[freenet-support] (no subject)
Could my IP address with a service provider be matched with that with an IP address in .07?. Jing -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060707/8f23f651/attachment.html>
[freenet-support] 64 bits jvm
Do like the error says. Get a 1.5 JVM. On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:29:46AM -0700, jordi wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to use freenet 0.7 but it seems that 64 > bits is not supported yet. Maybe I'm doing something > wrong. > > Any help will be wellcome. > > Thanks. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060707/3f013228/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-support] (No subject)
That depends on what you mean. The objective of freenet is that it be very difficult for an attacker to determine who is posting, or reading, a particular freesite or Frost post. Also freenet 0.7, if used properly, makes it difficult for an attacker to discover that you are running a freenet node. However you can only have this protection against discovery, and protection from various attacks, if you use 0.7 as a "darknet" i.e. you connect only to people you know/trust already. In any case, you are more vulnerable to somebody whose node you are connected to than to somebody you are not connected to. Now, the present implementation does have weaknesses, as it is only an alpha. However, that is our objective, and we have gone some way towards it. On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:25:44PM +0100, gemma_h at eircom.net wrote: > I am interested to know is free net so secure that a person cannot be tracked > by their IP address or email address? -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060707/4967d857/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-support] (no subject)
Can a computer or person be traced from freenet by its IP address or by emails from it. I am interested to know how secure freenet actually is. Jing_b -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060707/eb67378b/attachment.html>
[freenet-support] (No subject)
You wrote: > I am interested to know is free net so secure that a person cannot be > tracked by their IP address or email address? Freenet is indeed very secure. The most any attacker or snoop can determine is that you are running a freenet node and even that is less likely than ever with 0.7 As long as you use sensible, basic precautions to secure your machine and do not insert material that contains clues to your identity then it is absolutely not possible to determine WHAT you are inserting. Check out Frost, it's message boards are forever full of people ranting on about pedophiles and child porn. While CP posters are vile, they do server a function in freenet as much as many would like not to admit it. The fact that CP can be posted so freely in freenet means that it is secure enough and anonymous enough to protect even vile people's identity. BTW- you don't have to support or approve of CP to be involved in freenet, and your involvment says nothing about your stance on CP. If you don't like it, then don't support it by requesting any CP files or sites. The fewer people who request something, the more likely it'll drop out of freenet.
[freenet-support] (No subject)
I am interested to know is free net so secure that a person cannot be tracked by their IP address or email address? - Find the home of your dreams with eircom net property Sign up for email alerts now http://www.eircom.net/propertyalerts
[freenet-support] running 0.7 in win98se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I tried the webinstaller and it complained that I didn't have java, yet I have Sun Java 1.4.2_08 installed and on the path (java -version works from any dos prompt) as the download page advises, I tried the linux instructions and ran javaws http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/freenet.jnlp it started to install, then stopped when I didn't want it to download java (since I've already got it) Next was to download: http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/selfextractpack.jar and execute it: java -jar selfextractpack.jar That got the install done, at the end it ran into an error when it tried to install as a service (something 98SE doesn't care for). I saw the start, run and stop *.cmd files, they did nothing untill I renamed them to *.bat, and then did nothing but scroll errors too fast to read and exit. I got the same results from running java -jar freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar anyone have advice for trying to run 0.7 in win98se? I'd try it on my debian box, but it's WAY to underpowered for freenet right now. (just manages to run KDE desktop and email) - -- The best way to get past my spam filter is to use pgp or gnupg to encrypt your Mail to me with RSA Key ID: 0x84D46604 (fingerprint: DA03 1EA4 7F5D DF74 B89F E871 757E 627C 84D4 6604) This key can be found on public keyservers such as http://keyserver.kjsl.com:11371/#extract =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= A Peculiar Blog http://blog.peculiarplace.com / \ \ / Join the ASCII-Ribbon Campaign to Stamp Out HTML Email ! X / \ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBRK6D2XV+YnyE1GYEAQIcqwf+KJBYV8fyUIMseQJLrzcYKj9nG0IrbP3s YK55RsFKJqrPHt94a95bR8Mt3i6naks7XEu/1WcxTV6Ay1TbjegDnU7RpbhoNpKG 7TpSMMGG6ed/SckacqB/q9Anh7fIj5ikfiTOhQddWy12XPb2hBcLQe61tt1iihjm 6crAL8qSMWjtZkPde64ywkFRkt8sQYNFrK/F2kjwGB4wvKjyg6bU5CrEnBF4AGGo fGcxtAcB/fWOBwPpQfOJ1j2Ca+tkeCVh7eNFFxPDTOvgyrEYTfBAQmsLgOAODHvJ kJVc1tojHiVoMs79DKWEtZJsDSz+MOtyMGU77aTJyJDFfGKSuMCuLQ== =/GXZ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[freenet-support] 64 bits jvm
Hi, I'm trying to use freenet 0.7 but it seems that 64 bits is not supported yet. Maybe I'm doing something wrong. Any help will be wellcome. Thanks. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: wrapper.log Type: text/x-log Size: 5758 bytes Desc: 3418027544-wrapper.log URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060707/f522c82f/attachment.bin>
Re: [freenet-support] (No subject)
That depends on what you mean. The objective of freenet is that it be very difficult for an attacker to determine who is posting, or reading, a particular freesite or Frost post. Also freenet 0.7, if used properly, makes it difficult for an attacker to discover that you are running a freenet node. However you can only have this protection against discovery, and protection from various attacks, if you use 0.7 as a darknet i.e. you connect only to people you know/trust already. In any case, you are more vulnerable to somebody whose node you are connected to than to somebody you are not connected to. Now, the present implementation does have weaknesses, as it is only an alpha. However, that is our objective, and we have gone some way towards it. On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:25:44PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am interested to know is free net so secure that a person cannot be tracked by their IP address or email address? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] 64 bits jvm
Do like the error says. Get a 1.5 JVM. On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:29:46AM -0700, jordi wrote: Hi, I'm trying to use freenet 0.7 but it seems that 64 bits is not supported yet. Maybe I'm doing something wrong. Any help will be wellcome. Thanks. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] (no subject)
Can a computer or person be traced from freenet by its IP address or by emails from it. I am interested to know how secure freenet actually is. Jing_b___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (No subject)
You wrote: I am interested to know is free net so secure that a person cannot be tracked by their IP address or email address? Freenet is indeed very secure. The most any attacker or snoop can determine is that you are running a freenet node and even that is less likely than ever with 0.7 As long as you use sensible, basic precautions to secure your machine and do not insert material that contains clues to your identity then it is absolutely not possible to determine WHAT you are inserting. Check out Frost, it's message boards are forever full of people ranting on about pedophiles and child porn. While CP posters are vile, they do server a function in freenet as much as many would like not to admit it. The fact that CP can be posted so freely in freenet means that it is secure enough and anonymous enough to protect even vile people's identity. BTW- you don't have to support or approve of CP to be involved in freenet, and your involvment says nothing about your stance on CP. If you don't like it, then don't support it by requesting any CP files or sites. The fewer people who request something, the more likely it'll drop out of freenet. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] running 0.7 in win98se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I tried the webinstaller and it complained that I didn't have java, yet I have Sun Java 1.4.2_08 installed and on the path (java -version works from any dos prompt) as the download page advises, I tried the linux instructions and ran javaws http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/freenet.jnlp it started to install, then stopped when I didn't want it to download java (since I've already got it) Next was to download: http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/selfextractpack.jar and execute it: java -jar selfextractpack.jar That got the install done, at the end it ran into an error when it tried to install as a service (something 98SE doesn't care for). I saw the start, run and stop *.cmd files, they did nothing untill I renamed them to *.bat, and then did nothing but scroll errors too fast to read and exit. I got the same results from running java -jar freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar anyone have advice for trying to run 0.7 in win98se? I'd try it on my debian box, but it's WAY to underpowered for freenet right now. (just manages to run KDE desktop and email) - -- The best way to get past my spam filter is to use pgp or gnupg to encrypt your Mail to me with RSA Key ID: 0x84D46604 (fingerprint: DA03 1EA4 7F5D DF74 B89F E871 757E 627C 84D4 6604) This key can be found on public keyservers such as http://keyserver.kjsl.com:11371/#extract =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= A Peculiar Blog http://blog.peculiarplace.com / \ \ / Join the ASCII-Ribbon Campaign to Stamp Out HTML Email ! X / \ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBRK6D2XV+YnyE1GYEAQIcqwf+KJBYV8fyUIMseQJLrzcYKj9nG0IrbP3s YK55RsFKJqrPHt94a95bR8Mt3i6naks7XEu/1WcxTV6Ay1TbjegDnU7RpbhoNpKG 7TpSMMGG6ed/SckacqB/q9Anh7fIj5ikfiTOhQddWy12XPb2hBcLQe61tt1iihjm 6crAL8qSMWjtZkPde64ywkFRkt8sQYNFrK/F2kjwGB4wvKjyg6bU5CrEnBF4AGGo fGcxtAcB/fWOBwPpQfOJ1j2Ca+tkeCVh7eNFFxPDTOvgyrEYTfBAQmsLgOAODHvJ kJVc1tojHiVoMs79DKWEtZJsDSz+MOtyMGU77aTJyJDFfGKSuMCuLQ== =/GXZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (No subject)
If I was to be identified, could my IP addresswith aservice provider match that with an IP address in .07?. - Original Message From: Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: support@freenetproject.orgSent: Friday, 7 July, 2006 10:05:17 PMSubject: Re: [freenet-support] (No subject) You wrote: I am interested to know is free net so secure that a person cannot be tracked by their IP address or email address?Freenet is indeed very secure.The most any attacker or snoop can determine is that you are running a freenet node and even that is less likely than ever with 0.7As long as you use sensible, basic precautions to secure your machine and do not insert material that contains clues to your identity then it is absolutely not possible to determine WHAT you are inserting.Check out Frost, it's message boards are forever full of people ranting on about pedophiles and child porn.While CP posters are vile, they do server a function in freenet as much as many would like not to admit it.The fact that CP can be posted so freely in freenet means that it is secure enough and anonymous enough to protect even vile people's identity.BTW- you don't have to support or approve of CP to be involved in freenet, and your involvment says nothing about your stance on CP.If you don't like it, then don't support it by requesting any CP files or sites.The fewer people who request something, the more likely it'll drop out of freenet.___Support mailing listSupport@freenetproject.orghttp://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.supportUnsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/supportOr mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] (no subject)
Couldmy IP addresswith aservice provider be matched withthat with an IP address in .07?. Jing___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] running 0.7 in win98se
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 03:55:00PM +, Edward Langenback wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I tried the webinstaller and it complained that I didn't have java, yet I have Sun Java 1.4.2_08 installed and on the path (java -version works from any dos prompt) as the download page advises, I tried the linux instructions and ran javaws http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/freenet.jnlp it started to install, then stopped when I didn't want it to download java (since I've already got it) It asked you to download java?! You sure? Screenshot? As far as I know by this point you are already running a java app... Next was to download: http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/selfextractpack.jar and execute it: java -jar selfextractpack.jar That got the install done, at the end it ran into an error when it tried to install as a service (something 98SE doesn't care for). I saw the start, run and stop *.cmd files, they did nothing untill I renamed them to *.bat, and then did nothing but scroll errors too fast to read and exit. It won't run very well on 98. I got the same results from running java -jar freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar anyone have advice for trying to run 0.7 in win98se? I'd try it on my debian box, but it's WAY to underpowered for freenet right now. (just manages to run KDE desktop and email) java -Xmx128M -cp freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar;freenet-ext.jar -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (No subject)
Absolutely ANY service you use on the internet will at some point have to see your IP address. This is how the internet works - in order for 2 peers to communicate they must know each other's IP addresses. Freenet disguises a) the fact that you are using freenet, and b) what you are doing on freenet (which files you are fetching or inserting). On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:45:11PM +0200, jing bling wrote: If I was to be identified, could my IP address with a service provider match that with an IP address in .07?. - Original Message From: Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: support@freenetproject.org Sent: Friday, 7 July, 2006 10:05:17 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] (No subject) You wrote: I am interested to know is free net so secure that a person cannot be tracked by their IP address or email address? Freenet is indeed very secure. The most any attacker or snoop can determine is that you are running a freenet node and even that is less likely than ever with 0.7 As long as you use sensible, basic precautions to secure your machine and do not insert material that contains clues to your identity then it is absolutely not possible to determine WHAT you are inserting. Check out Frost, it's message boards are forever full of people ranting on about pedophiles and child porn. While CP posters are vile, they do server a function in freenet as much as many would like not to admit it. The fact that CP can be posted so freely in freenet means that it is secure enough and anonymous enough to protect even vile people's identity. BTW- you don't have to support or approve of CP to be involved in freenet, and your involvment says nothing about your stance on CP. If you don't like it, then don't support it by requesting any CP files or sites. The fewer people who request something, the more likely it'll drop out of freenet. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
