Re: [Sugar-devel] Request to review solution for SL #2464
I have added the binaries for python 2.7 in 64 bit arch Gonzalo On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks James. The problem with the permissions in the activity.info file must be because the last time i created the xo file by hand with zip and now i am using setup.py I will put this information information in the ticket. I am trying to add fill/linux64_27 but fedora 14 is crazy in my machine... Gonzalo On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:13 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:33:02AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: I have uploaded a new xo to http://dev.laptop.org/~gonzalo/Paint-29.xohttp://dev.laptop.org/%7Egonzalo/Paint-29.xo I don't have a 0.82 system, can anybody confirm if is working ok? Tested on freshly installed XO-1 OLPC OS 8.2.1 build gg-802-1, Sugar 0.82.1, and it starts okay. This addresses the problem in SL #2464. I was able to draw, quit, and then restore the drawing. There were no unusual messages in the log. Attached. Also checked that it is essentially the same as git master for Paint, except for the activity.info file version line. Reviewed the changes from activities.sugarlabs.org Paint-28 and your Paint-29 ... apart from the code changes, the other interesting things were: - MANIFEST is present in -29, not in -28, (is it needed?), - a patch file is present in -28, not in -29, (this is good), - .gitignore present in -28, not in -29, (this is good), - fill/linux32_27 was added in -29, (this is good). Well done. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ -- Gonzalo Odiard -- Gonzalo Odiard ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Request to review solution for SL #2464
Thanks James. The problem with the permissions in the activity.info file must be because the last time i created the xo file by hand with zip and now i am using setup.py I will put this information information in the ticket. I am trying to add fill/linux64_27 but fedora 14 is crazy in my machine... Gonzalo On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:13 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:33:02AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: I have uploaded a new xo to http://dev.laptop.org/~gonzalo/Paint-29.xohttp://dev.laptop.org/%7Egonzalo/Paint-29.xo I don't have a 0.82 system, can anybody confirm if is working ok? Tested on freshly installed XO-1 OLPC OS 8.2.1 build gg-802-1, Sugar 0.82.1, and it starts okay. This addresses the problem in SL #2464. I was able to draw, quit, and then restore the drawing. There were no unusual messages in the log. Attached. Also checked that it is essentially the same as git master for Paint, except for the activity.info file version line. Reviewed the changes from activities.sugarlabs.org Paint-28 and your Paint-29 ... apart from the code changes, the other interesting things were: - MANIFEST is present in -29, not in -28, (is it needed?), - a patch file is present in -28, not in -29, (this is good), - .gitignore present in -28, not in -29, (this is good), - fill/linux32_27 was added in -29, (this is good). Well done. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ -- Gonzalo Odiard ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Request to review solution for SL #2464
Hello! I have uploaded a new xo to http://dev.laptop.org/~gonzalo/Paint-29.xo I don't have a 0.82 system, can anybody confirm if is working ok? Thanks! Gonzalo On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.comwrote: Hi Anurag/Gonzalo, On 19 Oct 2010, at 16:43, Anurag Chowdhury wrote: Gonzalo, I have run the chmod commands as suggested by Gary, and have uploaded Paint xo bundle at http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2464. Kindly review it. Thanks, your test bundle installed and launched correctly on Sugar 0.82, I've updated the ticket with my comments: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2464 ...and added you to the cc: field – I'm just replying to your email here in case others are also interested in the ticket (usually I would just add my comments to the ticket and assume other interested parties were already following it). Regards, --Gary Regards, Anurag ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Gonzalo Odiard ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Request to review solution for SL #2464
Hi Anurag/Gonzalo, On 19 Oct 2010, at 16:43, Anurag Chowdhury wrote: Gonzalo, I have run the chmod commands as suggested by Gary, and have uploaded Paint xo bundle at http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2464. Kindly review it. Thanks, your test bundle installed and launched correctly on Sugar 0.82, I've updated the ticket with my comments: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2464 ...and added you to the cc: field – I'm just replying to your email here in case others are also interested in the ticket (usually I would just add my comments to the ticket and assume other interested parties were already following it). Regards, --Gary Regards, Anurag ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Request to review solution for SL #2464
Gary, I have updated the version of paint package from 28 to 29, and have uploaded Paint xo bundle at http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2464 Kindly review it. Regards, Anurag ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Request to review solution for SL #2464
It's new for me. May be was in the past? Thanks Daniel! Gonzalo On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On 19 October 2010 17:48, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@gmail.com wrote: Like I said previously to Gary, I don't think is a permissions problem, because the .xo file is a zip, and zip ignores permissions. It doesn't actually. I was surprised too. Run a quick experiment (zip up a file with weird permissions then extract it). Daniel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Request to review solution for SL #2464
Like I said previously to Gary, I don't think is a permissions problem, because the .xo file is a zip, and zip ignores permissions. I don't have a 0.82 system to test, but I suggest try adding a MANIFEST file. Probably rainbow in 0.82 need this file. If this works, please confirm. Gonzalo On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Anurag Chowdhury anu...@seeta.in wrote: Gonzalo, I have run the chmod commands as suggested by Gary, and have uploaded Paint xo bundle at http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2464. Kindly review it. Regards, Anurag -- Gonzalo Odiard ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
