[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Fwd: [Bugs] #1747 UNSP: Default sugar-emulator window size does not follow HIG
Hi, this ticket raises the question of how the layout section in the HIG should be interpreted/modified for screens with different proportions than that of the XO-1. Regards, Tomeu -- Forwarded message -- From: Sugar Labs Bugs bugtracker-nore...@sugarlabs.org Date: Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 13:51 Subject: Re: [Bugs] #1747 UNSP: Default sugar-emulator window size does not follow HIG To: Cc: b...@lists.sugarlabs.org #1747: Default sugar-emulator window size does not follow HIG --+- Reporter: alsroot | Owner: tomeu Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Unspecified by Maintainer | Milestone: Unspecified by Release Team Component: sugar | Version: Git as of bugdate Severity: Unspecified | Keywords: r? Distribution: Unspecified | Status_field: Unconfirmed --+- Changes (by sascha_silbe): * cc: sascha_silbe (added) * keywords: = r? * version: Unspecified = Git as of bugdate Comment: I'm not convinced changing sugar-emulator to use some odd size (832x624 with the default scaling of 72 if I've got my math right) is a good idea. Sugar should scale well to real-world screen sizes. 800x600 was chosen because it's used in actual, current hardware. If we really want to raise the bar, we should go for 1024x600 (used by several netbooks, e.g. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EeePC#Specifications Asus Eee PC]). -- Ticket URL: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1747#comment:2 Sugar Labs http://sugarlabs.org/ Sugar Labs bug tracking system ___ Bugs mailing list b...@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/bugs ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Fwd: [Bugs] #1747 UNSP: Default sugar-emulator window size does not follow HIG
Why not use sugar-emulator -f option in terminal (full screen mode)? Tom Gilliard satellit Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Hi, this ticket raises the question of how the layout section in the HIG should be interpreted/modified for screens with different proportions than that of the XO-1. Regards, Tomeu -- Forwarded message -- From: Sugar Labs Bugs bugtracker-nore...@sugarlabs.org Date: Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 13:51 Subject: Re: [Bugs] #1747 UNSP: Default sugar-emulator window size does not follow HIG To: Cc: b...@lists.sugarlabs.org #1747: Default sugar-emulator window size does not follow HIG --+- Reporter: alsroot| Owner: tomeu Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: Unspecified by Maintainer | Milestone: Unspecified by Release Team Component: sugar |Version: Git as of bugdate Severity: Unspecified| Keywords: r? Distribution: Unspecified| Status_field: Unconfirmed --+- Changes (by sascha_silbe): * cc: sascha_silbe (added) * keywords: = r? * version: Unspecified = Git as of bugdate Comment: I'm not convinced changing sugar-emulator to use some odd size (832x624 with the default scaling of 72 if I've got my math right) is a good idea. Sugar should scale well to real-world screen sizes. 800x600 was chosen because it's used in actual, current hardware. If we really want to raise the bar, we should go for 1024x600 (used by several netbooks, e.g. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EeePC#Specifications Asus Eee PC]). -- Ticket URL: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1747#comment:2 Sugar Labs http://sugarlabs.org/ Sugar Labs bug tracking system ___ Bugs mailing list b...@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/bugs ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
