C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> Please reserve the 3pm-5pm Thursday time slot for the roadmap meeting;
> I've gotten people to clear their schedules for that slot already.
I've left it there, and split it in two parts:
15-17: Brainstorm: OLPC 9.1 draft roadmap and priorities
17-19 Brainstorm: Sugar 0.84 roadmap and priorities
Ed McNierney is leading the first, Marco the second.
The Sugar roadmap comes last so we can use the OLPC requirements as
input for finer-grained tasks impacting Sugar.
I know you'll find this split controversial, but this is what a lot of
people asked for. I also think defining independent -- but
interoperable -- roadmaps will result in higher quality results.
We can ensure that periodic (or continuous) integration is part of the
equation.
>> I would decompress the talks on multiple days, keeping into account
>> that the OLPC developers might have to leave at any time to assist
>> with G1G1.
>
> I'd prefer the Wed talks not be decompressed. But +1 on claiming
> other slots via wiki.
How about moving talks that are less interesting to OLPC people to
Monday and Tueday? I'm thinking things like Sugar Labs
Infrastructure, etc.
Secondly, I suppose Tuesday after hours, when OLPC employees could
attend freely, would be a good time to reallocate more of those talks.
Also, what are these talks with no title you scheduled Tuesday after
dinner?
1900 Marco Gritti / Michael Stone
2000 C. Scott Ananian / Tomeu Vizoso
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
