Re: [Sugar-devel] [support-gang] http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4285#comment:7

2013-02-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
 On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Thomas Gilliard
 satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote:
 My Settings/ Software Update is important to have for both fedora 18
 sugar-desktop and the fedora 18 Sugar on a Stick spin.

 Nobody doubts that its a bug worth fixing, but resources are limited,
 so we set priorities. Maybe you can help us reprioritise it by
 explaining why it is so important for these two use cases.

 To me this it is not of obviously high importance, since this software
 update component is not able to update any of the software shipped in
 those 2 platforms (they ship systemwide activities, and the updater in
 question cannot touch these).

I agree that this isn't important in sugar for SoaS, I would actually
prefer someone did a PackageKit interface to allow people to apply OS
updates and to select non default Sugar Activities that we ship in
Fedora.

Peter
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [support-gang] http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4285#comment:7

2013-02-22 Thread Daniel Drake
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Thomas Gilliard
satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote:
 My Settings/ Software Update is important to have for both fedora 18
 sugar-desktop and the fedora 18 Sugar on a Stick spin.

Nobody doubts that its a bug worth fixing, but resources are limited,
so we set priorities. Maybe you can help us reprioritise it by
explaining why it is so important for these two use cases.

To me this it is not of obviously high importance, since this software
update component is not able to update any of the software shipped in
those 2 platforms (they ship systemwide activities, and the updater in
question cannot touch these).

Daniel
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel