Re: [Sugar-devel] I reinstalled my system back to a previous image, but don't know where to put my public key for gitorious
Hello, - for my system instability, i fixed it by installing Xubuntu instead of Kubuntu (my laptop begins to be old). So another question come to me : if i change of computer, i presume that i will have to generate a new key pair (as the public key ends with my system account). Am i right ? - i generated a new keys pair, but i was still unable to confirm my key on sugar gitorious. I joined the script file of my terminal. Regards 2011/6/2 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 06:59:15PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote: Is there a way to configure my repository with a new SSH keys pair ? You can configure your system with a new SSH key pair. Then you must configure gitorious by uploading the new public half of the SSH key. I don't think either your local system repository or the gitorious repository are ever configured with an SSH key. Because i erased the old public key in the public repository (that was before i read your answer) , replaced by a new public key = which i lost when my computer crashed one more time. What should i do ? You keep losing keys. I suggest careful actions. Different to normal actions because of your unusual environment. 0. remedy the cause of your computer crashing, 1. make a new SSH key pair, 2. copy the SSH key pair to more reliable media, such as a USB drive, or CD-R, or another computer via network, taking into account the risk of losing the key or having the key intercepted, (e.g. if you only use the key for gitorious, then the exposure risk is low.) 3. upload the public key again to gitorious, 4. confirm you can access gitorious using the private key you hold, 5. clone the public repository to a new directory, 6. resume development of the files. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ Le script a dƩbutƩ sur jeu. 02 juin 2011 09:42:58 CEST ]0;laurent@bordeaux8064: ~laurent@bordeaux8064:~$ ssh gitori...@git.sugarlabs.org true The authenticity of host 'git.sugarlabs.org (18.85.44.120)' can't be established. RSA key fingerprint is 4f:5e:5c:7f:ca:94:49:9d:2e:77:85:86:7c:de:56:f1. Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? no Host key verification failed. ]0;laurent@bordeaux8064: ~laurent@bordeaux8064:~$ exit exit Script complƩtƩ sur jeu. 02 juin 2011 09:43:16 CEST ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Sharing a folder in VirtualBox Trisquel image, failed saying no such device
Hello, 1. I installed VirtualBox 4.08 on mu Xubuntu and the Extensions Pack 2. I installed Sugar OLPC Trisquel image and the Guest Additions 3. I creating a shared folder called learningwriting pointing to my Xubuntu LearningWriting folder, with full access and without automatic mounting 4. Back on Trisquel Image, i created a folder ~/learningwriting 5. I tried sudo mount -t vboxsf learningwriting ~/learningwriting but i got the error : No such device Does anyone know why ? Regards ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] [SugarCommander] Added ability to export Journal items.
Sebastian, Do you have this in a cloned Git repository? That is how others have made modifications to my Activities. Aleksey Lim did this when he made improvements to Speech in Read Etexts, for instance. I did not put this functionality into Sugar Commander because I didn't think it would work. If there are deployments without Rainbow where it might be of use, fine with me. However, I like my Activities to degrade gracefully. If you could do some permission checks of known files and hide this functionality for deployments where it would not work that would be helpful. Ana Cichero said my chapter Fun With The Journal was discussed at EduJAM. I guess she wasn't kidding! James Simmons On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@somosazucar.org wrote: This could grow but its a basic implementation that works for me. Let me know if I should improve it. This was requested at EduJAM. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] SunMoonMusic Activity does not open in Mango Lassi
@ Walter: Thanks for the info. In Mango Lassi, indeed, user-installed activities *cannot* be erased. I've filed a ticket: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2876 Strangely, the latest nightly Fedora 15 builds work correctly in this regard. Apparently, quite a bit of my problem was related to running out of protected memory on my USB sticks. Perhaps a warning should be posted somewhere that more protected memory (or larger capacities) on SoaS sticks is better - since SoaS/Fedora is getting larger, and now that pre-installed activities cannot be easily deleted. (I note, for the record, that most pre-installed activities *are* eraseable in Strawberry, all except Etoys on Blueberry, and some on Mirabelle. This option freed up space and allowed for greater user-customization - a desirable situation in *some* cases certainly.) Just curious: are different versions (i.e., Strawberry, Blueberry, Mirabelle, etc.) of SoaS tailored to specific deployments? If not, why are there such variations in installed activities and whether they are regarded as permanent or not? Art Hunkins - Original Message - From: Walter Bender To: Art Hunkins Cc: James Cameron ; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 12:13 PM Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SunMoonMusic Activity does not open in Mango Lassi The only activities where deleting is disabled are pre-installed ones. The ones you install should be able to be deleted. If not, this is a bug. Regarding the decision to make pre-installed activities permanent, it is driven by Sugar deployments: teachers requested that certain activities always be available. Which ones is a deployment x deployment decision. For SoaS, we have a very limited set of pre-installed activities, but as the Fedora image grows, the user-space shrinks. FWIW, from the Terminal Activity, you can delete the pre-loaded activities in /usr/share/sugar regards. -walter -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Csound MIDI with Mango Lassi (and later)
@ Peter: Please disregard my report that Csound MIDI was not working correctly in SoaS Mango Lassi or the latest nightly builds of Fedora 15. MIDI is working fine - my mistake. Art Hunkins ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] multi-selection in journal
Hi Martin, On 31 May 2011, at 05:38, Martin Abente wrote: Hello Amigos, Lately I have been working on the support for multi-selection in the journal. This feature was originally part of Dextrose3's TODO [1], but during EduJAM [2], many people were interested in having it on Sugar mainstream, so I will give it a try ;) I already have a functional prototype running on sugar 0.9.x (check video!) [3], its design was based on different ideas and proposals [4,5]. My current patch does the minimum required to get this working, avoiding any big code re-factoring or massive rewrites (for now). Anyway, I would like to hear everyone's feedback on the current design! First, thanks for taking this challenge on! Thanks in advance, tch References: 1. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Dextrose/3/Todo 2. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/EduJAM/2011/Brainstorm 3. http://www.sugarlabs.org/~tch/journal2.mpeg Nice movie :) some quick general questions/comments: - When clicking Select all does it only select all the currently visible objects? When clicking Select none does it clear the tick selection from hidden objects? - I'm not convinced changes to object details while in the multi-select mode should change the filtered selection shown. You show in the mpeg un-favouring an object in detail view and it disappearing while still being ticked for a multi-select operation, will this hidden but still ticked object be operated on? Keeping the two workflows separate might help – step one, if needed set your filter to narrow down the number of objects displayed; step two, activate multi-selection (this list is now locked in), make your checkbox selection, take action. Or perhaps any selected objects that are filtered out could simply be de-selected? - A slight variation to this design raised a while back is to pick up on how most iPad apps now deal with multi selection lists. Rather than always showing a long line of checkbox clutter, consuming screen space, have a distinct Edit button in the main toolbar. Once clicked display the checkboxes next to each object ready for multi-selection, once cancelled hide/clear the checkboxes. This button could perhaps be a single toggle icon that looks like your current Select all/none icons, and would also provide continuity toggling between the two toolbars (i.e. the multi-select on/off button would have the same placement in each, the far left would seem a likely position). This might also avoid a tick box vs. favourite star confusion. ^^^ FWIW the above 'always show all checkboxes vs. edit mode toggle button' I seem to remember had an even split when it was last discussed – so likely no clear winner. - Need to make sure it is very obvious how to get out of a multi-select mode. We don't want to end up with another mode confusion as in Home favourite vs. list mode. - If Journal is in the multi-select mode, do you still get the mono action hover palette pop-up? Can you still resume an object? I do like all the confirmation dialogues when performing operations on multiple objects. Also it's a nice touch that deleting all multi-selected objects also de-activated multi-select mode, where as the copy to action keeps the multi-select mode as is in case you want to perform extra steps on the current selection :) Great to see multi-select moving forward at last! Regards, --Gary 4. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Design_Team/Designs/Journal#06 5. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Journal_NewUI ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
