Re: Buehlmann / Buhlmann / Bühlmann

2015-09-15 Thread Salvador Cuñat 
El 16/09/2015 01:23, "Dirk Hohndel"  escribió:
>
> Any volunteer to patch this EVERYWHERE?
>

I can do it this evening.
Regards.
Salva.
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: Buehlmann / Buhlmann / Bühlmann

2015-09-15 Thread Rick Walsh 
On 16 Sep 2015 09:23, "Dirk Hohndel"  wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 15, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Salvador Cuñat 
wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-09-15 23:33 GMT+02:00 Salvador Cuñat :
>>>
>>> Good night.
>>>
>>> I remember that this was discussed some time ago, but can't remember if
there was an agreement about it.
>>
>>
>> I've finally found the thread.
>> Seems that there was an agreement about using "Buhlmann" as it is the
most widely used in the web.  Then ... nobody used it  (specially in
manual, where there is no occurrence for this, just Buehlmann and Bühlmann).
>
>
> Back then we didn't want UTF-8 in our source and so went with Buhlmann.
I'd be happy to simply change it everywhere to Bühlmann.
> Any volunteer to patch this EVERYWHERE?
>
By *everywhere* I hope you mean everywhere except variable names, which
should be Buhlmann.  Consistency there is good but ü is a pain for many of
us to type in text editors.
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: Buehlmann / Buhlmann / Bühlmann

2015-09-15 Thread Dirk Hohndel 

> On Sep 15, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Salvador Cuñat  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 2015-09-15 23:33 GMT+02:00 Salvador Cuñat  >:
> Good night.
> 
> I remember that this was discussed some time ago, but can't remember if there 
> was an agreement about it.
> 
> I've finally found the thread.
> Seems that there was an agreement about using "Buhlmann" as it is the most 
> widely used in the web.  Then ... nobody used it  (specially in manual, where 
> there is no occurrence for this, just Buehlmann and Bühlmann).

Back then we didn't want UTF-8 in our source and so went with Buhlmann. I'd be 
happy to simply change it everywhere to Bühlmann.
Any volunteer to patch this EVERYWHERE?

/D___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: Buehlmann / Buhlmann / Bühlmann

2015-09-15 Thread Dirk Hohndel 

> On Sep 15, 2015, at 4:33 PM, Rick Walsh  wrote:
> >
> > Back then we didn't want UTF-8 in our source and so went with Buhlmann. I'd 
> > be happy to simply change it everywhere to Bühlmann.
> > Any volunteer to patch this EVERYWHERE?
> >
> By *everywhere* I hope you mean everywhere except variable names, which 
> should be Buhlmann.  Consistency there is good but ü is a pain for many of us 
> to type in text editors.
Of course. I meant to say "all user visible strings, both in the UI and the 
user manual, but not variable names or names of settings".

/D___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: Buehlmann / Buhlmann / Bühlmann

2015-09-15 Thread Salvador Cuñat 
2015-09-15 23:33 GMT+02:00 Salvador Cuñat :

> Good night.
>
> I remember that this was discussed some time ago, but can't remember if
> there was an agreement about it.
>

I've finally found the thread.
Seems that there was an agreement about using "Buhlmann" as it is the most
widely used in the web.  Then ... nobody used it  (specially in manual,
where there is no occurrence for this, just Buehlmann and Bühlmann).

Regards.

Salva-
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Buehlmann / Buhlmann / Bühlmann

2015-09-15 Thread Salvador Cuñat 
Good night.

I remember that this was discussed some time ago, but can't remember if
there was an agreement about it.

I've just realized we are mixing the names everywhere (there are just two
occurrences in planner and they are different), mainly in user-manual.

I don't known if there is a correct one, but we will probably have to
choose one and use only this along the whole project.

Regards.

Salva
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface