[sugar] Reviews report
= Rejected requests = Can't see all items in the Control Panel http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8487 ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
[sugar] [Telepathy] ANNOUNCE: telepathy-salut 0.3.5 released
For those not on the Telepathy list... -- Forwarded message -- From: Guillaume Desmottes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 18:38 Subject: [Telepathy] ANNOUNCE: telepathy-salut 0.3.5 released To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] telepathy-salut 0.3.5 (2008-09-17) == The Please don't flood my network release. Tarball: http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/releases/telepathy-salut/telepathy-salut-0.3.5.tar.gz Signature: http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/releases/telepathy-salut/telepathy-salut-0.3.5.tar.gz.asc This release fixes an annoying bug causing Salut announcing all the OLPC activities which are present on the network. You should consider upgrading if they are OLPC XO's running on your network. Enhancements: * Add a test framework Fixes: * Only announce OLPC activity we actually joined (dev.laptop.org #8441) Regards, G. ___ Telepathy mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/telepathy ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
[sugar] G1G1v2 Activities
Hi All, We need to pick the activities we ship with 8.2 when its manufactured for G1G1 users. Management needs to sign off on the final list as early as next week. Its not definitive but we want your input on what we should include. What do you think are the most important activities to include? Please pick up to 10 and put them in order of priority. We will tally the votes and use that as input to the decision. Thanks, Greg S PS this is not a scientific voting system like used recently in the sugar vote. I accept Arrow's impossibility theorem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow%27s_impossibility_theorem) and my math foo is weak so I'm not going to try and justify the methodology. ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] G1G1v2 Activities
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 05:54:45PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote: Hi All, We need to pick the activities we ship with 8.2 when its manufactured for G1G1 users. [...] What do you think are the most important activities to include? Please pick up to 10 and put them in order of priority. Going over http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities , there are so many cool ones it's frustrating to pick only 10. 1. Browse 2. Write 3. Read 4. Record 5. Pippy 6. eToys 7. TamTamJam 8. Paint 9. Implode 10. x2o I didn't pick Terminal to squeeze in one more and I pretended that the console might be enough (but I don't believe you'd ship without Terminal). Thanks, Greg S Martin pgpKLnMITldC4.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
[sugar] Finale: consider merging a few fun Sugar patches?
Folks, We've reached the last call for changes before final test and, in the hopes of ending our development cycle on a playful note, I'd like to ask the sugar team to consider whether they'd be comfortable reviewing and merging a couple of the outstanding UI patches like Scott's alternate layouts patches [1] and Martin's network feedback patches [2]. Sugar team: you can nix the idea if it seems too risky, if the patches aren't baked, or if it would take too much time to accomplish, but if you're willing to step up and handle the review, merge, and testing, then I think it would a joyous finale to a remarkable development cycle. Regards, Michael [1]: http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/mdengler/sugar;a=shortlog;h=network-feedback-2866 [2]: http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/cscott/sugar P.S. - (The deadline for this action, should you choose to accept it, would be Friday afternoon.) P.P.S. - Eben mentioned to me that he was concerned that people might falsely interpret some of the new 8.2.0 Sugar APIs as stable when they are, in fact, almost certain to change in the next major release. I would find it commendable if some Sugar developer took this last opportunity to add some bold comments to the relevant APIs warning developers who examine them about this probable future breakage. ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] Finale: consider merging a few fun Sugar patches?
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * At *very* high level the patch sets looks sane. I would be comfortable with them going in if Scott reviews Martin set, and Martin reviews Scott set. * The patches are large and I don't think it's impossible that they would cause regressions. Our release manager should be aware of it and keep loving us if it happens. * I would help by getting packages in the builds and doing a bit of testing. * Both patches contains string additions I guess (hopefully not changes?). Someone would have to sort that out with sayamindu and the localization team. Marco ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Re: [sugar] Finale: consider merging a few fun Sugar patches?
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 02:30:30AM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: * At *very* high level the patch sets looks sane. I would be comfortable with them going in if Scott reviews Martin set, and Martin reviews Scott set. Sounds good. Hopefully there are a few other sugar volunteers who could chip in to help look for regressions? * The patches are large and I don't think it's impossible that they would cause regressions. Our release manager should be aware of it and keep loving us if it happens. I'm the one who'se suggesting it, so I'd take the blame. * I would help by getting packages in the builds and doing a bit of testing. This can happen immediately, yes? P.P.S. - Eben mentioned to me that he was concerned that people might falsely interpret some of the new 8.2.0 Sugar APIs as stable when they are, in fact, almost certain to change in the next major release. I would find it commendable if some Sugar developer took this last opportunity to add some bold comments to the relevant APIs warning developers who examine them about this probable future breakage. Eben, what APIs are you thinking about? In general the whole Sugar API will need to be reviewed. I have yet to figure out when, how and what kind of backward compatibility we offer. It's something I'll be working on in the next few weeks. Eben specifically mentioned the APIs used by Frame devices, layouts, and Control Panel entries. Michael ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
