Re: [Sugar-devel] battery indicator missing on customized image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5

2011-08-03 Thread German Ruiz
Daniel and list, upower was not included in the build, so, by adding this
package with:

[custom_packages]
add_packages=upower

the battery indicator is now back on sugar :)

Thanks...

2011/8/2 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org

 On 2 August 2011 23:01, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
  Hi:
 
  I haven't tried to remove gnome, but the one difference is the battery
  applet rpm(batti) is being asked to be installed on the image in
  modules/gnome/kspkglist.50.gnome.inc, which is no longer being included.

 Batti isn't used by sugar, but you might well be onto the problem.

 German, is the upower package included in your build?
 If not, if you add it (e.g. with custom_packages) does it fix your problem?

 Thanks,
 Daniel




-- 
German R S
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] battery indicator missing on customized image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5

2011-08-03 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:42 PM, German Ruiz germa...@opensuse.org.niwrote:

 Daniel and list, upower was not included in the build, so, by adding this
 package with:

 [custom_packages]
 add_packages=upower

 the battery indicator is now back on sugar :)


Not sure why as the sugar packages have upower as a requirement.

Peter
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] battery indicator missing on customized image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5

2011-08-03 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:

 On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Not sure why as the sugar packages have upower as a requirement.

 Looks like an issue with OLPC's forked sugar package, where this
 dependency isn't present. (the fork just removes the keyboard and
 software updater dialogs from Sugar, everything else is upstream).


Sounds like a spec rebase is required :-)

Peter
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] battery indicator missing on customized image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5

2011-08-03 Thread Daniel Drake
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
 Not sure why as the sugar packages have upower as a requirement.

Looks like an issue with OLPC's forked sugar package, where this
dependency isn't present. (the fork just removes the keyboard and
software updater dialogs from Sugar, everything else is upstream).

Thanks to Jerry for pointing us in the right direction and German for
getting back to us with the results. If we do another v3.0 release of
olpc-os-builder we'll force inclusion of upower for sugar, and for
11.3 we'll fix the sugar RPM to have the dependency.
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/11106

Daniel
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] battery indicator missing on customized image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5

2011-08-02 Thread Jerry Vonau
Hi:

I haven't tried to remove gnome, but the one difference is the battery
applet rpm(batti) is being asked to be installed on the image in
modules/gnome/kspkglist.50.gnome.inc, which is no longer being included.
Sounds like batti should be in a kspkglist file in modules/powered if
sugar needs this rpm also. Perhaps you can add that rpm to your .ini
file, to have that rpm installed. Think you then would need to have
kspost.50.batti.inc run, to pick up the needed changes, maybe copy that
fle to modules/powerd/   

Jerry

On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 15:02 -0600, German Ruiz wrote:
 Hello List
 
 
 I'm trying to create an olpc image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5 with
 some customization like (no gnome, new bootanim, adobe flash, extra
 activities, etc...), but i have one problem, when i disable the option
 for gnome desktop enviroment, the battery indicator is missing[0], i'm
 using the olpc-os-builder 3.0.0 on a fedora 14 desktop, has anybody
 seen this issue before???
 
 
 Thanks...
 
 
 [0]http://germanrs.fedorapeople.org/olpc-files/sugar_battery.png
 [1]http://germanrs.fedorapeople.org/olpc-files/olpc-os-11.2.0-xo1.5.ini
 [2]http://dev.laptop.org/pub/source/olpc-os-builder/olpc-os-builder-3.0.0.tar.bz2
 
 
 -- 
 German R S 
 
 
 
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] battery indicator missing on customized image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5

2011-08-02 Thread James Cameron
I really don't think batti is used by Sugar.  Maybe something that batti
depended on was needed.  German, check the logs?

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] battery indicator missing on customized image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5

2011-08-02 Thread Daniel Drake
On 2 August 2011 23:01, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
 Hi:

 I haven't tried to remove gnome, but the one difference is the battery
 applet rpm(batti) is being asked to be installed on the image in
 modules/gnome/kspkglist.50.gnome.inc, which is no longer being included.

Batti isn't used by sugar, but you might well be onto the problem.

German, is the upower package included in your build?
If not, if you add it (e.g. with custom_packages) does it fix your problem?

Thanks,
Daniel
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel