Re: [Sugar-devel] [SUMMARY] development meeting 18/07/14

2014-07-25 Thread Lionel Laské
Sure I've done.
The roadmap seems compatible with the current status of the project.
Plus, this feature has a very small impact on the Sugar source code (mainly
in apisocket.py).

Lionel.


2014-07-25 15:41 GMT+02:00 Martin Abente :

> Thanks Lionel and Puneet!
>
> BTW, have you checked the latest draft for the roadmap [1]?
>
> Refs:
> 1. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.104/Roadmap
>
>
>
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [SUMMARY] development meeting 18/07/14

2014-07-25 Thread Martin Abente
Thanks Lionel and Puneet!

BTW, have you checked the latest draft for the roadmap [1]?

Refs:
1. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.104/Roadmap



On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Lionel Laské 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> As decided to the meeting, Puneet has wrote a new page for the Cordova
> container Feature that we could include in 0.104.
> You could find this new page it here:
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Cordova_Container_for_Sugar
> Thanks to Puneet for the job.
>
>  Lionel
>
>
>
> 2014-07-24 13:36 GMT+02:00 Gonzalo Odiard :
>
>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Ignacio Rodríguez 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just thinking, we need to choice the backgrounds from the contest and
>>> package it for new sugar.
>>>
>>>
>> Yes. We are waiting for the judges to select the images.
>> Manuel Quiñones (manuq) is who coordinate that.
>>
>>
>>
>>> btw, would be good if we can have animated backgrounds, like gifs.
>>>
>>>
>> That would increase the battery consumption a lot :(
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Ignacio Rodríguez
>>> +598 91 686 835
>>> nachoe...@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-07-22 16:04 GMT-05:00 Martin Abente >> >:
>>>
  Hello everyone,

 Some updates:

 On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Martin Abente <
 martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a summary of the topics we discussed in our first development
> meeting. Logs can be found here [1].
>
> *Topic #1: What should we do for 0.104?*
>
>- Focus on core ideas:
>- Fix or re-work collaboration? Cover web activities integration.
>   - Make Sugar more customizable? Get rid of control panel by
>   converting sections into applications. Make sugar itself modifiable 
> like
>   activities.
>   - Make student assessment part of the sugar experience? Think
>   of ways in which all these statistics gathering efforts can become 
> part of
>   this.
>
>
>- Performance enhancements:
>- Make Sugar more responsive? Starting by the journal.
>   - Make activities launch time faster? Moving common bits to
>   sugar-toolkit, ie., text-to-speech.
>
>
>- Cover other classroom needs:
>- Printing in Sugar?
>   - Integrate screen sharing in Sugar?
>
> These are initial suggestions, we all agreed that collaboration and
> performance should be prioritized.
>
>
> *Topic #2: How do we do it?*
>
>- Keep the current structure for phases and deadlines, ie., [2].
>- Keep the 6 months release schedules.
>- Find a way to re-sync with  Gnome [3] and Fedora [4], so we can
>achieve the previous item.
>
>
 This is a tentative Roadmap for 0.104:
 http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.104/Roadmap . Please read it, think
 about it, and sent me your feedback.


>
>-
>- Have regular development meetings. Each 2 weeks? Each month?
>- Have at least one code  sprint for each release, ie., SF meeting
>in Oct/14, and UY youth summit in Sept/14.
>- Request for former Sugar developers guidance.
>- Share design team responsibilities among all of us.
>- Document maintainers and responsibilities.
>
> *Topic #3: What are the Infrastructure needs?*
>
>- *Bring Pootle back to life*! Call for a special meeting
>regarding this.
>
>
 Today (22 /04/2014), we had a meeting between gonzalo, cjl, icarito,
 bernie and me. Summary: (a) bernie is going to update newpootle machine,
 and (b) I am going to research a bit about setting a new Pootle instance
 from scratch, to understand what would be best path to follow.


>
>-
>- Move activities repositories to github?
>
>
 Gonzalo is going to make an inventory on activities and repositories.

>
>- Set up a discourse instance (GSoC project)?
>
>
> Many thanks to gonzalo, walterbender, llaske, bashintosh and satellit
> for joining and contributing to the meeting!
>
> Saludos,
> tch.
>
> *Refs:*
>
>1.
>
> http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2014-07-18T13:29:08.html
>2. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Roadmap
>3. https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointThirteen
>4. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule
>
>
>

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gonzalo Odiard
>>
>> SugarLabs - Software for children learning
>>
>
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [SUMMARY] development meeting 18/07/14

2014-07-25 Thread Lionel Laské
Hi all,

As decided to the meeting, Puneet has wrote a new page for the Cordova
container Feature that we could include in 0.104.
You could find this new page it here:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Cordova_Container_for_Sugar
Thanks to Puneet for the job.

 Lionel



2014-07-24 13:36 GMT+02:00 Gonzalo Odiard :

>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Ignacio Rodríguez 
> wrote:
>
>> Just thinking, we need to choice the backgrounds from the contest and
>> package it for new sugar.
>>
>>
> Yes. We are waiting for the judges to select the images.
> Manuel Quiñones (manuq) is who coordinate that.
>
>
>
>> btw, would be good if we can have animated backgrounds, like gifs.
>>
>>
> That would increase the battery consumption a lot :(
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
>
>>
>> Ignacio Rodríguez
>> +598 91 686 835
>> nachoe...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>> 2014-07-22 16:04 GMT-05:00 Martin Abente 
>> :
>>
>>>  Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> Some updates:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Martin Abente <
>>> martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 Hello everyone,

 This is a summary of the topics we discussed in our first development
 meeting. Logs can be found here [1].

 *Topic #1: What should we do for 0.104?*

- Focus on core ideas:
- Fix or re-work collaboration? Cover web activities integration.
   - Make Sugar more customizable? Get rid of control panel by
   converting sections into applications. Make sugar itself modifiable 
 like
   activities.
   - Make student assessment part of the sugar experience? Think of
   ways in which all these statistics gathering efforts can become part 
 of
   this.


- Performance enhancements:
- Make Sugar more responsive? Starting by the journal.
   - Make activities launch time faster? Moving common bits to
   sugar-toolkit, ie., text-to-speech.


- Cover other classroom needs:
- Printing in Sugar?
   - Integrate screen sharing in Sugar?

 These are initial suggestions, we all agreed that collaboration and
 performance should be prioritized.


 *Topic #2: How do we do it?*

- Keep the current structure for phases and deadlines, ie., [2].
- Keep the 6 months release schedules.
- Find a way to re-sync with  Gnome [3] and Fedora [4], so we can
achieve the previous item.


>>> This is a tentative Roadmap for 0.104:
>>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.104/Roadmap . Please read it, think
>>> about it, and sent me your feedback.
>>>
>>>

-
- Have regular development meetings. Each 2 weeks? Each month?
- Have at least one code  sprint for each release, ie., SF meeting
in Oct/14, and UY youth summit in Sept/14.
- Request for former Sugar developers guidance.
- Share design team responsibilities among all of us.
- Document maintainers and responsibilities.

 *Topic #3: What are the Infrastructure needs?*

- *Bring Pootle back to life*! Call for a special meeting regarding
this.


>>> Today (22 /04/2014), we had a meeting between gonzalo, cjl, icarito,
>>> bernie and me. Summary: (a) bernie is going to update newpootle machine,
>>> and (b) I am going to research a bit about setting a new Pootle instance
>>> from scratch, to understand what would be best path to follow.
>>>
>>>

-
- Move activities repositories to github?


>>> Gonzalo is going to make an inventory on activities and repositories.
>>>

- Set up a discourse instance (GSoC project)?


 Many thanks to gonzalo, walterbender, llaske, bashintosh and satellit
 for joining and contributing to the meeting!

 Saludos,
 tch.

 *Refs:*

1.

 http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2014-07-18T13:29:08.html
2. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Roadmap
3. https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointThirteen
4. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule



>>>
>>> ___
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Gonzalo Odiard
>
> SugarLabs - Software for children learning
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [SUMMARY] development meeting 18/07/14

2014-07-24 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Ignacio Rodríguez 
wrote:

> Just thinking, we need to choice the backgrounds from the contest and
> package it for new sugar.
>
>
Yes. We are waiting for the judges to select the images.
Manuel Quiñones (manuq) is who coordinate that.



> btw, would be good if we can have animated backgrounds, like gifs.
>
>
That would increase the battery consumption a lot :(

Gonzalo



>
> Ignacio Rodríguez
> +598 91 686 835
> nachoe...@gmail.com
>
>
> 2014-07-22 16:04 GMT-05:00 Martin Abente :
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Some updates:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Martin Abente <
>> martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> This is a summary of the topics we discussed in our first development
>>> meeting. Logs can be found here [1].
>>>
>>> *Topic #1: What should we do for 0.104?*
>>>
>>>- Focus on core ideas:
>>>- Fix or re-work collaboration? Cover web activities integration.
>>>   - Make Sugar more customizable? Get rid of control panel by
>>>   converting sections into applications. Make sugar itself modifiable 
>>> like
>>>   activities.
>>>   - Make student assessment part of the sugar experience? Think of
>>>   ways in which all these statistics gathering efforts can become part 
>>> of
>>>   this.
>>>
>>>
>>>- Performance enhancements:
>>>- Make Sugar more responsive? Starting by the journal.
>>>   - Make activities launch time faster? Moving common bits to
>>>   sugar-toolkit, ie., text-to-speech.
>>>
>>>
>>>- Cover other classroom needs:
>>>- Printing in Sugar?
>>>   - Integrate screen sharing in Sugar?
>>>
>>> These are initial suggestions, we all agreed that collaboration and
>>> performance should be prioritized.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Topic #2: How do we do it?*
>>>
>>>- Keep the current structure for phases and deadlines, ie., [2].
>>>- Keep the 6 months release schedules.
>>>- Find a way to re-sync with  Gnome [3] and Fedora [4], so we can
>>>achieve the previous item.
>>>
>>>
>> This is a tentative Roadmap for 0.104:
>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.104/Roadmap . Please read it, think about
>> it, and sent me your feedback.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>-
>>>- Have regular development meetings. Each 2 weeks? Each month?
>>>- Have at least one code  sprint for each release, ie., SF meeting
>>>in Oct/14, and UY youth summit in Sept/14.
>>>- Request for former Sugar developers guidance.
>>>- Share design team responsibilities among all of us.
>>>- Document maintainers and responsibilities.
>>>
>>> *Topic #3: What are the Infrastructure needs?*
>>>
>>>- *Bring Pootle back to life*! Call for a special meeting regarding
>>>this.
>>>
>>>
>> Today (22 /04/2014), we had a meeting between gonzalo, cjl, icarito,
>> bernie and me. Summary: (a) bernie is going to update newpootle machine,
>> and (b) I am going to research a bit about setting a new Pootle instance
>> from scratch, to understand what would be best path to follow.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>-
>>>- Move activities repositories to github?
>>>
>>>
>> Gonzalo is going to make an inventory on activities and repositories.
>>
>>>
>>>- Set up a discourse instance (GSoC project)?
>>>
>>>
>>> Many thanks to gonzalo, walterbender, llaske, bashintosh and satellit
>>> for joining and contributing to the meeting!
>>>
>>> Saludos,
>>> tch.
>>>
>>> *Refs:*
>>>
>>>1.
>>>
>>> http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2014-07-18T13:29:08.html
>>>2. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Roadmap
>>>3. https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointThirteen
>>>4. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>


-- 
Gonzalo Odiard

SugarLabs - Software for children learning
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [SUMMARY] development meeting 18/07/14

2014-07-23 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:59:13PM -0500, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote:
> Just thinking, we need to choice the backgrounds from the contest
> and package it for new sugar.

That would be good.

> btw, would be good if we can have animated backgrounds, like gifs.

I can see that would be good for coal miners and other sources of
electrical energy production.  ;-)

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [SUMMARY] development meeting 18/07/14

2014-07-23 Thread Ignacio Rodríguez
Just thinking, we need to choice the backgrounds from the contest and
package it for new sugar.

btw, would be good if we can have animated backgrounds, like gifs.



Ignacio Rodríguez
+598 91 686 835
nachoe...@gmail.com


2014-07-22 16:04 GMT-05:00 Martin Abente :

> Hello everyone,
>
> Some updates:
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Martin Abente <
> martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> This is a summary of the topics we discussed in our first development
>> meeting. Logs can be found here [1].
>>
>> *Topic #1: What should we do for 0.104?*
>>
>>- Focus on core ideas:
>>- Fix or re-work collaboration? Cover web activities integration.
>>   - Make Sugar more customizable? Get rid of control panel by
>>   converting sections into applications. Make sugar itself modifiable 
>> like
>>   activities.
>>   - Make student assessment part of the sugar experience? Think of
>>   ways in which all these statistics gathering efforts can become part of
>>   this.
>>
>>
>>- Performance enhancements:
>>- Make Sugar more responsive? Starting by the journal.
>>   - Make activities launch time faster? Moving common bits to
>>   sugar-toolkit, ie., text-to-speech.
>>
>>
>>- Cover other classroom needs:
>>- Printing in Sugar?
>>   - Integrate screen sharing in Sugar?
>>
>> These are initial suggestions, we all agreed that collaboration and
>> performance should be prioritized.
>>
>>
>> *Topic #2: How do we do it?*
>>
>>- Keep the current structure for phases and deadlines, ie., [2].
>>- Keep the 6 months release schedules.
>>- Find a way to re-sync with  Gnome [3] and Fedora [4], so we can
>>achieve the previous item.
>>
>>
> This is a tentative Roadmap for 0.104:
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.104/Roadmap . Please read it, think about
> it, and sent me your feedback.
>
>
>>
>>-
>>- Have regular development meetings. Each 2 weeks? Each month?
>>- Have at least one code  sprint for each release, ie., SF meeting in
>>Oct/14, and UY youth summit in Sept/14.
>>- Request for former Sugar developers guidance.
>>- Share design team responsibilities among all of us.
>>- Document maintainers and responsibilities.
>>
>> *Topic #3: What are the Infrastructure needs?*
>>
>>- *Bring Pootle back to life*! Call for a special meeting regarding
>>this.
>>
>>
> Today (22 /04/2014), we had a meeting between gonzalo, cjl, icarito,
> bernie and me. Summary: (a) bernie is going to update newpootle machine,
> and (b) I am going to research a bit about setting a new Pootle instance
> from scratch, to understand what would be best path to follow.
>
>
>>
>>-
>>- Move activities repositories to github?
>>
>>
> Gonzalo is going to make an inventory on activities and repositories.
>
>>
>>- Set up a discourse instance (GSoC project)?
>>
>>
>> Many thanks to gonzalo, walterbender, llaske, bashintosh and satellit for
>> joining and contributing to the meeting!
>>
>> Saludos,
>> tch.
>>
>> *Refs:*
>>
>>1.
>>
>> http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2014-07-18T13:29:08.html
>>2. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Roadmap
>>3. https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointThirteen
>>4. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule
>>
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [SUMMARY] development meeting 18/07/14

2014-07-22 Thread Martin Abente
Hello everyone,

Some updates:

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Martin Abente <
martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a summary of the topics we discussed in our first development
> meeting. Logs can be found here [1].
>
> *Topic #1: What should we do for 0.104?*
>
>- Focus on core ideas:
>- Fix or re-work collaboration? Cover web activities integration.
>   - Make Sugar more customizable? Get rid of control panel by
>   converting sections into applications. Make sugar itself modifiable like
>   activities.
>   - Make student assessment part of the sugar experience? Think of
>   ways in which all these statistics gathering efforts can become part of
>   this.
>
>
>- Performance enhancements:
>- Make Sugar more responsive? Starting by the journal.
>   - Make activities launch time faster? Moving common bits to
>   sugar-toolkit, ie., text-to-speech.
>
>
>- Cover other classroom needs:
>- Printing in Sugar?
>   - Integrate screen sharing in Sugar?
>
> These are initial suggestions, we all agreed that collaboration and
> performance should be prioritized.
>
>
> *Topic #2: How do we do it?*
>
>- Keep the current structure for phases and deadlines, ie., [2].
>- Keep the 6 months release schedules.
>- Find a way to re-sync with  Gnome [3] and Fedora [4], so we can
>achieve the previous item.
>
>
This is a tentative Roadmap for 0.104:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.104/Roadmap . Please read it, think about
it, and sent me your feedback.


>
>-
>- Have regular development meetings. Each 2 weeks? Each month?
>- Have at least one code  sprint for each release, ie., SF meeting in
>Oct/14, and UY youth summit in Sept/14.
>- Request for former Sugar developers guidance.
>- Share design team responsibilities among all of us.
>- Document maintainers and responsibilities.
>
> *Topic #3: What are the Infrastructure needs?*
>
>- *Bring Pootle back to life*! Call for a special meeting regarding
>this.
>
>
Today (22 /04/2014), we had a meeting between gonzalo, cjl, icarito, bernie
and me. Summary: (a) bernie is going to update newpootle machine, and (b) I
am going to research a bit about setting a new Pootle instance from
scratch, to understand what would be best path to follow.


>
>-
>- Move activities repositories to github?
>
>
Gonzalo is going to make an inventory on activities and repositories.

>
>- Set up a discourse instance (GSoC project)?
>
>
> Many thanks to gonzalo, walterbender, llaske, bashintosh and satellit for
> joining and contributing to the meeting!
>
> Saludos,
> tch.
>
> *Refs:*
>
>1.
>
> http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2014-07-18T13:29:08.html
>2. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Roadmap
>3. https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointThirteen
>4. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule
>
>
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [SUMMARY] development meeting 18/07/14

2014-07-20 Thread Peter Robinson
> This is a summary of the topics we discussed in our first development
> meeting. Logs can be found here [1].
>
> Topic #1: What should we do for 0.104?
>
> Focus on core ideas:
>
> Fix or re-work collaboration? Cover web activities integration.
> Make Sugar more customizable? Get rid of control panel by converting
> sections into applications. Make sugar itself modifiable like activities.
> Make student assessment part of the sugar experience? Think of ways in which
> all these statistics gathering efforts can become part of this.
>
> Performance enhancements:
>
> Make Sugar more responsive? Starting by the journal.
> Make activities launch time faster? Moving common bits to sugar-toolkit,
> ie., text-to-speech.
>
> Cover other classroom needs:
>
> Printing in Sugar?
> Integrate screen sharing in Sugar?
>
> These are initial suggestions, we all agreed that collaboration and
> performance should be prioritized.
>
>
> Topic #2: How do we do it?
>
> Keep the current structure for phases and deadlines, ie., [2].
> Keep the 6 months release schedules.
> Find a way to re-sync with  Gnome [3] and Fedora [4], so we can achieve the
> previous item.

Let me know how I can assist with the Fedora side of things. At the
moment I don't have a huge amount of cycles free at the moment but
that should improve to some extend mid to late August. F-21 will have
the latest 102 stable release, are there plans for bug fix dot
releases?

Peter
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [SUMMARY] development meeting 18/07/14

2014-07-20 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 07/18/2014 12:46 PM, Martin Abente wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> This is a summary of the topics we discussed in our first development
> meeting. Logs can be found here [1].
> 
> *Topic #1: What should we do for 0.104?*
> 
>   * Focus on core ideas:
>   o Fix or re-work collaboration? Cover web activities integration.
>   o Make Sugar more customizable? Get rid of control panel by
> converting sections into applications. Make sugar itself
> modifiable like activities. 
>   o Make student assessment part of the sugar experience? Think of
> ways in which all these statistics gathering efforts can become
> part of this.
> 
>   * Performance enhancements:
>   o Make Sugar more responsive? Starting by the journal.
>   o Make activities launch time faster? Moving common bits to
> sugar-toolkit, ie., text-to-speech.
> 
>   * Cover other classroom needs:
>   o Printing in Sugar?
>   o Integrate screen sharing in Sugar?
> 
> These are initial suggestions, we all agreed that collaboration and
> performance should be prioritized.
> 
> 
> *Topic #2: How do we do it?*
> 
>   * Keep the current structure for phases and deadlines, ie., [2].
>   * Keep the 6 months release schedules.
>   * Find a way to re-sync with  Gnome [3] and Fedora [4], so we can
> achieve the previous item.
>   * Have regular development meetings. Each 2 weeks? Each month?
>   * Have at least one code  sprint for each release, ie., SF meeting in
> Oct/14, and UY youth summit in Sept/14.
>   * Request for former Sugar developers guidance.
>   * Share design team responsibilities among all of us.
>   * Document maintainers and responsibilities.
> 
> *Topic #3: What are the Infrastructure needs?*
> 
>   * _Bring Pootle back to life_! Call for a special meeting regarding this.

Let me know when this is happening. I can't volunteer to maintain
Pootle, but I can support whoever steps up to do it.


>   * Move activities repositories to github?
>   * Set up a discourse instance (GSoC project)?
> 
> 
> Many thanks to gonzalo, walterbender, llaske, bashintosh and satellit
> for joining and contributing to the meeting!
> 
> Saludos,
> tch.
> 
> _Refs:_
> 
>  1. 
> http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2014-07-18T13:29:08.html
>  2. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Roadmap
>  3. https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointThirteen
>  4. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule
> 
> 


-- 
Bernie Innocenti
Sugar Labs Infrastructure Team
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Infrastructure_Team
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [SUMMARY] development meeting 18/07/14

2014-07-18 Thread Walter Bender
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Martin Abente <
martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a summary of the topics we discussed in our first development
> meeting. Logs can be found here [1].
>
> *Topic #1: What should we do for 0.104?*
>
>- Focus on core ideas:
>- Fix or re-work collaboration? Cover web activities integration.
>   - Make Sugar more customizable? Get rid of control panel by
>   converting sections into applications. Make sugar itself modifiable like
>   activities.
>   - Make student assessment part of the sugar experience? Think of
>   ways in which all these statistics gathering efforts can become part of
>   this.
>
> For the record, I am not convinced that statistics gathering is the key to
assessing the Sugar experience. This is perhaps more of a research project
than a deployment topic at this point in time.

-walter

>
>- Performance enhancements:
>- Make Sugar more responsive? Starting by the journal.
>   - Make activities launch time faster? Moving common bits to
>   sugar-toolkit, ie., text-to-speech.
>
>
>- Cover other classroom needs:
>- Printing in Sugar?
>   - Integrate screen sharing in Sugar?
>
> These are initial suggestions, we all agreed that collaboration and
> performance should be prioritized.
>
>
> *Topic #2: How do we do it?*
>
>- Keep the current structure for phases and deadlines, ie., [2].
>- Keep the 6 months release schedules.
>- Find a way to re-sync with  Gnome [3] and Fedora [4], so we can
>achieve the previous item.
>- Have regular development meetings. Each 2 weeks? Each month?
>- Have at least one code  sprint for each release, ie., SF meeting in
>Oct/14, and UY youth summit in Sept/14.
>- Request for former Sugar developers guidance.
>- Share design team responsibilities among all of us.
>- Document maintainers and responsibilities.
>
> *Topic #3: What are the Infrastructure needs?*
>
>- *Bring Pootle back to life*! Call for a special meeting regarding
>this.
>- Move activities repositories to github?
>- Set up a discourse instance (GSoC project)?
>
>
> Many thanks to gonzalo, walterbender, llaske, bashintosh and satellit for
> joining and contributing to the meeting!
>
> Saludos,
> tch.
>
> *Refs:*
>
>1.
>
> http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2014-07-18T13:29:08.html
>2. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Roadmap
>3. https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointThirteen
>4. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule
>
>
>


-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] [SUMMARY] development meeting 18/07/14

2014-07-18 Thread Martin Abente
Hello everyone,

This is a summary of the topics we discussed in our first development
meeting. Logs can be found here [1].

*Topic #1: What should we do for 0.104?*

   - Focus on core ideas:
   - Fix or re-work collaboration? Cover web activities integration.
  - Make Sugar more customizable? Get rid of control panel by
  converting sections into applications. Make sugar itself modifiable like
  activities.
  - Make student assessment part of the sugar experience? Think of ways
  in which all these statistics gathering efforts can become part of this.


   - Performance enhancements:
   - Make Sugar more responsive? Starting by the journal.
  - Make activities launch time faster? Moving common bits to
  sugar-toolkit, ie., text-to-speech.


   - Cover other classroom needs:
   - Printing in Sugar?
  - Integrate screen sharing in Sugar?

These are initial suggestions, we all agreed that collaboration and
performance should be prioritized.


*Topic #2: How do we do it?*

   - Keep the current structure for phases and deadlines, ie., [2].
   - Keep the 6 months release schedules.
   - Find a way to re-sync with  Gnome [3] and Fedora [4], so we can
   achieve the previous item.
   - Have regular development meetings. Each 2 weeks? Each month?
   - Have at least one code  sprint for each release, ie., SF meeting in
   Oct/14, and UY youth summit in Sept/14.
   - Request for former Sugar developers guidance.
   - Share design team responsibilities among all of us.
   - Document maintainers and responsibilities.

*Topic #3: What are the Infrastructure needs?*

   - *Bring Pootle back to life*! Call for a special meeting regarding this.
   - Move activities repositories to github?
   - Set up a discourse instance (GSoC project)?


Many thanks to gonzalo, walterbender, llaske, bashintosh and satellit for
joining and contributing to the meeting!

Saludos,
tch.

*Refs:*

   1.
   http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2014-07-18T13:29:08.html
   2. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Roadmap
   3. https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointThirteen
   4. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel