Re: New York Times - Today will be the earliest sunset of the year.

2016-12-07 Thread Roger Bailey
Thanks Bob for this link. This date may be true for NYC but the date varies 
with latitude. It is 7 Dec for NYC at 40.7° but 28/29 Nov for Miami at 25.7° 
and 10 Dec where I live in Sidney by the Sea BC at 48.6°. Some time ago I 
developed a spreadsheet to calculate sunrise and sunset times. Input the 
location, Lat and Long, and the starting date and the spreadsheet calculates 
the equation of time, declination rise and set times for a two month period. 
The results for my location are plotted in the chart attached, a 25 kb file. 
The spreadsheet is too big at 87 kb to attach but I would be happen to send it 
to anyone for their use. 

Helmut Sonderegger programmed the equation of time and declination algorithms 
in a spreadsheet  that I imported into this spreadsheet for these calculations. 
It works well to show what happens around the solstice.

Regards, 
Roger Bailey
Walking Shadow Designs



From: Robert Terwilliger 
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 6:34 AM
To: sundial@uni-koeln.de 
Subject: New York Times - Today will be the earliest sunset of the year.


http://www.twigsdigs.com/annex/sunset.html

 

Bob

 






---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial




Solstice Rise Set.doc
Description: MS-Word document
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



New York Times - Today will be the earliest sunset of the year.

2016-12-07 Thread Robert Terwilliger
http://www.twigsdigs.com/annex/sunset.html

 

Bob

 

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Earliest sunset

2011-11-19 Thread John Shepherd
Is there a name for the day on which the earliest sunset occurs? I know it 
varies with latitude unlike the solstice.

Cheers,

John

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Earliest sunset

1996-05-06 Thread Ronald W Doerfler
An excellent article on this is:

Wagon, Stan. Why December 21 Is the Longest Day of the Year  Mathematics
Magazine, Vol. 63, No. 5, December, 1990, pp. 307-311.

Mathematics Magazine is a journal of the Mathematical Association of America
(MAA) and is available in most all college libraries in the US.  Despite
the subtitle of the article, How fundamental ideas from max-min theory
explain the location of the extrema of the times of sunrise and sunset,
there are no formal equations to wade through, but nice graphs and figures
explaining the equation of time and effects such as offset sunrise and
sunset extrema.  Very readable.

The title refers to the fact that since the equation of time has the
greatest advance (slope) on December 22, this day is the longest in terms
of time from solar noon to solar noon the next day.

Also, John Shepherd is correct--the ecliptic angle is the predominant 
cause.  The sunrise/sunset phenomenon and the general shape of the 
graphs of solar noon and solar day length would be the same even if the
earth's orbit were a circle centered at the sun!

If anyone who wants the article can't find it, send me an email with
your address and I'll drop a photocopy off in the mail (post).


Ron Doerfler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Earliest sunset

1996-05-05 Thread Thibaud Taudin Chabot
Earliest sunset is around 12 dec., but the latest sunrise is around 30 dec.
Combining the two gives the shortest day at 21 dec.
Thibaud Taudin-Chabot [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Earliest sunset

1996-05-05 Thread John Shepherd
Here is a copy of the letter I sent to Rory, who contacted me through my
web page (http://www.uwrf.edu/sundial/), before the letter from Jack Aubert
was posted.

Cheers,
John

Rory,

I am sorry to have taken so long to reply but I have a couple of deadlines
to make.

Your question is an interesting one and I think if you study the large
photo of the Swensen Sundial you can see the answer.

Many years ago a golf-playing uncle in Los Angeles asked me why it was
that the shortest day of the year was the winter solstice, but the sun
actually set earliest on about Dec. 13 (he had noticed that he could get
in an extra hole of golf on Dec. 21 -- I'm not making this up.)

After a lot of research (there was no Web then!) I realized the answer
had to do with the equation of time, the difference between solar and
sideral days, and mean solar time (and no doubt you know more about this
than I do.)

Yes you are correct. The annalema shapes arise because of the equation of
time, shifting the correct positions of the hour markers.

Now on my dial sun rise/sun set can be represented by a horizontal line
through the base of the lower gnomon. In other words the tip of the shadows
can never be higher than that point. Now I didn't cut the annalemas off
there or put a horizontal line (we already have the lines of the mortar in
the bricks) as I thought it would spoil the looks of the whole dial. There
are some anchient dials in existence that have so many lines on them that
the meaning of some of them have been lost!

Anyway imagine a horizontal line through the bottom of the gnomon. Look at
where that line intersects an analema, say the 5 pm or right-mostone. It is
somewhere between the two upper daylines for the Gold or spring side but it
is between 2nd and 3rd day lines for the Fall side. This is because in the
late Fall the Sun sets before 5pm and the shadow never reaches that part of
the analemma. Because of the rapid curve of the annalemas near the top of
the dial the time of sun set varies rapidly becoming later as we pass the
Winter Solstice.

This explains the change in sunset and that the earliest sunset is not at
the winter solstice.


So I told my uncle this, and the family got down to accomplishing other
life-tasks. Unfortunately, I recently realized that this explanation
must be false. This came about by looking more closely at an analemma on
a globe. If I am not mistaken, the analemma describes not only the
difference between mean and clock-time (due to the eccentricity of the
earth's orbit being non-zero) but also the (I guess arbitrary) dates on
which our clock is set. I.e. when the official timekeepers say that
the annual clock is zeroed. And here, I was shocked to see a) that this
date seems to be the winter solstice; and b) that I had never noticed
this before!

No its a difference and when averaged over the whole year it must come out
to zero.

Also its not just the eccentricity of the orbit with the Earth being
closest to the Sun on Jan 4th. but the larger effect (+-10 mins to +-
8mins.) is due to the 23.5 degree tilt of the Earth's Axis. The
eccentricity effect is zero Jan 4th and 6months later. The tilt effect is
zero Dec 21st. and every 3 months after.

You see, I always knew that the earth was moving fastest around
Christmas time (near perihelion) and so I figured it made sense that the
clock was furthest out of whack around this time. And sure enough,
consulting either an almanac or a St. Joseph's Aspirin calendar, one can
see that the sun indeed sets earliest on Dec. 13, not Dec. 21. BUT HOW
IS THIS POSSIBLE, IF THE CLOCK IS ZEROED ON THE SOLSTICE? Shouldn't
the equation of time being equal to zero on Dec. 21 mean that the sun
should set the earliest on that date, too?


The equation of time which is the combination of the two effects is actualy
zero close to the 25th. but this is not arbitary.

I hope this helps but I realise this is complicated and drawing diagrams
would help.

All the best
John S.




Earliest sunset

1996-05-05 Thread Pam Eastlick
Greetings All,

I've been trying to figure this one out myself since here on Guam, the 
sun starts setting later in November and continues rising later until 
February, so we don't have a shortest day.  Well, that's not true, the 
shortest days of the year on Guam are all even numbered days between 
December 10 and December 30.  A similar bizarre situation prevails around 
the summer solstice (ie. the sun starts rising earlier but also *sets* 
earlier long before the longest day of the year).

While I realize that this probably happens because we are below the Tropic
of Cancer, I'm still at a loss to explain *why* it happens.  Any help
anyone can give me (and I'm still trying to absorb the post about the
equation of time) about why this happens, would be greatly appreciated. 

Pam

   ===
   | Pam Eastlick  | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
   | Planetarium Coordinator   | Voice: (671) 735-2783   |
   | CAS/DNS   | Fax  : (671) 734-1299 or -4582  |
   | UOG Station   | Location : 13.25N, 144.47E  |
   | Mangilao, Guam USA 96923  | Time : GMT+10EST+15 |
   | |
   |LOOK UP TONIGHT, THE UNIVERSE AWAITS YOU!|
   ===




Re: Earliest sunset of Jack Aubert

1996-05-04 Thread Fer J. de Vries
Jack Aubert,

Your question was : 'Why the earliest sunset is at 13 dec'?
 

Only looking to the aspect of the declination of the sun in december the 
length of a day wil shorten so the sun will set earlier each day till 
about 21 december. From then the length of the days will increase.
In this periode the difference in the time of the sunset each day 
however is smaller than one minute. From about 12 or 13  december this 
difference is even smaller than 30 seconds and still decreases till 
zero at about 21 december. (this also depends on the latitude you live)
 
But we also have to consider the equation of time.
In december the difference in the equation of time is about 30 seconds 
each day and this means that, only looking for this aspect, the sun sets 
30 seconds later than the day before.
Not the value of the equation of time is relavant, but the difference 
each day.

When we sum these 2 aspects we see that from about 13 december the 
sunset will be later than the day before.

For the same reason during some days after the winter begins the sun 
rises later than the day before.

Fer de Vries.
[EMAIL PROTECTED],nl


Re: Earliest sunset

1996-05-04 Thread Richard Langley
On Fri, 3 May 1996, Jack Aubert wrote:

 I would like to forward the following enquiry to all those dialiasts
 who know more than I do about celestial mechanics.  It seems to me
 that the answer has something to do with the fact that the sun appears 
 as a disk rather than a point in space, but I don't know enough to think
 this through logically.  The question was posed by  Rory Sellers 
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).  What exactly does he have to do to subscribe 
 to the sundial list?  
 
 Many years ago a golf-playing uncle in Los Angeles asked me why it was 
 that the shortest day of the year was the winter solstice, but the sun 
 actually set earliest on about Dec. 13 (he had noticed that he could get 
 in an extra hole of golf on Dec. 21 -- I'm not making this up.)
 
 After a lot of research (there was no Web then!) I realized the answer 
 had to do with the equation of time, the difference between solar and 
 sideral days, and mean solar time (and no doubt you know more about this 
 than I do.)
 
 So I told my uncle this, and the family got down to accomplishing other 
 life-tasks. Unfortunately, I recently realized that this explanation 
 must be false. This came about by looking more closely at an analemma on 
 a globe. If I am not mistaken, the analemma describes not only the 
 difference between mean and clock-time (due to the eccentricity of the 
 earth's orbit being non-zero) but also the (I guess arbitrary) dates on 
 which our clock is set. I.e. when the official timekeepers say that 
 the annual clock is zeroed. And here, I was shocked to see a) that this 
 date seems to be the winter solstice; and b) that I had never noticed 
 this before!
 
 You see, I always knew that the earth was moving fastest around 
 Christmas time (near perihelion) and so I figured it made sense that the 
 clock was furthest out of whack around this time. And sure enough, 
 consulting either an almanac or a St. Joseph's Aspirin calendar, one can 
 see that the sun indeed sets earliest on Dec. 13, not Dec. 21. BUT HOW 
 IS THIS POSSIBLE, IF THE CLOCK IS ZEROED ON THE SOLSTICE? Shouldn't 
 the equation of time being equal to zero on Dec. 21 mean that the sun 
 should set the earliest on that date, too?
 
 Please help! A family conundrum that I thought we had settled twenty 
 years ago is now bothering me!


I believe it is the equation of time that is responsible for the
difference.  Let's consider the sun to be a point (taking into account the
sun's semi-diameter won't affect us too much).  When the sun is on the
horizon (actually sunset occurs when the refracted upper limb of the sun
is on the horizon, but as I said we won't worry about this detail), the
local hour angle of the true sun is given by

 cos(H) = -tan(lat) * tan(delta)

where lat is the latitude of the place and delta is the sun's declination.
The hour angle of the true sun is equal to the hour angle of the mean sun
plus the equation of time and the hour angle of the mean sun is equal to
mean solar time minus 12 hours.  So,

 H = H_m + E = MT -12h + E/60

where E is in minutes.

So, MT of sunset, in hours, is given by

MT = 12h - E/60 + acos(-tan(lat)*tan(delta))/180*12.

Now, consider first a point on the equator:

MT = 12h - E/60 + 6h = 18h - E/60.

Notice that this equation is independent of the sun's declination,
except via E.  The earliest sunset will occur when E is largest.  This
happens around 3 November.

If we re-do the calculation for Los Angles, with latitude of about 34
degrees, we find that the earliest sunset occurs around 6 December.  Note
that we have to take into account both the time variation of E and the
sun's declination.

=== 
 Richard B. Langley Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 Geodetic Research Laboratory   BITnet:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Dept. of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Phone:(506) 453-5142
 University of New BrunswickFAX:  (506) 453-4943
 Fredericton, N.B., Canada  E3B 5A3 Telex:014-46202 
Fredericton?  Where's that? See: http://degaulle.hil.unb.ca/NB/fredericton.html 
=== 




Re: Earliest sunset of Jack Aubert

1996-05-04 Thread slevy
One thing to keep in mind: the zero point of the Equation of Time is
*not* arbitrary, but comes from the shape of the analemma (or equivalently
from the shape of the earth's orbit and orientation of its north pole).

The Equation of Time is the difference between apparent solar time 
(tied to the sun's right ascension, i.e. its position measured in the
earth's equatorial system) and mean solar time (a uniform time scale
chosen so that the average is correct).  From the definition of mean solar
time, the integral of the E. of T. over a year must be zero.  That determines
its zero point.

I haven't checked this, but I'll bet the fact that the zero points of the
equation of time lie near the solstices comes from the fact that the
peri-/aphelion points of the earth's orbit lie (currently) near the
solstice points.  That is, the Earth-Sun system is almost symmetrical about 
the Dec 21 - June 21 axis, and so the analemma has nearly bilateral symmetry
about its vertical axis.   After a few thousand years of precession of the
earth's pole, that won't be close to true, and the analemma's zero points
will be displaced a bit further from its bottom and top.


Earliest Sunset

1996-05-04 Thread Lufkin Brad
According to my Soda Can Dial, the earliest sunset appears to be around 11 Dec
(at least for Washington, D.C.) and the latest on July 2.  I don't know if that
is true everywhere (in fact, I doubt it).
Brad


Earliest sunset

1996-05-03 Thread Jack Aubert
I would like to forward the following enquiry to all those dialiasts
who know more than I do about celestial mechanics.  It seems to me
that the answer has something to do with the fact that the sun appears 
as a disk rather than a point in space, but I don't know enough to think
this through logically.  The question was posed by  Rory Sellers 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).  What exactly does he have to do to subscribe 
to the sundial list?  

Many years ago a golf-playing uncle in Los Angeles asked me why it was 
that the shortest day of the year was the winter solstice, but the sun 
actually set earliest on about Dec. 13 (he had noticed that he could get 
in an extra hole of golf on Dec. 21 -- I'm not making this up.)

After a lot of research (there was no Web then!) I realized the answer 
had to do with the equation of time, the difference between solar and 
sideral days, and mean solar time (and no doubt you know more about this 
than I do.)

So I told my uncle this, and the family got down to accomplishing other 
life-tasks. Unfortunately, I recently realized that this explanation 
must be false. This came about by looking more closely at an analemma on 
a globe. If I am not mistaken, the analemma describes not only the 
difference between mean and clock-time (due to the eccentricity of the 
earth's orbit being non-zero) but also the (I guess arbitrary) dates on 
which our clock is set. I.e. when the official timekeepers say that 
the annual clock is zeroed. And here, I was shocked to see a) that this 
date seems to be the winter solstice; and b) that I had never noticed 
this before!

You see, I always knew that the earth was moving fastest around 
Christmas time (near perihelion) and so I figured it made sense that the 
clock was furthest out of whack around this time. And sure enough, 
consulting either an almanac or a St. Joseph's Aspirin calendar, one can 
see that the sun indeed sets earliest on Dec. 13, not Dec. 21. BUT HOW 
IS THIS POSSIBLE, IF THE CLOCK IS ZEROED ON THE SOLSTICE? Shouldn't 
the equation of time being equal to zero on Dec. 21 mean that the sun 
should set the earliest on that date, too?

Please help! A family conundrum that I thought we had settled twenty 
years ago is now bothering me!

Thanks,

Rory Sellers

P.S. Interesting sidelights:

1. When I first tried to answer my Uncle's question, I tried calling up 
the chief of the Griffith Park Planetarium in Los Angeles. He not only 
did not know the answer to my question, he didn't even know it was true! 
(I.e. that the shortest day and the day on which the sun sets the 
earliest are not the same.)

2. The year before he died, I wrote a letter to Richard Feynmann trying 
to get him interested in a project I was undertaking involving 
interactive video and physics teaching. After reading Surely You're 
Joking, Mr. Feynmann I knew the only way I could get his attention and 
possibly get an answer to my letter was to pique his interest by 
announcing on the outside of the envelope that there were puzzles 
enclosed. It worked! Feynmann wrote back, regretted he couldn't take 
part in my project, and solved one of the two puzzled I had posed. 
Unfortunately, he chose the one OTHER THAN the one about the equation of 
time! (In fact, our correspondence was noticed by Gleick researching his 
book Genius about Feynmann who then wrote me for an explanation.) It 
was all very gratifying to my ego, but didn't help with the time 
question!!



Jack Aubert
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.cpcug.org/user/jaubert