[freenet-support] AMAZINGLY CONFUSED? what is the point of FREENET? more like NONET!!

2006-05-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
Can you please give us some specifics:
- What OS are you running this on?
- Are you trying to run Freenet 0.7 or 0.5?
- Can you get to http://127.0.0.1:/ ?
- If you are running 0.7, do you have any darknet peers? (click Darknet)
- If you are running 0.5, do you have any connections (click Advanced
  mode, then Open Connections)?

On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:19:19PM -0500, adampol at peoplepc.com wrote:
> i dont know who may get this? non the less this service is totaly ridiculous, 
> IT DOES NOT WORK!  FIRST WHEN I HAD IT, I TRIED FOR OVER A WEEK. I COULD NOT 
> GET ANYTHING TO COME UP, JUST BITS AND PIECES.( i read were it says to keep 
> trying till it gets your nods or something,  but for how long??? so i even 
> went from internet explorer to firefox, no different).. ok, so nothing works! 
>   then did not try for a few weeks.  tried again now, my shortcut links  , 
> click nothing comes up?  so  ok,  i uninstall.   i try to re install,  i get 
> almost done then:   not able to locate file on disk or something.   disk 
> full,  write protected?  so i find i did not uninstall first time, so i do 
> for sure uninstall... try again, SAME DEAL?  WHAT IS THE POINT OF THIS?   i 
> had dialup at first, thought mabey that was a prob. NOT, cause now i have DSL 
> just got it the 28`th.  still aparently high speed does nothing?? I DONT GET 
> IT? 
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060502/065b34be/attachment.pgp>


[freenet-support] Bug report : update scripts are empty

2006-05-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:33:57AM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I don't know if it's a known bug but this morning, when I tried to 
> update my 0.7 node, I found that both update.sh and update2.sh were empty !
> 
> Could someone put them on downloads.freenetproject.org so I can retreive 
> them safely ?

http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/apps/installer/installclasspath/linux/?rev=8599
> 
> Regards
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060502/cd095b93/attachment.pgp>


[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 - Install Help on Fedora 5

2006-05-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:00:43PM -0700, Shoey Fighter wrote:
> Hello. I am having some troubles installing Freenet 0.7 onto my Fedora
> 5 machine. I am fairly new to linux, so please bear with me.
> 
> I installed the Sun JVM, but I might have screwed something up.
> Anyway, here is my
> java -version:
> java version "1.5.0_06"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_06-b05)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_06-b05, mixed mode, sharing)
> 
> When I run:
> javaws http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/freenet.jnlp
> 
> it says:
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
> /opt/jdk1.5.0_06/jre/lib/i386/libdeploy.so:
> /opt/jdk1.5.0_06/jre/lib/i386/libdeploy.so: cannot restore segment
> prot after reloc: Permission denied
>at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)
>at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:1751)
>at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1647)
>at java.lang.Runtime.load0(Runtime.java:769)
>at java.lang.System.load(System.java:967)
>at com.sun.deploy.config.UnixConfig.loadLibDeploy(UnixConfig.java:41)
>at com.sun.deploy.config.UnixConfig.(UnixConfig.java:26)
>at 
>com.sun.deploy.config.ConfigFactory.newInstance(ConfigFactory.java:11)
>at com.sun.deploy.config.Config.getInstance(Config.java:575)
>at com.sun.deploy.config.Config.(Config.java:591)
>at com.sun.javaws.Main.main(Main.java:82)
> 
> When I run:
> java -jar 
> http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/selfextractpack.jar
> 
> it says:
> Unable to access jarfile
> http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/selfextractpack.jar

Have you tried downloading it then running java -jar
selfextractpack.jar ?
> 
> 
> Any thoughts? I think this is a great project and I would love to help
> test it out.
> 
> Thanks,
> ShoeyFighter
> shoeyfighter at gmail.com
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060502/0e144102/attachment.pgp>


[freenet-support] Bug report : update scripts are empty

2006-05-02 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Hi,

I don't know if it's a known bug but this morning, when I tried to 
update my 0.7 node, I found that both update.sh and update2.sh were empty !

Could someone put them on downloads.freenetproject.org so I can retreive 
them safely ?

Regards



[freenet-support] Freenet .5 messes up my internet connection

2006-05-02 Thread Evan Daniel
On 4/29/06, vinyl1  wrote:
> Joseph Terranova said:
>
> "Linksys routers have a nasty flaw: they keep track of all connections for 
> days. So if you're using something that has a lot of connections, such as p2p 
> or freenet, it bonks fairly quickly. You might want to try looking for an 
> alternative open-source firmware for it that fixes the problem.
>
> Well, that certainly doesn't sound good.  But while I'm a fan of open-source, 
> I think mixing it with old hardware might lead to even more difficulties.
>
> I'd rather look into D-Link,  Netgear and Belkin.  What is everyone using?  
> What model works well with Freenet in a home environment?

I'm using a Linksys box just fine with Freenet 0.7; 0.7 has far fewer
connections and no churn.

I had it working with 0.5 ages ago, I think I just turned down max
connections and bandwidth available in the freenet config.  It would
reset occasionally, but as long as everything used static ip, not
dhcp, that wasn't a huge issue most of the time.

HTH

Evan



Re: [freenet-support] Freenet .5 messes up my internet connection

2006-05-02 Thread Evan Daniel

On 4/29/06, vinyl1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Joseph Terranova said:

"Linksys routers have a nasty flaw: they keep track of all connections for 
days. So if you're using something that has a lot of connections, such as p2p or 
freenet, it bonks fairly quickly. You might want to try looking for an alternative 
open-source firmware for it that fixes the problem.

Well, that certainly doesn't sound good.  But while I'm a fan of open-source, I 
think mixing it with old hardware might lead to even more difficulties.

I'd rather look into D-Link,  Netgear and Belkin.  What is everyone using?  
What model works well with Freenet in a home environment?


I'm using a Linksys box just fine with Freenet 0.7; 0.7 has far fewer
connections and no churn.

I had it working with 0.5 ages ago, I think I just turned down max
connections and bandwidth available in the freenet config.  It would
reset occasionally, but as long as everything used static ip, not
dhcp, that wasn't a huge issue most of the time.

HTH

Evan
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] AMAZINGLY CONFUSED? what is the point of FREENET? more like NONET!!

2006-05-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
Can you please give us some specifics:
- What OS are you running this on?
- Are you trying to run Freenet 0.7 or 0.5?
- Can you get to http://127.0.0.1:/ ?
- If you are running 0.7, do you have any darknet peers? (click Darknet)
- If you are running 0.5, do you have any connections (click Advanced
  mode, then Open Connections)?

On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:19:19PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i dont know who may get this? non the less this service is totaly ridiculous, 
> IT DOES NOT WORK!  FIRST WHEN I HAD IT, I TRIED FOR OVER A WEEK. I COULD NOT 
> GET ANYTHING TO COME UP, JUST BITS AND PIECES.( i read were it says to keep 
> trying till it gets your nods or something,  but for how long??? so i even 
> went from internet explorer to firefox, no different).. ok, so nothing works! 
>   then did not try for a few weeks.  tried again now, my shortcut links  , 
> click nothing comes up?  so  ok,  i uninstall.   i try to re install,  i get 
> almost done then:   not able to locate file on disk or something.   disk 
> full,  write protected?  so i find i did not uninstall first time, so i do 
> for sure uninstall... try again, SAME DEAL?  WHAT IS THE POINT OF THIS?   i 
> had dialup at first, thought mabey that was a prob. NOT, cause now i have DSL 
> just got it the 28`th.  still aparently high speed does nothing?? I DONT GET 
> IT? 
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Bug report : update scripts are empty

2006-05-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:33:57AM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I don't know if it's a known bug but this morning, when I tried to 
> update my 0.7 node, I found that both update.sh and update2.sh were empty !
> 
> Could someone put them on downloads.freenetproject.org so I can retreive 
> them safely ?

http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/apps/installer/installclasspath/linux/?rev=8599
> 
> Regards
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 - Install Help on Fedora 5

2006-05-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:00:43PM -0700, Shoey Fighter wrote:
> Hello. I am having some troubles installing Freenet 0.7 onto my Fedora
> 5 machine. I am fairly new to linux, so please bear with me.
> 
> I installed the Sun JVM, but I might have screwed something up.
> Anyway, here is my
> java -version:
> java version "1.5.0_06"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_06-b05)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_06-b05, mixed mode, sharing)
> 
> When I run:
> javaws http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/freenet.jnlp
> 
> it says:
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
> /opt/jdk1.5.0_06/jre/lib/i386/libdeploy.so:
> /opt/jdk1.5.0_06/jre/lib/i386/libdeploy.so: cannot restore segment
> prot after reloc: Permission denied
>at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)
>at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:1751)
>at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1647)
>at java.lang.Runtime.load0(Runtime.java:769)
>at java.lang.System.load(System.java:967)
>at com.sun.deploy.config.UnixConfig.loadLibDeploy(UnixConfig.java:41)
>at com.sun.deploy.config.UnixConfig.(UnixConfig.java:26)
>at 
>com.sun.deploy.config.ConfigFactory.newInstance(ConfigFactory.java:11)
>at com.sun.deploy.config.Config.getInstance(Config.java:575)
>at com.sun.deploy.config.Config.(Config.java:591)
>at com.sun.javaws.Main.main(Main.java:82)
> 
> When I run:
> java -jar 
> http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/selfextractpack.jar
> 
> it says:
> Unable to access jarfile
> http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/selfextractpack.jar

Have you tried downloading it then running java -jar
selfextractpack.jar ?
> 
> 
> Any thoughts? I think this is a great project and I would love to help
> test it out.
> 
> Thanks,
> ShoeyFighter
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] AMAZINGLY CONFUSED? what is the point of FREENET? more like NONET!!

2006-05-02 Thread adampol



i dont know who may get this? non the less this 
service is totaly ridiculous, IT DOES NOT WORK!  FIRST WHEN I HAD IT, I 
TRIED FOR OVER A WEEK. I COULD NOT GET ANYTHING TO COME UP, JUST BITS AND 
PIECES.( i read were it says to keep trying till it gets your nods or 
something,  but for how long??? so i even went from internet explorer 
to firefox, no different).. ok, so nothing works!   then did 
not try for a few weeks.  tried again now, my shortcut links  , click 
nothing comes up?  so  ok,  i uninstall.   i try to re 
install,  i get almost done then:   not able to locate file on 
disk or something.   disk full,  write protected?  so i find 
i did not uninstall first time, so i do for sure uninstall... try again, SAME 
DEAL?  WHAT IS THE POINT OF THIS?   i had dialup at first, 
thought mabey that was a prob. NOT, cause now i have DSL just got it the 
28`th.  still aparently high speed does nothing?? I DONT GET IT? 

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Bug report : update scripts are empty

2006-05-02 Thread Julien Cornuwel

Hi,

I don't know if it's a known bug but this morning, when I tried to 
update my 0.7 node, I found that both update.sh and update2.sh were empty !


Could someone put them on downloads.freenetproject.org so I can retreive 
them safely ?


Regards
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]