Re: [Sugar-devel] Automated testing

2013-04-06 Thread Walter Bender
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 just a quick update on automated testing.

 I submitted a few pull requests which add some initial unit tests for
 sugar-toolkit-gtk3 and make the ones in sugar actually work. As soon as
 they are merged, I will turn these on in buildbot.

 I have also been doing a bit of work on making the codebase pyflakes
 clean. I will do the same for pep8 and then add these scripts to make
 check.

 The finally we can start requiring people to submit patches that pass the
 code checks and include unit tests!


Nice.

FYI, I am still on the road for one more week with a broken laptop so I am
of limited use for reviewing code at the moment. I do have a bunch of
patches in the works.

-walter


 --
 Daniel Narvaez

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel




-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Web Services, Control Panel section

2013-04-06 Thread Walter Bender
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:

 Hi, some bits of design topics for the Web Services feature.

 1. Wording.  Are we OK with Configure your Web Services?  First of,
 no other section use verbs.  According to the description in the
 feature page, this is an account manager.  Other names come to my
 mind:

 - Social Accounts
 - Web Accounts
 - Web Services Configuration (similar to Modem Configuration)

 More ideas?

 2. Icon.  So there is no icon yet.  I did a test using dialog baloons.
  I'm not very convinced, what do people think?

 http://dev.laptop.org/~manuq/websettings-icon.png
 http://dev.laptop.org/~manuq/module-webservices.svg

 When no web services are installed the CP section displays a message.
 Good!  To close it, buttons Cancel or OK can be pressed.  They both do
 the same, which can be confusing, but this is a flaw of the sugar
 control panel itself, nothing to do in this feature about this.

 Ideally the link in that message could be pressed by the user, but we
 know the limitations of Sugar opening activities from inside other
 activities.  What would be convenient, is if the text could be
 selected and copied to the clipboard, or dragged to it.  I think it
 could even contain the link information.

 By the way I have tried the link and it doesn't exist:
 http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/WebServices gives 404 not found.

 Walter, can you point me to one webservice extension so I can test
 further?  I can see from this screenshot it embeds a webview?

 http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:FB-online-account-manager.png


 --
 .. manuq ..
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel



Try grabbing the latest bits from
http://git.sugarlabs.org/+redwood-city/sugar/social-sugar

Re icons, I had just been using the Browse icon.

regards.

-walter
-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Tag for Sugar 0.100 in ASLO

2013-04-06 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:01:24AM -0300, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
 Hi ASLO maintainers,
 
 sooner or later we'll need the 0.100 tag.  I would like to have it
 soon to upload latest Browse, so it can be grabbed in olpc builds.
 
 Thanks in advance,

Done.

P.S.

The regular way for such tasks is creating bugs.sl.o ticket for
activities.sugarlabs.org component:

http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/newticket?component=activities.sugarlabs.org

Emailing to common ML is less useful.

-- 
Aleksey
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Music keyboard stuck keys

2013-04-06 Thread Daniel Drake
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
 I will try.
 Is not the same issue we see in Paint with the mouse emulation?

No, because there is no mouse movement involved.

Daniel
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] F18.. go sugar-build, go!

2013-04-06 Thread Cornelio
Manuel Quiñones manuq at laptop.org writes:

 
 I installed Fedora 18 last night, and I have to say I like sugar-build
 more and more.  With just this steps in a clean F18 you get Sugar
 running and ready to hack each part of it:  Kudos Daniel Narvaez!
 
 sudo yum install git
 git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-build/sugar-build
 cd sugar-build
 make build
 make run
 


everything fine ... until I got in the last step ... make run ...
transaction check error file /usr/lib/audit from install of
glibc-2.16.30.fc18.1686 conflicts with file from package audt-2.2.1-2.fc18.1686 

I asume some version conflicts, yet as i didn´t touch unix/linux for more
but a decade [i started using it in 1974] some advice what now to some
very oldy would be apreciated 

Cornelio 

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] F18.. go sugar-build, go!

2013-04-06 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hmm, I suppose it's really audit-2.2.1-2. Try sudo yum update and then
make run again.


On 6 April 2013 04:59, Cornelio cornelio.hopm...@gmail.com wrote:

 Manuel Quiñones manuq at laptop.org writes:

 
  I installed Fedora 18 last night, and I have to say I like sugar-build
  more and more.  With just this steps in a clean F18 you get Sugar
  running and ready to hack each part of it:  Kudos Daniel Narvaez!
 
  sudo yum install git
  git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-build/sugar-build
  cd sugar-build
  make build
  make run
 


 everything fine ... until I got in the last step ... make run ...
 transaction check error file /usr/lib/audit from install of
 glibc-2.16.30.fc18.1686 conflicts with file from package
 audt-2.2.1-2.fc18.1686

 I asume some version conflicts, yet as i didn´t touch unix/linux for more
 but a decade [i started using it in 1974] some advice what now to some
 very oldy would be apreciated

 Cornelio

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel




-- 
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel