Re: [Sugar-devel] Analyze activity

2016-04-11 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:22:47AM -0400, Chris Leonard wrote:
> Seeking opinions/information:
> 
> Is garycmartin's Analyze activity still useful?

I don't know.  I'm not including it at the moment in OLPC builds.

> Is it ported to gtk3 yet?

No.  You can tell by observing "import gtk" in analyze.py, instead of
"from gi.repository import ...".

It might also need porting for the presence service feature.

> Is anyone interested in migrating it to github and maintaining it?

I'm not.

> If there are positive answers to the above, I'll be restoring it's
> PO files to Pootle, otherwise, maybe not, we'll see.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] Analyze activity

2016-04-11 Thread Chris Leonard
Seeking opinions/information:

Is garycmartin's Analyze activity still useful?

Is it ported to gtk3 yet?

Is anyone interested in migrating it to github and maintaining it?

If there are positive answers to the above, I'll be restoring it's PO
files to Pootle, otherwise, maybe not, we'll see.

Relevant links.

http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4200

http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/Analyze

https://git.sugarlabs.org/analyze

cjl
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel