little
benefit... is bit vague. I would say that custom tags the do
PRESENTATION logic are of benefit, e.g. iterators, formatting, html
controls, etc. all fit into that category for me. You are right, you
have to do it somehow, where otherwise you end up with just static HTML
right?

I'm not sure why he would say that XML syntax is more difficult to
maintain than other types. That is probably more of an 'eye of the
beholder' issue. If you have web developers that are unfamiliar with
Java, then the XML syntax is probably easier than a bunch of scriptlets,
no? Personally I think it is a lot easier to read than other dynamic
page systems (ASP, PHP, etc.), but that is just me.

- Robert

-- 
Eddie Bush




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:struts-user-help;jakarta.apache.org

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:struts-user-help;jakarta.apache.org




Re: action mapping input

2002-10-18 Thread John Nicholas
Chen, Gin wrote:

Hi all,
	I'm still new to struts and I cant find this in the documentation
but, lets say that you have one of the struts-config from the docs.

  global-forwards type=org.apache.struts.action.ActionForward/
forward name=logon path=/logon.jsp redirect=false /
  /global-forwards
  action-mappings
action path=/logon type=org.apache.struts.example.LogonAction
name=logonForm scope=request input=/logon.jsp unknown=false
validate=true /
  /action-mappings

   Rather than have input=/logon.jsp as in the snip can you have
input=logon and have it use the path from the global-forwards?
   It just seems like it would make more sense since that means that you
only have to change one location in case the location of the file ever has
to change.




The input attribute is used when validation of the form bean fails. if 
the validation in the form bean (or the validator) fails the action is 
never run so it couldn't use the forward. The controller is returning 
you to the input page.

If a validation in the action fails (like a business logic failure)then 
you can use a failure forward.

John Nicholas



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:struts-user-help;jakarta.apache.org



RE: action mapping input

2002-10-18 Thread Chen, Gin
Okay, just to get this straight.
So I define a failure forward and it will behave the same as validation
error following the input tag?
No additional coding required?
Also, the reason that I wanted to use the input tag instead of another
forward is that I want to use the 1.1b2 method getInputForward(). It would
almost make sense that with the inclusion of this new method, the intent was
for it to behave as if it were looking up a forward or global.
No?

-Tim

-Original Message-
From: John Nicholas [mailto:jakarta;mobosplash.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: action mapping input


Chen, Gin wrote:
 Hi all,
   I'm still new to struts and I cant find this in the documentation
 but, lets say that you have one of the struts-config from the docs.
 
   global-forwards type=org.apache.struts.action.ActionForward/
 forward name=logon path=/logon.jsp redirect=false /
   /global-forwards
   action-mappings
 action path=/logon type=org.apache.struts.example.LogonAction
 name=logonForm scope=request input=/logon.jsp unknown=false
 validate=true /
   /action-mappings
 
Rather than have input=/logon.jsp as in the snip can you have
 input=logon and have it use the path from the global-forwards?
It just seems like it would make more sense since that means that you
 only have to change one location in case the location of the file ever has
 to change.
 


The input attribute is used when validation of the form bean fails. if 
the validation in the form bean (or the validator) fails the action is 
never run so it couldn't use the forward. The controller is returning 
you to the input page.

If a validation in the action fails (like a business logic failure)then 
you can use a failure forward.

John Nicholas



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:struts-user-help;jakarta.apache.org

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:struts-user-help;jakarta.apache.org




Re: action mapping input

2002-10-18 Thread Kris Schneider
You can also leverage the input attribute in an action by returning the 
following from perform/execute:

new ActionForward(mapping.getInput())

Quoting John Nicholas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Chen, Gin wrote:
  Hi all,
  I'm still new to struts and I cant find this in the documentation
  but, lets say that you have one of the struts-config from the docs.
  
global-forwards type=org.apache.struts.action.ActionForward/
  forward name=logon path=/logon.jsp redirect=false /
/global-forwards
action-mappings
  action path=/logon type=org.apache.struts.example.LogonAction
  name=logonForm scope=request input=/logon.jsp unknown=false
  validate=true /
/action-mappings
  
 Rather than have input=/logon.jsp as in the snip can you have
  input=logon and have it use the path from the global-forwards?
 It just seems like it would make more sense since that means that you
  only have to change one location in case the location of the file ever
 has
  to change.
  
 
 
 The input attribute is used when validation of the form bean fails. if 
 the validation in the form bean (or the validator) fails the action is 
 never run so it couldn't use the forward. The controller is returning 
 you to the input page.
 
 If a validation in the action fails (like a business logic failure)then 
 you can use a failure forward.
 
 John Nicholas
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
 mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:struts-user-help;jakarta.apache.org

-- 
Kris Schneider mailto:kris;dotech.com
D.O.Tech   http://www.dotech.com/

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:struts-user-help;jakarta.apache.org




RE: action mapping input

2002-10-18 Thread Kris Schneider
I haven't played much with 1.1, but here's a snippet from the 1.1 DTD about the 
controller element's inputForward attribute:

inputForward 

Set to true if you want the input attribute of action
elements to be the name of a local or global ActionForward,
which will then be used to calculate the ultimate URL. Set
to false (the default) to treat the input parameter of
action elements as a module-relative path to the resource
to be used as the input form. Since Struts 1.1.
[false]

So, it sounds like you can configure it to have the behavior you want. The 
attribute affects the way ActionMapping.getInputForward behaves. It's a small 
piece of code, so here it is:

public ActionForward getInputForward() {
  if (getApplicationConfig().getControllerConfig().getInputForward()) {
return (findForward(getInput()));
  } else {
return (new ActionForward(getInput()));
  }
}

Quoting Chen, Gin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Okay, just to get this straight.
 So I define a failure forward and it will behave the same as validation
 error following the input tag?
 No additional coding required?
 Also, the reason that I wanted to use the input tag instead of another
 forward is that I want to use the 1.1b2 method getInputForward(). It would
 almost make sense that with the inclusion of this new method, the intent
 was
 for it to behave as if it were looking up a forward or global.
 No?
 
 -Tim
 
 -Original Message-
 From: John Nicholas [mailto:jakarta;mobosplash.com]
 Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 2:45 PM
 To: Struts Users Mailing List
 Subject: Re: action mapping input
 
 
 Chen, Gin wrote:
  Hi all,
  I'm still new to struts and I cant find this in the documentation
  but, lets say that you have one of the struts-config from the docs.
  
global-forwards type=org.apache.struts.action.ActionForward/
  forward name=logon path=/logon.jsp redirect=false /
/global-forwards
action-mappings
  action path=/logon type=org.apache.struts.example.LogonAction
  name=logonForm scope=request input=/logon.jsp unknown=false
  validate=true /
/action-mappings
  
 Rather than have input=/logon.jsp as in the snip can you have
  input=logon and have it use the path from the global-forwards?
 It just seems like it would make more sense since that means that you
  only have to change one location in case the location of the file ever
 has
  to change.
  
 
 
 The input attribute is used when validation of the form bean fails. if 
 the validation in the form bean (or the validator) fails the action is 
 never run so it couldn't use the forward. The controller is returning 
 you to the input page.
 
 If a validation in the action fails (like a business logic failure)then 
 you can use a failure forward.
 
 John Nicholas
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:struts-user-help;jakarta.apache.org
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
 mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:struts-user-help;jakarta.apache.org
 
 


-- 
Kris Schneider mailto:kris;dotech.com
D.O.Tech   http://www.dotech.com/

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:struts-user-help;jakarta.apache.org




mapping-input

2002-06-10 Thread hans albers

hi there,

I want to validate my input, if there are any errors,
i get a server-error mapping-input is null.

How to do values come in  the mapping-input, in my mapping-path,
there is the correct path?

hans



_
Senden und empfangen Sie Hotmail über Ihr Mobilgerät: http://mobile.msn.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: mapping-input

2002-06-10 Thread Mark Nichols


 I want to validate my input, if there are any errors,
 i get a server-error mapping-input is null.

 How to do values come in  the mapping-input, in my mapping-path,
 there is the correct path?

 hans


Without seeing your code it is hard to say for sure what the problem maybe.
However, I think the message is saying your action mapping is missing the
input parameter which specifies the input JSP.  When you get validation
errors the controller would like to display them on the input page for
you. Without that mapping it can't.

Or I could be wrong.

/mark



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]