Re: azimuth lines

2013-08-01 Thread JOHN DAVIS
Hi Frank et al,

Dials with azimuth lines are rare but not unknown in the UK. Writing from 
memory, there is a rather nice one on Grundisburgh church near me and I believe 
the famous Queens' College, Cambridge, dial also has them amongst all the other 
furniture. There are a few others, I'm sure: didn't Ian Butson restore a wooden 
one?  

The key requirement, of course, is that there has to be a nodus so the gnomon 
on your lighthouse dial can't be original. The dial is in obvious need of 
restoration, or at least conservation. Perhaps a nodus could be added. Once the 
spacings of the azimuth lines have been measured, the trig to calculate the 
nodus position is straigntforwrad.

Regards,

John D

--

Dr J Davis
Flowton Dials



 From: Frank Evans 
To: Sundial  
Sent: Thursday, 1 August 2013, 14:03
Subject: azimuth lines
 

Greetings, fellow dialists,
Attached is a picture of the dial on a lighthouse in North Shields, England 
(55N 1.5W). It is probably from the eighteenth century and is badly eroded. As 
well as its hour marks it has a series of vertical azimuth lines labelled with 
the points of the compass. These may lie between the solstice curves. I am at a 
loss as to how the lines would have worked. There is no sign of a nodus on the 
gnomon (which looks old). Possibly, if there was a date scale associated with 
the azimuth lines, now eroded away, then it would be possible to get the sun's 
bearing from where the time line crosses the azimuth line but that looks pretty 
cumbersome. Any suggestions?
Frank 55N 1W


---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



RE: azimuth lines

2013-08-01 Thread Andrew James
The Queens' College dial certainly has azimuth lines as John wrote.

Frank, is it possible that some feature of the rather nice ornamental and 
unusual gnomon support provides the nodus? Working from the azimuth line 
spacing you should be able to estimate the required height of the nodus and see 
whether this is at all plausible. The "8" support looks too low down the dial 
really, but it may be worth a calculation if only to rule it out!

Regards
Andrew James





Secure Meters (UK) Ltd. is a registered company in England: 2199653  
Secure House, Moorside Road, Winchester, SO23 7RX
 
This correspondence is confidential and solely for the intended recipient(s). 
If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, 
distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the 
intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and 
notify the sender immediately.
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Re azimuth lines

2013-08-04 Thread JOHN DAVIS
Hi Frank E,

As Frank K has said, your suggestion for reading azimuths with a polar-oriented 
gnomon and a set of declination lines (rather than with a nodus) is perfectly 
possible. But, in my experience, it would make the dial somewhere between very 
rare and unique as all the English examples I've ever seen make (or made) use 
of a nodus. Apart from anything else, trying to read shadows and dec lines on a 
wall sundial taxes the eyesight and visual coordination.

FK's wacky idea of a secondary, vertical, gnomon  to indicate azimuth directly 
is fun. There are cases on horizontal dials (eg the Whitehouse dial in Cumbria) 
where this was done. But again, I've never seen it on a vertical.

Any chance of the dial being conserved/restored?

Regards,

John
-
 
Dr J Davis
Flowton Dials



 From: Frank Evans 
To: "King, Frank" ; "Davis, John" 
; andrew.ja...@securetogether.co.uk; Sundial 
 
Sent: Friday, 2 August 2013, 20:36
Subject: Re azimuth lines
 

Greetings, fellow dialists,
Thanks to all for suggested solutions to my dial puzzle. As I read the dial 
picture, the azimuth lines related to the supposed nodus would have extended 
from the summer solstice curve, visible on the dial, up to a winter solstice 
curve now lost. If so this rules out the use of the figure 8 gnomon support as 
a nodus as its shadow in the picture falls outside this frame. Suggestions so 
far are that the gnomon is a replacement together with indications of how a new 
nodus might be calculated. I am still wondering about the alternative 
suggestion I made that there was no nodus but a vertical date scale at the 
sides. Then, selecting the date, you follow the declinational curve from there 
to the point where the gnomon shadow crosses the azimuth line and that gives 
the sun's bearing.

Is this correct in principle and do any dials anywhere use this method?
Frank 55N 1 W---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial