Re: chpst -u and supplementary groups
When I need this functionality, I generally use `groups=id -G|sed -e 's/\s/:/g'` then `chpst -u myuser:$groups` for the command line. This is almost always just for processes I want to run as my own user, so it's a rarity. Tj On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 7:08 AM Jan Braun wrote: > Hello list! > > Yesterday, I spent way too much time chasing down a permissions problem > caused by the fact that "chpst -u acc prog..." only sets the account's > primary group, and ignores any supplementary groups the account may be a > member of. > > TFM mentions "All initial supplementary groups are removed.", but I > failed to memorize that. (Also, what does "initial" signify here?) > > My inability to see the issue came from the fact that all other similar > programs (I'm aware of) do in fact add the supplementary groups. Watch: > > | # chpst -u test id > | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test) > | # runuser -u test id > | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test),4(adm) > | # s6-setuidgid test id > | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test),4(adm) > | # su - test -c id > | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test),4(adm) > | # su test -c id > | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test),4(adm) > | # sudo -u test id > | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test),4(adm) > | # > > So now I'm wondering: > What are the use cases for not applying existing supplementary groups? > Should chpst apply them by default? > Should chpst grow an option to (not) apply them? > "chpst -u acc: prog..." is still free. > Or is everything as it's supposed to be, and people might need to munge > the output of "getent initgroups acc" and feed it to the -u option? > > I'll be happy to try to come up with a patch (even if it's still a > fatter warning in the manpage) if people can agree here what the right > thing to do is. > > regards, > Jan >
Re: chpst -u and supplementary groups
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:08:07 +0200 Jan Braun wrote: > Hello list! > > Yesterday, I spent way too much time chasing down a permissions > problem caused by the fact that "chpst -u acc prog..." only sets the > account's primary group, and ignores any supplementary groups the > account may be a member of. > > TFM mentions "All initial supplementary groups are removed.", but I > failed to memorize that. (Also, what does "initial" signify here?) > > My inability to see the issue came from the fact that all other > similar programs (I'm aware of) do in fact add the supplementary > groups. Watch: > > | # chpst -u test id > | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test) > | # runuser -u test id > | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test),4(adm) > | # s6-setuidgid test id > | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test),4(adm) > | # su - test -c id > | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test),4(adm) > | # su test -c id > | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test),4(adm) > | # sudo -u test id > | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test),4(adm) > | # > > So now I'm wondering: > What are the use cases for not applying existing supplementary groups? > Should chpst apply them by default? > Should chpst grow an option to (not) apply them? > "chpst -u acc: prog..." is still free. > Or is everything as it's supposed to be, and people might need to > munge the output of "getent initgroups acc" and feed it to the -u > option? > > I'll be happy to try to come up with a patch (even if it's still a > fatter warning in the manpage) if people can agree here what the right > thing to do is. > > regards, > Jan Thanks Jan, I was having a similar problem, and inspired by your post, I solved it the following way, using Runit's chpst: chpst -u slitt:audio:disk /tmp/test.sh In the preceding, /tmp/test.sh was permissioned 750 owner root.audio, and contained the following: #!/bin/sh whoami cat /d/audio.group cat /d/disk.group groups pwd file /d/audio.group was 640 root.audio, while /d/disk.group was 640 root.disk. Both cat statements printed out the contents of the files, proving that I was acting with both groups disk and audio. The output of the whoami proved I was acting as user slitt. You're obviously right that having all the groups slitt belongs to, which include both disk and audio, would have been easier, but as you say, it doesn't work right now, so I used this method for the time being. Thanks for helping me solve my problem. SteveT Steve Litt August 2019 featured book: Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting http://www.troubleshooters.com/28
chpst -u and supplementary groups
Hello list! Yesterday, I spent way too much time chasing down a permissions problem caused by the fact that "chpst -u acc prog..." only sets the account's primary group, and ignores any supplementary groups the account may be a member of. TFM mentions "All initial supplementary groups are removed.", but I failed to memorize that. (Also, what does "initial" signify here?) My inability to see the issue came from the fact that all other similar programs (I'm aware of) do in fact add the supplementary groups. Watch: | # chpst -u test id | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test) | # runuser -u test id | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test),4(adm) | # s6-setuidgid test id | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test),4(adm) | # su - test -c id | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test),4(adm) | # su test -c id | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test),4(adm) | # sudo -u test id | uid=1003(test) gid=1003(test) groups=1003(test),4(adm) | # So now I'm wondering: What are the use cases for not applying existing supplementary groups? Should chpst apply them by default? Should chpst grow an option to (not) apply them? "chpst -u acc: prog..." is still free. Or is everything as it's supposed to be, and people might need to munge the output of "getent initgroups acc" and feed it to the -u option? I'll be happy to try to come up with a patch (even if it's still a fatter warning in the manpage) if people can agree here what the right thing to do is. regards, Jan signature.asc Description: PGP signature
