Re: [Sugar-devel] New feature: add information in About this computer
Hi Gonzalo, Is it possible to show/hide the control panel sections by some gconf entry? It can be useful to clean some sections that some deployment have not been using. Cheers, Esteban. 2013/11/11 Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org The deployments need a few pieces of information about the software in the Xos. This feature collect these changes because are small, and are connected to the About Computer section. The actual implementation is only a reference, is not proposed to be included in the actual form. The information to be added is: * Computer model. * Other licenses * Last update More information: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/AddInformationInAboutComputer ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] New feature: add information in About this computer
Right now, every section is packaged in a rpm, may be is only needed install/uninstall the needed section? Can you give us a example? Gonzalo On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Esteban Bordón ebor...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: Hi Gonzalo, Is it possible to show/hide the control panel sections by some gconf entry? It can be useful to clean some sections that some deployment have not been using. Cheers, Esteban. 2013/11/11 Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org The deployments need a few pieces of information about the software in the Xos. This feature collect these changes because are small, and are connected to the About Computer section. The actual implementation is only a reference, is not proposed to be included in the actual form. The information to be added is: * Computer model. * Other licenses * Last update More information: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/AddInformationInAboutComputer ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposing backup/restore as feature for 0.102
The level of indirection was added because it used different backup mechanisms, IE: to the XS (via dsd's rsync scripts) and to memory sticks. Not sure who else is using dsd's scripts, other than Paraguay though. On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: One of the features we want upstream is Backup/Restore of the Journal. There are already a page for this feature [1] but the currently only is implemented the backup/restore to a connected device (pen drive), and not to/from the school server. I did the port to Sugar 0.100 of the code in dextrose, (patches [2] and [3]) but still think need more work before pushing upstream. Here my comments/questions: * Right now, the access to backup/restore functionality is available in the menu of the connected device (see [4]). May be should be in the Journal button, to allow other destinations in the future, like google drive/dropbox/etc? Or should be as a option in the control panel? (If the control panel is only for configuration this may be not the right place) * The screen look alien [5]. Should be better if we add a toolbar or should be in a modal dialog similar to the control panel/ object chooser? * We need a better icon. * The actual implementation have scripts to backup/restore from the command line. Then the sugar code execute the scripts, and the scripts execute tar. Is needed this indirection or should be better call tar from sugar? This implementation can be tested in our AU images [6] Comments? Gonzalo [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Backup_and_Restore [2] https://github.com/godiard/au1b_rpms/blob/master/sugar/0001-Backup-and-Restore-to-a-mounted-device.patch [3] https://github.com/godiard/au1b_rpms/blob/master/sugar/0001-Fix-backup-restore-functionality-SL-4616.patch [4] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:Backup_usb_menu.png [5] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:Backup_before.png [6] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=0.100/Testing ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] New feature: add information in About this computer
I'm talking about the about-computer module. For example, Activation info is not being used in Uruguay and we comment the lines that show these info 2013/11/11 Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org Right now, every section is packaged in a rpm, may be is only needed install/uninstall the needed section? Can you give us a example? Gonzalo On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Esteban Bordón ebor...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: Hi Gonzalo, Is it possible to show/hide the control panel sections by some gconf entry? It can be useful to clean some sections that some deployment have not been using. Cheers, Esteban. 2013/11/11 Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org The deployments need a few pieces of information about the software in the Xos. This feature collect these changes because are small, and are connected to the About Computer section. The actual implementation is only a reference, is not proposed to be included in the actual form. The information to be added is: * Computer model. * Other licenses * Last update More information: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/AddInformationInAboutComputer ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] New feature: add information in About this computer
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 13:08 -0200, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Right now, every section is packaged in a rpm, may be is only needed install/uninstall the needed section? Can you give us a example? Gonzalo Please check the spec file, About my Computer, and About Me are not packaged by themselves as cp-applets, those are part of sugar. Perhaps having each field that is viewable controlled via gconf to make those optional, much like logout and register currently are selectable. No point in having serial number, model and lease viewable on SOAS. Jerry On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Esteban Bordón ebor...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: Hi Gonzalo, Is it possible to show/hide the control panel sections by some gconf entry? It can be useful to clean some sections that some deployment have not been using. Cheers, Esteban. 2013/11/11 Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org The deployments need a few pieces of information about the software in the Xos. This feature collect these changes because are small, and are connected to the About Computer section. The actual implementation is only a reference, is not proposed to be included in the actual form. The information to be added is: * Computer model. * Other licenses * Last update More information: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/AddInformationInAboutComputer ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs Roadmap. [SD 61;79]
On 11 November 2013 05:10, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.comwrote: My experience has been that educational software politics and policies have been been the dominate influence within Sugar Labs. If this is the role that Sugar Labs wants to maintain that is fine, as long as they open the door to other organizations focusing on proven educational software quality. The commits stats Gonzalo posted on this thread tells something very different. In the last year Sugar Labs community developers made a lot more more commits than company sponsored ones. Commits are not the most reliable way of measuring contributions of course, but here they reflects pretty well reality IMO. Both approaches have challenges. If Sugar Labs is willing to assume responsibility for quality education software, they will have to adopt a culture and processes which encourage feedback (even negative feedback) and ways to implement solutions to that feedback. I think Sugar Labs is already assuming responsibility for the quality of the software, in the form of contributions to the code base. We are doing what we can to gather feedback too. How many times we asked for testing on 0.100 and we got almost none? I wish we had more feedback from the deployments, but I have not idea of how to do that. Please help out with it? Otherwise they are going to have to accept the lose of control if other organizations such as AC provide that service. I don't think we are afraid of organizations like AC getting involved. All the contrary, I'd say the main Sugar Labs goal is to get more organizations and individuals involved. Please contribute to the project and if you see concrete roadblocks point them out, we will do what we can to remove them. As the bottom line; the Association is good at sales and marketing, Sugar Labs is good and vision and inspiration, and Activity Central is good at support and implementation. The most likely way to success is to figure out how these three, and any other organizations, can work together. Rather than focus on grudges. Well, to set the facts straigths... OLPC is not selling Sugar anymore, as far as I can tell from the comments on this list, some from ex OLPC employees. And implementation has been done almost exclusively by the Sugar Labs community in the last six months. I hope AC will get more involved in the implementation and I'm encouraged by the recent contributions. I'm sure a discussion on how we can concretely help your support work would be welcome. (You might have intended implementation in a larger sense, but the stricter sense I'm using is a big part of it). ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] New feature: add information in About this computer
Ahh, ok. I get it. On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Esteban Bordón ebor...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: I'm talking about the about-computer module. For example, Activation info is not being used in Uruguay and we comment the lines that show these info 2013/11/11 Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org Right now, every section is packaged in a rpm, may be is only needed install/uninstall the needed section? Can you give us a example? Gonzalo On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Esteban Bordón ebor...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: Hi Gonzalo, Is it possible to show/hide the control panel sections by some gconf entry? It can be useful to clean some sections that some deployment have not been using. Cheers, Esteban. 2013/11/11 Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org The deployments need a few pieces of information about the software in the Xos. This feature collect these changes because are small, and are connected to the About Computer section. The actual implementation is only a reference, is not proposed to be included in the actual form. The information to be added is: * Computer model. * Other licenses * Last update More information: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/AddInformationInAboutComputer ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] New feature: add information in About this computer
True. Not all the sections are separated. Anyway, Esteban clarification point to make the information in the About my computer optative, not to make the different sections optative. Gonzalo On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 13:08 -0200, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Right now, every section is packaged in a rpm, may be is only needed install/uninstall the needed section? Can you give us a example? Gonzalo Please check the spec file, About my Computer, and About Me are not packaged by themselves as cp-applets, those are part of sugar. Perhaps having each field that is viewable controlled via gconf to make those optional, much like logout and register currently are selectable. No point in having serial number, model and lease viewable on SOAS. Jerry On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Esteban Bordón ebor...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: Hi Gonzalo, Is it possible to show/hide the control panel sections by some gconf entry? It can be useful to clean some sections that some deployment have not been using. Cheers, Esteban. 2013/11/11 Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org The deployments need a few pieces of information about the software in the Xos. This feature collect these changes because are small, and are connected to the About Computer section. The actual implementation is only a reference, is not proposed to be included in the actual form. The information to be added is: * Computer model. * Other licenses * Last update More information: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/AddInformationInAboutComputer ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] seeking help to enable nepali keyboard input for XO-4
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 5:18 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: If you need to scale up this change to many laptops, contact reu...@laptop.org or myself. I must know the SKU number. In the particular case of changing language/keyboard defaults as we are discussing, instead of changing manufacturing data I would recommend doing it via olpc-os-builder, configuration for [base], see http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/olpc-os-builder/tree/modules/base/README#n46 Daniel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] seeking help to enable nepali keyboard input for XO-4
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 11:38 -0600, Daniel Drake wrote: On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 5:18 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: If you need to scale up this change to many laptops, contact reu...@laptop.org or myself. I must know the SKU number. In the particular case of changing language/keyboard defaults as we are discussing, instead of changing manufacturing data I would recommend doing it via olpc-os-builder, configuration for [base], see http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/olpc-os-builder/tree/modules/base/README#n46 Or use TinyCore's xo-custom plugin to make the customizations to an existing image on an unlocked XO. http://dev.laptop.org/~quozl/mktinycorexo/HOWTO.xo-custom Jerry ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Performance: activities start up time
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: One of the arguments of the dynamic bindings was a better startup time due to not need initialize all the libraries until is needed use them. Then the import should be lighter than before. Looks like that is not so true. You should look in the last few months of archives of the pygobject list, the discussions that I was involved in. pygobject is not doing much lazy-loading, the overrides are really heavy, etc. Lots of improvements to be made. Daniel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Browse-156
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4024 Sugar Platform: 0.100 - 0.100 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28823/browse-156.xo Release notes: Fixes: keep image doesn't work if the image is also a link. Translations. Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposing backup/restore as feature for 0.102
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: One of the features we want upstream is Backup/Restore of the Journal. There are already a page for this feature [1] but the currently only is implemented the backup/restore to a connected device (pen drive), and not to/from the school server. I did the port to Sugar 0.100 of the code in dextrose, (patches [2] and [3]) but still think need more work before pushing upstream. Here my comments/questions: * Right now, the access to backup/restore functionality is available in the menu of the connected device (see [4]). May be should be in the Journal button, to allow other destinations in the future, like google drive/dropbox/etc? Or should be as a option in the control panel? (If the control panel is only for configuration this may be not the right place) * The screen look alien [5]. Should be better if we add a toolbar or should be in a modal dialog similar to the control panel/ object chooser? * We need a better icon. * The actual implementation have scripts to backup/restore from the command line. Then the sugar code execute the scripts, and the scripts execute tar. Is needed this indirection or should be better call tar from sugar? This implementation can be tested in our AU images [6] Comments? Perfect. Cleaning up the Dextrose patches and included them in mainline Sugar is an excellent way of adding value: 1. The patches represent feedback from deployments in the form of issues they felt were important enough to pay to fix. 2. The patches are often limited in their scoop due to deployment budget restraints. 3. After a clean up, they will be available to anyone using Sugar. Gonzalo [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Backup_and_Restore [2] https://github.com/godiard/au1b_rpms/blob/master/sugar/0001-Backup-and-Restore-to-a-mounted-device.patch [3] https://github.com/godiard/au1b_rpms/blob/master/sugar/0001-Fix-backup-restore-functionality-SL-4616.patch [4] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:Backup_usb_menu.png [5] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:Backup_before.png [6] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=0.100/Testing ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- David Farning Activity Central: http://www.activitycentral.com ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] seeking help to enable nepali keyboard input for XO-4
I made the changes but how do we set the key combination to invoke the nepali layout. We need to have english as default and then nepali as and when required. -Basanta On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:03 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:08:18AM +0545, Basanta Shrestha wrote: But I am still wondering how we could alter/change the stored data to our preference or if we can do it ourselves. Please suggest. At the firmware ok prompt [1], you may change the tag values [2], for example; ok tags( ok delete-tag KL ok add-tag KL np ok delete-tag KV ok add-tag KV olpc2 ok )tags The )tags command will force a reboot. If you need to scale up this change to many laptops, contact reu...@laptop.org or myself. I must know the SKU number. References: 1. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Ok 2. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Manufacturing_Data_Specification#Defined_Tags -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] seeking help to enable nepali keyboard input for XO-4
D On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 5:18 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: If you need to scale up this change to many laptops, contact reu...@laptop.org or myself. I must know the SKU number. In the particular case of changing language/keyboard defaults as we are discussing, instead of changing manufacturing data I would recommend doing it via olpc-os-builder, configuration for [base], see http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/olpc-os-builder/tree/modules/base/README#n46 Doing it via olpc-os-builder would be easier especially when we be having more than 200 laptops to work on. This way we won't have to deal with each and every laptop. So the lines I would have to add would be following : [base] default_language=us default_kbd_model=us default_kbd_layout=us default_kbd_variant=np But where do we set the key combination to switch between default and nepali. I would like to assign alt+space or alt+shift as combination. Note: We need to set default layout to english. Nepali input is only required for few activities in Epaath and for typing document in Nepali. -basanta ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Few sugar activities crashes
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: You should check where are you getting the list of activities and versions. In the file olpc-os-13.2.0-xo4.ini you have a section: [sugar_activity_group] url=http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1 The activities that get installed doesn't match the version shown on above link. I wonder why. this url points to a page with the activities and versions to download. If you want try, I am working with a cloned repository https://github.com/godiard/olpc-os-builder/tree/v7.0 with the last version of sugar, many activities updates, and a few changes implemented for the Australia deployment. Gonzalo Yes I am giving it a try. On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Basanta Shrestha basanta.shres...@olenepal.org wrote: HI, On my 13.2.0 build, few activities like peppy, write, terminal doesn't work. When I uninstall the default version of terminal ( version 41) and install terminal-40.xo, it works. But when I try to generate image by putting version 40 under /usr/share/doc/olpc-os-builder-7.0.0/examples/activities/ it doesn't install. I always use olpc-os-builder --cache-only olpc-os-13.2.0-xo4.ini. I was wondering will removing --cache-only in the above command will look for new terminal version and solve the issue? Or is there a way to exclude installing some sugar activities through olpc-os.13.2.0.xo4.ini file ? so that I can test and install the ones that works? Please suggest. Regards, Basanta Shrestha ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Basanta Shrestha Network Engineer Open Learning Exchange (OLE) Nepal Tel: +977.1.551, 5520075 Ext. 303 Cell: +977.9818 605110 http://www.olenepal.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Few sugar activities crashes
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:25:22AM +0545, Basanta Shrestha wrote: On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: You should check where are you getting the list of activities and versions. In the file olpc-os-13.2.0-xo4.ini you have a section: [sugar_activity_group] url=http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1 The activities that get installed doesn't match the version shown on above link. I wonder why. Cache between you and our web server? Try this instead: url=http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Activities/G1G1 (I have not tried this.) -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] seeking help to enable nepali keyboard input for XO-4
The laptops(XO-4) have arrived but it turns out the keyboard is the other one the rubber one (Improved Membrane Keyboard ?). -Basanta On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Basanta Shrestha basanta.shres...@olenepal.org wrote: D On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 5:18 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: If you need to scale up this change to many laptops, contact reu...@laptop.org or myself. I must know the SKU number. In the particular case of changing language/keyboard defaults as we are discussing, instead of changing manufacturing data I would recommend doing it via olpc-os-builder, configuration for [base], see http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/olpc-os-builder/tree/modules/base/README#n46 Doing it via olpc-os-builder would be easier especially when we be having more than 200 laptops to work on. This way we won't have to deal with each and every laptop. So the lines I would have to add would be following : [base] default_language=us default_kbd_model=us default_kbd_layout=us default_kbd_variant=np But where do we set the key combination to switch between default and nepali. I would like to assign alt+space or alt+shift as combination. Note: We need to set default layout to english. Nepali input is only required for few activities in Epaath and for typing document in Nepali. -basanta -- Basanta Shrestha Network Engineer Open Learning Exchange (OLE) Nepal Tel: +977.1.551, 5520075 Ext. 303 Cell: +977.9818 605110 http://www.olenepal.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Few sugar activities crashes
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: You should check where are you getting the list of activities and versions. In the file olpc-os-13.2.0-xo4.ini you have a section: [sugar_activity_group] url=http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1 this url points to a page with the activities and versions to download. If you want try, I am working with a cloned repository https://github.com/godiard/olpc-os-builder/tree/v7.0 with the last version of sugar, many activities updates, and a few changes implemented for the Australia deployment. Abacus-53.xo is breaking. Gonzalo On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Basanta Shrestha basanta.shres...@olenepal.org wrote: HI, On my 13.2.0 build, few activities like peppy, write, terminal doesn't work. When I uninstall the default version of terminal ( version 41) and install terminal-40.xo, it works. But when I try to generate image by putting version 40 under /usr/share/doc/olpc-os-builder-7.0.0/examples/activities/ it doesn't install. I always use olpc-os-builder --cache-only olpc-os-13.2.0-xo4.ini. I was wondering will removing --cache-only in the above command will look for new terminal version and solve the issue? Or is there a way to exclude installing some sugar activities through olpc-os.13.2.0.xo4.ini file ? so that I can test and install the ones that works? Please suggest. Regards, Basanta Shrestha ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Basanta Shrestha Network Engineer Open Learning Exchange (OLE) Nepal Tel: +977.1.551, 5520075 Ext. 303 Cell: +977.9818 605110 http://www.olenepal.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
