Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 24, Issue 17

2007-12-27 Thread Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie
*Dear Mr Gianni Ferrari,*
**
*   Greetings, happy new year and Merry Christmas to you and all members.*
**
*   As I recall, the azimuth of a body and its time of transit are not
affected by refraction. Please kindly do comment.*
**
*   Also, I would like to have a good and applied article on astronomical
corrections (Refraction, Parallax, Dip of Horizon and Semi-Diameter.) I
wonder if any respectful member could help.*
**
*Best regards,*
**
*Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie*

On Dec 26, 2007 2:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Send sundial mailing list submissions to
sundial@uni-koeln.de

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of sundial digest...


 Today's Topics:

   1. R: Re: Azimuth of Sunrise - Sunset ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 22:58:32 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: R: Re: Azimuth of Sunrise - Sunset
 To: sundial@uni-koeln.de
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8


 And the air refraction ?

 Because of refraction, the sun is already
 below the horizon when we observe
 the upper limb kiss the horizon. In
 this moment the altitude of the Sun?s center is  about
 ?(34+14) = -48?
 (the refraction at 0? degree is about 34?)
 The Azimuth of the point
 where we begin to see the Sun (limb) is then different from the
 theoretical and geometrical value, also if the differences are small at
 mean latitudes.

  With Lat = 45 on  Winter Solstice,  the Azimut of the
 Sun?s limb (when it appears)  is about 56.8 degree ; the Azimuth of the
 Sun?s center 56.4? and the theoretical Azimuth 55.8?.
 The differences
 increase when Latitude increases.
 With Lat.= 66?. the Sun?s limb
 appears with an Azimuth about 7 degree more than the theoretical value
 (18.8 and 11.9?)

 My best wishes for a sunny New Year !
 Gianni Ferrari




 --

 ___
 sundial mailing list
 sundial@uni-koeln.de
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial


 End of sundial Digest, Vol 24, Issue 17
 ***




-- 
Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 24, Issue 17

2007-12-27 Thread Bill Gottesman
Mashallah,

I believe you are correct about azimuth and time of transit being unaffected by 
refraction.

Astronomical Algorithms by Jean Meeus has a good section on calculating 
effects of refraction and the sun's semi-diameter.  Also a valuable section 
about how to correct for the effects of Nutation.  I'm not so sure about the 
other topics you mention.  I would guess parallax of the sun from the 
perspective of the earth's diameter is covered in surveying books, or perhaps 
one of the astronomical trigonometry books by Smart.

-Bill Gottesman
  - Original Message - 
  From: Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie 
  To: sundial@uni-koeln.de 
  Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:24 AM
  Subject: Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 24, Issue 
17


  Dear Mr Gianni Ferrari,

 Greetings, happy new year and Merry Christmas to you and all members.

 As I recall, the azimuth of a body and its time of transit are not 
affected by refraction. Please kindly do comment.

 Also, I would like to have a good and applied article on astronomical 
corrections (Refraction, Parallax, Dip of Horizon and Semi-Diameter.) I wonder 
if any respectful member could help. 

  Best regards,

  Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie


  On Dec 26, 2007 2:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Send sundial mailing list submissions to
   sundial@uni-koeln.de 

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of sundial digest...


Today's Topics:

  1. R: Re: Azimuth of Sunrise - Sunset ( [EMAIL PROTECTED])


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 22:58:32 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R: Re: Azimuth of Sunrise - Sunset
To: sundial@uni-koeln.de 
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8


And the air refraction ?

Because of refraction, the sun is already 
below the horizon when we observe
the upper limb kiss the horizon. In
this moment the altitude of the Sun?s center is  about
?(34+14) = -48?
(the refraction at 0? degree is about 34?)
The Azimuth of the point 
where we begin to see the Sun (limb) is then different from the
theoretical and geometrical value, also if the differences are small at
mean latitudes.

 With Lat = 45 on  Winter Solstice,  the Azimut of the 
Sun?s limb (when it appears)  is about 56.8 degree ; the Azimuth of the
Sun?s center 56.4? and the theoretical Azimuth 55.8?.
The differences
increase when Latitude increases.
With Lat.= 66?. the Sun?s limb 
appears with an Azimuth about 7 degree more than the theoretical value
(18.8 and 11.9?)

My best wishes for a sunny New Year !
Gianni Ferrari




--

___ 
sundial mailing list
sundial@uni-koeln.de
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial 


End of sundial Digest, Vol 24, Issue 17
***




  -- 
  Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie 


--


  ---
  https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 24, Issue 17

2007-12-27 Thread Warren Thom
Hi Bill,

If I recall your comments at the NASS meeting correctly,  while azimuth might 
be unaffected by refraction, because the real time of sunset  is later due to 
refraction, the azimuth at a later time needs to be calculated. That is, for us 
at North latitudes the sunset is further North than a normal calculation of 
sunset would give.  Assume no objects on the horizon.   Did I miss something?

Warren


  - Original Message - 
  From: Bill Gottesman 
  To: Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie ; sundial@uni-koeln.de 
  Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:12 AM
  Subject: Re: Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 
24,Issue 17


  Mashallah,

  I believe you are correct about azimuth and time of transit being unaffected 
by refraction.

  Astronomical Algorithms by Jean Meeus has a good section on calculating 
effects of refraction and the sun's semi-diameter.  Also a valuable section 
about how to correct for the effects of Nutation.  I'm not so sure about the 
other topics you mention.  I would guess parallax of the sun from the 
perspective of the earth's diameter is covered in surveying books, or perhaps 
one of the astronomical trigonometry books by Smart.

  -Bill Gottesman
- Original Message - 
From: Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie 
To: sundial@uni-koeln.de 
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:24 AM
Subject: Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 24, 
Issue 17


Dear Mr Gianni Ferrari,

   Greetings, happy new year and Merry Christmas to you and all members.

   As I recall, the azimuth of a body and its time of transit are not 
affected by refraction. Please kindly do comment.

   Also, I would like to have a good and applied article on astronomical 
corrections (Refraction, Parallax, Dip of Horizon and Semi-Diameter.) I wonder 
if any respectful member could help. 

Best regards,

Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie


On Dec 26, 2007 2:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Send sundial mailing list submissions to
 sundial@uni-koeln.de 

  To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
  or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  You can reach the person managing the list at
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
  than Re: Contents of sundial digest...


  Today's Topics:

1. R: Re: Azimuth of Sunrise - Sunset ( [EMAIL PROTECTED])


  --

  Message: 1
  Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 22:58:32 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
  From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: R: Re: Azimuth of Sunrise - Sunset
  To: sundial@uni-koeln.de 
  Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8


  And the air refraction ?

  Because of refraction, the sun is already 
  below the horizon when we observe
  the upper limb kiss the horizon. In
  this moment the altitude of the Sun?s center is  about
  ?(34+14) = -48?
  (the refraction at 0? degree is about 34?)
  The Azimuth of the point 
  where we begin to see the Sun (limb) is then different from the
  theoretical and geometrical value, also if the differences are small at
  mean latitudes.

   With Lat = 45 on  Winter Solstice,  the Azimut of the 
  Sun?s limb (when it appears)  is about 56.8 degree ; the Azimuth of the
  Sun?s center 56.4? and the theoretical Azimuth 55.8?.
  The differences
  increase when Latitude increases.
  With Lat.= 66?. the Sun?s limb 
  appears with an Azimuth about 7 degree more than the theoretical value
  (18.8 and 11.9?)

  My best wishes for a sunny New Year !
  Gianni Ferrari




  --

  ___ 
  sundial mailing list
  sundial@uni-koeln.de
  https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial 


  End of sundial Digest, Vol 24, Issue 17
  ***




-- 
Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie 





---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial




--


  ---
  https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 24, Issue 17

2007-12-27 Thread Roger Bailey
Hello Mashallah,

My reference on this topic is The American Navigator H.O. Pub No. 9, 
originally by Nathaniel Bowditch and the altitude correction tables inside the 
front cover of the Nautical Almanac. These cover the topic very well from a 
navigators' point of view. There are additional refraction corrections for 
temperature, temperature gradient and atmospheric pressure. Height of eye and 
dip short due to a false horizon are also important. The Newgrange video showed 
the rising sun was visible from the top of the mound significantly before 
lighting the window.

These effects are quite pronounced in Canada at higher latitudes and colder 
temperatures. An astronomer friend in Alberta bought a farm and built his 
observatory based on the lights of Calgary being far enough away to be below 
the horizon. This was based on observations on a summer night. On clear cold 
winter nights he was surprised and disappointed to see the lights of the 
distant city come into direct view due to increased refraction. 

The experience of Tony Moss and the first light on the Longyearbyen sundial at 
78º 13' North are relevant here. The date of the first return of the sun can 
vary do to refraction changing with the weather conditions.

John Dunn's photo at http://www.arcticlight.com/ shows the path of the midnight 
sun quite well. I was once on a ski tour* with John. We were amazed at his 
comfort waking around in the snow in underwear and flip flops when we were 
bundled up in down parkas. His metabolic rate was quite a bit higher than ours 
and quite suitable for arctic explorer.

Regards, 
Roger Bailey

*Not the Baffin Island traverse!
  - Original Message - 
  From: Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie 
  To: sundial@uni-koeln.de 
  Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 1:24 AM
  Subject: Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 24, Issue 
17


  Dear Mr Gianni Ferrari,

 Greetings, happy new year and Merry Christmas to you and all members.

 As I recall, the azimuth of a body and its time of transit are not 
affected by refraction. Please kindly do comment.

 Also, I would like to have a good and applied article on astronomical 
corrections (Refraction, Parallax, Dip of Horizon and Semi-Diameter.) I wonder 
if any respectful member could help. 

  Best regards,

  Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 24, Issue 17

2007-12-27 Thread Bill Gottesman
Warren, It is good to hear from you.  And now I know at least one person was 
awake during my talk.

I think you are exactly right.  

Did I misinterpret Mashallah's question?  By Time of Transit, I took that to 
mean when the sun or a star passes the north-south meridian overhead, and not 
the sunrise or sunset.  Frankly, I forgot that this question was asked in the 
context of the solstice sunrise at Newfane.  Refraction does not affect azimuth 
at any given time, but it affects the azimuth of sunset because it also affects 
the time of (apparent) sunset.

-Bill
   - Original Message - 
  From: Warren Thom 
  To: Bill Gottesman ; Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie ; sundial@uni-koeln.de 
  Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 12:47 PM
  Subject: Re: Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 
24,Issue 17


  Hi Bill,

  If I recall your comments at the NASS meeting correctly,  while azimuth might 
be unaffected by refraction, because the real time of sunset  is later due to 
refraction, the azimuth at a later time needs to be calculated. That is, for us 
at North latitudes the sunset is further North than a normal calculation of 
sunset would give.  Assume no objects on the horizon.   Did I miss something?

  Warren


- Original Message - 
From: Bill Gottesman 
To: Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie ; sundial@uni-koeln.de 
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 
24,Issue 17


Mashallah,

I believe you are correct about azimuth and time of transit being 
unaffected by refraction.

Astronomical Algorithms by Jean Meeus has a good section on calculating 
effects of refraction and the sun's semi-diameter.  Also a valuable section 
about how to correct for the effects of Nutation.  I'm not so sure about the 
other topics you mention.  I would guess parallax of the sun from the 
perspective of the earth's diameter is covered in surveying books, or perhaps 
one of the astronomical trigonometry books by Smart.

-Bill Gottesman
  - Original Message - 
  From: Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie 
  To: sundial@uni-koeln.de 
  Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:24 AM
  Subject: Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 24, 
Issue 17


  Dear Mr Gianni Ferrari,

 Greetings, happy new year and Merry Christmas to you and all members.

 As I recall, the azimuth of a body and its time of transit are not 
affected by refraction. Please kindly do comment.

 Also, I would like to have a good and applied article on astronomical 
corrections (Refraction, Parallax, Dip of Horizon and Semi-Diameter.) I wonder 
if any respectful member could help. 

  Best regards,

  Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie


  On Dec 26, 2007 2:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Send sundial mailing list submissions to
   sundial@uni-koeln.de 

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of sundial digest...


Today's Topics:

  1. R: Re: Azimuth of Sunrise - Sunset ( [EMAIL PROTECTED])


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 22:58:32 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R: Re: Azimuth of Sunrise - Sunset
To: sundial@uni-koeln.de 
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8


And the air refraction ?

Because of refraction, the sun is already 
below the horizon when we observe
the upper limb kiss the horizon. In
this moment the altitude of the Sun?s center is  about
?(34+14) = -48?
(the refraction at 0? degree is about 34?)
The Azimuth of the point 
where we begin to see the Sun (limb) is then different from the
theoretical and geometrical value, also if the differences are small at
mean latitudes.

 With Lat = 45 on  Winter Solstice,  the Azimut of the 
Sun?s limb (when it appears)  is about 56.8 degree ; the Azimuth of the
Sun?s center 56.4? and the theoretical Azimuth 55.8?.
The differences
increase when Latitude increases.
With Lat.= 66?. the Sun?s limb 
appears with an Azimuth about 7 degree more than the theoretical value
(18.8 and 11.9?)

My best wishes for a sunny New Year !
Gianni Ferrari




--

___ 
sundial mailing

Re: Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 24, Issue 17

2007-12-27 Thread Roger Bailey
As Gianni Ferrari pointed out, the simplified equations solve for the 
theoretical time, direction and path of sunset when the altitude is zero. 
Reality is different.  You can always use the full spherical triangle sin sin 
sin cos cos cos equations with an input of say 49' to account for the average 
values of semidiameter and refraction. Gianni gave a couple of examples. I 
worked through a couple of others in an article I am writing on designing a 
sunset sundial from scratch. In that case, the last crack of sunset was 5 
minutes later at Lat 37º in mid November.

Frank King gave the full equations for the solution of the triangle. They look 
formidable but are actually quite solvable with a normal scientific calculator. 
Frank gave the true Cosine form for the sides which are CoLat, CoDec and CoAlt. 
I prefer to substitute Cos (90-x) = sin x as outlined below. Your known inputs 
are the sides: Declination, Dec, Latitude Lat and Altitude Alt and you solve 
for final term, the desired contained angle in the triangle, time t, direction 
Az, or path Phi.

Time: Sin Alt= Sin Lat x Sin Dec + Cos Lat x Cos Dec x Cos t 
Direction: Sin Dec = Sin Lat x Sin Alt +  Cos Lat x Cos Dec x Cos Az
Path: Sin Lat = Sin Alt x Sin Dec +Cos Alt x Cos Dec x Cos Phi

From these equations it is easy to see what disappears when the Altitude is 
zero. to give the simplified forms.
See Sunset Phenomenon a 1999 NASS presentation, publication #17 at my 
website. www.walkingshadow.info .

Regards,
Roger Bailey 

- Original Message - 
  From: Warren Thom 
  To: Bill Gottesman ; Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie ; sundial@uni-koeln.de 
  Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:47 AM
  Subject: Re: Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 
24,Issue 17


  Hi Bill,

  If I recall your comments at the NASS meeting correctly,  while azimuth might 
be unaffected by refraction, because the real time of sunset  is later due to 
refraction, the azimuth at a later time needs to be calculated. That is, for us 
at North latitudes the sunset is further North than a normal calculation of 
sunset would give.  Assume no objects on the horizon.   Did I miss something?

  Warren


- Original Message - 
From: Bill Gottesman 
To: Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie ; sundial@uni-koeln.de 
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 
24,Issue 17


Mashallah,

I believe you are correct about azimuth and time of transit being 
unaffected by refraction.

Astronomical Algorithms by Jean Meeus has a good section on calculating 
effects of refraction and the sun's semi-diameter.  Also a valuable section 
about how to correct for the effects of Nutation.  I'm not so sure about the 
other topics you mention.  I would guess parallax of the sun from the 
perspective of the earth's diameter is covered in surveying books, or perhaps 
one of the astronomical trigonometry books by Smart.

-Bill Gottesman
  - Original Message - 
  From: Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie 
  To: sundial@uni-koeln.de 
  Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:24 AM
  Subject: Does Refraction Affect Azimuth? / Re: sundial Digest, Vol 24, 
Issue 17


  Dear Mr Gianni Ferrari,

 Greetings, happy new year and Merry Christmas to you and all members.

 As I recall, the azimuth of a body and its time of transit are not 
affected by refraction. Please kindly do comment.

 Also, I would like to have a good and applied article on astronomical 
corrections (Refraction, Parallax, Dip of Horizon and Semi-Diameter.) I wonder 
if any respectful member could help. 

  Best regards,

  Mashallah Ali-Ahyaie
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial