Re: [sumo-user] FatalTraCIError: connection closed by SUMO (receiving error message while zooming-in)

2021-04-12 Thread Jakob Erdmann
Hello,
the problem is this: https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/8482
Make sure that all the 'state' definitions have the correct length.
regards,
Jakob

Am Mo., 12. Apr. 2021 um 14:31 Uhr schrieb Harald Schaefer <
fechs...@gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> it seems that the sumo-gui process exits with exit code 1,  no core.
>
> It can be reproduced also with a current version (ok 4 days old)
>
> Harald
>
> Am 12.04.21 um 12:18 schrieb Shah Sultan:
> > Roundabout.rar
> > <
> http://sumo-user-mailing-list.90755.n8.nabble.com/file/t507/Roundabout.rar
> >
> > Hello Jacob
> >
> > - I am using sumo-1.7.0
> > - I do not understand what should I do with that link and how can I
> > reproduce the crash.
> > - All the related files are attached
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from: http://sumo-user-mailing-list.90755.n8.nabble.com/
> > ___
> > sumo-user mailing list
> > sumo-user@eclipse.org
> > To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user


Re: [sumo-user] FatalTraCIError: connection closed by SUMO (receiving error message while zooming-in)

2021-04-12 Thread Harald Schaefer

Hi,

it seems that the sumo-gui process exits with exit code 1,  no core.

It can be reproduced also with a current version (ok 4 days old)

Harald

Am 12.04.21 um 12:18 schrieb Shah Sultan:

Roundabout.rar

Hello Jacob

- I am using sumo-1.7.0
- I do not understand what should I do with that link and how can I
reproduce the crash.
- All the related files are attached



--
Sent from: http://sumo-user-mailing-list.90755.n8.nabble.com/
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user


Re: [sumo-user] FatalTraCIError: connection closed by SUMO (receiving error message while zooming-in)

2021-04-12 Thread Shah Sultan
Roundabout.py
  

Roundabout.py file is attached for your consideration



--
Sent from: http://sumo-user-mailing-list.90755.n8.nabble.com/
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user


Re: [sumo-user] FatalTraCIError: connection closed by SUMO (receiving error message while zooming-in)

2021-04-12 Thread Harald Schaefer

Hi,

can you provide the Roundabout script as plain .py file, not as ipython3 
file?


Thanks, Harald

Am 12.04.21 um 12:18 schrieb Shah Sultan:

Roundabout.rar

Hello Jacob

- I am using sumo-1.7.0
- I do not understand what should I do with that link and how can I
reproduce the crash.
- All the related files are attached



--
Sent from: http://sumo-user-mailing-list.90755.n8.nabble.com/
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user


Re: [sumo-user] FatalTraCIError: connection closed by SUMO (receiving error message while zooming-in)

2021-04-12 Thread Shah Sultan
Roundabout.rar
 
Hello Jacob

- I am using sumo-1.7.0
- I do not understand what should I do with that link and how can I
reproduce the crash. 
- All the related files are attached



--
Sent from: http://sumo-user-mailing-list.90755.n8.nabble.com/
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user


Re: [sumo-user] About the state of the simulation when multiple parking areas are created

2021-04-12 Thread g2121044
I understand.
I will try to figure out the cause again based on the two advices you gave me.


Thank you for the information very much,
Kazuma Nishikawa 

- Original Message -
From: Jakob Erdmann 
To: Sumo project User discussions 
Date: 2021-04-12 18:55:17
Subject: Re: [sumo-user] About the state of the simulation when multiple 
parking areas are created


- if for some reason the number of traci calls is increased, this can have an 
impact on running speed. You could test this be using libsumo which removes 
this communication overhead (https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Libsumo.html)
- it would be helpful if you could figure out whether the additional running 
time is spent in sumo or in your own script. Currently, the only way to do this 
is to log the duration of the traci.simulationStep calls from within your script


regards,
Jakob



Am Mo., 12. Apr. 2021 um 11:40 Uhr schrieb g2121044 :

Thank you for your reply.


- Are you using TraCI to control the vehicle?
Yes, I am controlling the vehicle with TraCI.
- Are you using a cab device? If so, how are you doing it?
No, I am not using a cab.
- Are you using Rerouter with parkingAreaReroute?
No, I am not using rerouter.


The simple flow of the simulation is as follows.
1. Move each vehicle to the parking area as soon as the simulation starts. 2. 
(This process is only in rou.xml)
2. When a customer request is received, the dispatching algorithm and the 
duarouter determine the route and vehicle. 
3. The route is changed to the target vehicle using traci.vehicle.setRoute.
4. When the vehicle arrives at the boarding and alighting point, if all the 
assigned requests have been fulfilled, the vehicle will change target to the 
parking area.


From the state 1 of this flow, the process is slowing down.
And when I compared the speed of the simulation by changing only the number of 
parking areas, the difference in speed was noticeable. (All other conditions 
were the same except for the parking area.)
Therefore, I thought that the parking area was the cause.
However, when I found out that it was not the cause, the problem became even 
more difficult.


regard,
Kazuma Nishikawa

- Original Message -
From: Jakob Erdmann 
To: Sumo project User discussions 
Date: 2021-04-12 17:59:32
Subject: Re: [sumo-user] About the state of the simulation when multiple 
parking areas are created


Hello,
ParkingAreas by themselves should have no impact on simulation speed.

- are you controlling the vehicles via TraCI?
- are you using the taxi device? If so, how?
- are you using rerouters with parkingAreaReroute?


regards,
Jakob





Am Mo., 12. Apr. 2021 um 10:51 Uhr schrieb g2121044 :

Hello Everyone

I have a question about the state of the simulation when multiple parking areas 
are created.

I am a graduate student and I am using SUMO for my research on DARP (dial a 
ride problem).
I set up four parking areas on the four sides of a square road network, and 
simulated DAR on the road network.
The number of vehicles is set to 8. Each of the four parking areas has two 
vehicles waiting for a customer's request.

As a result of the simulation, the processing speed of the simulation was 
clearly reduced compared to the case with one parking area. The speed of the 
simulation was probably reduced by more than 90%.

Does the simulation process become slower when multiple parking areas are 
created?

I have tried to use multi-threading (--device.router.thread), but it does not 
work.

Best regards,
Kazuma Nishikawa
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user



___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user





___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user


Re: [sumo-user] About the state of the simulation when multiple parking areas are created

2021-04-12 Thread Jakob Erdmann
- if for some reason the number of traci calls is increased, this can have
an impact on running speed. You could test this be using libsumo which
removes this communication overhead (https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Libsumo.html)
- it would be helpful if you could figure out whether the additional
running time is spent in sumo or in your own script. Currently, the only
way to do this is to log the duration of the traci.simulationStep calls
from within your script

regards,
Jakob

Am Mo., 12. Apr. 2021 um 11:40 Uhr schrieb g2121044 :

> Thank you for your reply.
>
> - Are you using TraCI to control the vehicle?
> Yes, I am controlling the vehicle with TraCI.
> - Are you using a cab device? If so, how are you doing it?
> No, I am not using a cab.
> - Are you using Rerouter with parkingAreaReroute?
> No, I am not using rerouter.
>
> The simple flow of the simulation is as follows.
> 1. Move each vehicle to the parking area as soon as the simulation starts.
> 2. (This process is only in rou.xml)
> 2. When a customer request is received, the dispatching algorithm and the
> duarouter determine the route and vehicle.
> 3. The route is changed to the target vehicle using traci.vehicle.setRoute.
> 4. When the vehicle arrives at the boarding and alighting point, if all
> the assigned requests have been fulfilled, the vehicle will change target
> to the parking area.
>
> From the state 1 of this flow, the process is slowing down.
> And when I compared the speed of the simulation by changing only the
> number of parking areas, the difference in speed was noticeable. (All other
> conditions were the same except for the parking area.)
> Therefore, I thought that the parking area was the cause.
> However, when I found out that it was not the cause, the problem became
> even more difficult.
>
> regard,
> Kazuma Nishikawa
>
> *- Original Message -*
> *From: Jakob Erdmann >*
> *To: Sumo project User discussions  >*
> *Date: 2021-04-12 17:59:32*
> *Subject: Re: [sumo-user] About the state of the simulation when multiple
> parking areas are created*
>
> Hello,
> ParkingAreas by themselves should have no impact on simulation speed.
> - are you controlling the vehicles via TraCI?
> - are you using the taxi device? If so, how?
> - are you using rerouters with parkingAreaReroute?
>
> regards,
> Jakob
>
>
> Am Mo., 12. Apr. 2021 um 10:51 Uhr schrieb g2121044 :
>
>> Hello Everyone
>>
>> I have a question about the state of the simulation when multiple parking
>> areas are created.
>>
>> I am a graduate student and I am using SUMO for my research on DARP (dial
>> a ride problem).
>> I set up four parking areas on the four sides of a square road network,
>> and simulated DAR on the road network.
>> The number of vehicles is set to 8. Each of the four parking areas has
>> two vehicles waiting for a customer's request.
>>
>> As a result of the simulation, the processing speed of the simulation was
>> clearly reduced compared to the case with one parking area. The speed of
>> the simulation was probably reduced by more than 90%.
>>
>> Does the simulation process become slower when multiple parking areas are
>> created?
>>
>> I have tried to use multi-threading (--device.router.thread), but it does
>> not work.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Kazuma Nishikawa
>> ___
>> sumo-user mailing list
>> sumo-user@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>
>
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user


Re: [sumo-user] About the state of the simulation when multiple parking areas are created

2021-04-12 Thread g2121044
Thank you for your reply.


- Are you using TraCI to control the vehicle?
Yes, I am controlling the vehicle with TraCI.
- Are you using a cab device? If so, how are you doing it?
No, I am not using a cab.
- Are you using Rerouter with parkingAreaReroute?
No, I am not using rerouter.


The simple flow of the simulation is as follows.
1. Move each vehicle to the parking area as soon as the simulation starts. 2. 
(This process is only in rou.xml)
2. When a customer request is received, the dispatching algorithm and the 
duarouter determine the route and vehicle. 
3. The route is changed to the target vehicle using traci.vehicle.setRoute.
4. When the vehicle arrives at the boarding and alighting point, if all the 
assigned requests have been fulfilled, the vehicle will change target to the 
parking area.


From the state 1 of this flow, the process is slowing down.
And when I compared the speed of the simulation by changing only the number of 
parking areas, the difference in speed was noticeable. (All other conditions 
were the same except for the parking area.)
Therefore, I thought that the parking area was the cause.
However, when I found out that it was not the cause, the problem became even 
more difficult.


regard,
Kazuma Nishikawa

- Original Message -
From: Jakob Erdmann 
To: Sumo project User discussions 
Date: 2021-04-12 17:59:32
Subject: Re: [sumo-user] About the state of the simulation when multiple 
parking areas are created


Hello,
ParkingAreas by themselves should have no impact on simulation speed.

- are you controlling the vehicles via TraCI?
- are you using the taxi device? If so, how?
- are you using rerouters with parkingAreaReroute?


regards,
Jakob





Am Mo., 12. Apr. 2021 um 10:51 Uhr schrieb g2121044 :

Hello Everyone

I have a question about the state of the simulation when multiple parking areas 
are created.

I am a graduate student and I am using SUMO for my research on DARP (dial a 
ride problem).
I set up four parking areas on the four sides of a square road network, and 
simulated DAR on the road network.
The number of vehicles is set to 8. Each of the four parking areas has two 
vehicles waiting for a customer's request.

As a result of the simulation, the processing speed of the simulation was 
clearly reduced compared to the case with one parking area. The speed of the 
simulation was probably reduced by more than 90%.

Does the simulation process become slower when multiple parking areas are 
created?

I have tried to use multi-threading (--device.router.thread), but it does not 
work.

Best regards,
Kazuma Nishikawa
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user


___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user


Re: [sumo-user] About the state of the simulation when multiple parking areas are created

2021-04-12 Thread Jakob Erdmann
Hello,
ParkingAreas by themselves should have no impact on simulation speed.
- are you controlling the vehicles via TraCI?
- are you using the taxi device? If so, how?
- are you using rerouters with parkingAreaReroute?

regards,
Jakob


Am Mo., 12. Apr. 2021 um 10:51 Uhr schrieb g2121044 :

> Hello Everyone
>
> I have a question about the state of the simulation when multiple parking
> areas are created.
>
> I am a graduate student and I am using SUMO for my research on DARP (dial
> a ride problem).
> I set up four parking areas on the four sides of a square road network,
> and simulated DAR on the road network.
> The number of vehicles is set to 8. Each of the four parking areas has two
> vehicles waiting for a customer's request.
>
> As a result of the simulation, the processing speed of the simulation was
> clearly reduced compared to the case with one parking area. The speed of
> the simulation was probably reduced by more than 90%.
>
> Does the simulation process become slower when multiple parking areas are
> created?
>
> I have tried to use multi-threading (--device.router.thread), but it does
> not work.
>
> Best regards,
> Kazuma Nishikawa
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user


[sumo-user] About the state of the simulation when multiple parking areas are created

2021-04-12 Thread g2121044
Hello Everyone

I have a question about the state of the simulation when multiple parking areas 
are created.

I am a graduate student and I am using SUMO for my research on DARP (dial a 
ride problem).
I set up four parking areas on the four sides of a square road network, and 
simulated DAR on the road network.
The number of vehicles is set to 8. Each of the four parking areas has two 
vehicles waiting for a customer's request.

As a result of the simulation, the processing speed of the simulation was 
clearly reduced compared to the case with one parking area. The speed of the 
simulation was probably reduced by more than 90%.

Does the simulation process become slower when multiple parking areas are 
created?

I have tried to use multi-threading (--device.router.thread), but it does not 
work.

Best regards, 
Kazuma Nishikawa
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user


Re: [sumo-user] Issue with new Netedit version

2021-04-12 Thread Jakob Erdmann
Hello,
I suppose there must be something special about your use-case because
'move' mode does work as expected in our tests.
These things might help (not necessarily all at once):

- try the latest development version:
https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Downloads.php#sumo_-_latest_development_version
(this will be released as 1.9.0 soon anyway)
- provide the network file and describe in details where you tried to click
- provide a screencast of the problem

regards,
Jakob

Am Mo., 12. Apr. 2021 um 08:00 Uhr schrieb Nicoló Avogadro <
nicoav...@gmail.com>:

> Good morning everyone,
> I'm writing about a problem I've encountered installing the new version of
> SUMO (1.8.0). In detail, contrary to previous versions, using the netedit
> "move" command it is no longer possible to move the start or end point of
> an edge (red node). Can anyone suggest how to change the position of the
> start and end nodes of an edge?
>
> Thank you very much
> Nicolò
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user