Re: [Sugar-devel] OLPC OS with gnome only.
Its building and working fine Jems. Thank you very much for all help. On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 12:13 PM, James Cameron wrote: > No, I don't have any ideas as to what went wrong. > > You might send me a log of the build, and check the exit status with > "echo $?". > > You might also send me your .ini file and "git diff" so I can see what > you changed, and perhaps try it myself. > > It isn't really on-topic for sugar-devel@, so perhaps you could use > private mail? > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 11:40:36AM +0545, Buddhi Tuladhar wrote: > > After removing "ds-backup-client" and "systemctl enableds-backup.timer," > from > > module. Something strange happened, builder log says buid is complete > but i > > cannot find .zd image in output directory. Even after including the > > "ds-backup-client" and enabling "systemctl enableds-backup.timer" its not > > working. > > > > * Running part unmountfs base unmountfs.40.unmount.sh... > > * Running part cleanup base cleanup.50.cleanup.sh... > > * Build completed successfully. > > * Output is in /oob/olpc-os-builder-lts/olpc-os-builder/build/output > > -bash-4.2# cd build/output/ > > -bash-4.2# ls > > 32021xx4.activities.txt 32021xx4.files.txt.gz 32021xx4.libraries.txt > > 32021xx4.packages.txt > > > > I am also trying to build OLPC OS in my normal desktop machine. I > frequently > > get error message like package not found. Packages are : vte, > openssh-server, > > xorg-x11-server-Xorg > > my machine info is : intel cpu with fedora 18 installed in it. > > Do you have any idea about this? > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:26 PM, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> > wrote: > > > > No, don't try to remove on first boot, as it makes first boot > fragile, > > and makes build larger. Instead, in your OLPC OS builder branch; > > > > 1. edit modules/base/kspkglist.10.core.inc to remove > > ds-backup-client, > > > > 2. edit modules/base/kspost.10.core.inc to remove systemctl enable > > ds-backup.timer, and; > > > > 3. edit modules/base/kspost.10.core.inc to echo gnome to > > .olpc-active-desktop file. > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 01:31:09PM +0545, Buddhi Tuladhar wrote: > > > Seems like those three sugar packages depends on one another > package > > called > > > "ds-backup-client" . I removed those 3 sugar packages and changed > the > > active > > > desktop to gnome in home folder. Working fine now. Wondering how to > > remove it > > > while building OS. Not sure but thinking to remove those 3 sugar > package > > in 1st > > > boot. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:55 AM, James Cameron <[1][2] > qu...@laptop.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > Remove the sugar packages using RPM and see what depends on > them? > > > > > > You cannot switch desktop with GUI once you remove package > > > olpc-switch-desktop, but you can edit .olpc-active-desktop > file by > > hand. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:58:19AM +0545, Buddhi Tuladhar > wrote: > > > > I removed olpc-switch-desktop from module but sugar still > starts at > > first > > > boot. > > > > what actually happens is, now i cannot switch to gnome form > sugar. > > I can > > > see > > > > these below sugar packages are still installed from my > package list > > of > > > build. I > > > > think there is still some dependencies left to remove. > > > > sugar-0.112.olpc.0-0.noarch > > > > sugar-artwork-0.112.olpc.0-0.armv7hl > > > > sugar-datastore-0.112.olpc.0-0.armv7hl > > > > sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.112.olpc.0-0.armv7hl > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 3:37 PM, James Cameron <[1][2][3] > > qu...@laptop.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >á á áThanks for testing. > > > > > > > >á á áolpc-switch-desktop is why Sugar is still included; the > Sugar > > > packages > > > >á á áare usually selected by modules/sugar/kspkglist.50. > sugar.inc, > > and > > > >á á áwithout the [sugar] mod
Re: [Sugar-devel] OLPC OS with gnome only.
After removing "ds-backup-client" and "systemctl enableds-backup.timer," from module. Something strange happened, builder log says buid is complete but i cannot find .zd image in output directory. Even after including the "ds-backup-client" and enabling "systemctl enableds-backup.timer" its not working. * Running part unmountfs base unmountfs.40.unmount.sh... * Running part cleanup base cleanup.50.cleanup.sh... * Build completed successfully. * Output is in /oob/olpc-os-builder-lts/olpc-os-builder/build/output -bash-4.2# cd build/output/ -bash-4.2# ls 32021xx4.activities.txt 32021xx4.files.txt.gz 32021xx4.libraries.txt 32021xx4.packages.txt I am also trying to build OLPC OS in my normal desktop machine. I frequently get error message like package not found. Packages are : vte, openssh-server, xorg-x11-server-Xorg my machine info is : intel cpu with fedora 18 installed in it. Do you have any idea about this? On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:26 PM, James Cameron wrote: > No, don't try to remove on first boot, as it makes first boot fragile, > and makes build larger. Instead, in your OLPC OS builder branch; > > 1. edit modules/base/kspkglist.10.core.inc to remove > ds-backup-client, > > 2. edit modules/base/kspost.10.core.inc to remove systemctl enable > ds-backup.timer, and; > > 3. edit modules/base/kspost.10.core.inc to echo gnome to > .olpc-active-desktop file. > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 01:31:09PM +0545, Buddhi Tuladhar wrote: > > Seems like those three sugar packages depends on one another package > called > > "ds-backup-client" . I removed those 3 sugar packages and changed the > active > > desktop to gnome in home folder. Working fine now. Wondering how to > remove it > > while building OS. Not sure but thinking to remove those 3 sugar package > in 1st > > boot. > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:55 AM, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> > wrote: > > > > Remove the sugar packages using RPM and see what depends on them? > > > > You cannot switch desktop with GUI once you remove package > > olpc-switch-desktop, but you can edit .olpc-active-desktop file by > hand. > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:58:19AM +0545, Buddhi Tuladhar wrote: > > > I removed olpc-switch-desktop from module but sugar still starts > at first > > boot. > > > what actually happens is, now i cannot switch to gnome form sugar. > I can > > see > > > these below sugar packages are still installed from my package > list of > > build. I > > > think there is still some dependencies left to remove. > > > sugar-0.112.olpc.0-0.noarch > > > sugar-artwork-0.112.olpc.0-0.armv7hl > > > sugar-datastore-0.112.olpc.0-0.armv7hl > > > sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.112.olpc.0-0.armv7hl > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 3:37 PM, James Cameron <[1][2] > qu...@laptop.org> > > wrote: > > > > > >á á áThanks for testing. > > > > > >á á áolpc-switch-desktop is why Sugar is still included; the Sugar > > packages > > >á á áare usually selected by modules/sugar/kspkglist.50.sugar.inc, > and > > >á á áwithout the [sugar] module present in your .ini file the > packages > > >á á áshould not be selected, but olpc-switch-desktop has a > dependency on > > >á á áSugar, and the package is added by > > >á á ámodules/gnome/kspkglist.50.gnome.inc.á So you might remove it > from > > >á á áthere. > > > > > >á á áTo start GNOME by default instead of Sugar, you must arrange > for your > > >á á ábuild to write "gnome" to the file /home/olpc/.olpc-active- > desktop > > and > > >á á áas a result /usr/bin/olpc-session will start the gnome-session. > > >á á > > >á á áOn Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 03:21:03PM +0545, Buddhi Tuladhar > wrote: > > >á á á> Tried removing [sugar], [sugar_activity_group], and > > >á á á[sugar_activities_extra] > > >á á á> but only activities was not installed. sugar remains same. > At first > > boot > > >á á áit > > >á á á> starts sugar. Can we do something to start gnome only then ? > > >á á á> > > >á á á> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:55 PM, James Cameron <[1][2][3] > > qu...@laptop.org> > > >á á áwrote: > > >á á á> > > >á á á>á á áLast time I tried this was in February 2015, with the > goal of > > >á á áreducing
Re: [Sugar-devel] OLPC OS with gnome only.
Seems like those three sugar packages depends on one another package called "ds-backup-client" . I removed those 3 sugar packages and changed the active desktop to gnome in home folder. Working fine now. Wondering how to remove it while building OS. Not sure but thinking to remove those 3 sugar package in 1st boot. On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:55 AM, James Cameron wrote: > Remove the sugar packages using RPM and see what depends on them? > > You cannot switch desktop with GUI once you remove package > olpc-switch-desktop, but you can edit .olpc-active-desktop file by hand. > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:58:19AM +0545, Buddhi Tuladhar wrote: > > I removed olpc-switch-desktop from module but sugar still starts at > first boot. > > what actually happens is, now i cannot switch to gnome form sugar. I can > see > > these below sugar packages are still installed from my package list of > build. I > > think there is still some dependencies left to remove. > > sugar-0.112.olpc.0-0.noarch > > sugar-artwork-0.112.olpc.0-0.armv7hl > > sugar-datastore-0.112.olpc.0-0.armv7hl > > sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.112.olpc.0-0.armv7hl > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 3:37 PM, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> > wrote: > > > > Thanks for testing. > > > > olpc-switch-desktop is why Sugar is still included; the Sugar > packages > > are usually selected by modules/sugar/kspkglist.50.sugar.inc, and > > without the [sugar] module present in your .ini file the packages > > should not be selected, but olpc-switch-desktop has a dependency on > > Sugar, and the package is added by > > modules/gnome/kspkglist.50.gnome.inc. So you might remove it from > > there. > > > > To start GNOME by default instead of Sugar, you must arrange for your > > build to write "gnome" to the file /home/olpc/.olpc-active-desktop > and > > as a result /usr/bin/olpc-session will start the gnome-session. > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 03:21:03PM +0545, Buddhi Tuladhar wrote: > > > Tried removing [sugar], [sugar_activity_group], and > > [sugar_activities_extra] > > > but only activities was not installed. sugar remains same. At > first boot > > it > > > starts sugar. Can we do something to start gnome only then ? > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:55 PM, James Cameron <[1][2] > qu...@laptop.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > Last time I tried this was in February 2015, with the goal of > > reducing > > > time between test builds. The method was to edit the .ini > file and > > > remove sections [usb_update], [sugar], [sugar_activity_group], > and > > > [sugar_activities_extra] > > > > > > I don't know if it will work. > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 01:43:38PM +0545, Buddhi Tuladhar > wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > > > I have a query about OLPC OS builder. > > > > Is it possible to build OLPC OS just with Gnome Desktop > > Environment ? if > > > yes > > > > then how can i do this? > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Buddhi. > > > > > > -- > > > James Cameron > > > [2][3]http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > > > > > References: > > > > > > [1] mailto:[4]qu...@laptop.org > > > [2] [5]http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > > > -- > > James Cameron > > [6]http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > > > References: > > > > [1] mailto:qu...@laptop.org > > [2] mailto:qu...@laptop.org > > [3] http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > [4] mailto:qu...@laptop.org > > [5] http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > [6] http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.netrek.org/ > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] OLPC OS with gnome only.
I removed olpc-switch-desktop from module but sugar still starts at first boot. what actually happens is, now i cannot switch to gnome form sugar. I can see these below sugar packages are still installed from my package list of build. I think there is still some dependencies left to remove. sugar-0.112.olpc.0-0.noarch sugar-artwork-0.112.olpc.0-0.armv7hl sugar-datastore-0.112.olpc.0-0.armv7hl sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.112.olpc.0-0.armv7hl On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 3:37 PM, James Cameron wrote: > Thanks for testing. > > olpc-switch-desktop is why Sugar is still included; the Sugar packages > are usually selected by modules/sugar/kspkglist.50.sugar.inc, and > without the [sugar] module present in your .ini file the packages > should not be selected, but olpc-switch-desktop has a dependency on > Sugar, and the package is added by > modules/gnome/kspkglist.50.gnome.inc. So you might remove it from > there. > > To start GNOME by default instead of Sugar, you must arrange for your > build to write "gnome" to the file /home/olpc/.olpc-active-desktop and > as a result /usr/bin/olpc-session will start the gnome-session. > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 03:21:03PM +0545, Buddhi Tuladhar wrote: > > Tried removing [sugar], [sugar_activity_group], and > [sugar_activities_extra] > > but only activities was not installed. sugar remains same. At first boot > it > > starts sugar. Can we do something to start gnome only then ? > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:55 PM, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> > wrote: > > > > Last time I tried this was in February 2015, with the goal of > reducing > > time between test builds. The method was to edit the .ini file and > > remove sections [usb_update], [sugar], [sugar_activity_group], and > > [sugar_activities_extra] > > > > I don't know if it will work. > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 01:43:38PM +0545, Buddhi Tuladhar wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > > > I have a query about OLPC OS builder. > > > Is it possible to build OLPC OS just with Gnome Desktop > Environment ? if > > yes > > > then how can i do this? > > > > > > Best, > > > Buddhi. > > > > -- > > James Cameron > > [2]http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > > > References: > > > > [1] mailto:qu...@laptop.org > > [2] http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.netrek.org/ > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] OLPC OS with gnome only.
Tried removing [sugar], [sugar_activity_group], and [sugar_activities_extra] but only activities was not installed. sugar remains same. At first boot it starts sugar. Can we do something to start gnome only then ? On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:55 PM, James Cameron wrote: > Last time I tried this was in February 2015, with the goal of reducing > time between test builds. The method was to edit the .ini file and > remove sections [usb_update], [sugar], [sugar_activity_group], and > [sugar_activities_extra] > > I don't know if it will work. > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 01:43:38PM +0545, Buddhi Tuladhar wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I have a query about OLPC OS builder. > > Is it possible to build OLPC OS just with Gnome Desktop Environment ? > if yes > > then how can i do this? > > > > Best, > > Buddhi. > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.netrek.org/ > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] OLPC OS with gnome only.
Dear all, I have a query about OLPC OS builder. Is it possible to build OLPC OS just with Gnome Desktop Environment ? if yes then how can i do this? Best, Buddhi. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Strange problem, a big size number in xo4's screen.
Dear James, Thank you so much for your guidance and all references. I will try my best to recover it, since i have not done these types of works before, it will be difficult for me. Below are the SKU numbers that you asked. SKU322 CQF51200C5E SKU326 CQF51300085 SKU322 CQF512000F8 SKU322 CQF5133 SKU322 CQF51200026 SKU322 CQF512000C6 SKU322 CQF51200C6A Regards, OLE Nepal Tech Team. On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:16 AM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > G'day Buddhi, > > Thanks for your question. Your question is not about Sugar, but I'll > reply here because there are some people who may be interested. > > This problem is seen with low frequency and has known causes. > > Please tell me the SKU, the affected serial numbers, how many laptops > affected, and how many laptops unaffected? I use this for measuring > the problem. > > My recommendations are; > > (a) now, repair the affected laptops using serial adapter [1] and SPI > FLASH recovery for XO-4 using CForth [2], > > (b) in future, identify laptops likely to be affected (see below) and > before reflashing remove charger and main battery for 30 seconds, > > (c) in future, when firmware reflash does hang, do not turn off, > instead connect a serial adapter and repair, > > (d) now, if the number of laptops is too high, reinforce normal > precautions for handling and storage. > > > In more detail; > > Electrostatic discharge, high altitude radiation, extreme > temperatures, humidity or physical shock can cause temporary > malfunction of the CPU, memory, and SPI FLASH chip. Malfunction > may be invisible until firmware reflash is started. > > Firmware reflash may hang. At this time some blocks are correctly > written with new firmware, some blocks are erased, and some > blocks have old firmware. > > e.g. "NEOOO" instead of "N", where "N" is new, "E" is > erased, and "O" is old firmware. > > Combined with your power off, the damage to SPI FLASH data means the > XO-4 cannot start. > > > In much deeper detail; > > The symbol "10" is during startup after CForth has run and before Open > Firmware has turned on memory management unit and caches. > > https://github.com/quozl/openfirmware/blob/olpc/cpu/ > arm/mmp3/resetvec.fth#L143 > > The symbol "16" is during startup after Open Firmware has unpacked and > processor cache is synchronised to memory. > > https://github.com/quozl/openfirmware/blob/olpc/cpu/ > arm/mmp3/resetvec.fth#L232 > > Both "10" and "16" can be result of interrupted reflashing. > > The full list of symbols is; > > "00" CForth before loading Open Firmware, > "01" CForth after loading but before executing, > "10" Open Firmware before turning on memory management unit and caches, > "11" Open Firmware after turning on memory management unit and caches, > "12" Open Firmware before inflating dropin, > "13" Open Firmware after inflating dropin, > "14" Open Firmware with uncompressed dropin, > "15" Open Firmware after dropin is written to cache, and > "16" Open Firmware after cache is synchronised to memory. > > CForth is in the first block of SPI FLASH, and can be used via serial > adapter. > > References: > > 1. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Serial_adapters > 2. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/SPI_FLASH_Recovery_for_XO-4_Using_CForth > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:49:13PM +0545, Buddhi Tuladhar wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I am facing this strange problem in XO4. Every time i start xo4 a big > size > > number appears in screen eg 10,16 . Below i have links of the picture of > xo4 > > screen. this problem appears after flashing the xo with the custom image > i > > build, it is not frequent but sometimes while flashing xo4's firmware, > it gets > > stuck in the middle and everything stops. After that only thing i can do > is to > > press power button and off it, then after that if i try to on the xo, > big size > > number appears. I cannot even go to "ok prompt" to re flash the xo. It is > > creating a big problem for me. If anyone can guide me to solve this > problem i > > would be very thankful. > > > > [1]http://download.olenepal.org/xo10.jpg > > [2]http://download.olenepal.org/xo16.jpg > > > > Regards, > > Buddhi Raj Tuladhar, > > OLE Nepal Tech Team > > > > References: > > > > [1] http://download.olenepal.org/xo10.jpg > > [2] http://download.olenepal.org/xo16.jpg > > > ___ > > Sugar-devel mailing list > > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.netrek.org/ > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Strange problem, a big size number in xo4's screen.
Dear all, I am facing this strange problem in XO4. Every time i start xo4 a *big size number* appears in screen eg 10,16 . Below i have links of the picture of xo4 screen. this problem appears after flashing the xo with the custom image i build, it is not frequent but sometimes while flashing xo4's firmware, it gets stuck in the middle and everything stops. After that only thing i can do is to press power button and off it, then after that if i try to on the xo, *big size number *appears. I cannot even go to "ok prompt" to re flash the xo. It is creating a big problem for me. If anyone can guide me to solve this problem i would be very thankful. http://download.olenepal.org/xo10.jpg http://download.olenepal.org/xo16.jpg Regards, Buddhi Raj Tuladhar, OLE Nepal Tech Team ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] 13.2.8 for xo4 (build 20) localization
Dear all, In OLPC OS for XO-4 13.2.8 (build 20) , sugar version 0.110.0.olpc.9 , i have found some mistakes after changing the system language to Nepali. There are lots of small mistakes in Nepali language but the main problem is in* "journal"* . While erasing the minimized activity from the *"journal"* or *"पन्जिका"* in Nepali it shows two options *"stop"* and *"continue"* . In Nepali language* "stop"* is localized to *"बान्द गर"* and *"continue"* is not localized, it is* "continue"* in Nepali and English both system language. It would be very helpful for me if anyone can suggest me how to fix this problem. I have attached a link to photograph to show how it looks like. http://dev.olenepal.org/buddhi/newfolder/IMG_20170728_090955.jpg Regards. Buddhi Raj Tuladhar ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Flash on OLPC image 13.2.7
Hello, I am trying to run flash plugin run on XO4, Firefox 25 for OLPC image 13.2.7. I downloaded the libflashplayer.so and put it in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugin and tried to wrap the plugin via *nspluginwrapper*, so far i am getting this "no appropriate view found for libflashplayer.so" every time i try to do this. I am doing this according to the instruction in this link http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Adobe_Flash . Can i get any links, instructions, suggestion or any kind of help to run flash player in xo4 OLPC image version 13.2.7 ?? . Thank you. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
