Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[laurent bernabe]

Thank you

indeed, I launched my Python server from inside my activity folder, instead
of the sugarizer top folder.

2017-09-15 21:17 GMT+02:00 Lionel Laské :

>
> Nice to hear it works now.
> Sugarizer do not allow multiple activities at the same time. You have to
> click on the Stop button activity to go back to the home view.
> Nothing to implement for this features, it's implemented in the sugar-web
> layer.
>
>   Lionel.
>
>
> 2017-09-15 14:38 GMT+02:00 laurent bernabe :
>
>> Sorry again for this question : but I did not find how to switch view in
>> Sugarizer Chrome/Chromium version. Is there a simple way to go back to
>> activities view or journal view from inside a launched activity ?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Laurent Bernabé
>>
>> laurent.bern...@gmail.com
>>
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Laurent Bernabé

laurent.bern...@gmail.com
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[Lionel Laské]

Hi Sebastian,

You're right I initially planned to fix it in v0.9 but didn't had time to
do that.
Will be fixed in the next version.

In the meantime, as you said, activities written for Sugarizer will work on
the XO but could fail on Sugar on PC depending of the WebKit version
installed.

Regards.

Lionel.


2017-09-15 13:07 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Silva :

>
>
> On 15/09/17 03:49, laurent bernabe wrote:
>
> Indeed, I first cloned Sugarizer repository from Github, copied activity
> template from inside it into the sugarizer activities directory.
> Then, as Sebastien Silva suggested me in order to correct a problem with
> my activity icon (appearing all black), I replaced the sugar-web folder
> with the one from Sugarizer top folder. *But the icon problem stayed the
> same : so I plan to put back the activity template version of sugar-web
> folder again.*
>
> Ah, mi recommendation was wrong then. I thought you had used the Sugar-Web
> template as is documented here (https://developer.sugarlabs.
> org/web-activity.md.html).
>
> Lionel, we should really unify instructions and make sure Sugarizer Apps
> run as Sugar Activities, even with the WebKit2 backend (last time I
> checked, it only worked with Webkit1 which is deprecated everywhere and
> only active by default on XO laptops.)
>
> I have made a bug in Sugarizer for this in the past,
> https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer/issues/116 and if there's anything
> you'd like to add to *sugar-web*, OLPC (via James Cameron) has
> unilaterally declared feature freeze for 0.112, but it shouldn't be a
> problem since *sugar-web* is not dinamically called but actually embedded
> in *every* activity.
>
> Laurent, if it is the same bug I reported, then your activity will work
> fine in Sugarizer and if Lionel will test on an XO, it will work fine in
> Sugar too, but it won't work in Sugar outside XO because of the
> aforementioned issue with environment detection for sugarizer's version of
> sugar-web which only detects Webkit1 as Sugar otherwise just assumes
> Sugarizer style journale etc.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Regards,
> Sebastian
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[Lionel Laské]

Nice to hear it works now.
Sugarizer do not allow multiple activities at the same time. You have to
click on the Stop button activity to go back to the home view.
Nothing to implement for this features, it's implemented in the sugar-web
layer.

  Lionel.


2017-09-15 14:38 GMT+02:00 laurent bernabe :

> Sorry again for this question : but I did not find how to switch view in
> Sugarizer Chrome/Chromium version. Is there a simple way to go back to
> activities view or journal view from inside a launched activity ?
>
> Regards
>
> Laurent Bernabé
>
> laurent.bern...@gmail.com
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[laurent bernabe]

Sorry again for this question : but I did not find how to switch view in
Sugarizer Chrome/Chromium version. Is there a simple way to go back to
activities view or journal view from inside a launched activity ?

Regards

Laurent Bernabé

laurent.bern...@gmail.com
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[laurent bernabe]

Also as a good news, the icon of my application has no problem on
Sugarizer. I did not changed it lately : I just launched my computer and
the local server one more time : and the icon has both colors.

Just have to center this circle around the icon zone, and I'll be able to
go on the activity development.

Regards,

Laurent Bernabé

laurent.bern...@gmail.com
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[laurent bernabe]

Thank you

2017-09-15 13:07 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Silva :

>
>
> On 15/09/17 03:49, laurent bernabe wrote:
>
> Indeed, I first cloned Sugarizer repository from Github, copied activity
> template from inside it into the sugarizer activities directory.
> Then, as Sebastien Silva suggested me in order to correct a problem with
> my activity icon (appearing all black), I replaced the sugar-web folder
> with the one from Sugarizer top folder. *But the icon problem stayed the
> same : so I plan to put back the activity template version of sugar-web
> folder again.*
>
> Ah, mi recommendation was wrong then. I thought you had used the Sugar-Web
> template as is documented here (https://developer.sugarlabs.
> org/web-activity.md.html).
>

Ok, I understand better your recommandation now



>
> Laurent, if it is the same bug I reported, then your activity will work
> fine in Sugarizer and if Lionel will test on an XO, it will work fine in
> Sugar too, but it won't work in Sugar outside XO because of the
> aforementioned issue with environment detection for sugarizer's version of
> sugar-web which only detects Webkit1 as Sugar otherwise just assumes
> Sugarizer style journale etc.
>
> Hope this helps
>

No problem

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Bernabé

laurent.bern...@gmail.com
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[Sebastian Silva]

On 15/09/17 03:49, laurent bernabe wrote:
> Indeed, I first cloned Sugarizer repository from Github, copied
> activity template from inside it into the sugarizer activities directory.
> Then, as Sebastien Silva suggested me in order to correct a problem
> with my activity icon (appearing all black), I replaced the sugar-web
> folder with the one from Sugarizer top folder. *But the icon problem
> stayed the same : so I plan to put back the activity template version
> of sugar-web folder again.*
> *
> *
Ah, mi recommendation was wrong then. I thought you had used the
Sugar-Web template as is documented here
(https://developer.sugarlabs.org/web-activity.md.html).

Lionel, we should really unify instructions and make sure Sugarizer Apps
run as Sugar Activities, even with the WebKit2 backend (last time I
checked, it only worked with Webkit1 which is deprecated everywhere and
only active by default on XO laptops.)

I have made a bug in Sugarizer for this in the past,
https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer/issues/116 and if there's anything
you'd like to add to /sugar-web/, OLPC (via James Cameron) has
unilaterally declared feature freeze for 0.112, but it shouldn't be a
problem since /sugar-web/ is not dinamically called but actually
embedded in /every/ activity.

Laurent, if it is the same bug I reported, then your activity will work
fine in Sugarizer and if Lionel will test on an XO, it will work fine in
Sugar too, but it won't work in Sugar outside XO because of the
aforementioned issue with environment detection for sugarizer's version
of sugar-web which only detects Webkit1 as Sugar otherwise just assumes
Sugarizer style journale etc.

Hope this helps,

Regards,
Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[laurent bernabe]

Hi,

thank you very much for your answer.

Indeed, I first cloned Sugarizer repository from Github, copied activity
template from inside it into the sugarizer activities directory.
Then, as Sebastien Silva suggested me in order to correct a problem with my
activity icon (appearing all black), I replaced the sugar-web folder with
the one from Sugarizer top folder. *But the icon problem stayed the same :
so I plan to put back the activity template version of sugar-web folder
again.*

Now I just have to push the first version of my application in my Github
account, and I'll go on working on it



2017-09-14 21:49 GMT+02:00 Lionel Laské :

>
> Hi Laurent,
>
> James is right Sugar/sugar-web work on Sugar but is not compatible with
> Sugarizer so you will have to update the sugar-web part of your app to run
> it in Sugarizer.
>
> I suggest you to use Sugarizer/sugar-web instead (just use
> activities/ActivityTemplate directory as template for your application and
> you will have it). This version will allow your app to work both on Sugar
> and on Sugarizer.
>
> Regards.
>
> Lionel.
>
>
> but Sugarizer/sugar-web is compliant both with Sugar and Sugarizer.
>
> 2017-09-13 12:17 GMT+02:00 :
>
>>
>> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 12:17:10 +0200
>> From: laurent bernabe 
>> To: James Cameron 
>> Cc: Sugar Devel 
>> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github
>> repositories ?
>> Message-ID:
>> > ail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> so I'll investigate into the mailing list before starting developping.
>>
>> 2017-09-13 12:09 GMT+02:00 James Cameron :
>>
>> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:40:34AM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
>> > > Thank you for your answer :
>> > >
>> > > You will need to use JavaScript and the Sugarizer sources to
>> write a
>> > > web activity for use with Sugarizer.  I don't think Python or
>> PyGame
>> > > are practical for Sugarizer.  Lionel would know.
>> > >
>> > > That's exactly what I had in mind: use Javascript and if possible an
>> > AMD-Ready
>> > > canvas framework.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > As it sounds like you will be the primary developer, best for the
>> > > moment would be a repository in your own GitHub user.
>> > >
>> > > Ok, sounds good to me
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > You might also work on a fork of Sugarizer in your own GitHub
>> user.
>> > >
>> > > I think I don't need deploying my application on Android devices in
>> > emergency :
>> > > I can at least start working on the web version, so that it will be
>> > > possible.
>> >
>> > I've seen discussions here on sugar-devel@ recently that suggested
>> > Sugarizer's web activity framework had diverged from the Sugar desktop
>> > framework, so take care.  I don't recall the details; check the
>> > mailing list archives.
>> >
>>
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Laurent Bernabé

laurent.bern...@gmail.com
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[Lionel Laské]

Hi Laurent,

James is right Sugar/sugar-web work on Sugar but is not compatible with
Sugarizer so you will have to update the sugar-web part of your app to run
it in Sugarizer.

I suggest you to use Sugarizer/sugar-web instead (just use
activities/ActivityTemplate directory as template for your application and
you will have it). This version will allow your app to work both on Sugar
and on Sugarizer.

Regards.

Lionel.


but Sugarizer/sugar-web is compliant both with Sugar and Sugarizer.

2017-09-13 12:17 GMT+02:00 :

>
> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 12:17:10 +0200
> From: laurent bernabe 
> To: James Cameron 
> Cc: Sugar Devel 
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github
> repositories ?
> Message-ID:
>  gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Thank you,
>
> so I'll investigate into the mailing list before starting developping.
>
> 2017-09-13 12:09 GMT+02:00 James Cameron :
>
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:40:34AM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > > Thank you for your answer :
> > >
> > > You will need to use JavaScript and the Sugarizer sources to write
> a
> > > web activity for use with Sugarizer.  I don't think Python or
> PyGame
> > > are practical for Sugarizer.  Lionel would know.
> > >
> > > That's exactly what I had in mind: use Javascript and if possible an
> > AMD-Ready
> > > canvas framework.
> > >
> > >
> > > As it sounds like you will be the primary developer, best for the
> > > moment would be a repository in your own GitHub user.
> > >
> > > Ok, sounds good to me
> > >
> > >
> > > You might also work on a fork of Sugarizer in your own GitHub user.
> > >
> > > I think I don't need deploying my application on Android devices in
> > emergency :
> > > I can at least start working on the web version, so that it will be
> > > possible.
> >
> > I've seen discussions here on sugar-devel@ recently that suggested
> > Sugarizer's web activity framework had diverged from the Sugar desktop
> > framework, so take care.  I don't recall the details; check the
> > mailing list archives.
> >
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[James Cameron]

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:40:34AM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> Thank you for your answer :
> 
> You will need to use JavaScript and the Sugarizer sources to write a
> web activity for use with Sugarizer.  I don't think Python or PyGame
> are practical for Sugarizer.  Lionel would know.
> 
> That's exactly what I had in mind: use Javascript and if possible an AMD-Ready
> canvas framework.
>  
> 
> As it sounds like you will be the primary developer, best for the
> moment would be a repository in your own GitHub user.
> 
> Ok, sounds good to me
>  
> 
> You might also work on a fork of Sugarizer in your own GitHub user.
> 
> I think I don't need deploying my application on Android devices in emergency 
> :
> I can at least start working on the web version, so that it will be
> possible.

I've seen discussions here on sugar-devel@ recently that suggested
Sugarizer's web activity framework had diverged from the Sugar desktop
framework, so take care.  I don't recall the details; check the
mailing list archives.

>  
> 
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:00:36AM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > Thank you again,
> >
> > My goal is to build a web version of the activity, and even extend it
> (for
> > example, there is only on question when we launch exercise, it would be
> more
> > convenient if we had 10 questions in a row for example) rather than
> working
> > with the Python/PyGame version, so that it will be directly usable in
> Sugarizer
> > (From my understanding, it is the fastest way to have it work also on
> Android
> > devices).
> >
> > And also this would be a great opportunity to discover sugar web 
> activity
> > programming (even if I already know the basics) : so that if I plan to
> build
> > new activities, it will be in Web form.
> >
> >   • Do you think it is a good plan ? Or is it better to go on with 
> Python
> >     version ?
> >   • If so, shall I ask you the same question concerning github hosting :
> what
> >     would be the best procedure ?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > 2017-09-12 22:15 GMT+02:00 laurent bernabe <[1][1]
> laurent.bern...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >     Thanks a lot! I will look at it and start working on the project
> tomorrow.
> >
> >     Le 12 sept. 2017 22:08, "James Cameron" <[2][2]qu...@laptop.org> a
> écrit :
> >
> >         [3][3]https://github.com/sugarlabs/hittheballs-activity has been
> created
> >         using most recent commits in [4][4]http://git.sugarlabs.org/hi
> ttheballs
> >
> >         and loloof64 invited as a collaborator.
> >
> >         new translations are available from 
> [5][5]translate.sugarlabs.org
> ,
> >         [6][6]https://translate.sugarlabs.org/projects/HitTheBalls/
> >
> >         On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:33:10PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> >         > Oups, sorry I was talking about [1][7][7]http://git.sugarla
> bs.org/
> >         > The name of my application is HitTheBalls
> >         >
> >         > 2017-09-12 12:28 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[2][8][8]
> qu...@laptop.org>:
> >         >
> >         >     That seems unlikely.  Both the OLPC git repositories and
> the
> >         Sugar
> >         >     Labs Gitorious repositories still exist.
> >         >
> >         >     [3][9][9]http://dev.laptop.org/git/
> >         >     [4][10][10]http://git.sugarlabs.org/
> >         >
> >         >     If you tell me the name of the activity, I can look for 
> it.
> >         >
> >         >     What was SugarOLPC git repository?
> >         >
> >         >     On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:18:12PM +0200, laurent bernabe
> wrote:
> >         >     > Thanks, the GNU GPL should be fine :)
> >         >     >
> >         >     > As for the repository for my first activity : it was
> hosted by
> >         the old
> >         >     > SugarOLPC git repository (does not exist any more). In
> the
> >         activities
> >         >     page,
> >         >     > there's just the XO bundle.
> >         >     >
> >         >     > 2017-09-12 12:15 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[1][5][11]
> >         [11]qu...@laptop.org>:
> >         >     >
> >         >     >     Sorry, I don't know which other licenses are
> suitable, but
> >         I know the
> >         >     >     GNU GPL license is suitable.
> >         >     >
> >         >     >     [2][6][12][12]https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/
> Sugar_Labs/FAQ#
> >         What_is_the_
> >         >     >     standard_Sugar_license.3F
> >         >     >
> >         >     >     You might also look at licenses of other 
> repositories
> in
> >         [3]https://
> >         >     >     [7][13][13]github.co

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[James Cameron]

You will need to use JavaScript and the Sugarizer sources to write a
web activity for use with Sugarizer.  I don't think Python or PyGame
are practical for Sugarizer.  Lionel would know.

As it sounds like you will be the primary developer, best for the
moment would be a repository in your own GitHub user.

You might also work on a fork of Sugarizer in your own GitHub user.

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:00:36AM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> Thank you again,
> 
> My goal is to build a web version of the activity, and even extend it (for
> example, there is only on question when we launch exercise, it would be more
> convenient if we had 10 questions in a row for example) rather than working
> with the Python/PyGame version, so that it will be directly usable in 
> Sugarizer
> (From my understanding, it is the fastest way to have it work also on Android
> devices).
> 
> And also this would be a great opportunity to discover sugar web activity
> programming (even if I already know the basics) : so that if I plan to build
> new activities, it will be in Web form.
> 
>   • Do you think it is a good plan ? Or is it better to go on with Python
> version ?
>   • If so, shall I ask you the same question concerning github hosting : what
> would be the best procedure ?
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> 2017-09-12 22:15 GMT+02:00 laurent bernabe <[1]laurent.bern...@gmail.com>:
> 
> Thanks a lot! I will look at it and start working on the project tomorrow.
> 
> Le 12 sept. 2017 22:08, "James Cameron" <[2]qu...@laptop.org> a écrit :
> 
> [3]https://github.com/sugarlabs/hittheballs-activity has been created
> using most recent commits in [4]http://git.sugarlabs.org/hittheballs
> 
> and loloof64 invited as a collaborator.
> 
> new translations are available from [5]translate.sugarlabs.org,
> [6]https://translate.sugarlabs.org/projects/HitTheBalls/
> 
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:33:10PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > Oups, sorry I was talking about [1][7]http://git.sugarlabs.org/
> > The name of my application is HitTheBalls
> >
> > 2017-09-12 12:28 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[2][8]qu...@laptop.org>:
> >
> >     That seems unlikely.  Both the OLPC git repositories and the
> Sugar
> >     Labs Gitorious repositories still exist.
> >
> >     [3][9]http://dev.laptop.org/git/
> >     [4][10]http://git.sugarlabs.org/
> >
> >     If you tell me the name of the activity, I can look for it.
> >
> >     What was SugarOLPC git repository?
> >
> >     On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:18:12PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> >     > Thanks, the GNU GPL should be fine :)
> >     >
> >     > As for the repository for my first activity : it was hosted by
> the old
> >     > SugarOLPC git repository (does not exist any more). In the
> activities
> >     page,
> >     > there's just the XO bundle.
> >     >
> >     > 2017-09-12 12:15 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[1][5][11]
> qu...@laptop.org>:
> >     >
> >     >     Sorry, I don't know which other licenses are suitable, but
> I know the
> >     >     GNU GPL license is suitable.
> >     >
> >     >     [2][6][12]https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/FAQ#
> What_is_the_
> >     >     standard_Sugar_license.3F
> >     >
> >     >     You might also look at licenses of other repositories in
> [3]https://
> >     >     [7][13]github.com/sugarlabs
> >     >
> >     >     On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:09:09PM +0200, laurent bernabe
> wrote:
> >     >     > Oups, sorry for the confusion : I'm not a member of 
> sugar
> git yet,
> >     but
> >     >     > SugarActivities Portal : [1]My profile
> >     >     > Also, are all Open Source license suitable ?
> >     >     >
> >     >     > 2017-09-12 12:04 GMT+02:00 laurent bernabe <[2][4]
> >     >     [8][14]laurent.bern...@gmail.com>:
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     Thank you very much,
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     of course, as an hobbyist developper, it is fine to
> share it
> >     on [3]
> >     >     http://
> >     >     >     [5][9][15]github.com/sugarlabs.
> >     >     >     So I must first become a member of Sugarlabs -but I
> think I am
> >     >     already a
> >     >     >     member as loloof64 : there's been a while since I
> developped my
> >     first
> >     >     >     activity- and take a suitable license for my source
> code.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     I'm going to check all right now.
> >     >     >
>  

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[laurent bernabe]

Thank you again,

My goal is to build a web version of the activity, and even extend it (for
example, there is only on question when we launch exercise, it would be
more convenient if we had 10 questions in a row for example) rather than
working with the Python/PyGame version, so that it will be directly usable
in Sugarizer (From my understanding, it is the fastest way to have it work
also on Android devices).

And also this would be a great opportunity to discover sugar web activity
programming (even if I already know the basics) : so that if I plan to
build new activities, it will be in Web form.


   - Do you think it is a good plan ? Or is it better to go on with Python
   version ?
   - If so, shall I ask you the same question concerning github hosting :
   what would be the best procedure ?

Thanks in advance

2017-09-12 22:15 GMT+02:00 laurent bernabe :

> Thanks a lot! I will look at it and start working on the project tomorrow.
>
> Le 12 sept. 2017 22:08, "James Cameron"  a écrit :
>
>> https://github.com/sugarlabs/hittheballs-activity has been created
>> using most recent commits in http://git.sugarlabs.org/hittheballs
>>
>> and loloof64 invited as a collaborator.
>>
>> new translations are available from translate.sugarlabs.org,
>> https://translate.sugarlabs.org/projects/HitTheBalls/
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:33:10PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
>> > Oups, sorry I was talking about [1]http://git.sugarlabs.org/
>> > The name of my application is HitTheBalls
>> >
>> > 2017-09-12 12:28 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[2]qu...@laptop.org>:
>> >
>> > That seems unlikely.  Both the OLPC git repositories and the Sugar
>> > Labs Gitorious repositories still exist.
>> >
>> > [3]http://dev.laptop.org/git/
>> > [4]http://git.sugarlabs.org/
>> >
>> > If you tell me the name of the activity, I can look for it.
>> >
>> > What was SugarOLPC git repository?
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:18:12PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
>> > > Thanks, the GNU GPL should be fine :)
>> > >
>> > > As for the repository for my first activity : it was hosted by
>> the old
>> > > SugarOLPC git repository (does not exist any more). In the
>> activities
>> > page,
>> > > there's just the XO bundle.
>> > >
>> > > 2017-09-12 12:15 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[1][5]qu...@laptop.org
>> >:
>> > >
>> > > Sorry, I don't know which other licenses are suitable, but I
>> know the
>> > > GNU GPL license is suitable.
>> > >
>> > > [2][6]https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/FAQ#What_is_
>> the_
>> > > standard_Sugar_license.3F
>> > >
>> > > You might also look at licenses of other repositories in
>> [3]https://
>> > > [7]github.com/sugarlabs
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:09:09PM +0200, laurent bernabe
>> wrote:
>> > > > Oups, sorry for the confusion : I'm not a member of sugar
>> git yet,
>> > but
>> > > > SugarActivities Portal : [1]My profile
>> > > > Also, are all Open Source license suitable ?
>> > > >
>> > > > 2017-09-12 12:04 GMT+02:00 laurent bernabe <[2][4]
>> > > [8]laurent.bern...@gmail.com>:
>> > > >
>> > > > Thank you very much,
>> > > >
>> > > > of course, as an hobbyist developper, it is fine to
>> share it
>> > on [3]
>> > > http://
>> > > > [5][9]github.com/sugarlabs.
>> > > > So I must first become a member of Sugarlabs -but I
>> think I am
>> > > already a
>> > > > member as loloof64 : there's been a while since I
>> developped my
>> > first
>> > > > activity- and take a suitable license for my source
>> code.
>> > > >
>> > > > I'm going to check all right now.
>> > > >
>> > > > 2017-09-12 11:58 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[4][6][10]
>> > qu...@laptop.org>:
>> > > >
>> > > > You could host a repository in [5][7][11]
>> http://github.com/
>> > sugarlabs
>> > > if;
>> > > >
>> > > > (a) the repository is part of, or used with Sugar or
>> > Sugarizer,
>> > > >
>> > > > (b) you are a member of the [6][8][12]
>> http://github.com/
>> > sugarlabs
>> > > > organisation,
>> > > >
>> > > > (c) the license of the source code is consistent
>> with Sugar
>> > Labs
>> > > > guidelines,
>> > > >
>> > > > (d) you welcome others in Sugar Labs to have commit
>> access,
>> > or
>> > > want a
>> > > > central location for tracking Issues or a Wiki.
>> > > >
>> > > > You could host a repository in your own GitHub
>> account if
>> > you've
>> > > no
>> > > > reason to have other people push commits, or no
>> reason to
>> > have
>> > >   

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[laurent bernabe]

Thanks a lot! I will look at it and start working on the project tomorrow.

Le 12 sept. 2017 22:08, "James Cameron"  a écrit :

> https://github.com/sugarlabs/hittheballs-activity has been created
> using most recent commits in http://git.sugarlabs.org/hittheballs
>
> and loloof64 invited as a collaborator.
>
> new translations are available from translate.sugarlabs.org,
> https://translate.sugarlabs.org/projects/HitTheBalls/
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:33:10PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > Oups, sorry I was talking about [1]http://git.sugarlabs.org/
> > The name of my application is HitTheBalls
> >
> > 2017-09-12 12:28 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[2]qu...@laptop.org>:
> >
> > That seems unlikely.  Both the OLPC git repositories and the Sugar
> > Labs Gitorious repositories still exist.
> >
> > [3]http://dev.laptop.org/git/
> > [4]http://git.sugarlabs.org/
> >
> > If you tell me the name of the activity, I can look for it.
> >
> > What was SugarOLPC git repository?
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:18:12PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > > Thanks, the GNU GPL should be fine :)
> > >
> > > As for the repository for my first activity : it was hosted by the
> old
> > > SugarOLPC git repository (does not exist any more). In the
> activities
> > page,
> > > there's just the XO bundle.
> > >
> > > 2017-09-12 12:15 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[1][5]qu...@laptop.org>:
> > >
> > > Sorry, I don't know which other licenses are suitable, but I
> know the
> > > GNU GPL license is suitable.
> > >
> > > [2][6]https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/FAQ#What_is_
> the_
> > > standard_Sugar_license.3F
> > >
> > > You might also look at licenses of other repositories in
> [3]https://
> > > [7]github.com/sugarlabs
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:09:09PM +0200, laurent bernabe
> wrote:
> > > > Oups, sorry for the confusion : I'm not a member of sugar
> git yet,
> > but
> > > > SugarActivities Portal : [1]My profile
> > > > Also, are all Open Source license suitable ?
> > > >
> > > > 2017-09-12 12:04 GMT+02:00 laurent bernabe <[2][4]
> > > [8]laurent.bern...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > Thank you very much,
> > > >
> > > > of course, as an hobbyist developper, it is fine to
> share it
> > on [3]
> > > http://
> > > > [5][9]github.com/sugarlabs.
> > > > So I must first become a member of Sugarlabs -but I
> think I am
> > > already a
> > > > member as loloof64 : there's been a while since I
> developped my
> > first
> > > > activity- and take a suitable license for my source code.
> > > >
> > > > I'm going to check all right now.
> > > >
> > > > 2017-09-12 11:58 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[4][6][10]
> > qu...@laptop.org>:
> > > >
> > > > You could host a repository in [5][7][11]
> http://github.com/
> > sugarlabs
> > > if;
> > > >
> > > > (a) the repository is part of, or used with Sugar or
> > Sugarizer,
> > > >
> > > > (b) you are a member of the [6][8][12]
> http://github.com/
> > sugarlabs
> > > > organisation,
> > > >
> > > > (c) the license of the source code is consistent
> with Sugar
> > Labs
> > > > guidelines,
> > > >
> > > > (d) you welcome others in Sugar Labs to have commit
> access,
> > or
> > > want a
> > > > central location for tracking Issues or a Wiki.
> > > >
> > > > You could host a repository in your own GitHub
> account if
> > you've
> > > no
> > > > reason to have other people push commits, or no
> reason to
> > have
> > > your
> > > > repository found in a search of [7][9][13]
> http://github.com
> > /sugarlabs
> > > >
> > > > If it is your source code, it is your responsibility
> to
> > choose.
> > > ;-)
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:43:28AM +0200, laurent
> bernabe
> > wrote:
> > > > > Hello everyone again,
> > > > >
> > > > > Further to my email about the problem I am facing
> with my
> > > activity
> > > > icon inside
> > > > > Sugarizer, I bet I can leave it as it for now, and
> that
> > the
> > > Sugarizer
> > > > problem
> > > > > will be resolved later.
> > > > >
> > > > > But now I have an important point : as for the VCS
> > system, late
> > > ago I
> > > > used the
> > > > > common sugar r

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[James Cameron]

https://github.com/sugarlabs/hittheballs-activity has been created
using most recent commits in http://git.sugarlabs.org/hittheballs

and loloof64 invited as a collaborator.

new translations are available from translate.sugarlabs.org,
https://translate.sugarlabs.org/projects/HitTheBalls/

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:33:10PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> Oups, sorry I was talking about [1]http://git.sugarlabs.org/
> The name of my application is HitTheBalls
> 
> 2017-09-12 12:28 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[2]qu...@laptop.org>:
> 
> That seems unlikely.  Both the OLPC git repositories and the Sugar
> Labs Gitorious repositories still exist.
> 
> [3]http://dev.laptop.org/git/
> [4]http://git.sugarlabs.org/
> 
> If you tell me the name of the activity, I can look for it.
> 
> What was SugarOLPC git repository?
> 
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:18:12PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > Thanks, the GNU GPL should be fine :)
> >
> > As for the repository for my first activity : it was hosted by the old
> > SugarOLPC git repository (does not exist any more). In the activities
> page,
> > there's just the XO bundle.
> >
> > 2017-09-12 12:15 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[1][5]qu...@laptop.org>:
> >
> >     Sorry, I don't know which other licenses are suitable, but I know 
> the
> >     GNU GPL license is suitable.
> >
> >     [2][6]https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/FAQ#What_is_the_
> >     standard_Sugar_license.3F
> >
> >     You might also look at licenses of other repositories in [3]https://
> >     [7]github.com/sugarlabs
> >
> >     On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:09:09PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> >     > Oups, sorry for the confusion : I'm not a member of sugar git yet,
> but
> >     > SugarActivities Portal : [1]My profile
> >     > Also, are all Open Source license suitable ?
> >     >
> >     > 2017-09-12 12:04 GMT+02:00 laurent bernabe <[2][4]
> >     [8]laurent.bern...@gmail.com>:
> >     >
> >     >     Thank you very much,
> >     >
> >     >     of course, as an hobbyist developper, it is fine to share it
> on [3]
> >     http://
> >     >     [5][9]github.com/sugarlabs.
> >     >     So I must first become a member of Sugarlabs -but I think I am
> >     already a
> >     >     member as loloof64 : there's been a while since I developped 
> my
> first
> >     >     activity- and take a suitable license for my source code.
> >     >
> >     >     I'm going to check all right now.
> >     >
> >     >     2017-09-12 11:58 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[4][6][10]
> qu...@laptop.org>:
> >     >
> >     >         You could host a repository in 
> [5][7][11]http://github.com/
> sugarlabs
> >     if;
> >     >
> >     >         (a) the repository is part of, or used with Sugar or
> Sugarizer,
> >     >
> >     >         (b) you are a member of the [6][8][12]http://github.com/
> sugarlabs
> >     >         organisation,
> >     >
> >     >         (c) the license of the source code is consistent with 
> Sugar
> Labs
> >     >         guidelines,
> >     >
> >     >         (d) you welcome others in Sugar Labs to have commit 
> access,
> or
> >     want a
> >     >         central location for tracking Issues or a Wiki.
> >     >
> >     >         You could host a repository in your own GitHub account if
> you've
> >     no
> >     >         reason to have other people push commits, or no reason to
> have
> >     your
> >     >         repository found in a search of 
> [7][9][13]http://github.com
> /sugarlabs
> >     >
> >     >         If it is your source code, it is your responsibility to
> choose. 
> >     ;-)
> >     >
> >     >         On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:43:28AM +0200, laurent bernabe
> wrote:
> >     >         > Hello everyone again,
> >     >         >
> >     >         > Further to my email about the problem I am facing with 
> my
> >     activity
> >     >         icon inside
> >     >         > Sugarizer, I bet I can leave it as it for now, and that
> the
> >     Sugarizer
> >     >         problem
> >     >         > will be resolved later.
> >     >         >
> >     >         > But now I have an important point : as for the VCS
> system, late
> >     ago I
> >     >         used the
> >     >         > common sugar repository. Following - from far - many
> Sugar
> >     Devel
> >     >         emails, it
> >     >         > seems to me that it is ok to use my own repository on
> Github :
> >     am I
> >     >         right ?
> >     >         >
> >     >         > Thanks in advance
> >     >         >
> >     >         > --
> >     >         > 

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[laurent bernabe]

Oups, sorry I was talking about http://git.sugarlabs.org/
The name of my application is HitTheBalls

2017-09-12 12:28 GMT+02:00 James Cameron :

> That seems unlikely.  Both the OLPC git repositories and the Sugar
> Labs Gitorious repositories still exist.
>
> http://dev.laptop.org/git/
> http://git.sugarlabs.org/
>
> If you tell me the name of the activity, I can look for it.
>
> What was SugarOLPC git repository?
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:18:12PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > Thanks, the GNU GPL should be fine :)
> >
> > As for the repository for my first activity : it was hosted by the old
> > SugarOLPC git repository (does not exist any more). In the activities
> page,
> > there's just the XO bundle.
> >
> > 2017-09-12 12:15 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org>:
> >
> > Sorry, I don't know which other licenses are suitable, but I know the
> > GNU GPL license is suitable.
> >
> > [2]https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/FAQ#What_is_the_
> > standard_Sugar_license.3F
> >
> > You might also look at licenses of other repositories in [3]https://
> > github.com/sugarlabs
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:09:09PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > > Oups, sorry for the confusion : I'm not a member of sugar git yet,
> but
> > > SugarActivities Portal : [1]My profile
> > > Also, are all Open Source license suitable ?
> > >
> > > 2017-09-12 12:04 GMT+02:00 laurent bernabe <[2][4]
> > laurent.bern...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > Thank you very much,
> > >
> > > of course, as an hobbyist developper, it is fine to share it
> on [3]
> > http://
> > > [5]github.com/sugarlabs.
> > > So I must first become a member of Sugarlabs -but I think I am
> > already a
> > > member as loloof64 : there's been a while since I developped
> my first
> > > activity- and take a suitable license for my source code.
> > >
> > > I'm going to check all right now.
> > >
> > > 2017-09-12 11:58 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[4][6]
> qu...@laptop.org>:
> > >
> > > You could host a repository in [5][7]http://github.com/
> sugarlabs
> > if;
> > >
> > > (a) the repository is part of, or used with Sugar or
> Sugarizer,
> > >
> > > (b) you are a member of the [6][8]http://github.com/
> sugarlabs
> > > organisation,
> > >
> > > (c) the license of the source code is consistent with
> Sugar Labs
> > > guidelines,
> > >
> > > (d) you welcome others in Sugar Labs to have commit
> access, or
> > want a
> > > central location for tracking Issues or a Wiki.
> > >
> > > You could host a repository in your own GitHub account if
> you've
> > no
> > > reason to have other people push commits, or no reason to
> have
> > your
> > > repository found in a search of [7][9]http://github.com/
> sugarlabs
> > >
> > > If it is your source code, it is your responsibility to
> choose.
> > ;-)
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:43:28AM +0200, laurent bernabe
> wrote:
> > > > Hello everyone again,
> > > >
> > > > Further to my email about the problem I am facing with my
> > activity
> > > icon inside
> > > > Sugarizer, I bet I can leave it as it for now, and that
> the
> > Sugarizer
> > > problem
> > > > will be resolved later.
> > > >
> > > > But now I have an important point : as for the VCS
> system, late
> > ago I
> > > used the
> > > > common sugar repository. Following - from far - many
> Sugar
> > Devel
> > > emails, it
> > > > seems to me that it is ok to use my own repository on
> Github :
> > am I
> > > right ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Laurent Bernabé
> > > >
> > > > [1][8][10]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > References:
> > > >
> > > > [1] mailto:[9][11]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > > > [10][12]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> > > > [11][13]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > James Cameron
> > > [12][14]http://quozl.netrek.org/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Laurent Bernabé
> > >
> > > [13][15]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Laurent Bernabé
> >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[James Cameron]

That seems unlikely.  Both the OLPC git repositories and the Sugar
Labs Gitorious repositories still exist.

http://dev.laptop.org/git/
http://git.sugarlabs.org/

If you tell me the name of the activity, I can look for it.

What was SugarOLPC git repository?

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:18:12PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> Thanks, the GNU GPL should be fine :)
> 
> As for the repository for my first activity : it was hosted by the old
> SugarOLPC git repository (does not exist any more). In the activities page,
> there's just the XO bundle.
> 
> 2017-09-12 12:15 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org>:
> 
> Sorry, I don't know which other licenses are suitable, but I know the
> GNU GPL license is suitable.
> 
> [2]https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/FAQ#What_is_the_
> standard_Sugar_license.3F
> 
> You might also look at licenses of other repositories in [3]https://
> github.com/sugarlabs
> 
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:09:09PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > Oups, sorry for the confusion : I'm not a member of sugar git yet, but
> > SugarActivities Portal : [1]My profile
> > Also, are all Open Source license suitable ?
> >
> > 2017-09-12 12:04 GMT+02:00 laurent bernabe <[2][4]
> laurent.bern...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >     Thank you very much,
> >
> >     of course, as an hobbyist developper, it is fine to share it on [3]
> http://
> >     [5]github.com/sugarlabs.
> >     So I must first become a member of Sugarlabs -but I think I am
> already a
> >     member as loloof64 : there's been a while since I developped my 
> first
> >     activity- and take a suitable license for my source code.
> >
> >     I'm going to check all right now.
> >
> >     2017-09-12 11:58 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[4][6]qu...@laptop.org>:
> >
> >         You could host a repository in [5][7]http://github.com/sugarlabs
> if;
> >
> >         (a) the repository is part of, or used with Sugar or Sugarizer,
> >
> >         (b) you are a member of the [6][8]http://github.com/sugarlabs
> >         organisation,
> >
> >         (c) the license of the source code is consistent with Sugar Labs
> >         guidelines,
> >
> >         (d) you welcome others in Sugar Labs to have commit access, or
> want a
> >         central location for tracking Issues or a Wiki.
> >
> >         You could host a repository in your own GitHub account if you've
> no
> >         reason to have other people push commits, or no reason to have
> your
> >         repository found in a search of 
> [7][9]http://github.com/sugarlabs
> >
> >         If it is your source code, it is your responsibility to choose. 
> ;-)
> >
> >         On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:43:28AM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> >         > Hello everyone again,
> >         >
> >         > Further to my email about the problem I am facing with my
> activity
> >         icon inside
> >         > Sugarizer, I bet I can leave it as it for now, and that the
> Sugarizer
> >         problem
> >         > will be resolved later.
> >         >
> >         > But now I have an important point : as for the VCS system, 
> late
> ago I
> >         used the
> >         > common sugar repository. Following - from far - many Sugar
> Devel
> >         emails, it
> >         > seems to me that it is ok to use my own repository on Github :
> am I
> >         right ?
> >         >
> >         > Thanks in advance
> >         >
> >         > --
> >         > Regards,
> >         >
> >         > Laurent Bernabé 
> >         >
> >         > [1][8][10]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> >         >
> >         > References:
> >         >
> >         > [1] mailto:[9][11]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> >
> >         > ___
> >         > Sugar-devel mailing list
> >         > [10][12]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> >         > [11][13]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
> >
> >         --
> >         James Cameron
> >         [12][14]http://quozl.netrek.org/
> >
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     Regards,
> >
> >     Laurent Bernabé 
> >
> >     [13][15]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Laurent Bernabé 
> >
> > [14][16]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> >
> > References:
> >
> > [1] [17]https://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/user/11411
> > [2] mailto:[18]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> > [3] [19]http://github.com/sugarlabs
> > [4] mailto:[20]qu...@laptop.org
> > [5] [21]http://github.com/sugarlabs
> > [6] [22]http://github.com/sugarlabs
> > [7] [23]http://github.com/sugarlabs
> 

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[laurent bernabe]

Thanks, the GNU GPL should be fine :)

As for the repository for my first activity : it was hosted by the old
SugarOLPC git repository (does not exist any more). In the activities page,
there's just the XO bundle.

2017-09-12 12:15 GMT+02:00 James Cameron :

> Sorry, I don't know which other licenses are suitable, but I know the
> GNU GPL license is suitable.
>
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/FAQ#What_is_the_
> standard_Sugar_license.3F
>
> You might also look at licenses of other repositories in
> https://github.com/sugarlabs
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:09:09PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > Oups, sorry for the confusion : I'm not a member of sugar git yet, but
> > SugarActivities Portal : [1]My profile
> > Also, are all Open Source license suitable ?
> >
> > 2017-09-12 12:04 GMT+02:00 laurent bernabe <[2]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> >:
> >
> > Thank you very much,
> >
> > of course, as an hobbyist developper, it is fine to share it
> on [3]http://
> > github.com/sugarlabs.
> > So I must first become a member of Sugarlabs -but I think I am
> already a
> > member as loloof64 : there's been a while since I developped my first
> > activity- and take a suitable license for my source code.
> >
> > I'm going to check all right now.
> >
> > 2017-09-12 11:58 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[4]qu...@laptop.org>:
> >
> > You could host a repository in [5]http://github.com/sugarlabs
> if;
> >
> > (a) the repository is part of, or used with Sugar or Sugarizer,
> >
> > (b) you are a member of the [6]http://github.com/sugarlabs
> > organisation,
> >
> > (c) the license of the source code is consistent with Sugar Labs
> > guidelines,
> >
> > (d) you welcome others in Sugar Labs to have commit access, or
> want a
> > central location for tracking Issues or a Wiki.
> >
> > You could host a repository in your own GitHub account if you've
> no
> > reason to have other people push commits, or no reason to have
> your
> > repository found in a search of [7]http://github.com/sugarlabs
> >
> > If it is your source code, it is your responsibility to choose.
> ;-)
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:43:28AM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > > Hello everyone again,
> > >
> > > Further to my email about the problem I am facing with my
> activity
> > icon inside
> > > Sugarizer, I bet I can leave it as it for now, and that the
> Sugarizer
> > problem
> > > will be resolved later.
> > >
> > > But now I have an important point : as for the VCS system,
> late ago I
> > used the
> > > common sugar repository. Following - from far - many Sugar
> Devel
> > emails, it
> > > seems to me that it is ok to use my own repository on Github :
> am I
> > right ?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Laurent Bernabé
> > >
> > > [1][8]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > References:
> > >
> > > [1] mailto:[9]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> >
> > > ___
> > > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > > [10]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> > > [11]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
> >
> > --
> > James Cameron
> > [12]http://quozl.netrek.org/
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Laurent Bernabé
> >
> > [13]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Laurent Bernabé
> >
> > [14]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> >
> > References:
> >
> > [1] https://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/user/11411
> > [2] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> > [3] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> > [4] mailto:qu...@laptop.org
> > [5] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> > [6] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> > [7] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> > [8] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> > [9] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> > [10] mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [11] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> > [12] http://quozl.netrek.org/
> > [13] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> > [14] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.netrek.org/
>



-- 
Cordialement,

Laurent Bernabé

laurent.bern...@gmail.com
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[James Cameron]

Sorry, I don't know which other licenses are suitable, but I know the
GNU GPL license is suitable.

https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/FAQ#What_is_the_standard_Sugar_license.3F

You might also look at licenses of other repositories in 
https://github.com/sugarlabs

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:09:09PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> Oups, sorry for the confusion : I'm not a member of sugar git yet, but
> SugarActivities Portal : [1]My profile
> Also, are all Open Source license suitable ?
> 
> 2017-09-12 12:04 GMT+02:00 laurent bernabe <[2]laurent.bern...@gmail.com>:
> 
> Thank you very much,
> 
> of course, as an hobbyist developper, it is fine to share it on [3]http://
> github.com/sugarlabs.
> So I must first become a member of Sugarlabs -but I think I am already a
> member as loloof64 : there's been a while since I developped my first
> activity- and take a suitable license for my source code.
> 
> I'm going to check all right now.
> 
> 2017-09-12 11:58 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[4]qu...@laptop.org>:
> 
> You could host a repository in [5]http://github.com/sugarlabs if;
> 
> (a) the repository is part of, or used with Sugar or Sugarizer,
> 
> (b) you are a member of the [6]http://github.com/sugarlabs
> organisation,
> 
> (c) the license of the source code is consistent with Sugar Labs
> guidelines,
> 
> (d) you welcome others in Sugar Labs to have commit access, or want a
> central location for tracking Issues or a Wiki.
> 
> You could host a repository in your own GitHub account if you've no
> reason to have other people push commits, or no reason to have your
> repository found in a search of [7]http://github.com/sugarlabs
> 
> If it is your source code, it is your responsibility to choose.  ;-)
> 
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:43:28AM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > Hello everyone again,
> >
> > Further to my email about the problem I am facing with my activity
> icon inside
> > Sugarizer, I bet I can leave it as it for now, and that the 
> Sugarizer
> problem
> > will be resolved later.
> >
> > But now I have an important point : as for the VCS system, late ago 
> I
> used the
> > common sugar repository. Following - from far - many Sugar Devel
> emails, it
> > seems to me that it is ok to use my own repository on Github : am I
> right ?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Laurent Bernabé 
> >
> > [1][8]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> >
> > References:
> >
> > [1] mailto:[9]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> 
> > ___
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > [10]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [11]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
> --
> James Cameron
> [12]http://quozl.netrek.org/
>
>
> 
> --
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Bernabé 
> 
> [13]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> 
> --
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Bernabé 
> 
> [14]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> 
> References:
> 
> [1] https://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/user/11411
> [2] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> [3] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> [4] mailto:qu...@laptop.org
> [5] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> [6] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> [7] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> [8] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> [9] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> [10] mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> [11] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> [12] http://quozl.netrek.org/
> [13] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> [14] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[James Cameron]

loloof64 is not on the list, see
https://github.com/orgs/sugarlabs/people

If you were on the list, then you can clone a repository into the
sugarlabs organisation on GitHub.

Someone can add you.

But first, looking at https://github.com/loloof64 you have so many
repositories I don't know which one you are asking about.  ;-)

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:04:07PM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> Thank you very much,
> 
> of course, as an hobbyist developper, it is fine to share it on [1]http://
> github.com/sugarlabs.
> So I must first become a member of Sugarlabs -but I think I am already a 
> member
> as loloof64 : there's been a while since I developped my first activity- and
> take a suitable license for my source code.
> 
> I'm going to check all right now.
> 
> 2017-09-12 11:58 GMT+02:00 James Cameron <[2]qu...@laptop.org>:
> 
> You could host a repository in [3]http://github.com/sugarlabs if;
> 
> (a) the repository is part of, or used with Sugar or Sugarizer,
> 
> (b) you are a member of the [4]http://github.com/sugarlabs organisation,
> 
> (c) the license of the source code is consistent with Sugar Labs
> guidelines,
> 
> (d) you welcome others in Sugar Labs to have commit access, or want a
> central location for tracking Issues or a Wiki.
> 
> You could host a repository in your own GitHub account if you've no
> reason to have other people push commits, or no reason to have your
> repository found in a search of [5]http://github.com/sugarlabs
> 
> If it is your source code, it is your responsibility to choose.  ;-)
> 
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:43:28AM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > Hello everyone again,
> >
> > Further to my email about the problem I am facing with my activity icon
> inside
> > Sugarizer, I bet I can leave it as it for now, and that the Sugarizer
> problem
> > will be resolved later.
> >
> > But now I have an important point : as for the VCS system, late ago I
> used the
> > common sugar repository. Following - from far - many Sugar Devel emails,
> it
> > seems to me that it is ok to use my own repository on Github : am I 
> right
> ?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Laurent Bernabé 
> >
> > [1][6]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> >
> > References:
> >
> > [1] mailto:[7]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> 
> > ___
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > [8]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [9]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
> 
> --
> James Cameron
> [10]http://quozl.netrek.org/
> 
> --
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Bernabé 
> 
> [11]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> 
> References:
> 
> [1] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> [2] mailto:qu...@laptop.org
> [3] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> [4] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> [5] http://github.com/sugarlabs
> [6] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> [7] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> [8] mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> [9] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> [10] http://quozl.netrek.org/
> [11] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com

> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[laurent bernabe]

Oups, sorry for the confusion : I'm not a member of sugar git yet, but
SugarActivities Portal : My profile

Also, are all Open Source license suitable ?

2017-09-12 12:04 GMT+02:00 laurent bernabe :

> Thank you very much,
>
> of course, as an hobbyist developper, it is fine to share it on
> http://github.com/sugarlabs.
> So I must first become a member of Sugarlabs -but I think I am already a
> member as loloof64 : there's been a while since I developped my first
> activity- and take a suitable license for my source code.
>
> I'm going to check all right now.
>
> 2017-09-12 11:58 GMT+02:00 James Cameron :
>
>> You could host a repository in http://github.com/sugarlabs if;
>>
>> (a) the repository is part of, or used with Sugar or Sugarizer,
>>
>> (b) you are a member of the http://github.com/sugarlabs organisation,
>>
>> (c) the license of the source code is consistent with Sugar Labs
>> guidelines,
>>
>> (d) you welcome others in Sugar Labs to have commit access, or want a
>> central location for tracking Issues or a Wiki.
>>
>> You could host a repository in your own GitHub account if you've no
>> reason to have other people push commits, or no reason to have your
>> repository found in a search of http://github.com/sugarlabs
>>
>> If it is your source code, it is your responsibility to choose.  ;-)
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:43:28AM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
>> > Hello everyone again,
>> >
>> > Further to my email about the problem I am facing with my activity icon
>> inside
>> > Sugarizer, I bet I can leave it as it for now, and that the Sugarizer
>> problem
>> > will be resolved later.
>> >
>> > But now I have an important point : as for the VCS system, late ago I
>> used the
>> > common sugar repository. Following - from far - many Sugar Devel
>> emails, it
>> > seems to me that it is ok to use my own repository on Github : am I
>> right ?
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Laurent Bernabé
>> >
>> > [1]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > References:
>> >
>> > [1] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com
>>
>> > ___
>> > Sugar-devel mailing list
>> > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>> --
>> James Cameron
>> http://quozl.netrek.org/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Bernabé
>
> laurent.bern...@gmail.com
>



-- 
Regards,

Laurent Bernabé

laurent.bern...@gmail.com
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[laurent bernabe]

Thank you very much,

of course, as an hobbyist developper, it is fine to share it on
http://github.com/sugarlabs.
So I must first become a member of Sugarlabs -but I think I am already a
member as loloof64 : there's been a while since I developped my first
activity- and take a suitable license for my source code.

I'm going to check all right now.

2017-09-12 11:58 GMT+02:00 James Cameron :

> You could host a repository in http://github.com/sugarlabs if;
>
> (a) the repository is part of, or used with Sugar or Sugarizer,
>
> (b) you are a member of the http://github.com/sugarlabs organisation,
>
> (c) the license of the source code is consistent with Sugar Labs
> guidelines,
>
> (d) you welcome others in Sugar Labs to have commit access, or want a
> central location for tracking Issues or a Wiki.
>
> You could host a repository in your own GitHub account if you've no
> reason to have other people push commits, or no reason to have your
> repository found in a search of http://github.com/sugarlabs
>
> If it is your source code, it is your responsibility to choose.  ;-)
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:43:28AM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> > Hello everyone again,
> >
> > Further to my email about the problem I am facing with my activity icon
> inside
> > Sugarizer, I bet I can leave it as it for now, and that the Sugarizer
> problem
> > will be resolved later.
> >
> > But now I have an important point : as for the VCS system, late ago I
> used the
> > common sugar repository. Following - from far - many Sugar Devel emails,
> it
> > seems to me that it is ok to use my own repository on Github : am I
> right ?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Laurent Bernabé
> >
> > [1]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> >
> > References:
> >
> > [1] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com
>
> > ___
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.netrek.org/
>



-- 
Regards,

Laurent Bernabé

laurent.bern...@gmail.com
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Is it ok to host my activity in my Github repositories ?

[James Cameron]

You could host a repository in http://github.com/sugarlabs if;

(a) the repository is part of, or used with Sugar or Sugarizer,

(b) you are a member of the http://github.com/sugarlabs organisation,

(c) the license of the source code is consistent with Sugar Labs
guidelines,

(d) you welcome others in Sugar Labs to have commit access, or want a
central location for tracking Issues or a Wiki.

You could host a repository in your own GitHub account if you've no
reason to have other people push commits, or no reason to have your
repository found in a search of http://github.com/sugarlabs

If it is your source code, it is your responsibility to choose.  ;-)

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:43:28AM +0200, laurent bernabe wrote:
> Hello everyone again,
> 
> Further to my email about the problem I am facing with my activity icon inside
> Sugarizer, I bet I can leave it as it for now, and that the Sugarizer problem
> will be resolved later.
> 
> But now I have an important point : as for the VCS system, late ago I used the
> common sugar repository. Following - from far - many Sugar Devel emails, it
> seems to me that it is ok to use my own repository on Github : am I right ?
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> --
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Bernabé 
> 
> [1]laurent.bern...@gmail.com
> 
> References:
> 
> [1] mailto:laurent.bern...@gmail.com

> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel