[freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem
Is the backoff related to the 100% / very high cpu usage that some people are reporting? Do they go together? On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 07:44:31PM -, Mr. Flibble wrote: > > So this is just an "all peers are backed off frequently after > > the load > > limiting changes" report? > > I have no idea :( > > > Or is there a definite problem with nodes not connecting or > > even being > > backed off? > > The usual nodes seem to be reconnecting. > In the last couple of days, I'm up to 3-4 nodes connected (with 4-8 backed > off) which seems better. I haven't changed anything here, so maybe someone > else could have given their nodes more bandwidth? -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070203/0e245a5c/attachment.pgp>
Re: [freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem
Is the backoff related to the 100% / very high cpu usage that some people are reporting? Do they go together? On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 07:44:31PM -, Mr. Flibble wrote: So this is just an all peers are backed off frequently after the load limiting changes report? I have no idea :( Or is there a definite problem with nodes not connecting or even being backed off? The usual nodes seem to be reconnecting. In the last couple of days, I'm up to 3-4 nodes connected (with 4-8 backed off) which seems better. I haven't changed anything here, so maybe someone else could have given their nodes more bandwidth? signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
