Re: [sugar] Composition -- we've been here before!

2008-09-25 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti 
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 09:45:44PM -0700, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
 At least this one has been fixed 4 months ago.

 Sure. I brought it up because, to me, it serves as a useful reminder of
 the careful regression test that enabling composition will require and
 of how few people really understand how the XO's graphics code works.

What worries me most is to fully understand and evaluate the memory tradeoff.

Marco
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [sugar] Composition -- we've been here before!

2008-09-24 Thread Bert Freudenberg 

Am 24.09.2008 um 16:46 schrieb Michael Stone:

 Folks,

 We've been over this ground before -- have any of the old bugs been
 fixed?
 [...]
 http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6759


At least this one has been fixed 4 months ago.

- Bert -


___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [sugar] Composition -- we've been here before!

2008-09-24 Thread Michael Stone 
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 09:45:44PM -0700, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
 At least this one has been fixed 4 months ago.

Sure. I brought it up because, to me, it serves as a useful reminder of
the careful regression test that enabling composition will require and
of how few people really understand how the XO's graphics code works.

Michael
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar