[sugar] from [geeks] : NodeBox art, animation and visualization via Python
Has anyone used NodeBox? It looks pretty fine. It uses Cocoa via puObjC; not an immediate candidate for sugarization. But a simple bundle along these lins would be fun... -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:50:58 -0800 From: watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [geeks] NodeBox: art, animation and visualization via Python "NodeBox is a Mac OS X application that lets you create 2D visuals (static, animated or interactive) using Python programming code and export them as a PDF or a QuickTime movie. NodeBox is free and well-documented." check out: http://nodebox.net/code/index.php/Gallery most examples have code available along with the screenshots. impressive how tiny some of this code is. i particularly like these: http://nodebox.net/code/index.php/Landslide http://nodebox.net/code/index.php/Andren_|_A_Digital_Remake http://nodebox.net/code/index.php/Evolution (scroll down) and http://nodebox.net/code/index.php/Superfolia which references this awesome math -> natural art concept: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superformula w___ geeks mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.false-profit.com/listinfo/geeks ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] idea for a tutorial recording activity
Bert, > To get around the CPU and storage constraints, wouldn't simply > recording input events along with voice-over be much better? Do you mean we would then replay the inputs, perhaps using synthetic X events? I doubt very much that would produce a usable tutorial. It would rely on all laptops behaving in precisely the same way every time, which is unrealistic. >From the tests I've run so far, I think pyvnc2swf may be workable, and recordmydesktop might be workable as well (it isn't on a B2, but Eduardo says it worked for him OK on a B4) I'll experiment some more when I get a B4, and see if I can prove the concept some more. Cheers, Tridge ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
[sugar] Fwd: joyride smoke test results?
I keep forgetting to reply to the list. I was having the same problems with the latests joyrides, and one by one downgraded using "olpc-update" until I found a joyride where everything is working (browse, record,etc.), 1381. 2007/12/10, Benjamin M. Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Erik Blankinship wrote: > > > > Wiki notes notwithstanding, 1395 is working for me. > > > > Note that I did a clean install (square-key with usb > > autoreinstallation). > > > > > > Just tried that on a b3 and same problem -- activities don't launch > > (other than Journal). > > It looks like some things work and some don't. I tried Chat, Connect, > Calculator, Clock, and Distance, all of which launched fine. Record > doesn't > launch, and neither does Browse. > > - --Ben > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFHXapSUJT6e6HFtqQRAp2bAJsGnz3HN00leXdEdqBPK9NXPTIQNgCgoXi9 > KnO7Y0zSvrbyUETaRsMYTW0= > =MgCG > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > ___ > Sugar mailing list > Sugar@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar > ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] joyride smoke test results?
--- "Erik Blankinship" wrote: A related question not yet answered on that wiki page: What is the last known joyride that, for the most part, worked? --- end of quote --- It looks like the last joyride test that went through the 1 hour smoke test was Joyride 1372. Unfortunately, joyride builds come out faster than they can be tested. Pretty soon we hope to have the results of tinderbox determine whether we post a joyride build or not. One of the things tinderbox does is try to load each activity. This will catch these big regressions very quickly. cscott is also working on making some headless tests that will be run on builds in order to find major bugs right off the bat. Also, mstone is working on Buildbot to do additional testing. If you have access to the teamwiki, the minutes from the testing meeting we had about this are here: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/TestMtg%2C_2007-12-02 - AlexL ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] joyride smoke test results?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erik Blankinship wrote: > > Wiki notes notwithstanding, 1395 is working for me. > > Note that I did a clean install (square-key with usb > autoreinstallation). > > > Just tried that on a b3 and same problem -- activities don't launch > (other than Journal). It looks like some things work and some don't. I tried Chat, Connect, Calculator, Clock, and Distance, all of which launched fine. Record doesn't launch, and neither does Browse. - --Ben -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHXapSUJT6e6HFtqQRAp2bAJsGnz3HN00leXdEdqBPK9NXPTIQNgCgoXi9 KnO7Y0zSvrbyUETaRsMYTW0= =MgCG -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] joyride smoke test results?
> Wiki notes notwithstanding, 1395 is working for me. > > Note that I did a clean install (square-key with usb autoreinstallation). Just tried that on a b3 and same problem -- activities don't launch (other than Journal). ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] joyride smoke test results?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erik Blankinship wrote: > A related question not yet answered on that wiki page: What is the last > known joyride that, for the most part, worked? Wiki notes notwithstanding, 1395 is working for me. Note that I did a clean install (square-key with usb autoreinstallation). - --Ben -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- --- end of quote --- There are some sugar rpms that are missing, which have caused a lot of activities to fail to launch, mostly becuase of Attribute errors. I believe our new build manager is aware of this, and is working on getting those rpms back into joyride. Were you able to get browse or record to load? Those are two which won't load for me on 1394, which should be the same as 1395 based on the changelogs (http://dev.laptop.org/~bert/joyride-pkgs.html), but that's not for certain. - AlexL ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] status of MANIFEST file
C. Scott Ananian schrieb: > On Dec 8, 2007 7:18 PM, Christoph Derndorfer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Daniel and me are again having another weekend-jam working on the >> activity handbook and we've just spent the past half hour looking at >> different .xo packages from the git-repository to see how the MANIFEST >> file inside the .xo package is being used. >> > > I'd like to see some documentation on how to integrate a non-Python > activity into sugar. It certainly has been done, but it seems > shrouded in the black art of the pygtk binding. Maybe a "C Hello > World" example would be nice, which contains the minimum python glue > to invoke a C function with the necessary GTK context? > --scott > Yeppa, we definitely want to integrate something like that in one of the chapters... However seeing how much work we have 'round here it might be some time before we actually get 'round to doing that. Maybe someone already knows how to do that and can write a quick'n'dirty howto! Cheers, Christoph ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] Branch rename, update-1 -> ship-2
On Dec 7, 2007 3:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 7, 2007 10:25 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Marco, > > How do we "switch" to the ship-2 branch in such a case ? Do the normal > > rules apply, or is there any simpler procedure (since this is a simple > > rename) ? > > I'm not sure how pootle is handling branches, but yeah this is > basically just another branch. > Btw it would be good to chat about the update-1 branches which we > started to create, if you have any time today... > It looks like some of the modules which had the update-1 branch previously do not have it now. Eg: chat-activity shows only ship-2, trial-3 and the master branches. Sugar, Journal activity on the other hand seems to have update-1 branches. Which modules have the update-1 branch now ? Thanks, Sayamindu -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] status of MANIFEST file
Edward Cherlin schrieb: > On Dec 8, 2007 4:18 PM, Christoph Derndorfer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> Daniel and me are again having another weekend-jam working on the >> activity handbook >> > > Excellent. Does it have a Wiki page? Would someone put a link and a > brief description on the OLPC Publications page? > There's a brief overview of the chapters that we're thinking to include over on http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Hacking_Sugar#Programming_Sugar Basically the activity handbook should end up being something like all those "learning in 21 days" types of documents. We really want to guide programmers who have no prior knowledge of OLPC, Sugar, etc. in being able to write activities for the XO. > Can I join in? > In order to preserve the coherence that we aim to achieve with the handbook (as opposed to the mess on the Wiki) we have decided to limit the number of contributors for the moment being. That will allow us to create the necessary structure and basis before releasing it into the wild. At the moment we think that we'll make the first public release of the handbook in mid-January So stay tuned! Cheers, Christoph > >> and we've just spent the past half hour looking at >> different .xo packages from the git-repository to see how the MANIFEST >> file inside the .xo package is being used. >> > > >> Results really vary, some activities don't come with a MANIFEST at all, >> some only list a file or two inside the MANIFEST while others really do >> come with a complete index of all the files included in the package. >> >> So what I'm basically asking is what the exact requirements for the >> MANIFEST file are as activities seem to work regardless of what it contains. >> >> Thanks, >> Christoph >> ___ >> Devel mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel >> > > ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] joyride smoke test results?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erik Blankinship wrote: > A related question not yet answered on that wiki page: What is the last > known joyride that, for the most part, worked? Wiki notes notwithstanding, 1395 is working for me. Note that I did a clean install (square-key with usb autoreinstallation). - --Ben -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHXaKxUJT6e6HFtqQRAtDUAJwOUFM0YMgrKwThFsxlI7S7EmyFNgCfR6ZI BcPt3xQfb/gq5YjtVaEU3T8= =6xyr -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] joyride smoke test results?
A related question not yet answered on that wiki page: What is the last known joyride that, for the most part, worked? ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] joyride smoke test results?
On 10 Dec 2007 14:48:05 -0500, Alexander M. Latham < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- "Erik Blankinship" wrote: > Is there a wiki page where release notes / smoke test notes on joyride are > posted? There used to be such a page before JoyRiding. > > Also, it looks like the automated release notes have stopped again. > --- end of quote --- > > Smoke Test notes and/or any other notes from testing (usually bugs that > make a build a waste of time to try out) should be posted here: > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Test_Group_Release_Notes Great -- I've updated the page. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Test_Group_Release_Notes#Joyride_Builds ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] joyride smoke test results?
--- "Erik Blankinship" wrote: Is there a wiki page where release notes / smoke test notes on joyride are posted? There used to be such a page before JoyRiding. Also, it looks like the automated release notes have stopped again. --- end of quote --- Smoke Test notes and/or any other notes from testing (usually bugs that make a build a waste of time to try out) should be posted here: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Test_Group_Release_Notes - AlexL ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] [Localization] Branch rename, update-1 -> ship-2
Hi, Ok - so my reading is, the Update 1 (Core) project that we were doing stays - and Ship 2 has already been dealt with, and from a translator's point of view, we need not worry much about Ship-2. (Apologies if I sound confused) Also, it looks like the branch renaming confused git at the Pootle end: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/checkouts/update1_core/write$ git pull You asked me to pull without telling me which branch you want to merge with, and 'branch.update-1.merge' in your configuration file does not tell me either. Please name which branch you want to merge on the command line and try again (e.g. 'git pull '). See git-pull(1) for details on the refspec. If you often merge with the same branch, you may want to configure the following variables in your configuration file: branch.update-1.remote = branch.update-1.merge = remote..url = remote..fetch = See git-config(1) for details. Can anyone tell me how to fix this ? Warm regards, Sayamindu On Dec 11, 2007 1:02 AM, Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, we have update.1... We had to quickly do Ship.2 to fix some > pressing wireless and upgrade problems > > See: https://dev.laptop.org/roadmap for details. >- Jim > > > > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 00:47 +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: > > Hi, > > Apologies for the delayed reply. > > > > On Dec 7, 2007 3:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 7, 2007 10:25 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Marco, > > > > How do we "switch" to the ship-2 branch in such a case ? Do the normal > > > > rules apply, or is there any simpler procedure (since this is a simple > > > > rename) ? > > > > > > I'm not sure how pootle is handling branches, but yeah this is > > > basically just another branch. > > > > So the update-1 branch no longer exists, and we have ship-2 branch in > > place - right ? > > > > > Btw it would be good to chat about the update-1 branches which we > > > started to create, if you have any time today... > > > > > > > We are using a system where we have a directory (update1_core) where > > all the modules which have an update-1 branch are kept (with the > > active branch being update-1). Pootle sees a file called > > translations/update-1/xx/module.po which is a symlink to > > checkouts/update-1/modules/po/xx.po. Thus Pootle thinks that Update 1 > > (Core) is a single project with multiple PO files to translate. > > We have a few scripts to handle this symlinking and to ensure sanity > > (no invalid links, no non-symlink files in translations/). > > This makes things a bit complicated at our end, but makes the job of > > the translation coordinator for a particular team easy, and it is also > > easy to gather overall statistics. > > > > I'll be on IRC for the entire day tomorrow - feel free to ping me > > anytime (my nick is unmadindu) > > > > > > Warm regards, > > Sayamindu > > > -- > Jim Gettys > One Laptop Per Child > > > -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] [Localization] Branch rename, update-1 -> ship-2
No, we have update.1... We had to quickly do Ship.2 to fix some pressing wireless and upgrade problems See: https://dev.laptop.org/roadmap for details. - Jim On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 00:47 +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: > Hi, > Apologies for the delayed reply. > > On Dec 7, 2007 3:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2007 10:25 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Marco, > > > How do we "switch" to the ship-2 branch in such a case ? Do the normal > > > rules apply, or is there any simpler procedure (since this is a simple > > > rename) ? > > > > I'm not sure how pootle is handling branches, but yeah this is > > basically just another branch. > > So the update-1 branch no longer exists, and we have ship-2 branch in > place - right ? > > > Btw it would be good to chat about the update-1 branches which we > > started to create, if you have any time today... > > > > We are using a system where we have a directory (update1_core) where > all the modules which have an update-1 branch are kept (with the > active branch being update-1). Pootle sees a file called > translations/update-1/xx/module.po which is a symlink to > checkouts/update-1/modules/po/xx.po. Thus Pootle thinks that Update 1 > (Core) is a single project with multiple PO files to translate. > We have a few scripts to handle this symlinking and to ensure sanity > (no invalid links, no non-symlink files in translations/). > This makes things a bit complicated at our end, but makes the job of > the translation coordinator for a particular team easy, and it is also > easy to gather overall statistics. > > I'll be on IRC for the entire day tomorrow - feel free to ping me > anytime (my nick is unmadindu) > > > Warm regards, > Sayamindu > -- Jim Gettys One Laptop Per Child ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] status of MANIFEST file
On Dec 8, 2007 7:18 PM, Christoph Derndorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel and me are again having another weekend-jam working on the > activity handbook and we've just spent the past half hour looking at > different .xo packages from the git-repository to see how the MANIFEST > file inside the .xo package is being used. I'd like to see some documentation on how to integrate a non-Python activity into sugar. It certainly has been done, but it seems shrouded in the black art of the pygtk binding. Maybe a "C Hello World" example would be nice, which contains the minimum python glue to invoke a C function with the necessary GTK context? --scott -- ( http://cscott.net/ ) ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] Translation advice for Pippy.
Hi, On Dec 9, 2007 12:56 AM, Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to make code comments in Pippy examples translatable, > especially since so many of our deployments have Spanish as a > first language. Here's one example of what an on-disk format > could look like: > ># The next comment is localised. >##en: Pippy example comment >##es: Pippy ejemplo comentario >a = 5 > > In the Pippy view, the user would see either "# Pippy example" or > "# Pippy ejemplo comentario" for that line, depending on their locale. > Well - you can have a system where there are source code example directories for each locale. So, when Pippy starts in with LANG set to es, it would load the files which are in examples/es >From what I understand, TurtleArt is moving towards such a solution (graphic files are loaded from locale specific directories) A script which extracts the translated comment from relevant PO files and builds the locale specific source code files should not be very difficult to write (If you want - I can try it out towards the end of this week). Warm regards, Sayamindu -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] Branch rename, update-1 -> ship-2
Hi, Apologies for the delayed reply. On Dec 7, 2007 3:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 7, 2007 10:25 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Marco, > > How do we "switch" to the ship-2 branch in such a case ? Do the normal > > rules apply, or is there any simpler procedure (since this is a simple > > rename) ? > > I'm not sure how pootle is handling branches, but yeah this is > basically just another branch. So the update-1 branch no longer exists, and we have ship-2 branch in place - right ? > Btw it would be good to chat about the update-1 branches which we > started to create, if you have any time today... > We are using a system where we have a directory (update1_core) where all the modules which have an update-1 branch are kept (with the active branch being update-1). Pootle sees a file called translations/update-1/xx/module.po which is a symlink to checkouts/update-1/modules/po/xx.po. Thus Pootle thinks that Update 1 (Core) is a single project with multiple PO files to translate. We have a few scripts to handle this symlinking and to ensure sanity (no invalid links, no non-symlink files in translations/). This makes things a bit complicated at our end, but makes the job of the translation coordinator for a particular team easy, and it is also easy to gather overall statistics. I'll be on IRC for the entire day tomorrow - feel free to ping me anytime (my nick is unmadindu) Warm regards, Sayamindu -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] status of MANIFEST file
On Dec 8, 2007 4:18 PM, Christoph Derndorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all, > > Daniel and me are again having another weekend-jam working on the > activity handbook Excellent. Does it have a Wiki page? Would someone put a link and a brief description on the OLPC Publications page? Can I join in? > and we've just spent the past half hour looking at > different .xo packages from the git-repository to see how the MANIFEST > file inside the .xo package is being used. > Results really vary, some activities don't come with a MANIFEST at all, > some only list a file or two inside the MANIFEST while others really do > come with a complete index of all the files included in the package. > > So what I'm basically asking is what the exact requirements for the > MANIFEST file are as activities seem to work regardless of what it contains. > > Thanks, > Christoph > ___ > Devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel -- Edward Cherlin Earth Treasury: End Poverty at a Profit http://www.EarthTreasury.org/ "The best way to predict the future is to invent it."--Alan Kay ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
[sugar] joyride smoke test results?
Is there a wiki page where release notes / smoke test notes on joyride are posted? There used to be such a page before JoyRiding. Also, it looks like the automated release notes have stopped again. ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] status of MANIFEST file
On Dec 8, 2007 7:38 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:18 , Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > > > So what I'm basically asking is what the exact requirements for the > > MANIFEST file are as activities seem to work regardless of what it > > contains. > > Currently, the MANIFEST is not consulted at all when installing or > running, an activity works fine even without it. > > Only the bundle builder (setup.py) to package your activity uses it. > The bundle builder also includes many files implicitly so they do not > have to be listed in MANIFEST. > > The situation might change once bundles are required to be signed, > but I don't know those plans. For the activity updater (trac #4951), we will need to include a 'real' manifest with file hashes; this may also be used in the activity signing code. However, I expect the bundle builder to generate this 'contents' file automatically. The short answer, I think, is that the MANIFEST is used to configure bundle-builder; it shouldn't be required in the final .xo (although a related 'contents' files will be automatically generated there). --scott -- ( http://cscott.net/ ) ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] sugar-jhbuild matchbox 64bit
Mike C. Fletcher wrote: > Simon Schampijer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to get sugar-jhbuild running on my 64bit F8 machine and get >> Incorrect params errors in the theme: >> > ... >> For sugar on a 64bit system it says (already a bit outdated) it is not >> working >> (http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Sugar_on_Ubuntu_Linux#On_64-bit_Linux_.28not_working.29), >> >> anyone done this already? >> > I'm running sugar-jhbuild from about a week ago on an AMD64 Gentoo box. > No such error encountered. Did have a problem with dbus-python's > "types" module causing a conflict with the built-in types, but just > ignoring the error (it's non-critical) let me complete. > > HTH, > Mike > Thanks, this is already a hint that sugar-jhbuild on 64 bit works in general. Simon ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] sugar-jhbuild matchbox 64bit
Simon Schampijer wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to get sugar-jhbuild running on my 64bit F8 machine and get > Incorrect params errors in the theme: > ... > For sugar on a 64bit system it says (already a bit outdated) it is not > working > (http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Sugar_on_Ubuntu_Linux#On_64-bit_Linux_.28not_working.29), > > anyone done this already? > I'm running sugar-jhbuild from about a week ago on an AMD64 Gentoo box. No such error encountered. Did have a problem with dbus-python's "types" module causing a conflict with the built-in types, but just ignoring the error (it's non-critical) let me complete. HTH, Mike -- Mike C. Fletcher Designer, VR Plumber, Coder http://www.vrplumber.com http://blog.vrplumber.com ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] idea for a tutorial recording activity
On Dec 10, 2007, at 2:14 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd like some feedback on an idea for a tutorial recording activity. > The basic tool I'm thinking of using is pyvnc2swf: > I don't know how much of this idea will be possible, as perhaps the > cpu and/or storage constraints will make it impractical. To get around the CPU and storage constraints, wouldn't simply recording input events along with voice-over be much better? - Bert - ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
[sugar] sugar-jhbuild matchbox 64bit
Hi, I am trying to get sugar-jhbuild running on my 64bit F8 machine and get Incorrect params errors in the theme: Matchbox: error parsing /home/erikos/sugar-jhbuild/build/share/themes/sugar/matchbox/theme.xml Incorrect Params in Matchbox: error parsing /home/erikos/sugar-jhbuild/build/share/themes/Default/matchbox/theme.xml Incorrect Params in After googeling I found an email of marco asking for the output of these commands answering a question to the same issue: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sugar]$ Xephyr :2 -ac & [1] 10359 [EMAIL PROTECTED] sugar]$ Extended Input Devices not yet supported. Impelement it at line 625 in kinput.c [EMAIL PROTECTED] sugar]$ DISPLAY=:2 matchbox-window-manager Matchbox: error parsing /home/erikos/sugar-jhbuild/build/share/themes/Default/matchbox/theme.xml Incorrect Params in For sugar on a 64bit system it says (already a bit outdated) it is not working (http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Sugar_on_Ubuntu_Linux#On_64-bit_Linux_.28not_working.29), anyone done this already? Thanks, Simon ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
