Re: [freenet-support] Problems with opening the browser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Walker Bohannan wrote: > Dear Support, > > I recently downloaded and installed Freenet 0.7 so I can access > certain sites on my laptop at school to do research for a paper we're > doing That reads to me like you're trying to use Freenet as a proxy to regular internet sites. Freenet will only connect you to sites hosted *within* freenet, NOT regular internet sites. > - -- The best way to get past my spam filter is to sign or encrypt your email to me. My PGP KeyId: 0x84D46604 http://blogdoofus.com http://tinfoilchef.com http://www.domaincarryout.com Un-official Freenet 0.5 alternative download http://peculiarplace.com/freenet/ Mixminion Message Sender, Windows GUI Frontend for Mixminion http://peculiarplace.com/mixminion-message-sender/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEVAwUBSiG4E3V+YnyE1GYEAQj+pgf9GFWSm23ih4tiDAlUv1igU2eB1EIU/rLx KQOWu7m42+DT/D6XZn2sbID8uprvw6WzZmzth/Q17zrmsY40/wBaPEF76jSF352R UelvV5G/zc3xBhCuotX4QQIak+Sob3ShALSwOBIBU2pA7NDZNKGEwTQU/PqbQi2B OhBKkLAdzsc5obwShePQN0cyELEU7HDhxmZcoTj8rzlU0iDy1kAcPn1/18I6SsGl dQcPkXSY2qr77HK8c0FUg9tmQ78gup4jD6XiEtU+k5a9MzxyTSrY1Gs6w9Awn7y3 LeRsVcgQxHOZ2ubcXhzcwr3LHxsg6NVT+Bs2n8t9MvJ1yOL1mNkGlA== =AXZR -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Problems with opening the browser
Does activity monitor show the wrapper process running? There should be something like "wrapper-macosx-universal-32", it may be cut off though. If that isn't in the process list, Freenet isn't actually running. You can start it manually by opening a terminal and running "/Applications/Freenet/run.sh start" This should not be necessary in the future. On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Walker Bohannan wrote: > Dear Support, > > I recently downloaded and installed Freenet 0.7 so I can access > certain sites on my laptop at school to do research for a paper we're > doing and everything downloaded and installed fine but then when it > opened up Safari and tried to connect to http://127.0.0.1: it gave > me the page that you get when you internet connection is not open. I > am running Mac OS X 10.5.6 by the way on a MacBook 2GHz and 1 GB RAM. > If there is anything else I need to provide to have you assist me > please do ask me for it. I love what you're doing and keep up the > good work! > > Walker Bohannan > A Now Avid Freenet supporter > ___ > Support mailing list > Support@freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
[freenet-support] Problems with opening the browser
Dear Support, I recently downloaded and installed Freenet 0.7 so I can access certain sites on my laptop at school to do research for a paper we're doing and everything downloaded and installed fine but then when it opened up Safari and tried to connect to http://127.0.0.1: it gave me the page that you get when you internet connection is not open. I am running Mac OS X 10.5.6 by the way on a MacBook 2GHz and 1 GB RAM. If there is anything else I need to provide to have you assist me please do ask me for it. I love what you're doing and keep up the good work! Walker Bohannan A Now Avid Freenet supporter ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Bug in HTTP socket handler in 1208?
On Sunday 10 May 2009 15:51:39 Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:58:48 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > I have seen a couple times my node stall due to exceeding the thread > > limit, caused by an absurd 333 "HTTP socket handlers" (86.7% of thread > > usage). (My node's thread limit is 300). > > > > I believe this is caused by my browser (dillo) making too many > > connections to fproxy. But, nevertheless, shouldn't these threads / > > sockets die after a few minutes? They were all still alive after > > more than 10mins of stalling my node, after which I had to restart to > > get things flowing again. > > The problem still exists in 1209. (If my Dillo browser opens a page > with hundreds of thumbnails and no limit to the number of connections > made to the server/fproxy (It probably relies on http server response > codes?), the number of HTTP socket handlers will sky-rocket above the > limit, and stay there. Again, how long are these threads supposed to > last for and why are they even allowed to exist (can't fproxy throttle > the number of incoming connections?). There still do remain a couple > "Pooled threads awaiting work", but the node effectively shuts down -- > cpu drops to almost nothing, and all traffic seems to stop. Does it happen in 1212/1213? Are you sure that all these connections have fetched data and are no longer active? A thread dump of the node in this condition would be helpful. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1211, 1212
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 15:41:47 SmallSister development wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Freenet 0.7 build 1212 is now available. Please upgrade. > [...] > > 1212: - Recently we have had several reports of bogus claims by peers > > that the auto-update key has been blown. The nodes would not > > transfer the revocation key, because they didn't have it, they would > > just cause panic. This appears to be a bug or a malicious attack. We > > now give peers a reasonable time to start transferring the > > auto-update revocation key, and if they don't, we cancel the alert > > and let the update through. If 3 of our peers have failed to transfer > > the key, we still treat that as broken. > > I had three peers with the message before upgrading to 1211... > > Another issue: I have several downloads that report being at 100%, but > they'll never report completed; even over freenet restarts. This could > be caused by a freenet crash while in the process of writing out the > files. (using db4o) When were they added? If you add a new download for the same key (for one of them), do they both complete? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe