Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84.0 Final Release
Congratulations to everyone - very nice job! - Ed On Mar 5, 2009, at 5:26 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: Bernie Innocenti wrote: On 03/05/09 10:56, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: So, how are we going to celebrate it? As 0.84.1 is going to be on, we could do a bug fix sprint during a weekend. Should we get the marketing team to prepare a press release? Did we announce it on Freshmeat? Slashdot? LWN? OLPCNews? The marketing team is already working on it. 2 things I think are left. Good release notes and a well enough working Soas for people to try out. Both will be available in the next days - at least that is the plan. Cheers, Simon ___ Devel mailing list de...@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Add Fedora logo to Sugar
Tomeu - Hi - thanks for bringing this up. Trac #8767 covers OLPC's agreement with Red Hat regarding the identification of OLPC's XO bundled software. The proposed identifications are to provide boot-time Fedora remix graphics on the XO. It says nothing one way or the other about non-OLPC Sugar distributions that may or may not contain packages derived from Fedora. This ticket is specific to the XO; other Sugar distributions should decide what their preferences and requirements are for various logo/brand identification. Presumably those requirements might vary from one distribution to another. I hope this helps - please let me know if there are more questions about this specific Trac ticket. Thanks! - Ed On 12/6/08 8:34 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Eben#Tasks: Add Fedora logo to Sugar We've agreed to include the Fedora logo in our Sugar distributions. (Is this an OLPC agreement, or something SugarLabs should be doing in general?) I've added some thoughts to the ticket (Trac #8767) , but I'd like to get some more feedback and finalize a plan so this doesn't become a last-minute problem. ~~~ SugarLabs wants to help distributions ship Sugar but isn't in the distribution business itself. Distributions are free to take the code we release and modify it at will to better suit their interests. Now, if distros want to be able to incorporate their brands in the Sugar UI and would prefer not to have to apply their own patches to every release, we could devise some way for distros to brand their Sugars without patching code. Distro people: what would you like to do regarding branding? Thanks, Tomeu ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
