Re: [freenet-support] idea
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 20:24:30 +0100, Edzard Pasma wrote: > > Op 19-feb-2011, om 18:21 heeft folkert het volgende geschreven: > > >>> Ok, that was not your point :-) Ok currently maybe not too many > >>> nodes > >>> in the net but maybe this changes when governments restrict > >>> access to > >>> what you can browse. Here in Europe governments already start > >>> talking > >>> about installing filters. > >> > >> This is why you /don't/ want any kind of broadcasting, or any other > >> kind of leak of identifiable traffic. Just encrypted > >> non-identifiable "noise". > > > > Then we definately need a solution around the seed nodes. I mean > > traffic > > going to them is a big fat warning that someone is doing freenet :-) > > > > > > Folkert van Heusden > > > The seednodes might then once be blocked by authorities in their > struggle against the evil. The solution seems to have as many > potential seednodes as their are users. Thus one automatically > becomes one after a while. The other way around, any foreigner is > then a potential seednode. Adddresses can dynamically be collected > to be used at a next start. Again, this is why darknet mode was implemented. There are no seednodes in darknet, only friends you know and trust, and that cannot be identified. (I believe Freenet 0.7 was intended to be a darknet, and opennet (i.e. how Freenet 0.5 operates) was only later added to make things easier for newbies.) ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] idea
Op 19-feb-2011, om 18:21 heeft folkert het volgende geschreven: Ok, that was not your point :-) Ok currently maybe not too many nodes in the net but maybe this changes when governments restrict access to what you can browse. Here in Europe governments already start talking about installing filters. This is why you /don't/ want any kind of broadcasting, or any other kind of leak of identifiable traffic. Just encrypted non-identifiable "noise". Then we definately need a solution around the seed nodes. I mean traffic going to them is a big fat warning that someone is doing freenet :-) Folkert van Heusden The seednodes might then once be blocked by authorities in their struggle against the evil. The solution seems to have as many potential seednodes as their are users. Thus one automatically becomes one after a while. The other way around, any foreigner is then a potential seednode. Adddresses can dynamically be collected to be used at a next start. Edzard Pasma. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] idea
> > Ok, that was not your point :-) Ok currently maybe not too many nodes > > in the net but maybe this changes when governments restrict access to > > what you can browse. Here in Europe governments already start talking > > about installing filters. > > This is why you /don't/ want any kind of broadcasting, or any other > kind of leak of identifiable traffic. Just encrypted non-identifiable > "noise". Then we definately need a solution around the seed nodes. I mean traffic going to them is a big fat warning that someone is doing freenet :-) Folkert van Heusden -- Multi tail barnamaj mowahib li mora9abat attasjilat wa nataij awamir al 7asoub. damj, talwin, mora9abat attarchi7 wa ila akhirih. http://www.vanheusden.com/multitail/ -- Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
