Re: [Sugar-devel] Starting a new web activity : problem when closing activity, and with icon design

[laurent bernabe]

Hi,

I've just pulled the latest version of sugar-build, but I still can't close
the activity.

My icon does not shows up well on the home view : no token inside the grid,
it seems empty.

Regards

2014-11-28 21:21 GMT+01:00 Gonzalo Odiard :

> Be sure the version of sugar-web included in your activity is updated.
> A error avoiding close the activity was solved recently.
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:00 AM, laurent bernabe <
> laurent.bern...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I am starting a new activity in order to get started with Web Actvity
>> development : a simple tic tac toe : github project
>> 
>>
>> But when I launch the activity from inside sugar-build :
>>
>>- the icon design seems to be weird, though I've tried to follow
>>advices at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Making_SVG_Icons_for_Sugar
>>- I don't manage to close the application
>>
>> I've sent the log file that I could read in
>> /home/dotsugar/default/logs, but I don't understand it.
>>
>> What is the best workaround ?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> --
>> Laurent Bernabé
>>
>> laurent.bern...@gmail.com
>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Gonzalo Odiard
>
> SugarLabs - Software for children learning
>



-- 
Laurent Bernabé

laurent.bern...@gmail.com
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Starting a new web activity : problem when closing activity, and with icon design

[Gonzalo Odiard]

What is wrong with the icon?

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Gonzalo Odiard 
wrote:

> Be sure the version of sugar-web included in your activity is updated.
> A error avoiding close the activity was solved recently.
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:00 AM, laurent bernabe <
> laurent.bern...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I am starting a new activity in order to get started with Web Actvity
>> development : a simple tic tac toe : github project
>> 
>>
>> But when I launch the activity from inside sugar-build :
>>
>>- the icon design seems to be weird, though I've tried to follow
>>advices at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Making_SVG_Icons_for_Sugar
>>- I don't manage to close the application
>>
>> I've sent the log file that I could read in
>> /home/dotsugar/default/logs, but I don't understand it.
>>
>> What is the best workaround ?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> --
>> Laurent Bernabé
>>
>> laurent.bern...@gmail.com
>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Gonzalo Odiard
>
> SugarLabs - Software for children learning
>



-- 
Gonzalo Odiard

SugarLabs - Software for children learning
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Starting a new web activity : problem when closing activity, and with icon design

[Gonzalo Odiard]

Be sure the version of sugar-web included in your activity is updated.
A error avoiding close the activity was solved recently.

Gonzalo


On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:00 AM, laurent bernabe  wrote:

>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am starting a new activity in order to get started with Web Actvity
> development : a simple tic tac toe : github project
> 
>
> But when I launch the activity from inside sugar-build :
>
>- the icon design seems to be weird, though I've tried to follow
>advices at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Making_SVG_Icons_for_Sugar
>- I don't manage to close the application
>
> I've sent the log file that I could read in
> /home/dotsugar/default/logs, but I don't understand it.
>
> What is the best workaround ?
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Laurent Bernabé
>
> laurent.bern...@gmail.com
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>


-- 
Gonzalo Odiard

SugarLabs - Software for children learning
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Building the sugar code base

[Namit Ohri]

I guess that is not the problem. The inherits folder doesn't point to
anything in my installation. Why do we need inherits@1 anyway?

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Nurendra Choudhary <
nurendrachoudhar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Try this:
> cp -r "/usr/lib/node_modules/inherits@1" /usr/lib/node_modules/inherits
>
> I noticed that /usr/lib/node_modules/inherits was a symlink pointing to an
> empty folder called "inherits@2". There was also another folder called
> "inherits@1" which seemed to contain the inherits module. At first I
> tried changing the symlink from @2  to @1
>  but this had no effect. Eventually I fixed it by
> replacing the symlink with a copy of the @1  folder.
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Starting a new web activity : problem when closing activity, and with icon design

[laurent bernabe]

Hello everyone,

I am starting a new activity in order to get started with Web Actvity
development : a simple tic tac toe : github project


But when I launch the activity from inside sugar-build :

   - the icon design seems to be weird, though I've tried to follow advices
   at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Making_SVG_Icons_for_Sugar
   - I don't manage to close the application

I've sent the log file that I could read in
/home/dotsugar/default/logs, but I don't understand it.

What is the best workaround ?

Regards

-- 
Laurent Bernabé

laurent.bern...@gmail.com
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/broot/sugar-build/build/out/install/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sugar3/activity/webactivity.py", line 161, in _app_scheme_cb
request.finish(Gio.File.new_for_path(path).read(None),
gi._glib.GError: Erreur à l'ouverture du fichier : Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/broot/sugar-build/build/out/install/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sugar3/activity/webactivity.py", line 161, in _app_scheme_cb
request.finish(Gio.File.new_for_path(path).read(None),
gi._glib.GError: Erreur à l'ouverture du fichier : Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

[Peter Robinson]

FYI the Fedora 21 RC1 is out. It has all the recent Sugar/SoaS fixes
on board so please test :-)

I think we're looking pretty good though, thanks for all the recent feedback


-- Forwarded message --
From: Andre Robatino 
Date: Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:34 PM
Subject: [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1)
Available Now!
To: test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org


As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Final Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6031#comment:21 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing
instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest
download, but download-ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror
(with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just
replace "dl" with "download-ib01" in the download URL.

Installation:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test

Base:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test

Workstation and Desktop:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test

Server:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Server_Test

Cloud:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Cloud_Test

Summary:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Summary

Ideally, all Alpha, Beta, and Final priority test cases for each of
these test pages [2] should pass in order to meet the Final Release
Criteria [3]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4],
or on the test list [5].

Create Fedora 21 Final test compose (TC) and release candidate (RC)
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6031

Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current

[1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-21/f-21-quality-tasks.html
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Final_Release_Criteria
[4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa
[5] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
--
test mailing list
t...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

[Peter Robinson]

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Iain Brown Douglas
 wrote:
> I have run (on Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4)
>
> sudo yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing sugar*
>
> In brief testing all good, no regressions seen - brief testing only, as
> this is not on a *clean* install.

Brilliant, and RC1 should be announced shortly with all the fixes
incorporated too :-)

Peter

> On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 07:16 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>> I think the spec was fixed by peter in sugar-speak 48-2
>>
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167791
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Iain Brown Douglas
>>  wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 14:56 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:09 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Sebastian Silva
>> > >  wrote:
>> > > > btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file,
>> no?
>> > >
>> > > No, it's not, it happens all the time. It might be that it
>> breaks in
>> > > certain situations, isn't re-distributable, causes
>> problems the
>> > > upstream maintainer won't fix or any number of other
>> reasons. What
>> > > ever the reason is it's historical and not documented, I
>> wouldn't
>> > > assume malice. It's likely because translations or similar
>> were broken
>> > > at the time. I mean we are talking the heady days of
>> Fedora 14 when it
>> > > was removed!
>> > >
>> > > Peter
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > 2014-11-25 7:46 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva
>> :
>> > > >> I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware
>> it was removed.
>> > > >> It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as
>> deployed in Peru.
>> > > >> I was not aware of responsible for the removed
>> functionality nor was I
>> > > >> aware of any bugs related to it or performance.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Please add it back
>> > > >> Sebastian Silva
>> > > >> http://somosazucar.org/
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 2014-11-25 7:17 GMT-05:00 Peter Robinson
>> :
>> > > >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
>>  wrote:
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > >  On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson
>> 
>> > >  wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
>> 
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory
>> should be deleted.
>> > > > > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm.
>> > > >
>> > > > It goes back long before I was  the maintainer and
>> was previously
>> > > > working. The question is what does it do, and why
>> when Speak has been
>> > > > working for years does it suddenly break.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> 
>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198
>> > > 
>> > Just an observation, mainly from what I learned the past few
>> days,
>> > rather than memory.
>> >
>> > Alice's brain in Speak has mysteriously appeared and
>> disappeared for me
>> > in SoaS.
>> >
>> > I just ran a SoaS Coconut CD, with Speak-29 on it. No
>> functioning brain.
>> > However I am guessing at the time I used it last, Speak
>> would have been
>> > updated from ASLO, and as a "Stick", the brain would have
>> been
>> > functioning.
>> >
>> > Iain
>> > > 
>> > >  That patch removes the bots functionality. Looks like
>> was done to make the
>> > >  activity
>> > >  work on systems with small memory (XO-1, probably)
>> > >  cc is Sebastian, the patch author, to check if this
>> is still needed.
>> > > 
>> > >  I see 438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198
>> removes the bots directory,
>> > >  _and_ apply the patch  sugar-speak-no-aiml.patch, to
>> remove the need of the
>> > >  bots data,
>> > >  but right now, we are not applying that patch, then
>> would be better add the
>> > >  bot directory again.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> I suspect it was sufficiently long ago that Seb won't
>> remember the reason.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Ultimately we need to just sort it out here.
>> > > >>>
>>
>>
>> Assertion, limited testing, please contradict:
>> Speak, "Ask robot a question" is bro

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

[Iain Brown Douglas]

I have run (on Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4)

sudo yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing sugar*

In brief testing all good, no regressions seen - brief testing only, as
this is not on a *clean* install.

Iain

On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 07:16 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> I think the spec was fixed by peter in sugar-speak 48-2
> 
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167791
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Iain Brown Douglas
>  wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 14:56 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:09 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Sebastian Silva
> > >  wrote:
> > > > btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file,
> no?
> > >
> > > No, it's not, it happens all the time. It might be that it
> breaks in
> > > certain situations, isn't re-distributable, causes
> problems the
> > > upstream maintainer won't fix or any number of other
> reasons. What
> > > ever the reason is it's historical and not documented, I
> wouldn't
> > > assume malice. It's likely because translations or similar
> were broken
> > > at the time. I mean we are talking the heady days of
> Fedora 14 when it
> > > was removed!
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > >
> > > > 2014-11-25 7:46 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva
> :
> > > >> I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware
> it was removed.
> > > >> It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as
> deployed in Peru.
> > > >> I was not aware of responsible for the removed
> functionality nor was I
> > > >> aware of any bugs related to it or performance.
> > > >>
> > > >> Please add it back
> > > >> Sebastian Silva
> > > >> http://somosazucar.org/
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> 2014-11-25 7:17 GMT-05:00 Peter Robinson
> :
> > > >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
>  wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson
> 
> > >  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory
> should be deleted.
> > > > > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm.
> > > >
> > > > It goes back long before I was  the maintainer and
> was previously
> > > > working. The question is what does it do, and why
> when Speak has been
> > > > working for years does it suddenly break.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> 
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198
> > > 
> > Just an observation, mainly from what I learned the past few
> days,
> > rather than memory.
> >
> > Alice's brain in Speak has mysteriously appeared and
> disappeared for me
> > in SoaS.
> >
> > I just ran a SoaS Coconut CD, with Speak-29 on it. No
> functioning brain.
> > However I am guessing at the time I used it last, Speak
> would have been
> > updated from ASLO, and as a "Stick", the brain would have
> been
> > functioning.
> >
> > Iain
> > > 
> > >  That patch removes the bots functionality. Looks like
> was done to make the
> > >  activity
> > >  work on systems with small memory (XO-1, probably)
> > >  cc is Sebastian, the patch author, to check if this
> is still needed.
> > > 
> > >  I see 438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198
> removes the bots directory,
> > >  _and_ apply the patch  sugar-speak-no-aiml.patch, to
> remove the need of the
> > >  bots data,
> > >  but right now, we are not applying that patch, then
> would be better add the
> > >  bot directory again.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I suspect it was sufficiently long ago that Seb won't
> remember the reason.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Ultimately we need to just sort it out here.
> > > >>>
> 
> 
> Assertion, limited testing, please contradict:
> Speak, "Ask robot a question" is broken in SoaS 1.00 >
> 
> It has been broken for several years, but is not seen because
> a Software
> update has been available which provides bot/ and
> functionality of "Ask
> robot a question".
> 
>  

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

[Iain Brown Douglas]

I am very sorry, Peter, that I did not realise that you had applied a
patch within 75 minutes of being made aware of it. Thank you for that.

More than one could expect from the most dedicated maintainer - a pity
you did not say though!

I mistakenly thought that your reply was, "Before my time, Guv", the
opportunity to test a patch was now closing, and that your point:

"The question is what does it do, and why when Speak has been
working for years does it suddenly break."

was still hanging in the air.

I regret that I made my comment terse in this respect: while I have
occasionally seen the issue:
Alice "I don't know what you are talking about?", whenever I tried to
chase it down it disappeared.

So I had opened up all the SoaS media I have. I compared the change logs
of Speak with the release dates of SoaS. In every examined case, prior
to the excellent Speak-48, there was a new version of Speak shortly
after each new SoaS.

This meant that, on Software update, the missing 
/usr/share/sugar/activities/Speak.activity/bot in the sugar.iso
was replaced by ~/Activities/Speak.activity/bot and the issue was not
seen.

I went straight to a hare-brained solution, instead of just reporting
what I saw.

Iain

On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 11:23 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Assertion, limited testing, please contradict:
> > Speak, "Ask robot a question" is broken in SoaS 1.00 >
> 
> 1.00? What?
> 
> > It has been broken for several years, but is not seen because a Software
> > update has been available which provides bot/ and functionality of "Ask
> > robot a question".
> 
> It tends to help by reporting the problem several years ago.
> Ultimately SoaS as a distribution is a complex beast with 1000s of
> moving parts. Maintaining it is not part of my dayjob and I do it in
> the little free time I have available and while I do basic runtime
> testing of all the Activities it's impossible for me to test all
> functionality hence it's vital for people to report bugs so people
> like Gonzalo and myself can investigate and ensure issues are fixed.
> 
> > Please can we release Speak-49 to restore "Ask robot a question"
> > functionality in SoaS 1.00 >
> 
> It has been restored and will be available in the Final SoaS 21 GA release.
> 
> > Please can we hold back Speak-49 from the closing SoaS deadline. This
> > way a Speak-49 Software update will be available to fix SoaS pro temps.
> 
> That would never happen, but it's also not a problem as the issue is
> now fixed and will land in the GA release.
> 
> SoaS is released as part of the Fedora release cycle. While it's not
> perfect it provides us a lot of automated process which I don't need
> to deal with. It's a give and take situation and without it I wouldn't
> have the time to deal with a release process and hence wouldn't do
> SoaS. It also enables us with zero effort to produce SoaS images that
> will run on all sorts of devices from the biggest Intel laptops to
> cheap ARM devices.
> 
> > I have no way of knowing how sugar-speak.spec file affects XOs, so I
> > cannot propose to alter sugar-speak.spec myself.
> 
> It doesn't at all.
> 
> Peter


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel