Re: Subsurface 4.8 & Subsurface-mobile 2.1 have been released

[Dirk Hohndel]

Thanks for catching that. Should be fixed now. Please check.

/D

> On Jun 29, 2018, at 6:49 PM, Matt Thompson  wrote:
> 
> I just tried to download the latest on Windows but the web site still points 
> to Subsurface 4.7.8. When I install and run that version there is an alert 
> that there is a new version available but it points me at 
> http://subsurface-divelog.org/downloads/smtk2ssrf-4.8.0.exe 
> .
> 
> macOS updated just fine.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Matt
> 
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Jan Iversen  > wrote:
> Gratulations to all who helped make this happen!
> 
> I am proud of being part of a team that taken action serious and talk less :-)
> 
> Looking forward to prepare some greater changes to the mobile version for an 
> upcoming release.
> 
> Thanks
> jan I
> 
> Enviado desde mi iPad
> 
> El 29 jun 2018, a las 21:26, Dirk Hohndel  > escribió:
> 
>> Hello everyone.
>> 
>> As promised, I pushed out the two releases this morning. The Android app 
>> just this moment got approved, the iOS is as usual still held up in review 
>> but should be available "soonishly".
>> Everything else is available for download, tags are pushed, sources 
>> uploaded, the announcement has been posted on our website and on Facebook 
>> (no one is really using Google Plus anymore, so I decided not to bother).
>> As always, sharing the post on Facebook helps us get more visibility (FB 
>> sends me daily nag emails that for only $30 / $50 / $25 / $xx I can reach N 
>> more people... sure, I'll pay for that... NOT).
>> 
>> I did a rather dreadful partial translation of the announcement into German 
>> for our website - I'd appreciate a better translation there. And I prepared 
>> for the Dutch and Spanish translations (as we typically have those two 
>> languages updated). If you want to create other translations of the 
>> announcement, let me know and I'll set it up (I need to create them in 
>> WordPress or things don't quite work).
>> 
>> The log shows that we have three new contributors: Allen Hall, Stephen 
>> Goodall, and a very active new contributor - thanks Jan Iversen for all your 
>> work. 
>> And thanks to the reviewers, maintainers, and especially to the translators 
>> who (because of the way we have set up our tooling) don't get credit in 
>> these stats.
>> 
>> $ git shortlog -sn v4.7.8..
>>126  Dirk Hohndel
>>116  jan Iversen
>> 73  Berthold Stoeger
>> 21  Willem Ferguson
>> 21  Robert C. Helling
>> 19  Miika Turkia
>> 16  Murillo Bernardes
>> 14  Anton Lundin
>>  7  Stefan Fuchs
>>  6  Lubomir I. Ivanov
>>  6  Jeremie Guichard
>>  6  Linus Torvalds
>>  3  Oliver Schwaneberg
>>  3  Michał Sawicz
>>  2  Stephen Goodall
>>  1  Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
>>  1  Guillaume GARDET
>>  1  Allen Hall
>>  1  Gaetan Bisson
>> 
>> 
>> I think we need to update the website - it's starting to look out of date. 
>> If anyone would like to help with that, I'd really appreciate it.
>> 
>> All the best and enjoy the weekend!
>> 
>> /D
>> ___
>> subsurface mailing list
>> subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org 
>> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface 
>> 
> 
> ___
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org 
> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface 
> 
> 
> 

___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: Subsurface 4.8 & Subsurface-mobile 2.1 have been released

[Matt Thompson]

I just tried to download the latest on Windows but the web site still
points to Subsurface 4.7.8. When I install and run that version there is an
alert that there is a new version available but it points me at
http://subsurface-divelog.org/downloads/smtk2ssrf-4.8.0.exe.

macOS updated just fine.

Thanks,
-Matt

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Jan Iversen  wrote:

> Gratulations to all who helped make this happen!
>
> I am proud of being part of a team that taken action serious and talk less
> :-)
>
> Looking forward to prepare some greater changes to the mobile version for
> an upcoming release.
>
> Thanks
> jan I
>
> Enviado desde mi iPad
>
> El 29 jun 2018, a las 21:26, Dirk Hohndel  escribió:
>
> Hello everyone.
>
> As promised, I pushed out the two releases this morning. The Android app
> just this moment got approved, the iOS is as usual still held up in review
> but should be available "soonishly".
> Everything else is available for download, tags are pushed, sources
> uploaded, the announcement has been posted on our website and on Facebook
> (no one is really using Google Plus anymore, so I decided not to bother).
> As always, sharing the post on Facebook helps us get more visibility (FB
> sends me daily nag emails that for only $30 / $50 / $25 / $xx I can reach N
> more people... sure, I'll pay for that... NOT).
>
> I did a rather dreadful partial translation of the announcement into
> German for our website - I'd appreciate a better translation there. And I
> prepared for the Dutch and Spanish translations (as we typically have those
> two languages updated). If you want to create other translations of the
> announcement, let me know and I'll set it up (I need to create them in
> WordPress or things don't quite work).
>
> The log shows that we have three new contributors: Allen Hall, Stephen
> Goodall, and a very active new contributor - thanks Jan Iversen for all
> your work.
> And thanks to the reviewers, maintainers, and especially to the
> translators who (because of the way we have set up our tooling) don't get
> credit in these stats.
>
> $ git shortlog -sn v4.7.8..
>126  Dirk Hohndel
>116  jan Iversen
> 73  Berthold Stoeger
> 21  Willem Ferguson
> 21  Robert C. Helling
> 19  Miika Turkia
> 16  Murillo Bernardes
> 14  Anton Lundin
>  7  Stefan Fuchs
>  6  Lubomir I. Ivanov
>  6  Jeremie Guichard
>  6  Linus Torvalds
>  3  Oliver Schwaneberg
>  3  Michał Sawicz
>  2  Stephen Goodall
>  1  Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
>  1  Guillaume GARDET
>  1  Allen Hall
>  1  Gaetan Bisson
>
>
> I think we need to update the website - it's starting to look out of date.
> If anyone would like to help with that, I'd really appreciate it.
>
> All the best and enjoy the weekend!
>
> /D
>
> ___
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
>
>
> ___
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
>
>
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: branches contra tags for releases.

[Dirk Hohndel]

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 09:57:10PM +0200, Jan Iversen wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Is there a reason why we use tags instead of branches for a release. I am 
> used to having a release branch for 2 reasons:
> - work on master is not blocked but continues normally (with cherry pick to 
> the release branch)
> - it is easy to make a release patch if needed.

There are different philosophies on how to manage a git repo. We tried
release branches and it was generally not worth the hassle. We typically
slow down master for just a few days (because we have no serious release
process, let's be honest about it), so the inconvenience for the
developers really isn't that big. And it removes the issue of ending up
with patches going to multiple branches. We don't have the scale and the
resources to really deal with providing updates to older releases, anyway.

When we did the Gtk->Qt transition this made sense. We've done it in other
circumstances where massive changes made master a bit unstable (or lost us
features) and therefore it was reasonable to have a stable branch off of a
release. But in general... I don't see a ton of value.

/D
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: branches contra tags for releases.

[Lubomir I. Ivanov]

On 29 June 2018 at 22:57, Jan Iversen  wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there a reason why we use tags instead of branches for a release. I am 
> used to having a release branch for 2 reasons:
> - work on master is not blocked but continues normally (with cherry pick to 
> the release branch)
> - it is easy to make a release patch if needed.
>

i don't mind our current workflow.
makes the life of the maintainers easier.

also our code/docs/string freeze period is very short.

lubomir
--
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

branches contra tags for releases.

[Jan Iversen]

Hi

Is there a reason why we use tags instead of branches for a release. I am used 
to having a release branch for 2 reasons:
- work on master is not blocked but continues normally (with cherry pick to the 
release branch)
- it is easy to make a release patch if needed.

so hence my question.
rgds
jan I

Enviado desde mi iPad
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: Subsurface 4.8 & Subsurface-mobile 2.1 have been released

[Jan Iversen]

Gratulations to all who helped make this happen!

I am proud of being part of a team that taken action serious and talk less :-)

Looking forward to prepare some greater changes to the mobile version for an 
upcoming release.

Thanks
jan I

Enviado desde mi iPad

> El 29 jun 2018, a las 21:26, Dirk Hohndel  escribió:
> 
> Hello everyone.
> 
> As promised, I pushed out the two releases this morning. The Android app just 
> this moment got approved, the iOS is as usual still held up in review but 
> should be available "soonishly".
> Everything else is available for download, tags are pushed, sources uploaded, 
> the announcement has been posted on our website and on Facebook (no one is 
> really using Google Plus anymore, so I decided not to bother).
> As always, sharing the post on Facebook helps us get more visibility (FB 
> sends me daily nag emails that for only $30 / $50 / $25 / $xx I can reach N 
> more people... sure, I'll pay for that... NOT).
> 
> I did a rather dreadful partial translation of the announcement into German 
> for our website - I'd appreciate a better translation there. And I prepared 
> for the Dutch and Spanish translations (as we typically have those two 
> languages updated). If you want to create other translations of the 
> announcement, let me know and I'll set it up (I need to create them in 
> WordPress or things don't quite work).
> 
> The log shows that we have three new contributors: Allen Hall, Stephen 
> Goodall, and a very active new contributor - thanks Jan Iversen for all your 
> work. 
> And thanks to the reviewers, maintainers, and especially to the translators 
> who (because of the way we have set up our tooling) don't get credit in these 
> stats.
> 
> $ git shortlog -sn v4.7.8..
>126  Dirk Hohndel
>116  jan Iversen
> 73  Berthold Stoeger
> 21  Willem Ferguson
> 21  Robert C. Helling
> 19  Miika Turkia
> 16  Murillo Bernardes
> 14  Anton Lundin
>  7  Stefan Fuchs
>  6  Lubomir I. Ivanov
>  6  Jeremie Guichard
>  6  Linus Torvalds
>  3  Oliver Schwaneberg
>  3  Michał Sawicz
>  2  Stephen Goodall
>  1  Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
>  1  Guillaume GARDET
>  1  Allen Hall
>  1  Gaetan Bisson
> 
> 
> I think we need to update the website - it's starting to look out of date. If 
> anyone would like to help with that, I'd really appreciate it.
> 
> All the best and enjoy the weekend!
> 
> /D
> ___
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Subsurface 4.8 & Subsurface-mobile 2.1 have been released

[Dirk Hohndel]

Hello everyone.

As promised, I pushed out the two releases this morning. The Android app just 
this moment got approved, the iOS is as usual still held up in review but 
should be available "soonishly".
Everything else is available for download, tags are pushed, sources uploaded, 
the announcement has been posted on our website and on Facebook (no one is 
really using Google Plus anymore, so I decided not to bother).
As always, sharing the post on Facebook helps us get more visibility (FB sends 
me daily nag emails that for only $30 / $50 / $25 / $xx I can reach N more 
people... sure, I'll pay for that... NOT).

I did a rather dreadful partial translation of the announcement into German for 
our website - I'd appreciate a better translation there. And I prepared for the 
Dutch and Spanish translations (as we typically have those two languages 
updated). If you want to create other translations of the announcement, let me 
know and I'll set it up (I need to create them in WordPress or things don't 
quite work).

The log shows that we have three new contributors: Allen Hall, Stephen Goodall, 
and a very active new contributor - thanks Jan Iversen for all your work. 
And thanks to the reviewers, maintainers, and especially to the translators who 
(because of the way we have set up our tooling) don't get credit in these stats.

$ git shortlog -sn v4.7.8..
   126  Dirk Hohndel
   116  jan Iversen
73  Berthold Stoeger
21  Willem Ferguson
21  Robert C. Helling
19  Miika Turkia
16  Murillo Bernardes
14  Anton Lundin
 7  Stefan Fuchs
 6  Lubomir I. Ivanov
 6  Jeremie Guichard
 6  Linus Torvalds
 3  Oliver Schwaneberg
 3  Michał Sawicz
 2  Stephen Goodall
 1  Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
 1  Guillaume GARDET
 1  Allen Hall
 1  Gaetan Bisson


I think we need to update the website - it's starting to look out of date. If 
anyone would like to help with that, I'd really appreciate it.

All the best and enjoy the weekend!

/D___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: Split a dive by time

[Salvador Cuñat]

Good evening.

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 06:56:03PM +0200, tormento wrote:
> There are no 0 segments, unfortunately. And by a defined time would be much
> more useful.
> 
> Il giorno ven 29 giu 2018 alle 14:04 Jan Mulder  ha
> scritto:
> 
> > Not really what you ask for, but there is a split dive option in the
> > context menu (right-click on a dive in the dive list). This splits dives
> > that have segments of 0m depth in the profile.
> >
> > On 29-06-18 13:57, tormento wrote:
> > > I have a request to do: I need to split a dive in two separate ones by
> > > giving time after which to split. Reason is: I kept too much high
> > > repetitive timespan on diving computer and we stayed floating before
> > > doing the second dive. Diving computer recorded it as a single one.
> 
Jan's option worked pretty well for me in the past. And I've tested it
with  gd853c477b and still does.  It even trims the surface time
giving you two "clean" dives.

It works automatically after downloading the dive in most cases, but
can be manually called, if needed, from the dive list context menu.

Best regards

Salva.
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: Split a dive by time

[tormento]

There are no 0 segments, unfortunately. And by a defined time would be much
more useful.

Il giorno ven 29 giu 2018 alle 14:04 Jan Mulder  ha
scritto:

> Not really what you ask for, but there is a split dive option in the
> context menu (right-click on a dive in the dive list). This splits dives
> that have segments of 0m depth in the profile.
>
> On 29-06-18 13:57, tormento wrote:
> > I have a request to do: I need to split a dive in two separate ones by
> > giving time after which to split. Reason is: I kept too much high
> > repetitive timespan on diving computer and we stayed floating before
> > doing the second dive. Diving computer recorded it as a single one.
> >
> > Is it difficult to implement?
>
> --jan
> ___
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
>
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: Split a dive by time

[Jan Mulder]

Not really what you ask for, but there is a split dive option in the 
context menu (right-click on a dive in the dive list). This splits dives 
that have segments of 0m depth in the profile.


On 29-06-18 13:57, tormento wrote:
I have a request to do: I need to split a dive in two separate ones by 
giving time after which to split. Reason is: I kept too much high 
repetitive timespan on diving computer and we stayed floating before 
doing the second dive. Diving computer recorded it as a single one.


Is it difficult to implement?


--jan
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Split a dive by time

[tormento]

I have a request to do: I need to split a dive in two separate ones by
giving time after which to split. Reason is: I kept too much high
repetitive timespan on diving computer and we stayed floating before doing
the second dive. Diving computer recorded it as a single one.

Is it difficult to implement?

Thanks,
Alberto
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface