RE: Question about analemmic sundials

2000-12-12 Thread Andrew James

Troy [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked
< I'm curious about analemmic sundials.  Is it possible 
  to move the gnomon of the dial (along an analemma course 
  marked with the proper days) to achieve the same effect? >

If I understand Troy correctly, to be asking about simple dials 
with "figure eight" analemmas on the hour lines, I think the 
answer is "no" as what is wanted must affect all the hour lines
equally, which could be achieved by a rotation of the dial
about the gnomon axis, and I believe no displacement of the 
gnomon will achieve this.  I'm open to correction, though!

Andrew James
N 51 04
W 01 18


Re: Question about analemmic sundials

2000-12-12 Thread John Carmichael

Hello Troy:

Are you talking about an "analemmic" dial or an "analemmatic" dial?  

John Carmichael

>I'm curious about analemmic sundials.  Is it possible to move the gnomon of 
>the dial (along an analemma course marked with the proper days) to achieve 
>the same effect?  I wonder since the analemma would likely be confusing to 
>laymen viewing the dial.
>
>Thanks,
>Troy
>
>


Determining hour-angle from azimuth

2000-12-12 Thread Steve Lelievre

I'm trying to convert an azimuth value into an hour-angle, and would
appreciate some help with the formula and with my algebra. Using
dcl=declination, lat=latitude, azi=azimuth,ha=hour-angle, I started with a
standard formula for azimuth given hour-angle:

tan(azi) = sin(ha)/(sin(lat)*cos(ha) + tan(dcl)*cos(lat))


After multiplying out and rearranging, I got:

sin(lat)*tan(azi)*cos(ha) - sin(ha) = -tan(azi)*tan(dcl)*cos(lat)


Substituting into a standard fromula from my old notes from school, this
solves as:


ha = arctan(-1 / sin(lat)*tan(azi)) + -  arccos( -tan(azi)*tan(dcl)*cos(lat)
/ sqrt( sin(lat)^2 * tan(azi)^2 +1 ))

where + - means plus or minus

Questions:

Is this the correct solution?

If so, how should I interpret the plus or minus element of the solution.
Surely for any given azimuth-latitude-declination there is only one possible
hour-angle, not the two implied by the plus or minus option?

Many thanks, Steve












Re: Question about analemmic sundials

2000-12-12 Thread PsykoKidd

Thanks, that answers my question.

In a message dated 12/12/00 10:40:34 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< Troy,
 
 In issue 5-1 of the NASS Compendium there is an article by Yvone Masse
 about such a dial.  The dial face is a straight line with hour marks.
 The gnomon is a string (or movable rod) that is attached to a pole at
 one end,  The other end is set to a point on a figure 8 according to the
 date thus giving the correction for the EOT.
 
 ++ron >>


Re: Determining hour-angle from azimuth

2000-12-12 Thread Steve Lelievre

Thanks to Jorge Ramalho for pointing out a sign error in my last message. It
should have read as below. I still have the same questions, tho'

Steve

I'm trying to convert an azimuth value into an hour-angle, and would
appreciate some help with the formula and with my algebra. Using
dcl=declination, lat=latitude, azi=azimuth,ha=hour-angle, I started with a
standard formula for azimuth given hour-angle:

 tan(azi) = sin(ha)/(sin(lat)*cos(ha) - tan(dcl)*cos(lat))


 After multiplying out and rearranging, I got:

sin(lat)*tan(azi)*cos(ha) - sin(ha) = tan(azi)*tan(dcl)*cos(lat)


 Substituting into a standard formula from my old notes from school
{solutions of a*cos(x)+b*sin(x)=c}, this means my solution is:


 ha = arctan(-1 / sin(lat)*tan(azi)) + -  arccos( tan(azi)*tan(dcl)*cos(lat)
/ sqrt( sin(lat)^2 * tan(azi)^2 +1 ))

 where + - means plus or minus

 Questions:

 Is this the correct solution?

 If so, how should I interpret the plus or minus element of the solution.
Surely for any given azimuth-latitude-declination there is only one possible
hour-angle, not the two implied by the plus or minus option?

 Many thanks, Steve


I think there can be 2 hour angle solutions for a single azimuth

2000-12-12 Thread BillGottesman

Steve L,

I think there can be 2 hour angle solutions for a single azimuth.  I think 
one h.a. will be less than 90 degrees, and the other greater than 90.  See 
attached DeltaCad file.  I wish I could comment on the derivation of your 
math, but I am unfamiliar with your arctan, arc cos solution for ha.  I hate 
to say it, but this is where spherical trig will yeild the answers.  Any 
takers?

Bill G.

Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="STEVE AZIMUTH.DC"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="STEVE AZIMUTH.DC"

Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:STEVE AZIMUTH.DC (/) (0001FCE2)