Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing 0.90 on an XO
On 10/05/2010 04:24 AM, James Cameron wrote: On 05/10/2010, at 12:39 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: How do I tell what an integration issue is? There's a few methods, but they require either experience or knowledge of the software components and how they interface. If in doubt, just log the issue and let the developer analyse and reject it. Hi Tony, sorry for the unclear request. Let's put it this way: Focus on issues that are in Sugar. For example I am not interested in things like idle suspend does not work or I can not use olpc-update, or the camera does not work, or sreen rotate does not work. I would say best is to start with testing the 0.90 Features. And then do test if Sugar has regressed: connecting to an AP, sharing an activity, correct entries in the Journal... I hope this explains it a bit better. And yes, like James said, if in doubt file it and we can figure it out. Thanks, Simon ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing 0.90 on an XO
On 10/05/2010 03:39 AM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: Please use these builds only for reporting back 0.90 issues. There are surely issues that are due to integration issues. Leave them for now. How do I tell what an integration issue is? Do you only want bugs on new features and not regressions? Tony Tony, thanks for filing the bugs. They are all great and 'valid'! I have followed up on them. Thanks as well for following the instructions and indicating the version number and setting the keyword, this does help a lot. Have a nice day, Simon ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing 0.90 on an XO
On 10/04/2010 05:22 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: Hi, I have been doing 0.90-F14 builds for the XO-1 and XO-1.5. You can grab the latest build from [1]. I provide these builds that people that do have XO-hardware can start helping testing 0.90. So far, we did not have much testing yet. We just released 0.90.0 and want to do a bug fix release at the end of the month [2]. So testing and filing good bug reports is highly welcome. Please use these builds only for reporting back 0.90 issues. There are surely issues that are due to integration issues. Leave them for now. When you report bugs at [3] with these builds please set the Version to 0.90 and add the keyword olpc-0.90 to be able differentiate those bugs. A good first start would be to test the Features [4] that have landed in 0.90. Each page does contain a test case. As well the release notes at [5] might be of help. And of course, testing different languages and smoke tests of all different fashions are welcome. Regards, Simon I added the olpc-0.90 keyword to all the bugs that are present in the builds [1]. Thanks to Tony Forster a few new ones could be identified. If you have an XO one can can make sure that the latest xorg-x11-drv-geode package does work fine for you and indicate that in bodhi [2] that would be great - so the driver will get into the stable repository. The Final Change Deadline for Fedora 14 is the 18th of October [3]. Would be great to get as many bugs as possible present in Sugar 0.90 on F14 fixed and pushed until then. Thanks, Simon [1] http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/query?status=acceptedstatus=assignedstatus=newstatus=reopenedorder=prioritycol=idcol=summarycol=statuscol=typecol=prioritycol=milestonecol=componentkeywords=~olpc-0.90 [2] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-geode-2.11.9-1.fc14?_csrf_token=fa12d11a38d93c2c6c1c817bd4390413b87db316 [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/14/Schedule ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Testing 0.90 on an XO
Hi, I have been doing 0.90-F14 builds for the XO-1 and XO-1.5. You can grab the latest build from [1]. I provide these builds that people that do have XO-hardware can start helping testing 0.90. So far, we did not have much testing yet. We just released 0.90.0 and want to do a bug fix release at the end of the month [2]. So testing and filing good bug reports is highly welcome. Please use these builds only for reporting back 0.90 issues. There are surely issues that are due to integration issues. Leave them for now. When you report bugs at [3] with these builds please set the Version to 0.90 and add the keyword olpc-0.90 to be able differentiate those bugs. A good first start would be to test the Features [4] that have landed in 0.90. Each page does contain a test case. As well the release notes at [5] might be of help. And of course, testing different languages and smoke tests of all different fashions are welcome. Regards, Simon [1] http://dev.laptop.org/~erikos/F14_builds/ [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.90/Roadmap#Schedule [3] http://bugs.sugarlabs.org [4] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.90/Feature_List [5] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.90/Notes === Known Issues === Here is a list of current Issues in the builds I have found so far: - Gnome keyring pops up at first start: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2339 --- At least a new behavior, if not fixable it should be documented what to do. - Physics crashes: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2363 --- We had a similar issue in Sugar, the same fix can be applied here. Gary is working on it as I am writing those lines... - Calculate does not start: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2245 --- Version 34 fixes it, will be in a next build - Terminal: Can not scroll when using less: Warning Terminal is not fully functional. On the XO builds I could not edit files with Vi neither which works here ok. There was a new version of VTE in updates-testing (0.26.0-1) but that one did not fix that issue. http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2394 --- We have a hint already. - Activity icon not disappearing from the neighborhood view http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2389 --- Tomeu has a fix in Gabble and is verifying now if that happens on Salut as well. - Sharing button not updated when resuming a previously-shared activity http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2390 --- Tomeu is on that one as well. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Testing 0.90 on an XO
Please use these builds only for reporting back 0.90 issues. There are surely issues that are due to integration issues. Leave them for now. How do I tell what an integration issue is? Do you only want bugs on new features and not regressions? Tony ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing 0.90 on an XO
On 05/10/2010, at 12:39 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: How do I tell what an integration issue is? There's a few methods, but they require either experience or knowledge of the software components and how they interface. If in doubt, just log the issue and let the developer analyse and reject it. -- James Cameron System Test Coordinator One Laptop per Child ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
