Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.90 and migration from GConf to GSettings?
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:53, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Is there yet any plans for migrations from GConf to GSettings in the 0.90 development of Sugar? I'm not sure if there's even any requirements but I've noticed in maintaining of the packages there's a dep on it. Do we get this free when pygtk migrates or is this something we need to do. I'm just asking from the perspective that there will be a mass migration over the next 6 months for gnome 3 and it will help get rid of a number of old dependency chains. It would be nice to start using the new API, but I'm not sure how we would make regarding the backend. Would be possible to let downstreams deal with choosing the backend they prefer? We need to think about migration as well. Regards, Tomeu Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.90 and migration from GConf to GSettings?
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:53, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Is there yet any plans for migrations from GConf to GSettings in the 0.90 development of Sugar? I'm not sure if there's even any requirements but I've noticed in maintaining of the packages there's a dep on it. Do we get this free when pygtk migrates or is this something we need to do. I'm just asking from the perspective that there will be a mass migration over the next 6 months for gnome 3 and it will help get rid of a number of old dependency chains. It would be nice to start using the new API, but I'm not sure how we would make regarding the backend. Would be possible to let downstreams deal with choosing the backend they prefer? We need to think about migration as well. I would think you would let the distribution choose the backend and that way you use what ever is supported on that platform. Then things like gnome/gstreamer/telepathy settings are shared between the various interfaces on that plaform which is useful for dual interface devices such as the XO-1.5 which can switch between gnome/sugar. For migration I presume we would be able to use the same strategy that gnome uses. Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.90 and migration from GConf to GSettings?
Hi All, Is there yet any plans for migrations from GConf to GSettings in the 0.90 development of Sugar? I'm not sure if there's even any requirements but I've noticed in maintaining of the packages there's a dep on it. Do we get this free when pygtk migrates or is this something we need to do. I'm just asking from the perspective that there will be a mass migration over the next 6 months for gnome 3 and it will help get rid of a number of old dependency chains. Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
