Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar on Surface Pro (Microsoft Partnership)

[Dave Crossland]

Hi

I agree completely

On Apr 2, 2017 7:52 PM, "Samuel Greenfeld"  wrote:

> But what is a more proper port to Windows going to give us beyond what
> Lionel has already done by including Sugarizer in pretty much every major
> app store (including Microsoft's and Apple's)?
>
> There is a cost associated with porting applications and their ongoing
> maintenance.  If Sugar is not going to receive a benefit, however measured,
> that outweighs the cost, then what is the point?
>
> Something similar already has happened with the original XO laptop
> series.  While it may be possible to port newer operating systems/Linux
> kernels/etc. to them, no one has quantified how many active users this
> could help, and no one has taken up the mantle of actually doing the work.
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Tony Anderson 
> wrote:
>
>> Having Sugar available on Windows 10 is important to establish its
>> reality as an alternative educational platform for educators. Educators in
>> Rwanda and the Philippines accept Windows as the software for vocational
>> preparation to the extent that the XO is not to be used for secondary
>> education because Sugar is for primary school children.
>>
>> Ideally, Sugar would be a normal Windows program with a large file in the
>> C: partition in the manner of Wubi. Sugar alongside Windows would be
>> helpful but less effective with educators with their Windows blinders on.
>>
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> On 04/03/2017 01:26 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
>>
>> The short answer is yes; there are any number of ways (HTML app,
>> ActivePython .NET port, WSL, GTK for Windows, etc.) to port Sugar to
>> Windows.
>>
>> Each has its own strengths and weaknesses.
>>
>> The big question is if any of them are worth it.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Yatin Maan  wrote:
>>
>>> Hey,
>>> I understand that this is an April fool's joke but with introduction on
>>> "Windows subsystem for Linux (WSL)"[1] I was wondering whether we might be
>>> able to directly run sugar on Windows 10.
>>>
>>> Someone here [2] even managed to get Unity and Xfce on WSL so I think it
>>> might actually be possible to run Sugar.
>>>
>>> [1] - https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/wsl/2016/07/08/bash-on-ubun
>>> tu-on-windows-10-anniversary-update/
>>>
>>> [2] - https://github.com/microsoft/bashonwindows/issues/637
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Yatin
>>>
>>> On Sun 2 Apr, 2017, 3:10 AM Samuel Greenfeld, 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 No; with all the thoughts of porting XOs to Fedora.next and having to
 look into ActivePython and such, I never got a chance to look into a proper
 Sugar .NET conversion.

 Besides with Sugarizer, we do not need a third language to maintain all
 the activities in.

 (It's amazing what you can do in Visual Studio within five minutes.)

 On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Samson Goddy < 
 samsongo...@gmail.com> wrote:

 Look nice, that is awesome. Did you finish it?

 On Apr 1, 2017 10:19 PM, "Samuel Greenfeld" 
 wrote:

 Looking around, I found the following code online:

 http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2017/SugarNET.png

 It doesn't seem to do much more than my previous port did [*], but it
 at least compiles.

 [*] http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2011/


 On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Samson Goddy 
 wrote:

 Lolz i guess, i am the king of pranks. Happy new month guys, hope you
 are enjoying your day.

 Samson


 On Apr 1, 2017 5:20 PM, "Walter Bender" < 
 walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:

 I  think Samson was looking at the calendar  (April 1) when he posted
 this.

 On Apr 1, 2017 7:46 AM, "Love Mehta" < 
 lovemehta...@gmail.com> wrote:

 Finally all the hard work is paying off. Soon, the time will come, when
 guys from Apple will be contacting Walter Sir. Let's keep up the good work.

 Greetings,
 Love




 On Apr 1, 2017 8:12 PM, "Utkarsh Tiwari" < 
 iamutkarshtiw...@gmail.com> wrote:

 Hi Samson,

 Great news! This venture will definitely help us gain more popularity
 and reach more Windows users

 Cheers,
 Utkarsh Tiwari

 On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 at 20:08 Samson Goddy < 
 samsongo...@gmail.com> wrote:

 Hello all,

 According to [1], Microsoft wants to make a deal with Sugar Labs to
 include Sugar on their Surface devices as an educational platform for
 windows users. They contacted Walter, so he asked me to forward it to the
 community.

 [1]https://goo.gl/4Ka694
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar on Surface Pro (Microsoft Partnership)

[Samuel Greenfeld]

But what is a more proper port to Windows going to give us beyond what
Lionel has already done by including Sugarizer in pretty much every major
app store (including Microsoft's and Apple's)?

There is a cost associated with porting applications and their ongoing
maintenance.  If Sugar is not going to receive a benefit, however measured,
that outweighs the cost, then what is the point?

Something similar already has happened with the original XO laptop series.
While it may be possible to port newer operating systems/Linux kernels/etc.
to them, no one has quantified how many active users this could help, and
no one has taken up the mantle of actually doing the work.


On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Tony Anderson  wrote:

> Having Sugar available on Windows 10 is important to establish its reality
> as an alternative educational platform for educators. Educators in Rwanda
> and the Philippines accept Windows as the software for vocational
> preparation to the extent that the XO is not to be used for secondary
> education because Sugar is for primary school children.
>
> Ideally, Sugar would be a normal Windows program with a large file in the
> C: partition in the manner of Wubi. Sugar alongside Windows would be
> helpful but less effective with educators with their Windows blinders on.
>
> Tony
>
>
> On 04/03/2017 01:26 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
>
> The short answer is yes; there are any number of ways (HTML app,
> ActivePython .NET port, WSL, GTK for Windows, etc.) to port Sugar to
> Windows.
>
> Each has its own strengths and weaknesses.
>
> The big question is if any of them are worth it.
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Yatin Maan  wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>> I understand that this is an April fool's joke but with introduction on
>> "Windows subsystem for Linux (WSL)"[1] I was wondering whether we might be
>> able to directly run sugar on Windows 10.
>>
>> Someone here [2] even managed to get Unity and Xfce on WSL so I think it
>> might actually be possible to run Sugar.
>>
>> [1] - https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/wsl/2016/07/08/bash-on-ubun
>> tu-on-windows-10-anniversary-update/
>>
>> [2] - https://github.com/microsoft/bashonwindows/issues/637
>>
>> Regards,
>> Yatin
>>
>> On Sun 2 Apr, 2017, 3:10 AM Samuel Greenfeld, 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> No; with all the thoughts of porting XOs to Fedora.next and having to
>>> look into ActivePython and such, I never got a chance to look into a proper
>>> Sugar .NET conversion.
>>>
>>> Besides with Sugarizer, we do not need a third language to maintain all
>>> the activities in.
>>>
>>> (It's amazing what you can do in Visual Studio within five minutes.)
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Samson Goddy < 
>>> samsongo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Look nice, that is awesome. Did you finish it?
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2017 10:19 PM, "Samuel Greenfeld" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Looking around, I found the following code online:
>>>
>>> http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2017/SugarNET.png
>>>
>>> It doesn't seem to do much more than my previous port did [*], but it at
>>> least compiles.
>>>
>>> [*] http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2011/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Samson Goddy 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Lolz i guess, i am the king of pranks. Happy new month guys, hope you
>>> are enjoying your day.
>>>
>>> Samson
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2017 5:20 PM, "Walter Bender" < 
>>> walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I  think Samson was looking at the calendar  (April 1) when he posted
>>> this.
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2017 7:46 AM, "Love Mehta" < 
>>> lovemehta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Finally all the hard work is paying off. Soon, the time will come, when
>>> guys from Apple will be contacting Walter Sir. Let's keep up the good work.
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> Love
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2017 8:12 PM, "Utkarsh Tiwari" < 
>>> iamutkarshtiw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Samson,
>>>
>>> Great news! This venture will definitely help us gain more popularity
>>> and reach more Windows users
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Utkarsh Tiwari
>>>
>>> On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 at 20:08 Samson Goddy < 
>>> samsongo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> According to [1], Microsoft wants to make a deal with Sugar Labs to
>>> include Sugar on their Surface devices as an educational platform for
>>> windows users. They contacted Walter, so he asked me to forward it to the
>>> community.
>>>
>>> [1]https://goo.gl/4Ka694
>>> ___
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> 
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Utkarsh Tiwari
>>>
>>> ___
>>> 

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar on Surface Pro (Microsoft Partnership)

[Tony Anderson]

Having Sugar available on Windows 10 is important to establish its 
reality as an alternative educational platform for educators. Educators 
in Rwanda and the Philippines accept Windows as the software for 
vocational preparation to the extent that the XO is not to be used for 
secondary education because Sugar is for primary school children.


Ideally, Sugar would be a normal Windows program with a large file in 
the C: partition in the manner of Wubi. Sugar alongside Windows would be 
helpful but less effective with educators with their Windows blinders on.


Tony

On 04/03/2017 01:26 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
The short answer is yes; there are any number of ways (HTML app, 
ActivePython .NET port, WSL, GTK for Windows, etc.) to port Sugar to 
Windows.


Each has its own strengths and weaknesses.

The big question is if any of them are worth it.


On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Yatin Maan > wrote:


Hey,
I understand that this is an April fool's joke but with
introduction on "Windows subsystem for Linux (WSL)"[1] I was
wondering whether we might be able to directly run sugar on
Windows 10.

Someone here [2] even managed to get Unity and Xfce on WSL so I
think it might actually be possible to run Sugar.

[1] -

https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/wsl/2016/07/08/bash-on-ubuntu-on-windows-10-anniversary-update/



[2] - https://github.com/microsoft/bashonwindows/issues/637


Regards,
Yatin


On Sun 2 Apr, 2017, 3:10 AM Samuel Greenfeld,
> wrote:

No; with all the thoughts of porting XOs to Fedora.next and
having to look into ActivePython and such, I never got a
chance to look into a proper Sugar .NET conversion.

Besides with Sugarizer, we do not need a third language to
maintain all the activities in.

(It's amazing what you can do in Visual Studio within five
minutes.)

On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Samson Goddy
> wrote:

Look nice, that is awesome. Did you finish it?

On Apr 1, 2017 10:19 PM, "Samuel Greenfeld"
> wrote:

Looking around, I found the following code online:

http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2017/SugarNET.png


It doesn't seem to do much more than my previous port
did [*], but it at least compiles.

[*] http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2011/



On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Samson Goddy
>
wrote:

Lolz i guess, i am the king of pranks. Happy new
month guys, hope you are enjoying your day.

Samson


On Apr 1, 2017 5:20 PM, "Walter Bender"
> wrote:

I  think Samson was looking at the calendar
 (April 1) when he posted this.

On Apr 1, 2017 7:46 AM, "Love Mehta"
> wrote:

Finally all the hard work is paying off.
Soon, the time will come, when guys from
Apple will be contacting Walter Sir. Let's
keep up the good work.

Greetings,
Love




On Apr 1, 2017 8:12 PM, "Utkarsh Tiwari"
> wrote:

Hi Samson,

Great news! This venture will
definitely help us gain more
popularity and reach more Windows users

Cheers,
Utkarsh Tiwari

On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 at 20:08 Samson
Goddy > wrote:

Hello all,

According to [1], Microsoft wants
to make a deal with Sugar Labs to
   

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar on Surface Pro (Microsoft Partnership)

[Samuel Greenfeld]

The short answer is yes; there are any number of ways (HTML app,
ActivePython .NET port, WSL, GTK for Windows, etc.) to port Sugar to
Windows.

Each has its own strengths and weaknesses.

The big question is if any of them are worth it.


On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Yatin Maan  wrote:

> Hey,
> I understand that this is an April fool's joke but with introduction on
> "Windows subsystem for Linux (WSL)"[1] I was wondering whether we might be
> able to directly run sugar on Windows 10.
>
> Someone here [2] even managed to get Unity and Xfce on WSL so I think it
> might actually be possible to run Sugar.
>
> [1] - https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/wsl/2016/07/08/bash-on-
> ubuntu-on-windows-10-anniversary-update/
>
> [2] - https://github.com/microsoft/bashonwindows/issues/637
>
> Regards,
> Yatin
>
> On Sun 2 Apr, 2017, 3:10 AM Samuel Greenfeld, 
> wrote:
>
>> No; with all the thoughts of porting XOs to Fedora.next and having to
>> look into ActivePython and such, I never got a chance to look into a proper
>> Sugar .NET conversion.
>>
>> Besides with Sugarizer, we do not need a third language to maintain all
>> the activities in.
>>
>> (It's amazing what you can do in Visual Studio within five minutes.)
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Samson Goddy 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Look nice, that is awesome. Did you finish it?
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2017 10:19 PM, "Samuel Greenfeld"  wrote:
>>
>> Looking around, I found the following code online:
>>
>> http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2017/SugarNET.png
>>
>> It doesn't seem to do much more than my previous port did [*], but it at
>> least compiles.
>>
>> [*] http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2011/
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Samson Goddy 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Lolz i guess, i am the king of pranks. Happy new month guys, hope you are
>> enjoying your day.
>>
>> Samson
>>
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2017 5:20 PM, "Walter Bender"  wrote:
>>
>> I  think Samson was looking at the calendar  (April 1) when he posted
>> this.
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2017 7:46 AM, "Love Mehta"  wrote:
>>
>> Finally all the hard work is paying off. Soon, the time will come, when
>> guys from Apple will be contacting Walter Sir. Let's keep up the good work.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Love
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2017 8:12 PM, "Utkarsh Tiwari" 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Samson,
>>
>> Great news! This venture will definitely help us gain more popularity and
>> reach more Windows users
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Utkarsh Tiwari
>>
>> On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 at 20:08 Samson Goddy  wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> According to [1], Microsoft wants to make a deal with Sugar Labs to
>> include Sugar on their Surface devices as an educational platform for
>> windows users. They contacted Walter, so he asked me to forward it to the
>> community.
>>
>> [1]https://goo.gl/4Ka694
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Utkarsh Tiwari
>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar on Surface Pro (Microsoft Partnership)

[Yatin Maan]

Hey,
I understand that this is an April fool's joke but with introduction on
"Windows subsystem for Linux (WSL)"[1] I was wondering whether we might be
able to directly run sugar on Windows 10.

Someone here [2] even managed to get Unity and Xfce on WSL so I think it
might actually be possible to run Sugar.

[1] -
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/wsl/2016/07/08/bash-on-ubuntu-on-windows-10-anniversary-update/

[2] - https://github.com/microsoft/bashonwindows/issues/637

Regards,
Yatin

On Sun 2 Apr, 2017, 3:10 AM Samuel Greenfeld,  wrote:

> No; with all the thoughts of porting XOs to Fedora.next and having to look
> into ActivePython and such, I never got a chance to look into a proper
> Sugar .NET conversion.
>
> Besides with Sugarizer, we do not need a third language to maintain all
> the activities in.
>
> (It's amazing what you can do in Visual Studio within five minutes.)
>
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Samson Goddy 
> wrote:
>
> Look nice, that is awesome. Did you finish it?
>
> On Apr 1, 2017 10:19 PM, "Samuel Greenfeld"  wrote:
>
> Looking around, I found the following code online:
>
> http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2017/SugarNET.png
>
> It doesn't seem to do much more than my previous port did [*], but it at
> least compiles.
>
> [*] http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2011/
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Samson Goddy 
> wrote:
>
> Lolz i guess, i am the king of pranks. Happy new month guys, hope you are
> enjoying your day.
>
> Samson
>
>
> On Apr 1, 2017 5:20 PM, "Walter Bender"  wrote:
>
> I  think Samson was looking at the calendar  (April 1) when he posted this.
>
> On Apr 1, 2017 7:46 AM, "Love Mehta"  wrote:
>
> Finally all the hard work is paying off. Soon, the time will come, when
> guys from Apple will be contacting Walter Sir. Let's keep up the good work.
>
> Greetings,
> Love
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 1, 2017 8:12 PM, "Utkarsh Tiwari" 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Samson,
>
> Great news! This venture will definitely help us gain more popularity and
> reach more Windows users
>
> Cheers,
> Utkarsh Tiwari
>
> On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 at 20:08 Samson Goddy  wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> According to [1], Microsoft wants to make a deal with Sugar Labs to
> include Sugar on their Surface devices as an educational platform for
> windows users. They contacted Walter, so he asked me to forward it to the
> community.
>
> [1]https://goo.gl/4Ka694
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
> --
> Regards,
> Utkarsh Tiwari
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
>
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
>
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar on Surface Pro (Microsoft Partnership)

[Samuel Greenfeld]

No; with all the thoughts of porting XOs to Fedora.next and having to look
into ActivePython and such, I never got a chance to look into a proper
Sugar .NET conversion.

Besides with Sugarizer, we do not need a third language to maintain all the
activities in.

(It's amazing what you can do in Visual Studio within five minutes.)

On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Samson Goddy  wrote:

> Look nice, that is awesome. Did you finish it?
>
> On Apr 1, 2017 10:19 PM, "Samuel Greenfeld"  wrote:
>
>> Looking around, I found the following code online:
>>
>> http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2017/SugarNET.png
>>
>> It doesn't seem to do much more than my previous port did [*], but it at
>> least compiles.
>>
>> [*] http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2011/
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Samson Goddy 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Lolz i guess, i am the king of pranks. Happy new month guys, hope you
>>> are enjoying your day.
>>>
>>> Samson
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2017 5:20 PM, "Walter Bender"  wrote:
>>>
>>> I  think Samson was looking at the calendar  (April 1) when he posted
>>> this.
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2017 7:46 AM, "Love Mehta"  wrote:
>>>
>>> Finally all the hard work is paying off. Soon, the time will come, when
>>> guys from Apple will be contacting Walter Sir. Let's keep up the good work.
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> Love
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2017 8:12 PM, "Utkarsh Tiwari" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Samson,
>>>
>>> Great news! This venture will definitely help us gain more popularity
>>> and reach more Windows users
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Utkarsh Tiwari
>>>
>>> On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 at 20:08 Samson Goddy  wrote:
>>>
 Hello all,

 According to [1], Microsoft wants to make a deal with Sugar Labs to
 include Sugar on their Surface devices as an educational platform for
 windows users. They contacted Walter, so he asked me to forward it to the
 community.

 [1]https://goo.gl/4Ka694
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Utkarsh Tiwari
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>> i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar on Surface Pro (Microsoft Partnership)

[Samson Goddy]

Look nice, that is awesome. Did you finish it?

On Apr 1, 2017 10:19 PM, "Samuel Greenfeld"  wrote:

> Looking around, I found the following code online:
>
> http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2017/SugarNET.png
>
> It doesn't seem to do much more than my previous port did [*], but it at
> least compiles.
>
> [*] http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2011/
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Samson Goddy 
> wrote:
>
>> Lolz i guess, i am the king of pranks. Happy new month guys, hope you are
>> enjoying your day.
>>
>> Samson
>>
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2017 5:20 PM, "Walter Bender"  wrote:
>>
>> I  think Samson was looking at the calendar  (April 1) when he posted
>> this.
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2017 7:46 AM, "Love Mehta"  wrote:
>>
>> Finally all the hard work is paying off. Soon, the time will come, when
>> guys from Apple will be contacting Walter Sir. Let's keep up the good work.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Love
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2017 8:12 PM, "Utkarsh Tiwari" 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Samson,
>>
>> Great news! This venture will definitely help us gain more popularity and
>> reach more Windows users
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Utkarsh Tiwari
>>
>> On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 at 20:08 Samson Goddy  wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> According to [1], Microsoft wants to make a deal with Sugar Labs to
>>> include Sugar on their Surface devices as an educational platform for
>>> windows users. They contacted Walter, so he asked me to forward it to the
>>> community.
>>>
>>> [1]https://goo.gl/4Ka694
>>> ___
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Utkarsh Tiwari
>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar on Surface Pro (Microsoft Partnership)

[Samuel Greenfeld]

Looking around, I found the following code online:

http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2017/SugarNET.png

It doesn't seem to do much more than my previous port did [*], but it at
least compiles.

[*] http://www.greenfeld.org/1April2011/


On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Samson Goddy  wrote:

> Lolz i guess, i am the king of pranks. Happy new month guys, hope you are
> enjoying your day.
>
> Samson
>
>
> On Apr 1, 2017 5:20 PM, "Walter Bender"  wrote:
>
> I  think Samson was looking at the calendar  (April 1) when he posted this.
>
> On Apr 1, 2017 7:46 AM, "Love Mehta"  wrote:
>
> Finally all the hard work is paying off. Soon, the time will come, when
> guys from Apple will be contacting Walter Sir. Let's keep up the good work.
>
> Greetings,
> Love
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 1, 2017 8:12 PM, "Utkarsh Tiwari" 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Samson,
>
> Great news! This venture will definitely help us gain more popularity and
> reach more Windows users
>
> Cheers,
> Utkarsh Tiwari
>
> On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 at 20:08 Samson Goddy  wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> According to [1], Microsoft wants to make a deal with Sugar Labs to
>> include Sugar on their Surface devices as an educational platform for
>> windows users. They contacted Walter, so he asked me to forward it to the
>> community.
>>
>> [1]https://goo.gl/4Ka694
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
> --
> Regards,
> Utkarsh Tiwari
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
>
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel