Hi Berthold.
On 25/04/24 19:05, Berthold Stoeger via subsurface wrote:
On Donnerstag, 25. April 2024 06:43:19 CEST Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> Rewriting this would be a huge mistake.
>
> There are like four working units left, three of the owners use
Subsurface,
> two of them have carefully hacked the existing code to work for them...
If these two persons are still active, they could help me debug it, no?
I can't sleep well knowing of the oddity I pointed out earlier and
gems like this one:
char *dive_no_ptr = strstr(dive_no_buf, "dive_no{int{") + 12;
if (dive_no_ptr) {
char *dive_no_end = strstr(dive_no_ptr, "{");
You should try hard liquor. ;-)
Cheers
Michael Keller
___
subsurface mailing list -- subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
To unsubscribe send an email to subsurface-le...@subsurface-divelog.org
