shadow velocity & shadow tracing

2000-02-09 Thread John Carmichael

Hi once more:

Just read all your e-mails on drawing hour lines by shadow tracing.  Chris
Lusby Taylor pointed out that it would be difficult to trace the whole hour
line because the shadow is constantly moving; so he suggested drawing a
point on the hour line first and then visually guestimating the entire hour
line's position on the ground.  This seems like it might cause small errors
in the hour lines because it is based on a guesstimate and not an actual
shadow tracing.

I have an idea, though, that might facilitate drawing an hour line from the
face edge to the center:  How about first marking only the hour points as
Chris suggests.  Then, at night, fasten a high power, tightly focused
flashlight to a ladder to simulate the sun.  Position the light so that the
style's shadow falls on the hour point that was marked earlier using the
sun.  The wiggly hour line could then be traced at one's convenience using
an unmoving "sun".

Whadaya think?

John


re: shadow velocity & shadow tracing

2000-02-09 Thread Larry Bohlayer

John,

If you are not to concerned with getting the hourline traced across dips
and hills on the ground, use a long straightedge (yardstick, meterstick, 8'
- 16' extruded strip of aluminum flashing, etc.) to mark the line. You can
maintain it on the shadow edge until the top of the hour and then mark the
line.


Larry Bohlayer

All MAIL:
Celestial Products, Inc.
P.O. Box 801
Middleburg, VA 20118-0801

All shipping:
Celestial Products, Inc.
20659 St. Louis Rd.
Philomont, Virginia 20131
U.S.A.

USA (Eastern Time Zone or -5 UT)

EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

VOICE: 540-338-4040
FAX:   540-338-4042
Order Line: 800-235-3783
On-line Catalog: http://www.celestialproducts.com
   



Re: shadow velocity & shadow tracing

2000-02-10 Thread Chris Lusby Taylor

Good idea John. But when you say "tightly focused" I take it you mean a
flashlight with a wide beam emanating from a small aperture. This is what gives
a
sharp edge to the shadow. Conversely, a flashlight with a narrow beam
from a large reflector would be poor.
The poor man's laser trigon, indeed.

Chris

John Carmichael wrote:

> Hi once more:
>
> Just read all your e-mails on drawing hour lines by shadow tracing.  Chris
> Lusby Taylor pointed out that it would be difficult to trace the whole hour
> line because the shadow is constantly moving; so he suggested drawing a
> point on the hour line first and then visually guestimating the entire hour
> line's position on the ground.  This seems like it might cause small errors
> in the hour lines because it is based on a guesstimate and not an actual
> shadow tracing.
>
> I have an idea, though, that might facilitate drawing an hour line from the
> face edge to the center:  How about first marking only the hour points as
> Chris suggests.  Then, at night, fasten a high power, tightly focused
> flashlight to a ladder to simulate the sun.  Position the light so that the
> style's shadow falls on the hour point that was marked earlier using the
> sun.  The wiggly hour line could then be traced at one's convenience using
> an unmoving "sun".
>
> Whadaya think?
>
> John


Re: shadow velocity & shadow tracing

2000-02-10 Thread John Carmichael

Hi Chris:

You're right!  I realized as soon as I sent my message that a small diameter
floodlight with a wide beam would be better than a tight beam, because it
must illuminate the entire style and not just a portion of it.

Thanks for confirming,

John

>Good idea John. But when you say "tightly focused" I take it you mean a
>flashlight with a wide beam emanating from a small aperture. This is what gives
>a
>sharp edge to the shadow. Conversely, a flashlight with a narrow beam
>from a large reflector would be poor.
>The poor man's laser trigon, indeed.
>
>Chris
>
>John Carmichael wrote:
>
>> Hi once more:
>>
>> Just read all your e-mails on drawing hour lines by shadow tracing.  Chris
>> Lusby Taylor pointed out that it would be difficult to trace the whole hour
>> line because the shadow is constantly moving; so he suggested drawing a
>> point on the hour line first and then visually guestimating the entire hour
>> line's position on the ground.  This seems like it might cause small errors
>> in the hour lines because it is based on a guesstimate and not an actual
>> shadow tracing.
>>
>> I have an idea, though, that might facilitate drawing an hour line from the
>> face edge to the center:  How about first marking only the hour points as
>> Chris suggests.  Then, at night, fasten a high power, tightly focused
>> flashlight to a ladder to simulate the sun.  Position the light so that the
>> style's shadow falls on the hour point that was marked earlier using the
>> sun.  The wiggly hour line could then be traced at one's convenience using
>> an unmoving "sun".
>>
>> Whadaya think?
>>
>> John
>
>


Re: shadow velocity & shadow tracing

2000-02-10 Thread John Davis


John Carmichael wrote (replying to Chris Lusby Taylor):

>You're right!  I realized as soon as I sent my message that a small
diameter
>floodlight with a wide beam would be better than a tight beam, because it
>must illuminate the entire style and not just a portion of it.
>

A drawback with the "floodlight" scheme is that a very tall ladder will be
needed unless you are only going to make use of the small bit of the gnomon
near the origin.  I know to my cost that big gnomons rarely have the
small-scale accuracy required!

 Since what you are actually trying to do is to reproduce the method of a
trigon (as Chris pointed out), why not use a real laser trigon.  Bob
Terwilliger has one on his webpages at
http://www.shadow.net/~bobt/trigon/trigon.htm (based on a transit
mechanism), and I published a cheap-and-cheerful small version in the BSS
Bulletin October 99.

Once the trigon is fixed to the style, and the hour angle set using the
incorporated auxilliary dial, all you have to do is swing the laser on its
declination axis and the spot will follow the humps and bumps on the ground
precisely.  If done at night, the laser spot is easy to see.  If done in
bright sunshine, you might need a red specular-reflector target and some red
sunglasses to see the laser spot clearly.

It's a shame you are so far away, as I built a "big" version of my trigon
for the New Hall Oxford dial, but it didn't get fully used and I'm looking
for another application!.  By indexing the auxillary dial with 0.25 degree
intervals, it gives 1 minute of time resolution.


Regards,

John


Dr J R Davis
Flowton, UK
52.08N, 1.043E
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: shadow velocity & shadow tracing

2000-02-10 Thread Dave Bell

On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, John Carmichael wrote:

> Hi Chris:
> 
> You're right!  I realized as soon as I sent my message that a small diameter
> floodlight with a wide beam would be better than a tight beam, because it
> must illuminate the entire style and not just a portion of it.
> 

Also, the smaller and more point-like the source, the better. Try a
Mini-MagLite flashlight, with the focussing reflector head entirely
unscrewed. This leaves you with a tiny bare lamp, almost painful to look
at directly. The total light output is fairly low, but should work on a
dark night!

Dave


Re: shadow velocity & shadow tracing

2000-02-10 Thread Dave Bell

On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, John Davis wrote:

>  Since what you are actually trying to do is to reproduce the method
> of a trigon (as Chris pointed out), why not use a real laser trigon.  
> Bob Terwilliger has one on his webpages at
> http://www.shadow.net/~bobt/trigon/trigon.htm (based on a transit
> mechanism), and I published a cheap-and-cheerful small version in the
> BSS Bulletin October 99.

John:

  Are you at liberty to re-print that design for us, say to put up on the
archive sites?

Dave Bell